Skip to content

Thiamine as Adjunctive Therapy for Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Thiamine as Adjunctive Therapy for Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03717896
Enrollment
102
Registered
2018-10-24
Start date
2018-11-21
Completion date
2024-10-01
Last updated
2026-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Keywords

diabetic ketoacidosis, DKA, thiamine, acidosis, oxygen consumption, lactate

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine if administration of intravenous thiamine will lead to quicker resolution of acidosis in patients admitted to the hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis. The investigators will secondarily investigate whether thiamine improves cellular oxygen consumption, shortens intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay or decreases hospital resource utilization.

Detailed description

Thiamine (vitamin B1) is a water-soluble vitamin that plays a key role in aerobic glucose metabolism. Thiamine is a cofactor of pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), an enzyme that must be activated for entry into the Krebs Cycle for aerobic metabolism. PDH activity is reduced in thiamine deficient states, resulting in a shift in pyruvate metabolism to the anaerobic pathway. This leads to increased lactate production and acidosis. Thiamine loss in the urine, with consequent thiamine deficiency, is not uncommon in diabetes. The investigators' preliminary studies have found that thiamine deficiency in occurs in as many as 39% of patients with DKA, and that thiamine levels are inversely associated with lactate and acidosis. The investigator hypothesizes that treating DKA patients with intravenous thiamine will lead to faster resolution of acidosis and improved aerobic metabolism. The investigator's secondary hypothesis is that thiamine treatment will shorten stays in the ICU and hospital and lead to utilization of fewer hospital resources. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients admitted to the hospital with DKA who are enrolled in the study will be randomized to either intravenous thiamine (200mg in 0.9% saline) twice daily for two days or an identical volume of 0.9% saline on the same schedule. The investigator's primary outcome is change in bicarbonate over the 24 hours following enrollment, with measurements at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 hours, using a linear mixed-effects model. Secondarily, patients will be stratified by Type I and Type II DM. Additionally, a pre-planned sub-analysis of thiamine deficient subjects will be performed.

Interventions

DRUG200mg IV thiamine in 50mL 0.9% saline

Thiamine 200mg IV every 12 hours for 2 days

DRUGPlacebo

50mL 0.9% saline

Sponsors

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Bicarbonate ≤15 mEq/L * Anion gap \> 12 mEq/L * Blood pH≤ 7.24 (if already obtained by clinical team) * Urine ketones (qualitative) or serum ketones (β-hydroxybutyric acid) \> 3 mmol/L * Enrollment within 6 hours of presentation

