Skip to content

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Eltrombopag in Patients With Poor Graft Function

The ELTION Study - A Multicenter Open-label Interventional Study of Eltrombopag in Patients With Poor Graft Function After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03718533
Acronym
ELTION
Enrollment
10
Registered
2018-10-24
Start date
2018-12-17
Completion date
2020-11-03
Last updated
2024-02-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Poor Graft Function

Keywords

Eltrombopag, Hematological response, Poor graft function, Stem cell transplantation, Adult, ELTION, Phase II

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of eltrombopag for poor graft function (PGF) on overall hematologic response (partial and complete), as determined by platelet, hemoglobin and neutrophil counts by 16 weeks after the initiation of eltrombopag in patients with poor graft function after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Detailed description

This was an open-label, single-arm phase II study, in which participants diagnosed with PGF after allo-HSCT were treated with eltrombopag up to week 36 or until the participant's premature withdrawal. The study consisted of the following periods: * Screening Period (baseline): the participant screening criteria was reviewed, and the procedures established in the evaluation schedule were performed. * Treatment Period: from administration of the first dose of eltrombopag until time when participant permanently stopped taking study treatment for any reason or until 36 weeks had passed. Eltrombopag was initiated on Day 1 at a dose of 150 mg once daily (75 mg daily in Asian ancestry participants). During the Treatment Period, participants were evaluated weekly during the first month, every 2 weeks during the next 2 months and subsequently every 4 weeks until week 24. For the last 3 months, participants were followed every 6 weeks Only participants who had a partial or complete response at Week 16 continued to receive eltrombopag up to Week 36 or until loss of response (defined as a decrease in blood counts to levels that did not continue to meet the criteria for response established in the protocol), unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation for any other reason. Participants who discontinued eltrombopag because efficacy, continued in the study and attended the scheduled visits of Treatment Period as per protocol. If loss of response occurred, eltrombopag was reintroduced at the last effective dose. * Final Visit (or Early Withdrawal): this visit took place 30 days after completion of the Treatment Period, or premature participant withdrawal. * Follow-up for Survival: all participants who discontinued from the study, regardless the reason of discontinuation, were followed for survival for 24 and 36 weeks, unless they withdrew their consent, died or were lost-to follow-up, in which case study visits were no longer carried out.

Interventions

DRUGEltrombopag

Eltrombopag was provided as 50 mg or 25 mg film-coated tablets for oral use administration

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient must be able to understand and communicate with the investigator and comply with the requirements of the study and must provide written, signed and dated informed consent form before any study assessment is performed 2. Male of female patients ≥ 18 years of age 3. Patients diagnosed with primary or secondary poor graft function (PGF) defined as two or more cytopenias after day +30 post-transplant (re-tested in a peripheral blood analysis at screening): 1. Platelet count \<20,000/ µL (mandatory) 2. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \<1,000/µL 3. Hemoglobin \<100 g/L 4. Presence of donor chimerism \>90% in screening visit 5. Karnofsky status ≥90% (Karnofsky assessment must be performed within 7 days prior to Day 1)

