Skip to content

Daily vs. Every Other Day Oral Iron Supplementation in Patients With Absolute Iron Deficiency Anemia

Daily vs. Every Other Day Oral Iron Supplementation in Patients With Absolute Iron Deficiency Anemia (DEODO): a Multi-centered, Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03725384
Acronym
DEODO
Enrollment
51
Registered
2018-10-31
Start date
2019-01-04
Completion date
2022-01-26
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia, Iron Deficiency Anemia

Keywords

Anemia, Iron deficiency, hemoglobin, oral iron, Ferrous sulfate

Brief summary

Iron deficiency anemia is a global health problem and the most common cause of anemia worldwide. Patients with iron deficiency (ID) and IDA can present with a multitude of symptoms including fatigue, restless legs syndrome and pica.Oral iron supplementation is associated with increasing hemoglobin in multiple studies in women, pregnant women and elderly patients.However, the optimal dose and frequency of oral iron supplementation for treatment remains unclear. The current proposed study attempts to address this gap in the literature.

Detailed description

This is a pilot, pragmatic, non-inferiority, open label randomized controlled trial (RCT) in outpatients with iron deficiency anemia to evaluate the effectiveness of oral ferrous sulfate 300mg (60mg elemental iron) once daily versus every other day to improve hemoglobin at 12 weeks post-initiation. The rationale for this study includes: (1) IDA is a common and prevalent condition with potential adverse consequences if left untreated; (2) optimizing effectiveness of oral iron supplementation while minimizing side effects will improve treatment for patients. Because IDA is a global health problem, common in clinical practice and treatable, this study will have a significant practical impact on how clinicians treat outpatients with iron deficiency anemia and how patients tolerate therapy. For the patient, the expected benefit from taking part in this study is the potential to improve and treat iron deficiency anemia. These potential changes may lead to improved symptoms associated with iron deficiency anemia, such as cognitive and physical functioning, and fatigue.

Interventions

DRUGFerrous Sulfate 300Mg Tablet

oral dose of Ferrous Sulfate (300 mg) every day versus every other day along with vitamin C

DRUGVitamin C 500Mg tablet

Vitamin C 500 Mg tablet every day versus every other day along with ferrous sulfate

Sponsors

Unity Health Toronto
CollaboratorOTHER
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 16 years; * Outpatients with iron deficiency anemia defined as Hb less than 120 g/L in women or 130g/L in men; AND ferritin less than 30 mcg/L

