Personal History of a Recent Suicidal Crisis, Suicidal Behaviour, Suicidal Ideation
Conditions
Keywords
Suicidal crisis, Suicidal behaviour, Prevention, Smartphone application, Ecological momentary assessment, Psychiatry, Follow-up
Brief summary
Sleep and appetite disorders as well as social exclusion, have been linked to the emergence of suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts.This study aims to evaluate the relationship between those factors and suicidal ideation and behaviour. To assess those factors an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) desing will be used. EMA will be carried out using 2 applications integrated into the smartphone of participants (Android or iOS), one to make an explicit data collection with questions and another one for the implicit collection of data from mobile sensors. 1044 suicide attempters will be included in three sites and followed for 6 months. Participants will be evaluated at inclusion and at the end of follow-up. The hypothesis is that sleep, appetite and social exclusion factors collected with the smartphone application will be linked to the intensity of death wish, suicidal ideations and suicidal attempts. An auxiliary study will also be led with 300 patients carrying an actimeter for the 30 first days after inclusion. This will help collecting more accurate data on various sleep parameters.
Detailed description
The proposed study will use ecological momentary assessment (EMA) via smartphone applications (apps) and wearable trackers to examine the relationship between suicidality (wish to die, suicidal ideation and suicide attempt) and changes in sleep quality and disturbed appetite. These behavioral markers, if the hypothesis is proven true, could help predict increased suicidal risk in real-time within a vulnerable population across different cultures. The study aims to: (1) Establish the extent to which quality of sleep is related to suicide ideation and suicide attempts; (2) Establish the extent to which change in appetite is related to suicide ideation and suicide attempts; (3) Determine the emotional impact of the app when suicidality is assessed; (4) Clarify the timeline of the relationship between sleep disturbances and suicidal behavior; (5) Develop personalized algorithms based on EMA protocol and motor activity markers or signatures to assess the risk of suicide attempts. The hypothesis is that variations in sleep quality will correlate with increased wish to die, suicide ideation and suicide attempts. It is expected that a decrease in sleep quality will be a suicide risk marker especially among young individuals. This prospective cross-national study will use the infrastructure of an existing network (WORECA). Woreca has defined a common protocol of suicide assessment, data sharing and analysis strategy. 1044 suicide attempters will be included and followed for 6 months. Each participant will be assessed using an EMA protocol via two smartphone apps: (1) One app will ask everyday questions following a dynamic protocol to assess quality of sleep, appetite, suicidal ideation and psychopathology; (2) the other app will record activity using smartphone sensors. Additionally, 300 participants (150 in France and 150 in Spain) will have their sleep phases and other physiological changes during sleep monitored with a wearable armband. Study outcomes include wish to live, wish to die, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempt during the follow-up period. A multi-level logit regression analysis will be used to account for multiple observations per individual, to identify individual-level (sleep, appetite, socio-demographic, clinical data, treatment data) and site-level characteristics associated with death desire, suicidal ideation or suicide attempt (aim 1 and 2). Hazards models will also be used to relate covariate characteristics (sleep, appetite, sociodemographic, clinical data, treatment data) with time to suicide reattempt during the follow-up period (aim 1 and 2). Data mining (machine learning) techniques will be used to examine risk factors, patterns of illness evolution (aim 3 and 4) and patient stratification by level of suicidal risk (aim 5). Identifying surrogate markers of suicidality related with physiological functions, which carry less or no stigma for the patients and are easier to report, or have a lower reporting threshold is an essential task. These markers would allow to predict in real-time an increase in suicidal risk within a vulnerable population and ultimately help to prevent and even personalize treatment.Suicidal behaviours, including suicidal ideation, are preventable but to be efficient, prevention needs to rely on the identication of specific risk factors.
Interventions
OTHEREMA
The mobile application (EMA) combines an explicit data collection with an implicit one. For the explicit data collection with Memind application, patients will have to answer specific questionnaires about sleep, appetite and social factors. Some of the questions will be asked on regular basis, at the same time everyday, while others will be asked randomly during the day (between 9 a.m and 9 p.m). The implicit data collecting will be carried out using smartphone sensors (application eB2).
