Skip to content

Cryoablation System FIM/CE Mark Study

Cryterion Cardiac Cryoablation System CE Mark Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03723070
Enrollment
88
Registered
2018-10-29
Start date
2018-05-15
Completion date
2020-12-22
Last updated
2025-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

Multi-center, open label, prospective clinical study to establish the acute safety and performance of the Cryterion Cardiac Cryoablation System

Detailed description

This is a single-arm, open-label clinical study using a cryoablation balloon device to isolate pulmonary veins during an atrial fibrillation ablation procedure. Cryo is a scientifically proven energy source used to create a thermal injury during endocardial ablation. The investigational device uses current technology with minor design modifications and will be studied to validate similarities in the safety and performance parameters compared to literature.

Interventions

DEVICEThe Cryterion Cardiac Cryoablation System

Cryoablation System that includes a Balloon Catheter, Circular Mapping Catheter, Steerable Sheath and Cryoablation Console. In combination, components of the System will be inserted into the left atrium and a thermal injury at the PV ostium will be created to electrically isolate the veins

Sponsors

Cryterion Medical, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Non-randomized study designed to validate the safety and performance of the Cryterion Cardiac Cryoablation System when used as intended

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria: * Currently scheduled for a de novo ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) defined as AF with self-terminating episodes lasting no longer than 7 continuous days (PAF) Main

Exclusion criteria

* In the opinion of the Investigator, any known contraindication to an AF ablation, Transesophageal Echocardiogram (TEE). or anticoagulation * Any duration of continuous AF lasting longer than 7 days * History of previous left atrial ablation or surgical treatment for Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter/Atrial Tachycardia (AF/AFL/AT) * More than four (4) electrical cardioversions in the year prior to enrollment excluding cardioversions performed within 24 hours of arrhythmia onset. * Significant structural heart disease or implanted cardiac devices

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Safety Outcome: Percentage of Participants With Procedure Related Adverse Events OR Device Related Adverse Events OR Serious Adverse Device Effects12 monthsPercentage of participants with procedure related adverse events OR device related adverse events OR Serious Adverse device effects including: Death, Myocardial Infarction, Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, Cerebral Infarct or systemic embolism, Major bleeding requiring transfusion of blood products, Mitral or tricuspid valvular damage, phrenic nerve damage causing persistent diaphragmatic paralysis, Symptomatic pulmonary vein stenosis, atrio-esophageal fistula, Air embolism leading to life-threatening event, other serious adverse device effects (SADEs)
Acute Procedural SuccessFollowing the last cryo-application for each of the targeted veins, during the index procedure. Mean procedure time was 118 minutes.Percentage of patients achieving pulmonary vein isolation defined as entrance and exit block for each of the targeted pulmonary veins following the last ablation application.
12 Month Treatment Success - Percentage of Subjects Free From Arrhythmias at 12 Months12 monthsA treatment failure is defined as a subject being an acute procedural failure, having more than one repeat procedure during the 90-day blanking period or having a documented, symptomatic episode(s) of atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia, between 91 and 365 days post index procedure. Occurrence or recurrence of a right atrial arrhythmia is not considered a treatment failure post the 90-day blanking period

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary Safety Outcome: Number of Procedure-related or Device Related Adverse Events.12 monthsAll procedure-related or device related adverse events with causal relationship
Percentage of Subjects With Isolation Immediately Post Ablation and With Reconnection During the Entrance/Exit Block Testing30 minutesPercentage of subjects that present PV isolation immediately after ablation but show reconnection after 30 minutes during entrance/exit block testing. This outcome is only measured in subjects that were enrolled under the protocol that required a 30 minute waiting period between isolation and verification of isolation.

Countries

Croatia, Netherlands, New Zealand

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PV Cryoablation
Ablation of the ostium of the pulmonary veins (PV) as a means to electrically isolate the veins in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. A cryoablation balloon will be inserted into the left atrium and cryo applications will be administered to create an endocardial thermal injury by using the Cryterion Cardiac Cryoablation System The Cryterion Cardiac Cryoablation System: Cryoablation System that includes a Balloon Catheter, Circular Mapping Catheter, Steerable Sheath and Cryoablation Console. In combination, components of the System will be inserted into the left atrium and a thermal injury at the PV ostium will be created to electrically isolate the veins
88
Total88

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyEnded the study at 1 month follow-up visit as per applicable protocol at that time6
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPV Cryoablation
Age, Continuous60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
81 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Croatia
64 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
9 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 88
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 88
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 88

Outcome results

Primary

12 Month Treatment Success - Percentage of Subjects Free From Arrhythmias at 12 Months

A treatment failure is defined as a subject being an acute procedural failure, having more than one repeat procedure during the 90-day blanking period or having a documented, symptomatic episode(s) of atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia, between 91 and 365 days post index procedure. Occurrence or recurrence of a right atrial arrhythmia is not considered a treatment failure post the 90-day blanking period

Time frame: 12 months

Population: In total, 88 subjects were enrolled. Six subjects ended the study at the one month follow-up visit and were therefore not eligible for the analysis. Of the 3 subjects that were withdrawn prior to study completion, one subject experienced a recurrence before being withdrawn and was therefore included in the analysis. The two other subjects were event free at time of study withdrawal.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PV Cryoablation12 Month Treatment Success - Percentage of Subjects Free From Arrhythmias at 12 Months58 Participants
Primary

Acute Procedural Success

Percentage of patients achieving pulmonary vein isolation defined as entrance and exit block for each of the targeted pulmonary veins following the last ablation application.

Time frame: Following the last cryo-application for each of the targeted veins, during the index procedure. Mean procedure time was 118 minutes.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PV CryoablationAcute Procedural Success87 Participants
Primary

Primary Safety Outcome: Percentage of Participants With Procedure Related Adverse Events OR Device Related Adverse Events OR Serious Adverse Device Effects

Percentage of participants with procedure related adverse events OR device related adverse events OR Serious Adverse device effects including: Death, Myocardial Infarction, Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, Cerebral Infarct or systemic embolism, Major bleeding requiring transfusion of blood products, Mitral or tricuspid valvular damage, phrenic nerve damage causing persistent diaphragmatic paralysis, Symptomatic pulmonary vein stenosis, atrio-esophageal fistula, Air embolism leading to life-threatening event, other serious adverse device effects (SADEs)

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PV CryoablationPrimary Safety Outcome: Percentage of Participants With Procedure Related Adverse Events OR Device Related Adverse Events OR Serious Adverse Device Effects50 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Isolation Immediately Post Ablation and With Reconnection During the Entrance/Exit Block Testing

Percentage of subjects that present PV isolation immediately after ablation but show reconnection after 30 minutes during entrance/exit block testing. This outcome is only measured in subjects that were enrolled under the protocol that required a 30 minute waiting period between isolation and verification of isolation.

Time frame: 30 minutes

Population: Out of 88 subjects enrolled in the study, 54 subjects have been enrolled under the protocol requiring a 30 minute waiting period between pulmonary vein isolation and entrance/exit block testing. All subjects for whom at least one additional application was performed minimally 30 minutes after the previous ablation, were considered having a potential reconnection during entrance/exit block testing.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PV CryoablationPercentage of Subjects With Isolation Immediately Post Ablation and With Reconnection During the Entrance/Exit Block Testing7 Participants
Secondary

Secondary Safety Outcome: Number of Procedure-related or Device Related Adverse Events.

All procedure-related or device related adverse events with causal relationship

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Causally related to procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PV CryoablationSecondary Safety Outcome: Number of Procedure-related or Device Related Adverse Events.12 Adverse Events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026