Congenital Heart Defects
Conditions
Keywords
Congenital Heart Defects, Diagnosis, Parents, Quality of Life, Education
Brief summary
Congenital heart defects (CHD) are the most common congenital malformations. Despite the progress made in the last decades in diagnosis and treatment, CHD continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Several studies have shown a reduction in the quality of life (QoL) of parents of children with CHD, which may affect children too. The main research aim is to assess and to understand the impact of a psychoeducational intervention in QoL of parents with newborns with CHD. We are including parents of inpatient newborns in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of UAG da Mulher e Criança - Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João (CHUSJ) with the diagnosis of non-syndromic CHD, between March 2019 and February 2020. We also included parents of newborns born at CHUSJ with the diagnosis of non-syndromic CHD, not admited in NICU, between September 2019 and February 2020. The inclusion criteria are: I) parents of newborns (up to 28 days) with the diagnosis of non- syndromic CHD; II) newborns hospitalized in CHUSJ; III) parents aged ≥ 18 years. Parents of newborns with other important co-morbidities associated with CHD and those who do not have good understanding and expression in Portuguese will be excluded. Parents will be divided in 2 study groups: INTERVENTION group (I) and CONTROL group (C). Group I will receive a psychoeducational intervention in addition to the usual routines of the Service. Group C will receive the usual routines of the Service. The psychoeducational intervention, which consists of 2 sessions lasting 90 minutes each one, will be performed as soon as possible after inclusion in the study. Participants will be evaluated in three moments: M1 beginning of the study; M2 4 weeks after the intervention (I) or after enrollment (C) and M3 16 weeks after intervention/enrollment. The primary outcome will be parental QoL, which will be evaluated through the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref (WHOQOL-Bref). The family impact and the perception of positive contributions will be secondary outcomes. These outcome variables will be assessed by the Impact on Family Scale and the Positive Contributions Scale - Kansas Inventory of Parental Perceptions, respectively. A semi-structured interview will be performed after all quantitative data have been collected. The authors expect to find an increase of QoL and positive contributions and a decrease of family impact in the intervention group comparatively to the control group.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALPsychoeducational intervention
The intervention, prepared by a multidisciplinary team, will consist of two 90 minutes collective sessions (max. 8 families). Sessions will consist of lectures, group discussion and relaxation. The program includes content on the effects of a diagnosis of a congenital anomaly on a child in the parents and in the family, stages of mourning, adaptation process, coping strategies, legislative framework and social protection. This is a non-specific intervention for CHD, where the main focus is the diagnosis of a congenital anomaly. In second session, written support material will be distributed. Participants will be asked to practice relaxation in the next 4 weeks.
Sponsors
Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde
Unidade Autónoma de Gestão da Mulher e Criança do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Universidade do Porto
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Parents will be divided in 2 study groups: INTERVENTION group (I) and CONTROL group (C). Group I will receive a psychoeducational intervention in addition to the usual routines of the Service. Group C will receive the usual routines of the Service. The intervention will be performed as soon as possible after inclusion in the study. Participants will be evaluated in 3 moments: M1 beginning of the study; M2 4 weeks after the intervention (I) or after enrollment (C) and M3 16 weeks after intervention/enrollment. The primary outcome will be parental QoL, which will be evaluated through the WHOQOL-Bref. The family impact and the perception of positive contributions will be secondary outcomes. These outcome variables will be assessed by the Impact on Family Scale and the Positive Contributions Scale - Kansas Inventory of Parental Perceptions, respectively. A semi-structured interview will be performed after all quantitative data have been collected.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Parents of newborns (up to 28 days) with the diagnosis of non-syndromic CHD; * Newborns hospitalized in CHUSJ; * Parents aged ≥ 18 years.
Exclusion criteria
* Parents of newborns with other important comorbidities associated with CHD; * Parents who do not have good understanding and expression in Portuguese.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes on parental QoL | INTERVENTION group - M1: baseline (beginning of the study); M2: 4 weeks after the intervention and M3: 16 weeks after intervention. CONTROL group - M1: baseline; M2: 4 weeks after enrollment and M3: 16 weeks after enrollment. | Changes on parental quality of life assessed through World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref (WHOQOL-Bref). The WHOQOL-Bref instrument is composed by 26 items, which are organized in 4 specific domains: Physical (7 items), Psychological (6 items), Social Relationships (3 items), Environment (8 items) and a general QoL facet (2 items). All items are quoted from 1 to 5. Three items, related to questions posed negatively (Q3, Q4 and Q26), must be reversed (the calculation implies the subtraction of their value to six units). The results are transformed on a scale of 0 to 100. Each domain score is computed through the formula: \[(sum of all items - number of items) / (4x number of items)\] x 100. Higher scores correspond to better quality of life. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes on family impact | INTERVENTION group - M1: baseline (beginning of the study); M2: 4 weeks after the intervention and M3: 16 weeks after intervention. CONTROL group - M1: baseline; M2 4 weeks after enrollment and M3 16 weeks after enrollment. | Changes on family impact assessed through Revised Impact on Family Scale. Impact on Family Scale evaluates the parents' perception of the impact of the child's chronic health condition in family life. Revised Impact on Family Scale contains 15 items. It is a unidimensional scale that scores overall family impact. This score results from sum of all item responses. The result ranges from 15 to 60. Higher scores are indicative of perceived higher family impact associated with child's health condition. |
| Changes on perception positive contributions | INTERVENTION group - M1: baseline ( beginning of the study); M2: 4 weeks after the intervention and M3: 16 weeks after intervention. CONTROL group - M1: baseline; M2: 4 weeks after enrollment and M3: 16 weeks after enrollment. | Changes on perception positive contributions assessed through Positive Contributions Scale - Kansas Inventory of Parental Perceptions. The Portuguese version of the Positive Contributions Scale - Kansas Inventory of Parental Perceptions is composed by 43 items that assessed 6 dimensions/subscales: 1) Source of Personal Growth and Future Consciousness; 2) Source of Learning Out of Experience; 3) Source of Acceptance and Family Cohesion; 4) Source of Happiness and Affection; 5) Source of Spirituality and 6) Source of Social Network Expansion. The scores of the subscales are computed by the average of the items that composes them. Higher scores indicate a perception of greater positive contributions in the different dimensions. |
Countries
Portugal
Outcome results
None listed