Exclusion criteria

* • Pregnancy * Currently breastfeeding * Known history of inflammatory bowel disease * Known history of celiac disease * Known history of thalassemia or thalassemia trait * Known inherited bleeding disorder * Known intolerance or lack of response to oral ferrous gluconate, sulfate or fumarate in the last 12 weeks * Multivitamin and mineral supplements (35 mg or more of elemental iron per day) in the 2 weeks prior to randomization * Allergy to oral iron * Allergy to any of the following medicinal and non-medicinal ingredients in ferrous sulfate: ferrous sulphate, calcium citrate, crospovidone, FD&C Red #40-Aluminum lake, FD&C Yellow #6-Aluminum Lake, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl alcohol, purified water, talc titanium dioxide * Allergy to any of the following medicinal and non-medicinal ingredients in vitamin C: Ascorbic acid, Colloidal silicon dioxide, croscarmellose sodium, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose and stearic acid * Intravenous iron therapy in the past 12 weeks * On anticoagulant therapy (e.g. warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) initiated in the past 6 months * Surgery planned in upcoming 12 weeks * Chemotherapy planned in upcoming 12 weeks * Blood donation planned in upcoming 12 weeks * Previously enrolled in the study * Creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min * Hemoglobin less than 80 g/L with active bleeding (defined as WHO grade 2 bleeding or higher in the past week)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of Enrolling Patients in the Trial2 yearsEnrollment in the trial will be defined as documentation of informed consent for patients approached. The primary outcome of this study is the feasibility of enrolling 52 participants in the trial over a 2-year period. Eligibility based on lab criteria was determined after consent.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients Receiving the Allocated Treatment2 yearsProportion of patients who signed informed consent and received the allocated treatment they were randomly assigned to.
Proportion of Patients Completing Laboratory Tests2 yearsProportion of treated patients who completed both 4 week and 12 week laboratory tests
Proportion of Treated Patients Completing Side Effect Questionnaire at Week 4, 8 and 122 yearsProportion of treated patients completing 4 week, 8 week and 12 week side effect questionnaire
Proportion of Patients Completing FACIT-fatigue Scale2 yearsProportion of patients who received treatment and completed 4 week, 8 week and 12 week FACIT-fatigue scale
Adherence to Treatment2 yearsAdherence was measured by the proportion of treated patients who took at least 90% of their prescribed doses
Proportion of Treated Patients Requiring a Step Down in Therapy2 yearsProportion of treated patients requiring a step down in therapy by Week 4 and Week 12 (same proportions at both time points).
Hemoglobin Increment12 weeksHemoglobin increment at 4 and 12 weeks is defined as the 4 or 12 week hemoglobin value minus the baseline hemoglobin value
Proportion With Complete Hemoglobin Response2 yearsProportion with complete hemoglobin response defined as hemoglobin greater than or equal to 120 g/L in women; and 130 g/L in men at 4 weeks and 12 weeks
Reticulocyte Count12 weeksChange in reticulocyte count at 4 and 12 weeks defined as the 4 or 12 week reticulocyte count minus the baseline reticulocyte count
Proportion of Eligible Participants Consenting2 yearsProportion of eligible patients after initial inclusion/exclusion screening that consent to participating in the study. Eligibility based on lab criteria was determined after consent.
Change in Serum Iron at 12 Weeks12 weeksChange in serum iron at 12 weeks defined as the value at 12 weeks minus the baseline value
Change in TSAT at 12 Weeks12 weeksChange in transferrin saturation (TSAT) at 12 weeks defined as the value at 12 weeks minus the baseline value. Interquartile range represents Q1 (25th percentile) to Q3 (75th percentile)
FACIT-fatigue Score at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks12 weeksQuality of life (FACIT-fatigue scale) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - fatigue scale. On this scale, lower scores indicate better symptoms and higher scores represent worse symptoms. The FACIT-fatigue scale has a range from 0 to 52.
Proportion of Patients With Side Effects at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks12 weeksProportion of patients with side effects at 4, 8 and 12 weeks, as determined by the oral iron side effect questionnaire
Proportion of Patients Who Stopped Oral Iron Due to Side Effects12 weeksNumber of patients who discontinued oral iron therapy due to side effects by week 12.
Number of Patients in Need of Escalation Therapy2 yearsNeed for escalation in therapy (increase in oral iron regimen from every other day to daily, need for intravenous iron, need for transfusion, visit to emergency department related to anemia) assessed at 12 weeks
Proportion of Patients With a Drop in Hemoglobin at Weeks 4 and 122 yearsProportion of patients with a drop in hemoglobin of 10 g/L or more at weeks 4 and 12
Types of Adverse Effects at 4 Weeks4 WeeksProportion of patients with each type of adverse event at week 4.
Change in Ferritin at 12 Weeks12 weeksChange in ferritin at 12 weeks, defined as the value at 12 weeks minus the baseline value.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Iron Daily
Ferrous sulfate (iron) 300mg tablet and vitamin C 500mg tablet taken by mouth every day for 12 weeks
24
Iron Every Other Day
Ferrous sulfate 300mg tablet and vitamin C 500mg tablet taken by mouth every other day for 12 weeks
27
Total51

