Skip to content

Lidocaine Compared to Magnesium Sulfate to Prolong Spinal Anesthesia: Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

Lidocaine Compared to Magnesium Sulfate to Prolong Spinal Anesthesia: Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03725228
Enrollment
44
Registered
2018-10-30
Start date
2018-11-07
Completion date
2019-04-01
Last updated
2020-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Pain

Brief summary

This study evaluates the addition of continuous infusion of lidocaine or continuous infusion of magnesium sufate in the duration of spinal anesthesia.

Detailed description

Both lidocaine and magnesium sulfate have been shown to prolong spinal anesthesia. The number of studies using magnesium sulfate to improve spinal anesthesia is greater than the number of studies using lidocaine, and methodology varies significantly between studies. Adverse effects of lidocaine are different from magnesium sulfate's. Lidocaine has a wider therapeutic interval with fewer side effects, including: Drowsiness, Feeling Anxious, Feeling Cold, Nervous, Numbness And Tingling, Signs And Symptoms At Injection Site, Twitching. Magnesium sulfate's side effects include: heart disturbances, breathing difficulties, poor reflexes, confusion, weakness, flushing (warmth, redness, or tingly feeling), sweating, lowered blood pressure, feeling like you might pass out, anxiety, cold feeling, extreme drowsiness, muscle tightness or contraction, or headache.

Interventions

DRUGMagnesium Sulfate

Magnesium Sulfate 15mg/kg/h

DRUGLidocaine

Lidocaine 1,5mg/kg/h

Sponsors

Brasilia University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Will receive spinal anesthesia for TURP por Histerectomy

Exclusion criteria

* Protocol violation; * Severe adverse events; * Change to general anesthesia or addition of epidural anesthesia; * Complete or partial spinal block failure; * Mental status alteration (agitation, confusion, loss of conciousness).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitive block duration9 hoursThermal and pinprick level lowering to S2

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor block duration9 hoursTime to Bromage return to baseline
Two levels regression9 hoursTime from maximal thermal (cold) sensitive block level to lower two levels
Pain at postanesthesia care unit1-3 hoursMaximum pain (0-10 verbal scale) during PACU

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026