Exclusion criteria

* Current thiamine supplementation ≥ 6 milligrams per day (i.e., more than a multivitamin) * Competing causes of severe acidosis including seizure, carbon monoxide poisoning, cyanide toxicity, cardiac arrest, liver dysfunction (specifically defined as known cirrhosis) * Known allergy to thiamine * Competing indication for thiamine administration as judged by the clinical team (e.g., significant alcohol use) * Research-protected populations (pregnant women and prisoners) * Patient enrolled previously in same study * Code status of Do Not Resuscitate/Do Not Intubate (DNR/DNI) or Comfort Measures Only (CMO)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasma Bicarbonate Levels6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after enrollmentPrimary outcome of plasma bicarbonate levels over 24 hours (6, 12, 18, 24 hours) following enrollment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lactate6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after enrollmentSecondary outcome of lactate over 24 hours (6, 12, 18, 24 hours) following enrollment
Anion Gap6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after enrollmentSecondary outcome of anion gap over 24 hours (6, 12, 18, 24 hours) following enrollment
ICU Length of Stay45 daysICU length of stay reflects the number of ICU admission days.
Hospital Length of Stay45 daysHospital length of stay reflects how long it takes a diabetic ketoacidosis patient to recover to the point where he/she can be released from the hospital.
Duration of Insulin TherapyFirst 7 days after enrollmentThe duration of insulin therapy is calculated by examining the hospital clinical information systems for all records of IV insulin infusion beginning at the time of enrollment. The start and the stop time-stamps of medication infusion are used to calculate a duration of infusion.
SOFA Score (Sequential Organ Failure Assessement Score)24 hoursThe SOFA score is a validated measure of organ dysfunction commonly used in critically ill patients, particularly those with sepsis. It evaluates the function of six organ systems-respiratory, cardiovascular, neurologic, hepatic, renal, and coagulation-based on routinely collected clinical and laboratory data. Each organ system is assigned a score from 0 (normal function) to 4 (most severe dysfunction), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 24. Higher SOFA scores indicate greater severity of organ failure and a higher risk of adverse outcomes. SOFA score in this study uses a modification in which the arterial oxygen saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen (SaO2 /FiO2) ratio is substituted for the partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2 /FiO2 ratio).
Oxygen Consumption by Circulating Mononuclear Cells24 hoursOxygen consumption rate of circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells measured using Seahorse. Basal respiration represents oxygen consumption under baseline conditions. ATP-linked respiration represents oxygen consumption coupled to ATP production, while proton leak represents oxygen consumption not linked to ATP synthesis. Maximal respiration represents the maximal capacity of the electron transport chain after uncoupling. Spare respiratory capacity represents the difference between maximal and basal respiration and indicates the ability to respond to increased energy demand. Non-mitochondrial respiration represents oxygen consumption independent of mitochondrial activity.
Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Activity24 hours and 72 hours (or at discharge if hostpial length of stay was less than 72 hours)Secondary outcome of change in PDH specific activity over 72 hours or at discharge if patient's hospital length of stay was less than 72 hours. PDH activity and total PDH protein quantity were measured in isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) following selective disruption of the mitochondrial membrane, using a previously validated immunocapture and microplate-based enzymatic assay protocol. PDH-specific activity was calculated as the ratio of measured PDH enzymatic activity to the natural logarithm of PDH protein quantity (PDH activity / ln\[PDH quantity\]), providing a normalized metric that reflects the functional efficiency of the enzyme independent of its expression level. Higher values suggest higher enzymatic efficiency.
Neurocognitive: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Total RecallAt hospital discharge, median of 4 daysThe Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Recall score is a measure of verbal learning and immediate memory. Participants are read a list of 12 words (from three semantic categories) and asked to recall as many words as possible across three consecutive learning trials. The Total Recall score is calculated as the sum of correctly recalled words across the three trials, yielding a possible range of 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating better verbal learning and memory performance. This score reflects both initial acquisition and short-term retention of verbal information and is commonly used to assess cognitive function in clinical research.
Neurocognitive: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Delayed RecallAt hospital discharge, median of 4 daysThe Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Delayed Recall score assesses retention of verbal information after a delay. Following completion of the three learning trials, participants are asked to recall the previously presented word list after a delay period (typically 20-25 minutes) without re-exposure to the words. The Delayed Recall score is calculated as the number of correctly recalled words, with a possible range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicate better memory retention. This measure reflects the ability to consolidate and retrieve learned information over time and is commonly used to evaluate memory function in clinical and research settings.
Neurocognitive: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - RetentionAt hospital discharge, median of 4 daysThe Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Retention (%) score reflects the proportion of learned information that is retained over a delay. It is calculated as the ratio of the Delayed Recall score to the highest number of words recalled on any of the three immediate recall trials, multiplied by 100, yielding a percentage value. Scores typically range from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating better retention of previously learned material. This measure provides an index of memory retention independent of initial learning performance.