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIron DailyIron Every Other DayTotal
Age, Continuous47.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.1
44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1
45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.5
Baseline C reactive protein0.9 mg/L1.0 mg/L0.9 mg/L
Baseline C reactive protein >/=5 mg/L1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Baseline creatinine0.83 mg/dL0.70 mg/dL0.78 mg/dL
Baseline ferritin9 mu grams/L9 mu grams/L9 mu grams/L
Baseline haemoglobin110 g/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
110 g/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
110 g/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Baseline haemoglobin <100 g/L3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Baseline mean corpuscular volume (MCV)80.0 fL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
80.6 fL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
80.3 fL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Baseline reticulocyte count48 x10^9 cells/L47 x10^9 cells/L48 x10^9 cells/L
Baseline serum iron8 mu mol/L5 mu mol/L7 mu mol/L
Body Mass Index25.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
27.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
26.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
History of bleeding in the past 2 months16 Participants23 Participants39 Participants
History of rheumatological disorders4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
IV iron use in the past year1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Medication history
Proton pump inhibitor
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Medication history
Ranitidine
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Menstrual bleeding, pictorial blood assessment chart >/= 1007 Participants16 Participants23 Participants
Oral iron use in the past year13 Participants13 Participants26 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Reason for iron deficient anemia (IDA) diagnosis
Blood donation
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Reason for iron deficient anemia (IDA) diagnosis
Gastrointestinal
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Reason for iron deficient anemia (IDA) diagnosis
Menorrhagia
11 Participants17 Participants28 Participants
Reason for iron deficient anemia (IDA) diagnosis
Other
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
24 participants27 participants51 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants21 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 240 / 51
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 279 / 2424 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 240 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Feasibility of Enrolling Patients in the Trial

Enrollment in the trial will be defined as documentation of informed consent for patients approached. The primary outcome of this study is the feasibility of enrolling 52 participants in the trial over a 2-year period. Eligibility based on lab criteria was determined after consent.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityFeasibility of Enrolling Patients in the Trial85 participants
Secondary

Adherence to Treatment

Adherence was measured by the proportion of treated patients who took at least 90% of their prescribed doses

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityAdherence to Treatment0.78 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayAdherence to Treatment0.82 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Change in Ferritin at 12 Weeks

Change in ferritin at 12 weeks, defined as the value at 12 weeks minus the baseline value.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityChange in Ferritin at 12 WeeksBaseline ferritin9 mcg/L
Total Number Screened for EligbilityChange in Ferritin at 12 WeeksWeek 12 ferritin30 mcg/L
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayChange in Ferritin at 12 WeeksBaseline ferritin9 mcg/L
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayChange in Ferritin at 12 WeeksWeek 12 ferritin23 mcg/L
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsChange in Ferritin at 12 WeeksBaseline ferritin9 mcg/L
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsChange in Ferritin at 12 WeeksWeek 12 ferritin27 mcg/L
Secondary

Change in Serum Iron at 12 Weeks

Change in serum iron at 12 weeks defined as the value at 12 weeks minus the baseline value

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityChange in Serum Iron at 12 WeeksBaseline serum iron8 micro mol/L
Total Number Screened for EligbilityChange in Serum Iron at 12 WeeksWeek 12 serum iron17 micro mol/L
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayChange in Serum Iron at 12 WeeksBaseline serum iron5 micro mol/L
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayChange in Serum Iron at 12 WeeksWeek 12 serum iron12 micro mol/L
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsChange in Serum Iron at 12 WeeksBaseline serum iron7 micro mol/L
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsChange in Serum Iron at 12 WeeksWeek 12 serum iron16 micro mol/L
Secondary

Change in TSAT at 12 Weeks

Change in transferrin saturation (TSAT) at 12 weeks defined as the value at 12 weeks minus the baseline value. Interquartile range represents Q1 (25th percentile) to Q3 (75th percentile)

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityChange in TSAT at 12 WeeksBaseline TSAT11 percentile
Total Number Screened for EligbilityChange in TSAT at 12 WeeksWeek 12 TSAT26 percentile
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayChange in TSAT at 12 WeeksBaseline TSAT7 percentile
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayChange in TSAT at 12 WeeksWeek 12 TSAT18 percentile
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsChange in TSAT at 12 WeeksBaseline TSAT9 percentile
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsChange in TSAT at 12 WeeksWeek 12 TSAT23 percentile
Secondary