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or nursing (lactating women). 2. Evidence of active acute or chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD). 3. Evidence of any active malignancy. 4. Subjects who are human immune deficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive in screening visit. 5. Cytogenetic abnormality in chromosome 7 present before the allo-HSC. 6. Evidence of any clonal abnormality on cytogenetics (in bone marrow analysis). * A local post-transplant conventional cytogenetic assessment should be available within 8 weeks before Day 1. * If the cytogenetics is not valuable, i.e, it does not show metaphases, a FISH for MDS-related most frequent abnormalities including chromosome 7 is accepted. As a consequence, patients with dry tap bone marrow aspiration are NOT eligible. 7. Evidence of bone marrow involvement or progression of the underlying disease assessed by the applicable methods in each case. 8. Evidence of thrombotic microangiopathy. 9. Evidence of possible causes of cytopenia other than PGF (active infections, myelotoxic drugs, hypersplenism…). 10. Prior use of any thrombopoietin receptor (TPO-R) agonists for PGF. 11. AST or ALT levels \>3 x ULN. 12. Creatinine level ≥1.5 x ULN. 13. Total bilirubin level ≥1.5 x ULN. 14. Previous thromboembolic event (other than line-related upper extremity thrombosis) 15. Hypersensitivity to eltrombopag or its components. 16. Clinically significant ECG abnormality history or current diagnosis of cardiac disease indicating significant risk of safety for subjects participating in the study such as uncontrolled or significant cardiac disease or impaired cardiac function including any of the following: 1. . Corrected QTc \> 450 msec (male subjects), \> 460 msec (female subjects) using Fredericia correction (QTcF) on the screening ECG 2. . Myocardial infarction 3. . Uncontrolled congestive heart failure 4. . Unstable angina 5. . Congenital long QT syndrome. 17. Administration of an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, preceding the first dose of study treatment. 18. Patient with liver cirrhosis. 19. Risk factors for Torsade de Pointes including uncorrected hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia. 20. Subjects with any serious and/ or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric disorder or other conditions that could interfere with patient´s safety, obtaining informed consent or compliance with the study procedures as per investigator discretion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hematologic Response Rate by 16 Weeks After the Initiation of EltrombopagBaseline up to Week 16Hematologic response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who met the criteria of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) by Week 16. PR was defined when any of the following: Platelet count ≥ 20000/microliter(μL) (with platelet transfusion independence), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1000/μL (when pretreatment ANC was \<1000/μL) and/or hemoglobin (Hb) ≥100 gram(g)/ liter(L) (when pretreatment Hb was \<100g/L) (with red blood cells transfusion independence), confirmed in two blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. CR was defined when all of the following: platelet count ≥100000/μL, ANC ≥1500/μL (when pretreatment ANC was \<1000/μL) and Hb ≥110 g/L (when pretreatment Hb was \<100g/L), confirmed in two blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. Participants who discontinued before Week 16 were considered as responders if, in the last evaluation, they had PR or CR. The 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Platelet LineageWeek 16, 20, 24, 30 and 36Percentage of participants who had a response (partial or complete) in the platelet lineage. A partial response in the platelet lineage was defined as platelet count ≥20000/µL (with platelet transfusion independence) confirmed in two consecutive blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. A complete response in the platelet lineage was defined as platelet count ≥ 100000/µL confirmed in two consecutive blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Hemoglobin LineageWeek 16, 20, 24, 30 and 36Percentage of participants who had a response (partial or complete) in the hemoglobin (Hb) lineage. A partial response in the Hb lineage was defined as Hb ≥100 g/L (when pretreatment Hb was \<100g/L) (with RBC transfusion independence), confirmed in two consecutive blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. A complete response in the Hb lineage was defined as Hb≥ 110 g/L (when pretreatment Hb was \<100g/L) confirmed in two consecutive blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.
Hematologic Response Rate at Week 24 and 36Week 24 and 36Hematologic response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who met the criteria of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at 24 weeks and 36 weeks after the initiation of eltrombopag. PR was defined when any of the following: Platelet count ≥20000/microliter (μL) (with platelet transfusion independence), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1000/μL (when pretreatment ANC was \<1000/μL) and/or hemoglobin (Hb) ≥100 gram (g)/ liter (L) (when pretreatment Hb was \<100g/L) (with red blood cells transfusion independence), confirmed in two blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. CR was defined when all three of the following: platelet count ≥100000/μL, ANC ≥1500/μL (when pretreatment ANC was \<1000/μL) and Hb ≥110 g/L (when pretreatment Hb was \<100g/L), confirmed in two blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Previously Platelet Transfusion-dependent and Did no Longer Require Platelet Transfusions After the Initiation of EltrombopagFrom start of treatment to end of treatment, assessed up to 36 weeksPercentage of participants who received at least one platelet transfusion before starting treatment and who did no longer require platelet transfusion before and after the first 16 weeks of treatment. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Previously Red Blood Cells Transfusion-dependent and Did no Longer Require Red Blood Cells TransfusionsFrom start of treatment to end of treatment, assessed up to 36 weeksPercentage of participants who received at least one red blood cells transfusion before starting treatment and who did no longer require red blood cells transfusion before and after the first 16 weeks of treatment. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Neutrophil LineageWeek 16, 20, 24, 30 and 36Percentage of participants who had a response (partial or complete) in the neutrophil lineage. A partial response in the neutrophil lineage was defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1000/ µL (when pretreatment ANC was \<1000/μL) confirmed in two consecutive blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. A complete response in the neutrophil lineage was defined as ANC ≥ 1500/ µL (when pretreatment ANC was \<1000/μL) confirmed in two consecutive blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued or Reduced the Use of Concomitant Erythropoietin (EPO) TherapyFrom start of treatment to end of treatment, assessed up to Week 36Percentage of participants who discontinued or reduced by ≥50% from baseline the use of concomitant EPO therapy while receiving eltrombopag. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued or Reduced the Use of Concomitant Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) TherapyFrom start of treatment to end of treatment, assessed up to Week 36Percentage of participants who discontinued or reduced by ≥50% from baseline the use of concomitant G-CSF therapy while receiving eltrombopag. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.
Overall Survival (OS)From start of treatment until the date of death, assessed up to 40 weeksOS defined as the time from the date of inclusion until the date of death due to any cause was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimated. All patients who discontinued from the study, regardless the reason of discontinuation, were followed for survival, unless they withdrew their consent, died or were lost-to follow-up, in which case were censored at the last contact.
Overall Survival Rate at 24 and 36 WeeksWeek 24 and 36Overall survival rate defined as the rate estimate of the percentage of participants who were alive at 24 and 36 weeks. All patients who discontinued from the study, regardless the reason of discontinuation, were followed for survival at Week 24 and 36, unless they withdrew their consent, died or were lost-to follow-up, in which case were censored at the last contact.
Duration of Transfusion IndependenceFrom start of treatment to end of treatment, assessed up to 36 weeksDuration of transfusion independence defined as the period of time where participants did not receive any platelet or red blood cells transfusions during the treatment period

