Skip to content

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Status
Suspended
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03726190
Enrollment
303
Registered
2018-10-31
Start date
2013-01-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2021-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Disc Herniation, Spondylolisthesis

Keywords

Degenerative Disk Disease, Lumbar Fusion, Minimally Invasive Surgery, Lumbar Disk Disease

Brief summary

This study is undertaken to evaluate the outcomes of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF). Specifically, the study seeks to measure outcomes on radiological imaging, outcomes reported by the patients on standardized questionnaires, and complication rates.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOblique Lateral Lumbar Fusion

Oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLLIF) is a lumbar spinal fusion. OLLIF is performed with the patient in the prone position and employs an oblique lateral approach that enables the instrumentation to pass through Kambin's triangle which is defined as the space between the exiting nerve, the superior border of the caudal vertebra, and the superior articulating process of the inferior facet. This approach may be performed without direct visualization, guided by electrophysiological monitoring and biplanar fluoroscopy. During the approach, a blunt probe is used to make contact with the disc, followed by a series of gentle dilations. Discectomy is performed through a 10-mm access portal. The cage is inserted under continued electrophysiological monitoring and fluoroscopy.

Sponsors

Tristate Brain and Spine Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis, confirmed by imaging, of one of the following conditions: severe degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, disc herniation * Completion of a full course of conservative therapy. Conservative therapy may include physical therapy, therapeutic injections, bracing and behavioral modification.

Exclusion criteria

* bony obstruction of the approach * significant spinal canal stenosis * large facet hypertrophy * grade II listhesis * scoliosis with Cobb angle \> 10º * Patients who underwent procedures that were converted to open fusions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient reported disability on the Oswestry Disability IndexOne year after surgeryThe Oswestry Disability Index is a commonly used tool to assess disability due to low back pain. The Oswestry is assessed on a standardized questionnaire and the scale ranges from 0% to 100% disability. A lower score is considered less disability.
Fusion rateOne year after surgeryThe rate of bony fusion as determined by independent radiologists on post-operative CT scans. Radiologists will determine whether each level that was operated on was fused, or not fused.
Rate of NeuropraxiaOne year after surgeryNeuropraxia is defined as lower extremity weakness of 3/5 or below on a standard 5 point strength scale as assessed by the surgeon at one year follow-up. The scale ranges from 5 (full strength) to 0 (no muscle tone). The deficit must have newly appeared just after surgery to be considered a result of the surgery.
Rate of Nerve Root IrritationOne year after surgeryNerve Root Irritation is defined as lower extremity paresthesias or dysesthesias corresponding to dermatome of the level of surgery or weakness of 4/5 or above on a standard 5 point strength scale as assessed by the surgeon at one year follow-up. The scale ranges from 5 (full strength) to 0 (no muscle tone). The deficit must have newly appeared just after surgery to be considered a result of the surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fluoroscopy TimeDuring surgery.The time fluoroscopy was used during surgery measured in seconds.
Rate of screw fractureOne year after surgeryThe percentage of all screws placed in the study group that is determined to have fractured on postoperative imaging. Imaging is read by independent radiologists.
Infection RateImmediately after surgeryThe percentage of patients that experienced a postoperative surgical site infection.
Patient reported pain on a 10-point pain scaleOne year after surgeryThe level of pain reported by the patient on a standard 10-point pain scale. The scale goes from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)
Bleeding RateDuring surgery and immediately after surgeryThe percentage of patients that experienced bleeding during surgery or immediately after surgery that required transfusion.
Surgery TimeDuring surgerySkin to skin surgery time measured in minutes
Hospital stayImmediately after surgeryThe number of nights spent in the hospital following the surgery measured in days
Blood LossDuring surgeryThe amount of blood lost during the surgery measured in milliliters.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026