FACIT-fatigue Score at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks

Quality of life (FACIT-fatigue scale) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - fatigue scale. On this scale, lower scores indicate better symptoms and higher scores represent worse symptoms. The FACIT-fatigue scale has a range from 0 to 52.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Number Screened for EligbilityFACIT-fatigue Score at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 8 FACIT-fatigue score21.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Total Number Screened for EligbilityFACIT-fatigue Score at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 4 FACIT-fatigue score23.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Total Number Screened for EligbilityFACIT-fatigue Score at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 12 FACIT-fatigue score20.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayFACIT-fatigue Score at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 8 FACIT-fatigue score24.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.4
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayFACIT-fatigue Score at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 4 FACIT-fatigue score26.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayFACIT-fatigue Score at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 12 FACIT-fatigue score21.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsFACIT-fatigue Score at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 4 FACIT-fatigue score25.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsFACIT-fatigue Score at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 12 FACIT-fatigue score21.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsFACIT-fatigue Score at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 8 FACIT-fatigue score23.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Secondary

Hemoglobin Increment

Hemoglobin increment at 4 and 12 weeks is defined as the 4 or 12 week hemoglobin value minus the baseline hemoglobin value

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total Number Screened for EligbilityHemoglobin IncrementHemoglobin at 4 weeks122 g/LStandard Deviation 7
Total Number Screened for EligbilityHemoglobin IncrementHemoglobin at baseline110 g/LStandard Deviation 13
Total Number Screened for EligbilityHemoglobin IncrementHemoglobin at 12 weeks131 g/LStandard Deviation 9
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayHemoglobin IncrementHemoglobin at 4 weeks119 g/LStandard Deviation 10
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayHemoglobin IncrementHemoglobin at baseline110 g/LStandard Deviation 10
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayHemoglobin IncrementHemoglobin at 12 weeks126 g/LStandard Deviation 8
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsHemoglobin IncrementHemoglobin at baseline110 g/LStandard Deviation 11
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsHemoglobin IncrementHemoglobin at 12 weeks129 g/LStandard Deviation 9
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsHemoglobin IncrementHemoglobin at 4 weeks121 g/LStandard Deviation 9
Secondary

Number of Patients in Need of Escalation Therapy

Need for escalation in therapy (increase in oral iron regimen from every other day to daily, need for intravenous iron, need for transfusion, visit to emergency department related to anemia) assessed at 12 weeks

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityNumber of Patients in Need of Escalation Therapy0 Participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayNumber of Patients in Need of Escalation Therapy0 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Eligible Participants Consenting

Proportion of eligible patients after initial inclusion/exclusion screening that consent to participating in the study. Eligibility based on lab criteria was determined after consent.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityProportion of Eligible Participants Consenting0.39 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Completing FACIT-fatigue Scale

Proportion of patients who received treatment and completed 4 week, 8 week and 12 week FACIT-fatigue scale

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityProportion of Patients Completing FACIT-fatigue Scale0.91 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayProportion of Patients Completing FACIT-fatigue Scale0.89 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Completing Laboratory Tests

Proportion of treated patients who completed both 4 week and 12 week laboratory tests

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityProportion of Patients Completing Laboratory Tests0.91 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayProportion of Patients Completing Laboratory Tests0.81 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsProportion of Patients Completing Laboratory Tests0.86 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Receiving the Allocated Treatment

Proportion of patients who signed informed consent and received the allocated treatment they were randomly assigned to.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityProportion of Patients Receiving the Allocated Treatment0.96 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayProportion of Patients Receiving the Allocated Treatment1 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsProportion of Patients Receiving the Allocated Treatment0.98 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Who Stopped Oral Iron Due to Side Effects

Number of patients who discontinued oral iron therapy due to side effects by week 12.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityProportion of Patients Who Stopped Oral Iron Due to Side Effects0 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayProportion of Patients Who Stopped Oral Iron Due to Side Effects0 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsProportion of Patients Who Stopped Oral Iron Due to Side Effects0 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With a Drop in Hemoglobin at Weeks 4 and 12

Proportion of patients with a drop in hemoglobin of 10 g/L or more at weeks 4 and 12

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityProportion of Patients With a Drop in Hemoglobin at Weeks 4 and 120 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayProportion of Patients With a Drop in Hemoglobin at Weeks 4 and 120 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Side Effects at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks

Proportion of patients with side effects at 4, 8 and 12 weeks, as determined by the oral iron side effect questionnaire

