Long-Arm vs Sugar-Tong

Closed Fracture of Shaft of Radius, Closed Fracture of Shaft of Ulna

Closed Reduction, Sugar-Tong Splint, Long-Arm Cast

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a sugar-tong splint is as effective as a long-arm cast in maintaining reduction of pediatric forearm shaft fractures in a randomized, prospective manner. Consented participants will be randomly assigned to be treated with either a sugar-tong splint or a long-arm cast (both standard of care treatments) in REDCap. Each participant will have a 50/50 chance of being assign to either treatment.

Forearm fractures are very common in the pediatric population and can often be treated with closed reduction and immobilization. Immobilization techniques include long-arm casting, short-arm casting and sugar-tong splinting. At the time of injury casts are usually split into two using a cast saw, known as bivalving, to allow for swelling and are overwrapped at a later time. By design sugar-tong splints allow for swelling and are overwrapped or converted to a cast at a later time. Traditionally long-arm casts have been used as the standard mode of immobilization for forearm fractures. Recent evidence demonstrates that long-arm casting is equivalent to better tolerated short-arm casting as an immobilization choice for distal third forearm fractures.1 Further work has shown that sugar-tong splints are also appropriate for treatment of distal third forearm fractures. No study has compared the efficacy of using a long-arm cast versus a sugar-tong splint for treatment of forearm shaft fractures.

No related papers found yet.

United States