Skip to content

En-bloc vs Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor

En-bloc vs Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor: Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03718754
Acronym
eBLOC
Enrollment
384
Registered
2018-10-24
Start date
2019-02-28
Completion date
2021-01-20
Last updated
2023-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Cancer

Brief summary

Based on current evidence, we hypothesize that eTURB represents an improvement in the surgical management of NMIBC. The resection is more precise and complete compared to cTURB. Moreover, the quality of an en-bloc specimen, including the tumor with its adjacent bladder wall layers, allows an accurate pathological review which leads to correct risk allocation and therapy. To answer these questions, we designed a RCT comparing eTURB with cTURB. Primary outcome of our study will be the accuracy of pathological staging assessment measured by the presence of detrusor muscle in the specimen as a surrogate parameter for quality of resection.

Interventions

DEVICEEn-Bloc TURB

En-bloc resection will be performed at each center based on local clinical practice and available instruments. Laser resection, hydrodissection with HybridKnife® or electric resection are allowed. All procedures, including cTURB, must be performed with an imaging enhancing technique (PDD / NBI at surgeon's discretion). After resection, a single intravesical instillation of 40mg Mitomycin-C will be performed if clinically feasible.

En-bloc resection will be performed at each center based on local clinical practice and available instruments. After resection, a single intravesical instillation of 40mg Mitomycin-C will be performed if clinically feasible.

Sponsors

David D'Andrea
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet all the following inclusion criteria to participate in this study: * Diagnosis by cystoscopy of primary papillary non-muscle invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (cTa, cT1) * Imaging examinations shows that the bladder muscle has not been affected, no lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis; * Diameter of tumor between 1cm and 3cm * Number of lesions ≤3 (The position of small lesions relatively concentrated as one place) * Patients who agree to eTURB or cTURB surgery, and will be effected to the postoperative follow-up treatment such as conventional infusion after the operation

Exclusion criteria

* Pure carcinoma in situ * Contraindications to surgery (i.e. bladder fibrosis) * Diameter of tumor \>3cm * Number of lesions \>3 * Poor performance status making a surgical intervention too risky * Life expectancy of less than one year * Patient refused to participate * Pregnancy * History of upper urinary tract malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The pathological staging assessment for eTURB compared to cTURB4 weeksThe primary objective of the study is to assess whether eBLOC is associated with a higher rate of detrusor muscle in the pathologic specimen, compared to cTURB

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Occurrence of obturator reflex1 day
Operative time1 day
Number of participants with bladder perforation7 days
Upstaging of disease upon second look transurethral resection surgery6 weeks
Number of participants with obturator reflex1 day
Residual disease within 3 months after initial TURB3 months
Number of tumors with positive lateral and deep resection margin4 weeks
Number of participants with conversion to other resection technique1 day
Number of participants with persistent disease at 2nd look TURB6 weeks
Recurrence-free survivalup to 5 years
Number of tumors with evaluable lateral and deep resection margin4 weeks

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026