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityProportion of Patients With Side Effects at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 80.33 Proportion of participants
Total Number Screened for EligbilityProportion of Patients With Side Effects at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 40.38 Proportion of participants
Total Number Screened for EligbilityProportion of Patients With Side Effects at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 120.33 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayProportion of Patients With Side Effects at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 80.48 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayProportion of Patients With Side Effects at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 40.56 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayProportion of Patients With Side Effects at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 120.44 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsProportion of Patients With Side Effects at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 40.47 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsProportion of Patients With Side Effects at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 120.39 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsProportion of Patients With Side Effects at 4, 8 and 12 WeeksWeek 80.41 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Treated Patients Completing Side Effect Questionnaire at Week 4, 8 and 12

Proportion of treated patients completing 4 week, 8 week and 12 week side effect questionnaire

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityProportion of Treated Patients Completing Side Effect Questionnaire at Week 4, 8 and 120.91 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayProportion of Treated Patients Completing Side Effect Questionnaire at Week 4, 8 and 120.85 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Treated Patients Requiring a Step Down in Therapy

Proportion of treated patients requiring a step down in therapy by Week 4 and Week 12 (same proportions at both time points).

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityProportion of Treated Patients Requiring a Step Down in Therapy0.13 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayProportion of Treated Patients Requiring a Step Down in Therapy0 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion With Complete Hemoglobin Response

Proportion with complete hemoglobin response defined as hemoglobin greater than or equal to 120 g/L in women; and 130 g/L in men at 4 weeks and 12 weeks

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityProportion With Complete Hemoglobin Response0.59 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayProportion With Complete Hemoglobin Response0.75 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Reticulocyte Count

Change in reticulocyte count at 4 and 12 weeks defined as the 4 or 12 week reticulocyte count minus the baseline reticulocyte count

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityReticulocyte CountWeek 12 reticulocyte count47 x10^9 cells/ L
Total Number Screened for EligbilityReticulocyte CountWeek 4 reticulocyte count61 x10^9 cells/ L
Total Number Screened for EligbilityReticulocyte CountBaseline reticulocyte count48 x10^9 cells/ L
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayReticulocyte CountWeek 4 reticulocyte count65 x10^9 cells/ L
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayReticulocyte CountBaseline reticulocyte count47 x10^9 cells/ L
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayReticulocyte CountWeek 12 reticulocyte count52 x10^9 cells/ L
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsReticulocyte CountBaseline reticulocyte count48 x10^9 cells/ L
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsReticulocyte CountWeek 12 reticulocyte count47 x10^9 cells/ L
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsReticulocyte CountWeek 4 reticulocyte count64 x10^9 cells/ L
Secondary

Types of Adverse Effects at 4 Weeks

Proportion of patients with each type of adverse event at week 4.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Number Screened for EligbilityTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksConstipation0.25 Proportion of participants
Total Number Screened for EligbilityTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksBreathlessness0.17 Proportion of participants
Total Number Screened for EligbilityTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksHeadache0.17 Proportion of participants
Total Number Screened for EligbilityTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksNausea0.17 Proportion of participants
Total Number Screened for EligbilityTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksHeartburn0.08 Proportion of participants
Total Number Screened for EligbilityTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksOther0.21 Proportion of participants
Total Number Screened for EligbilityTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksVomiting0.04 Proportion of participants
Total Number Screened for EligbilityTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksAbdominal pain0.08 Proportion of participants
Total Number Screened for EligbilityTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksDiarrhea0.08 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksAbdominal pain0.19 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksDiarrhea0.19 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksVomiting0.11 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksOther0.22 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksHeadache0.26 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksBreathlessness0.26 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksHeartburn0.30 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksNausea0.26 Proportion of participants
Total Number Allocated to Iron Every Other DayTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksConstipation0.22 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksOther0.22 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksConstipation0.24 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksNausea0.22 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksHeadache0.22 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksBreathlessness0.22 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksHeartburn0.20 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksAbdominal pain0.14 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksVomiting0.08 Proportion of participants
Total Number of Patients Allocated to Study ArmsTypes of Adverse Effects at 4 WeeksDiarrhea0.14 Proportion of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026