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted across 7 centers in 1 country (Spain).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 25 participants were screened in this study of which 15 failed screening and 10 participants were enrolled in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Eltrombopag
Participants received eltrombopag orally once daily up to 36 weeks.
10
Total10

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDisease progression1
Overall StudyMyelodysplastic syndrome and study indication1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision2
Overall StudyPhysician Decision and Adverse Event1
Overall StudyProtocol deviation1
Overall StudyRelapse1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEltrombopag
Age, Continuous52.5 Years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 102 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 100 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 100 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Hematologic Response Rate by 16 Weeks After the Initiation of Eltrombopag

Hematologic response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who met the criteria of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) by Week 16. PR was defined when any of the following: Platelet count ≥ 20000/microliter(μL) (with platelet transfusion independence), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1000/μL (when pretreatment ANC was \<1000/μL) and/or hemoglobin (Hb) ≥100 gram(g)/ liter(L) (when pretreatment Hb was \<100g/L) (with red blood cells transfusion independence), confirmed in two blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. CR was defined when all of the following: platelet count ≥100000/μL, ANC ≥1500/μL (when pretreatment ANC was \<1000/μL) and Hb ≥110 g/L (when pretreatment Hb was \<100g/L), confirmed in two blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. Participants who discontinued before Week 16 were considered as responders if, in the last evaluation, they had PR or CR. The 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagHematologic Response Rate by 16 Weeks After the Initiation of Eltrombopag40.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Transfusion Independence

Duration of transfusion independence defined as the period of time where participants did not receive any platelet or red blood cells transfusions during the treatment period

Time frame: From start of treatment to end of treatment, assessed up to 36 weeks

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EltrombopagDuration of Transfusion Independence137.7 DaysStandard Deviation 110.4
Secondary

