Skip to content

TrueTear in Sjogren's Disease Patients

Prospective Controlled Study of Intranasal Tear Neurostimulation for Sjogrens Patients With Dry Eye Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03719885
Enrollment
55
Registered
2018-10-25
Start date
2018-12-01
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2023-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes, Sjogren's Syndrome

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate acute tear production produced by the intranasal tear neurostimulator in participants with Sjögrens syndrome and aqueous tear deficiency. Our primary goal is to evaluate whether Sjögrens patients respond to this intervention and whether there is a baseline tear production level below which these patients do not respond.

Interventions

DEVICETrueTear Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator

This study will evaluate the immediate tear production resulting from use of intranasal tear neurostimulation in patients with Sjogren's disease

Sponsors

Allergan
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with Sjögren's syndrome based on American-European Consensus Group (AECG) American College of Rheumatology (ACR), or American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria * Baseline Schirmer score (with topical anesthesia) of ≤10 mm/5 min and retest value (during nasal stimulation with cotton swab) of at least 4 mm/5min higher than baseline value * Baseline Ocular Surface Disease Index® (OSDI) total score ≥13 * Age greater than or equal to 22 years old * Able to complete questionnaires independently * Willing to sign the informed consent and deemed capable of complying with the requirements of the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

* Use of any topical ophthalmic medication, including artificial tears, within 4 hours of either visit * Chronic or recurrent epistaxis, coagulation disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, may lead to clinically significant increased bleeding * Use of systemic anticoagulants * Nasal or sinus surgery including nasal cautery or significant trauma * Severely deviated septum * Cardiac demand pacemaker, implanted defibrillator or other implanted electronic device * Have an active implanted metallic or active implanted electronic device in the head, a cardiac demand pacemaker, or an implanted defibrillator * Known hypersensitivity to any of the procedural agents or materials in the study device that contact the nasal mucosa * Corneal transplant in either or both eyes * Participation in any clinical trial within 30 days of the Screening Visit * A woman who is pregnant, planning a pregnancy, or nursing at the Screening Visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Schirmer TestingImmediately following the procedure (ie immediately following use of the device)Tear production measured immediately following intranasal tear neurostimulation. For this measurement, Schirmer strips (small strips of paper with measurements on them) are placed in the corner of each eye. The amount of wetting of the Schirmer strips is measured in millimeters. Wetting of less than 5 mm is indicative of deficient tear production.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinically Significant Changes in Visual AcuityImmediately following the procedure (ie immediately following use of the device)Clinically significant change in Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)- this measurement was taken to determine if a significant change in BCVA was noted for participants. If a clinically significant change was noted (greater or equal to 2 lines of vision) then a subject would be listed in the data table below.
Clinically Significant Changes in Slit Lamp ExamImmediately following the procedure (ie immediately following use of the device)Clinically significant changes in slit lamp examination . Subjects who experienced clinically significant changes would be represented in the data table below.
Number of Adverse EventsImmediately following the procedure (ie immediately following use of the device)Pain, headache, nosebleed, etc felt to be associated with use of the device

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Study Group
The participants recruited for this study were those who had a clinical diagnosis of Sjogren's Syndrome (SS) and produced 10 mm. or less of tears over the course of 5 minutes (measured using Schirmer strips).
35
Total35

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStudy Group
Age, Continuous57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
33 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
OSDI Score50.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
Year of Sjogren's diagnosis
2000 - 2010
11 Participants
Year of Sjogren's diagnosis
After 2010
21 Participants
Year of Sjogren's diagnosis
Prior to 2000
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 55
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Schirmer Testing

Tear production measured immediately following intranasal tear neurostimulation. For this measurement, Schirmer strips (small strips of paper with measurements on them) are placed in the corner of each eye. The amount of wetting of the Schirmer strips is measured in millimeters. Wetting of less than 5 mm is indicative of deficient tear production.

Time frame: Immediately following the procedure (ie immediately following use of the device)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSchirmer TestingCotton Swab10.2 mm.Standard Deviation 1.3
InterventionSchirmer TestingExtranasal Application0.8 mm.Standard Deviation 0.8
InterventionSchirmer TestingIntranasal Application13.5 mm.Standard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Clinically Significant Changes in Slit Lamp Exam

Clinically significant changes in slit lamp examination . Subjects who experienced clinically significant changes would be represented in the data table below.

Time frame: Immediately following the procedure (ie immediately following use of the device)

Population: Eyes were examined pre and post active application to confirm that the device did not cause any changes to the physical structure or appearance of the eyes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionClinically Significant Changes in Slit Lamp Exam0 Participants
Secondary

Clinically Significant Changes in Visual Acuity

Clinically significant change in Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)- this measurement was taken to determine if a significant change in BCVA was noted for participants. If a clinically significant change was noted (greater or equal to 2 lines of vision) then a subject would be listed in the data table below.

Time frame: Immediately following the procedure (ie immediately following use of the device)

Population: Participants' eyes were examined pre and post active application to confirm that the device did not cause any changes to the participant's vision. A serious change in vision would have been reported as an adverse event

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionClinically Significant Changes in Visual Acuity0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Adverse Events

Pain, headache, nosebleed, etc felt to be associated with use of the device

Time frame: Immediately following the procedure (ie immediately following use of the device)

Population: All participants who used the device were observed for any adverse events

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
InterventionNumber of Adverse Events1 occurance of adverse event

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026