Neurocognitive: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Recognition Discrimination IndexAt hospital discharge, median of 4 daysThe Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Recognition Discrimination Index assesses recognition memory by evaluating the ability to distinguish previously learned words from novel distractors. During the recognition phase, participants are presented with a list of target words and distractor words and asked to identify those that were previously learned. The Recognition Discrimination Index is calculated as the number of true positives (correctly identified target words) minus the number of false positives (incorrectly identified distractor words), yielding a score typically ranging from -12 to 12. Higher scores indicate better recognition accuracy and discrimination ability, reflecting the integrity of memory retrieval processes.
Neurocognitive: Brief Visuospatial Memory TestAt hospital discharge, median of 4 daysThe Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT) assesses visuospatial learning and memory. Participants are shown six geometric designs for a brief period and asked to reproduce them from memory across three learning trials. Performance is scored based on the accuracy and placement of each design, with a total recall score ranging from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate better visuospatial memory. A delayed recall trial is administered after a delay to assess retention of visual information. This measure evaluates the ability to encode, store, and retrieve visuospatial material.
Neurocognitive: Trail Making Test - Test Part AAt hospital discharge, median of 4 daysThe Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A) assesses visual attention, processing speed, and psychomotor function. Participants are instructed to connect numbered circles in sequential order as quickly as possible. The primary outcome is the time to completion, measured in seconds, with lower times indicating better performance. There is no fixed maximum score, although testing is typically discontinued at a predefined time limit (commonly 300 seconds).
Neurocognitive: Trail Making Test - Test Part BAt hospital discharge, median of 4 daysThe Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B) assesses executive function, including cognitive flexibility and set-shifting, in addition to processing speed. Participants are required to alternate between numbers and letters in sequence (e.g., 1-A-2-B) as quickly as possible. The primary outcome is the time to completion, measured in seconds, with lower times indicating better performance. As with TMT-A, there is no fixed maximum score, and testing is typically discontinued at a predefined time limit (commonly 300 seconds).
Neurocognitive: WAIS-IV Digit SpanAt hospital discharge, median of 4 daysThe Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) Digit Span subtest assesses attention, working memory, and concentration. Participants are asked to repeat sequences of numbers in forward order (Digit Span Forward), reverse order (Digit Span Backward), and ascending order (Digit Span Sequencing). Scores are based on the total number of correctly recalled sequences, with higher scores indicating better attention and working memory capacity. The total score ranges from 0 to 48.
Neurocognitive: Test of Verbal Fluency and Animal NamingAt hospital discharge, median of 4 daysThe Animal Naming test is a measure of semantic verbal fluency and executive function. Participants are asked to name as many animals as possible within a fixed time period. The score is the total number of unique, correct animal names generated, with higher scores indicating better semantic memory retrieval and executive functioning. Scores range from 0 with no fixed upper limit.
Neurocognitive: Test of Premorbid FunctioningAt hospital discharge, median of 4 daysThe Test of Premorbid Functioning (TOPF) estimates an individual's baseline cognitive ability prior to illness or injury. Participants are asked to read aloud a list of irregularly spelled words, and performance is scored based on correct pronunciation. Scores are used to estimate premorbid intellectual functioning. Scores range from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating higher estimated premorbid functioning. This measure helps contextualize current cognitive performance relative to expected baseline levels.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMichael Donnino, MD

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous43 years
Anion Gap25.0 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
Baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score1 scores on a scale
Bicarbonate8 mEq/L
Diabetes Mellitus Type
Type 1 diabetes mellitus
37 Participants
Diabetes Mellitus Type
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
15 Participants
DKA History
None
23 Participants
DKA History
Previous DKA
44 Participants
DKA History
Unknown
1 Participants
Glucose315 mg/dL
Insulin Drip at Enrollment
No
1 Participants
Insulin Drip at Enrollment
Yes
51 Participants
Insulin Pump Use
No
43 Participants
Insulin Pump Use
Yes
9 Participants
Lactate2.2 mmol/L
pH7.19 pH
Prior Insulin Use
No
13 Participants
Prior Insulin Use
Yes
73 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
54 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
100 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
Alcohol use disorder
0 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
CAD
3 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
CHF
2 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
COPD
0 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
Dementia
0 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
Diabetes
39 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
HIV/AIDS
1 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
Liver Disease
1 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
Malignancy
7 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
No PMH
7 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
Renal Disease
8 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
Stroke/TIA
1 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
Tobacco Use
7 Participants
Selected Past Medical History (PMH)
Transplant
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 521 / 48
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 520 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 520 / 48

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 24, 2026