Hematologic Response Rate at Week 24 and 36

Hematologic response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who met the criteria of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at 24 weeks and 36 weeks after the initiation of eltrombopag. PR was defined when any of the following: Platelet count ≥20000/microliter (μL) (with platelet transfusion independence), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1000/μL (when pretreatment ANC was \<1000/μL) and/or hemoglobin (Hb) ≥100 gram (g)/ liter (L) (when pretreatment Hb was \<100g/L) (with red blood cells transfusion independence), confirmed in two blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. CR was defined when all three of the following: platelet count ≥100000/μL, ANC ≥1500/μL (when pretreatment ANC was \<1000/μL) and Hb ≥110 g/L (when pretreatment Hb was \<100g/L), confirmed in two blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: Week 24 and 36

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned. Number analyzed signified number of participants that reached the study week.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagHematologic Response Rate at Week 24 and 36Week 2483.3 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagHematologic Response Rate at Week 24 and 36Week 36100 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS defined as the time from the date of inclusion until the date of death due to any cause was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimated. All patients who discontinued from the study, regardless the reason of discontinuation, were followed for survival, unless they withdrew their consent, died or were lost-to follow-up, in which case were censored at the last contact.

Time frame: From start of treatment until the date of death, assessed up to 40 weeks

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EltrombopagOverall Survival (OS)NA Weeks
Secondary

Overall Survival Rate at 24 and 36 Weeks

Overall survival rate defined as the rate estimate of the percentage of participants who were alive at 24 and 36 weeks. All patients who discontinued from the study, regardless the reason of discontinuation, were followed for survival at Week 24 and 36, unless they withdrew their consent, died or were lost-to follow-up, in which case were censored at the last contact.

Time frame: Week 24 and 36

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagOverall Survival Rate at 24 and 36 WeeksWeek 3680.0 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagOverall Survival Rate at 24 and 36 WeeksWeek 2490.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued or Reduced the Use of Concomitant Erythropoietin (EPO) Therapy

Percentage of participants who discontinued or reduced by ≥50% from baseline the use of concomitant EPO therapy while receiving eltrombopag. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: From start of treatment to end of treatment, assessed up to Week 36

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned with evaluable data for this outcome measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued or Reduced the Use of Concomitant Erythropoietin (EPO) TherapyReduced by 50% EPO therapy0 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued or Reduced the Use of Concomitant Erythropoietin (EPO) TherapyDiscontinued EPO therapy37.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued or Reduced the Use of Concomitant Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Therapy

Percentage of participants who discontinued or reduced by ≥50% from baseline the use of concomitant G-CSF therapy while receiving eltrombopag. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: From start of treatment to end of treatment, assessed up to Week 36

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned with evaluable data for this outcome measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued or Reduced the Use of Concomitant Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) TherapyDiscontinued G-CSF therapy85.7 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued or Reduced the Use of Concomitant Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) TherapyReduced by 50% G-CSF therapy0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Hemoglobin Lineage

Percentage of participants who had a response (partial or complete) in the hemoglobin (Hb) lineage. A partial response in the Hb lineage was defined as Hb ≥100 g/L (when pretreatment Hb was \<100g/L) (with RBC transfusion independence), confirmed in two consecutive blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. A complete response in the Hb lineage was defined as Hb≥ 110 g/L (when pretreatment Hb was \<100g/L) confirmed in two consecutive blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 30 and 36

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned and pretreatment Hb \<100g/L. Number analyzed signified number of participants that reached the study week.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Hemoglobin LineageWeek 1660.0 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Hemoglobin LineageWeek 2060.0 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Hemoglobin LineageWeek 36100 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Hemoglobin LineageWeek 2480.0 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Hemoglobin LineageWeek 30100 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Neutrophil Lineage