Sponsors
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz
INSERM U1061 Neuropsychiatry Montpellier, France
University Hospital, Montpellier
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* To be at least 18 years old * To use a smartphone as a personal phone * To have consulted in the context of a suicidal crisis within the last 7 days * To be able to understand the nature, purpose and methodoly of the study. * To be in a minimal treatment phase (according to the clinician's judgment). * To accept participating to the study and the 6 months follow-up and to have signed the informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Refusal of participation * Subject protected by law (guardianship) * Deprived of liberty Subject (by judicial or administrative decision) * Diagnosis of a current hypomanic, manic or mixed episode, or a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder or schizophrenia. * No affiliation to the social safety system * Exclusion period in relation to another protocol * 65 years old patients and older with an MMSE score \< 24 at baseline
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Occurrence of suicidal event assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | 6 months | Evaluate the occurrence of a suicidal event with the C-SSRS. The questionnaire includes four subscales. The suicidal ideation severity subscale ranges from 1 to 5 (with higher number indicating more severe ideation). The intensity of ideation subscale includes 5 questions each one ranging from 1 to 5 (with higher number indicating more intense ideation). The suicidal behavior subscale includes 4 yes/no questions. The suicidal behavior lethality subscale inquires about the level of actual or potential medical damage. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of sensibility to social exclusion assessed by ecological momentary assessment (EMA) | 6 months | Evaluate social sensibility with EMA questions based on the Perceived Social Support and Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire |
| Evaluation of the intensity of death wish assessed by ecological momentary assessment (EMA) | 6 months | Evaluate death wish intensity with analogical scales |
| Evaluation of suicide attempts severity assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | 6 months | Evaluate suicide attempts severity with the C-SSRS. The severity of suicidal ideation subscale ranges from 1 to 5 (with higher number indicating more severe ideation). The intensity of ideation subscale includes 5 questions each ranging from 1 to 5 (with higher number indicating more intense ideation). The suicidal behavior subscale includes 4 yes/no questions. The suicidal behavior lethality subscale inquires about the level of actual or potential medical damage. |
| Evaluation of sleep duration assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) | 6 months | Evaluate sleep duration with one item from the PSQI (hours of night sleep during the past week) using EMA |
| Evaluation of physical activity by eB2 | 6 months | Evaluate physical activity with smartphone sensors (eB2). |
| Evaluation of insomnia assessed by ecological momentary assessment (EMA) | 6 months | Evaluate insomnia with the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score using EMA questions. The ISI score ranges from 0 to 27 (higher number indicating more severe insomnia). |
| Evaluation of insomnia assessed by Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) | 6 months | Evaluate insomnia with the ISI score. The ISI score ranges from 0 to 27 (higher number indicating more severe insomnia). |
| Evaluation of appetite assessed by ecological momentary assessment (EMA) | 6 months | Evaluate appetite using the Council of Nutrition Appetite Questionnaire (CNAQ) score with EMA questions. The CNAQ score ranges from 8 to 40 (a score of less than 28 is cause for concern, with lower number indicating greater risk). |
| Evaluation of suicidal ideation intensity assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | 6 months | Evaluate suicidal ideation intensity with the C-SSRS. The severity of suicidal ideation subscale ranges from 1 to 5 (with higher number indicating more severe ideation). The intensity of ideation subscale includes 5 questions each ranging from 1 to 5 (with higher number indicating more intense ideation). The suicidal behavior subscale includes 4 yes/no questions. The suicidal behavior lethality subscale inquires about the level of actual or potential medical damage. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of sleep quality with the actimeter | 1 month | Evaluate sleep quality with the actimeter. Only for patients included in the auxiliary study. |
| Evaluation of sleep quality with the sleep diary | 1 month | Evaluate sleep quality with the sleep diary. Only for patients included in the auxiliary study |
| Evaluation of sleep quantity with the sleep diary | 1 month | Evaluate sleep quantity with the sleep diary (self-report), only for patients included in the auxiliary study |
| Evaluation of sleep quantity with the actimeter | 1 month | Evaluate sleep quantity with the actimeter, only for patients included in the auxiliary study |
Countries
France, Spain
Contacts
Primary ContactJorge Lopez Castroman, MD PhD
Backup ContactEnrique Baca-Garcia, MD PhD
Outcome results
None listed