Skip to content

Rotator Cuff Pathway

The Association Between a Comprehensive Multimodal Pathway And Pain 0-48 Hours After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Before-and After Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03717753
Enrollment
140
Registered
2018-10-24
Start date
2018-09-07
Completion date
2020-03-01
Last updated
2024-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Pain

Brief summary

Rotator cuff surgery is mostly performed on an outpatient basis, and many patients still experience moderate to severe pain after surgery, despite the use of regional anesthesia and opioids. The specific aim is to determine whether a comprehensive pathway that includes a well-defined regional technique and multimodal analgesia will reduce the worst pain with movement 0-48 hours after block placement compared to the current standard practice. This is a 'before and after' study. We plan to have 70 patients studied prior to initiation of a pathway, and 70 patients studied after initiation of a pathway. Both groups will receive identical postoperative follow-up.

Detailed description

Previous study in shoulder arthroplasty patients demonstrated low pain scores and minimal intravenous opioid use when utilizing a clinical pathway that included peripheral nerve block and preemptive non-opioid analgesia (Goon et al. 2014). These surgeries were done as inpatient and patients had availability of intravenous opioids. Assessment of the current approach to managing rotator cuff repairs demonstrated an average worst pain score after surgery of 7.0, SD 2.1 (Kahn) which is often categorized as severe pain. Given that most rotator cuff repairs are done as outpatients, it is important to develop a clinical pathway that mitigates the worst pain experienced after surgery. With outpatient surgery, there are obvious limitations regarding availability of rescue pain medications. Therefore, the pathway needs to emphasize patient education and strategies to reduce the pain as peripheral nerve block subsides. Given these issues, we believe there is an advantage to prolonging the analgesia from the nerve block (Rosenfeld et al. 2016, Yadeau et al. 2016, Kahn) and educating patients regarding the importance of preemptive analgesia and when to take opioid medications. This study will evaluate whether the clinical pathway might mitigate the worst pain after surgery that occurs with the current standard practice.

Interventions

OTHERPathway

The study team emphasizes that all components of the pathway are considered standard of care at this institution. The objective of this study is to ensure that the study patients assigned to the pathway will receive these standard of care components. Both groups will receive identical postoperative follow-up.

Sponsors

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ambulatory rotator cuff patients with participating surgeons. Includes the following concomitant procedures: * Arthroscopic SLAP (Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior) repair * Arthroscopic Stabilization * Arthroscopic AC (Acromioclavicular) resection * Arthroscopic SAD (Sub-Acromial Decompression) * Arthroscopic or mini open biceps tenodesis * Age 18-80

Exclusion criteria

* chronic pain history (defined as use of opioids \> 3 months or current gabapentinoids for pain) * open surgery (but sub pectoralis mini open biceps tenodesis is not excluded) * revision surgery * kidney disease (GFR \< 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 for 3 months or more) * liver disease (transaminitis, cirrhosis, hepatitis, hypoalbuminemia, coagulopathy) * planned avoidance of regional anesthesia * any contraindication to or patient refusal of any component in the pathway * Non-English speakers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Outcome - Worst NRS With Movement0-48 hours after block placementworst NRS with movement. A lower score is a better outcome. The score range is between 0 and 10.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Opioid UsePost Op Days 1,2,7,14The total opioid consumption measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Although recorded at different time points, the total MME per patient was calculated.
Patient Satisfaction With Pain ManagementPost Op Days 1,2,7,14Measures the patient's satisfaction with their pain management on a scale of 0-10. A higher score is a better outcome.
Pain Score at RestPost Op Days 1,2,7,14a NRS score on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 means no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. A lower score is a better outcome.
Block DurationThrough Post Op Day 2Measures the duration of the block from: the time the block started to the time the block completely wore off the time the block started to the time the patient first noticed pain the time the block started to the time the patient felt normal sensation

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Before Group
We plan to have 70 patients studied prior to initiation of a pathway.
70
After Group
We plan to have 70 patients studied after initiation of a pathway. Pathway: The study team emphasizes that all components of the pathway are considered standard of care at this institution. The objective of this study is to ensure that the study patients assigned to the pathway will receive these standard of care components.
70
Total140

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBefore GroupTotalAfter Group
Age, Continuous55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
ASA Level
ASA I
17 Participants29 Participants12 Participants
ASA Level
ASA II
51 Participants104 Participants53 Participants
ASA Level
ASA III
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
BMI27.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
28.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
28.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
66 Participants135 Participants69 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Procedure Time47 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
52 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
57 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
62 Participants121 Participants59 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
70 participants140 participants70 participants
Rotator Cuff Repair Performed59 Participants123 Participants64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants60 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants80 Participants38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 700 / 70
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 700 / 70
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 700 / 70

Outcome results

Primary

Primary Outcome - Worst NRS With Movement

worst NRS with movement. A lower score is a better outcome. The score range is between 0 and 10.

