Skip to content

Effects of Resistance Training With High vs. Light-moderate Loads on Muscle-tendon Function in the Elderly

Effects of Resistance Training With High vs. Light-moderate Loads on Muscle-tendon Function in the Elderly

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03724461
Enrollment
55
Registered
2018-10-30
Start date
2017-09-01
Completion date
2020-03-12
Last updated
2020-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging, Frail Elderly Syndrome, Sarcopenia

Keywords

resistance training, sarcopenia, hypertrophy, tendon, frailty, ageing

Brief summary

There are no unbiased studies that have analyzed the effects of resistance training with traditional, heavy versus light-moderate loads on muscle, tendon and bone in elderly people. The purpose of the present study is to assess the effects on muscle mass and function, tendon and bone of two different training intensities, light-moderate vs. heavy load, in people older than 65 years old. The study will be carried out with a randomized controlled design. Participants will perform single training sessions and a 12-wk dynamic resistance training program on the knee extensors with different training intensities on each leg. One leg will train with heavy loads and the other one will train with light-moderate loads, but matching the load x repetitions performed by the contralateral side.

Detailed description

The decline in muscle function provoked by the aging process and frailty are directly related to decreases in mobility and the ability to perform the so called daily life activities. Resistance training is especially useful at this stage, given that it is an effective and widely applicable intervention to control and revert sarcopenia, and the deterioration of tendon and bone function. Despite of the effectiveness of heavy load resistance training, a controversy has arisen in the last years about the effects of lower load resistance training programs to achieve similar adaptations. This is because most of the studies that have compared light-moderate versus heavy load programs did not control the differences in total training load, measured as the overall mechanical work performed during the training program. Therefore, there are no unbiased studies that have analyzed the effects of resistance training with traditional, heavy versus light-moderate loads on muscle, tendon and bone in elderly people. The purpose of the present study is to assess the effects on muscle mass and function, tendon and bone of two different training intensities, light-moderate vs. heavy load, in people older than 65 years old. The studies will be carried out with a crossover (acute training sessions) and randomized controlled design (longitudinal training intervention). Participants will perform single training sessions with each resistance training intensity and a 12-wk dynamic resistance training program on the knee extensors with different training intensities on each leg. One leg will train with heavy loads and the other one will train with light-moderate loads, but matching the load x repetitions performed by the contralateral side. Muscle adaptations (EMG, muscle size and architecture), tendon mechanical properties, bone mineral density, blood parameters and life quality will be analyzed before and after the cessation of the training program.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHigh Intensity resistance training (12 weeks)

High intensity resistance training (80% of 1 repetition maximum), 2 d/wk (Longitudinal)

BEHAVIORALLight-moderate intensity resistance training (12 weeks)

Light-moderate intensity resistance training (40% of 1 repetition maximum), 2 d/wk (Longitudinal)

BEHAVIORALControl (12 weeks)

No resistance training during the intervention period.

BEHAVIORALOne High Intensity resistance training session

High intensity resistance training, 1 training session

BEHAVIORALOne Light-moderate intensity resistance training session

Light-moderate intensity resistance training, 1 training session

Sponsors

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Biomedical Research Networking Center on Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 65 years and older, * non-institutionalized * passed physical examination including physical function assessment (no frailty status; SPPB \>7 points)

Exclusion criteria

* Neurological, musculoskeletal, or other disorder that would preclude completing resistance training and all performance tests * Uncontrolled hypertension, unstable or exercise-induced angina pectoris or myocardial ischemia or any other medical condition that would interfere with testing or increase one's risk of complications during exercise. * History of regular resistance exercise during the previous 3 years * Knee prosthesis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute change in muscle size (cross sectional area, cm2)Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training sessionUltrasound-based determination quadriceps muscle size and architecture.
Change in muscle size (cross sectional area, cm2)Change from baseline to week 12Ultrasound-based determination quadriceps muscle size and architecture.
Acute change in muscle function (N)Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training sessionForce-velocity profile of the single-leg press exercise
Change in muscle function (N)Change from baseline to week 12Force-velocity profile of the single-leg press exercise

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute change in muscle excitation (mV)Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training sessionElectromyographic activity of the knee extensor and flexor muscles during strength assessment and training
Change in muscle excitation (mV)Change from baseline to week 12Electromyographic activity of the knee extensor and flexor muscles during strength assessment and training
Change in physical functionChange from baseline to week 12Short Physical Performance Battery
Blood analysis: Acute change in oxidative stressChange from baseline at 5 minutes after a training sessionCarbonyl proteins (plasma concentration)
Blood analysis: Change in oxidative stressChange from baseline to week 12Carbonyl proteins (plasma concentration)
Change in patellar tendon stiffness (N/mm)Change from baseline to week 12Ultrasound and force-based measures of tendon mechanical properties.
Blood analysis: Change in inflammationChange from baseline to week 12Interleukin 6, Tumoral necrosis factor Alpha, C reactive protein (plasma concentration)
Blood analysis: Acute change in anabolic processesChange from baseline at 5 minutes after a training sessionTestosterone, growth hormone, Insulin growth factor-1 (plasma concentration)
Blood analysis: Change in anabolic processesChange from baseline to week 12Testosterone, growth hormone, Insulin growth factor-1 (plasma concentration)
Blood analysis: Acute change in catabolic processesChange from baseline at 5 minutes after a training sessionCortisol, Creatin kinase (plasma concentration)
Blood analysis: Change in catabolic processesChange from baseline to week 12Cortisol, Creatin kinase (plasma concentration)
Blood analysis: Acute change in InflammationChange from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session (Acute)Interleukin 6, Tumoral necrosis factor Alpha, C reactive protein (plasma concentration)
Acute change in patellar tendon stiffness (N/mm)Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training sessionUltrasound and force-based measures of tendon mechanical properties.
Change in muscle mass (kg)Change from baseline to week 12Lean mass determined by Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Change in bone mass (g)Change from baseline to week 12Bone mineral content determined by Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026