Percentage of participants who had a response (partial or complete) in the neutrophil lineage. A partial response in the neutrophil lineage was defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1000/ µL (when pretreatment ANC was \<1000/μL) confirmed in two consecutive blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. A complete response in the neutrophil lineage was defined as ANC ≥ 1500/ µL (when pretreatment ANC was \<1000/μL) confirmed in two consecutive blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method

Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 30 and 36

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned and pretreatment ANC was \<1000 µL. Number analyzed signified number of participants that reached the study week.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Neutrophil LineageWeek 16100 Percentage of Participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Neutrophil LineageWeek 20100 Percentage of Participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Neutrophil LineageWeek 24100 Percentage of Participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Neutrophil LineageWeek 30100 Percentage of Participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Neutrophil LineageWeek 36100 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Platelet Lineage

Percentage of participants who had a response (partial or complete) in the platelet lineage. A partial response in the platelet lineage was defined as platelet count ≥20000/µL (with platelet transfusion independence) confirmed in two consecutive blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. A complete response in the platelet lineage was defined as platelet count ≥ 100000/µL confirmed in two consecutive blood tests separated a minimum of 7 days. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 30 and 36

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned. Number analyzed signified number of participants that reached the study week.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Platelet LineageWeek 2066.7 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Platelet LineageWeek 2483.3 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Platelet LineageWeek 1666.7 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Platelet LineageWeek 30100 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Had a Response in the Platelet LineageWeek 36100 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Previously Platelet Transfusion-dependent and Did no Longer Require Platelet Transfusions After the Initiation of Eltrombopag

Percentage of participants who received at least one platelet transfusion before starting treatment and who did no longer require platelet transfusion before and after the first 16 weeks of treatment. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: From start of treatment to end of treatment, assessed up to 36 weeks

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned and who received at least one platelet transfusion before starting treatment. Number analyzed signified number of participants with evaluable data for this outcome measure at specified time points

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Were Previously Platelet Transfusion-dependent and Did no Longer Require Platelet Transfusions After the Initiation of EltrombopagFrom start of treatment to Week 160 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Were Previously Platelet Transfusion-dependent and Did no Longer Require Platelet Transfusions After the Initiation of EltrombopagFrom Week 16 to end of treatment66.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Previously Red Blood Cells Transfusion-dependent and Did no Longer Require Red Blood Cells Transfusions

Percentage of participants who received at least one red blood cells transfusion before starting treatment and who did no longer require red blood cells transfusion before and after the first 16 weeks of treatment. The 95% CI was the binomial exact CI based on Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: From start of treatment to end of treatment, assessed up to 36 weeks

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned and who received at least one red blood cells transfusion before starting treatment. Number analyzed signified number of participants with evaluable data for this outcome measure at specified time points

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Were Previously Red Blood Cells Transfusion-dependent and Did no Longer Require Red Blood Cells TransfusionsFrom Week 16 to end of treatment50 Percentage of participants
EltrombopagPercentage of Participants Who Were Previously Red Blood Cells Transfusion-dependent and Did no Longer Require Red Blood Cells TransfusionsFrom start of treatment to Week 1616.7 Percentage of participants
Post Hoc

All Collected Deaths

On-treatment deaths due to any cause were collected from first dose of study medication to 30 days after the last dose of eltrombopag. Post-treament survival follow-up deaths were collected from day 31 after last dose of study medication to end of study. Participants who completed treatment with study drug as planned at Week 36, were followed up until Week 40 and deaths that occurred within that time frame were counted as on-treatment. For all participants who discontinued from eltrombopag, post-treatment deaths due to any cause were collected after the on-treatment period until end of survival follow-up period.

Time frame: On-treatment deaths: Up to 40 weeks. Post-treatment survival follow-up deaths: up to 40 weeks

Population: All participants to whom study treatment was assigned.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EltrombopagAll Collected DeathsOn-treatment deaths0 Participants
EltrombopagAll Collected DeathsPost-treatment survival follow-up deaths2 Participants
EltrombopagAll Collected DeathsAll deaths2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026