Time frame: 0-48 hours after block placement

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Before GroupPrimary Outcome - Worst NRS With MovementPost-Op Day 15.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Before GroupPrimary Outcome - Worst NRS With MovementPost-Op Day 26.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
After GroupPrimary Outcome - Worst NRS With MovementPost-Op Day 13.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
After GroupPrimary Outcome - Worst NRS With MovementPost-Op Day 26.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Secondary

Block Duration

Measures the duration of the block from: the time the block started to the time the block completely wore off the time the block started to the time the patient first noticed pain the time the block started to the time the patient felt normal sensation

Time frame: Through Post Op Day 2

Population: Some patients were lost to follow up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Before GroupBlock DurationTime to first notice pain21.1 hours
Before GroupBlock DurationTime to block start to wear off20.1 hours
Before GroupBlock DurationTime to block to completely wear off22.7 hours
Before GroupBlock DurationTime to normal sensation22.8 hours
After GroupBlock DurationTime to normal sensation28.6 hours
After GroupBlock DurationTime to first notice pain25.4 hours
After GroupBlock DurationTime to block to completely wear off28.4 hours
After GroupBlock DurationTime to block start to wear off23.2 hours
Secondary

Pain Score at Rest

a NRS score on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 means no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. A lower score is a better outcome.

Time frame: Post Op Days 1,2,7,14

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Before GroupPain Score at RestPost-Op Day 14.0 score on a scale ofStandard Deviation 2.9
Before GroupPain Score at RestPost-Op Day 24.2 score on a scale ofStandard Deviation 2.1
Before GroupPain Score at RestPost-Op Day 72.3 score on a scale ofStandard Deviation 2.1
Before GroupPain Score at RestPost-Op Day 142.2 score on a scale ofStandard Deviation 1.9
After GroupPain Score at RestPost-Op Day 141.7 score on a scale ofStandard Deviation 1.4
After GroupPain Score at RestPost-Op Day 11.9 score on a scale ofStandard Deviation 2.3
After GroupPain Score at RestPost-Op Day 73 score on a scale ofStandard Deviation 2.4
After GroupPain Score at RestPost-Op Day 24.7 score on a scale ofStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction With Pain Management

Measures the patient's satisfaction with their pain management on a scale of 0-10. A higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame: Post Op Days 1,2,7,14

Population: Some patients were lost to follow up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Before GroupPatient Satisfaction With Pain ManagementPOD18.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Before GroupPatient Satisfaction With Pain ManagementPOD78.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Before GroupPatient Satisfaction With Pain ManagementPOD28.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Before GroupPatient Satisfaction With Pain ManagementPOD149 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Before GroupPatient Satisfaction With Pain ManagementPOD09.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
After GroupPatient Satisfaction With Pain ManagementPOD149.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
After GroupPatient Satisfaction With Pain ManagementPOD09.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
After GroupPatient Satisfaction With Pain ManagementPOD19.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
After GroupPatient Satisfaction With Pain ManagementPOD28.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
After GroupPatient Satisfaction With Pain ManagementPOD79.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Secondary

Total Opioid Use

The total opioid consumption measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Although recorded at different time points, the total MME per patient was calculated.

Time frame: Post Op Days 1,2,7,14

Population: some patients were lost to follow up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Before GroupTotal Opioid Use0-24 hours15 morphine equivalent units (mg)
Before GroupTotal Opioid Use24-48 hours22.5 morphine equivalent units (mg)
Before GroupTotal Opioid UsePOD70 morphine equivalent units (mg)
Before GroupTotal Opioid UsePOD140 morphine equivalent units (mg)
After GroupTotal Opioid UsePOD140 morphine equivalent units (mg)
After GroupTotal Opioid Use0-24 hours0 morphine equivalent units (mg)
After GroupTotal Opioid UsePOD70 morphine equivalent units (mg)
After GroupTotal Opioid Use24-48 hours15 morphine equivalent units (mg)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026