Skip to content

Real-world CANadian CUvitru Non-Interventional Study in Subjects Transitioning From Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (CANCUN)

Real-world CANadian CUvitru Non-Interventional Study in Subjects Transitioning From Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (CANCUN)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03716700
Enrollment
126
Registered
2018-10-23
Start date
2018-09-24
Completion date
2020-07-23
Last updated
2021-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PID)

Brief summary

This study will provide insights on the infusion parameters, dosing, and experience of participants transitioning to CUVITRU in a real-world setting.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALCUVITRU

CUVITRU

Sponsors

Baxalta Innovations GmbH, now part of Shire
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Baxalta now part of Shire
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(The participant will not be considered eligible for the study without meeting all of the criteria below): * Voluntarily provide written, signed, and dated (personally or via a legally authorized representative) informed consent or assent as applicable to participate in the study; * Participant \> 2 years of age with a documented diagnosis of PID or SID requiring IgG replacement therapy, as defined by the International Union of Immunological Societies Scientific Committee 2009 and by diagnostic criteria according to Conley et al., 1999; * Participant has received subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy previous to CUVITRU for at least 3 months; and * Participant has received CUVITRU in line with the product specification (CUVITRU Product Monograph (Baxalta Canada Corporation, 2018) at start of study

Exclusion criteria

(Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria are met): * Participation in any interventional clinical study within the last 30 days * Participant participates in a clinical study in parallel during the observation period; and * Participant had a dose change 30 days prior to transition to CUVITRU for Cohort 1

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infusion parameter 1: Cohort 3- 12 Month Final Follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian infusion volume per site.
Infusion parameter 1.1: Cohort 3- 12 Month Final Follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian infusion volume per infusion.
Infusion parameter 1: Cohort 1-Start of data collectionBaselineMedian infusion volume per site
Infusion parameter 1: Cohort 1- Month 3Month 3Median infusion volume per site
Infusion parameter 1: Cohort 1- Month 6Month 6Median infusion volume per site
Infusion parameter 1: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian infusion volume per site
Infusion parameter 1: Cohort 2- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian infusion volume per site
Infusion parameter 1: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian infusion volume per site
Infusion parameter 1.1: Cohort 1- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian infusion volume per infusion
Infusion parameter 1.1: Cohort 1- Month 3Month 3Median infusion volume per infusion
Infusion parameter 1.1: Cohort 1- Month 6Month 6Median infusion volume per infusion
Infusion parameter 3.3: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusions to reach final dose interval per participant
Infusion parameter 1.1: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian infusion volume per infusion
Infusion parameter 1.1: Cohort 2- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian infusion volume per infusion
Infusion parameter 1.1: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian infusion volume per infusion
Infusion parameter 2: Cohort 1- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian number of infusion sites
Infusion parameter 2: Cohort 1- Month 3Month 3Median number of infusion sites
Infusion parameter 2: Cohort 1- Month 6Month 6Median number of infusion sites
Infusion parameter 2: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusion sites
Infusion parameter 2: Cohort 2- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian number of infusion sites
Infusion parameter 2: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusion sites
Infusion parameter 3: Cohort 1- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian infusion duration
Infusion parameter 3: Cohort 1- Month 3Month 3Median infusion duration
Infusion parameter 3: Cohort 1- Month 6Month 6Median infusion duration
Infusion parameter 3: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian infusion duration
Infusion parameter 3: Cohort 2- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian infusion duration
Infusion parameter 3: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian infusion duration
Infusion parameter 3.1: Cohort 1- Month 3 Follow-upMonth 3Median number of infusions to reach participant's maximum infusion volume
Infusion parameter 3.1: Cohort 1- Month 6 Follow-upMonth 6Median number of infusions to reach participant's maximum infusion volume
Infusion parameter 3.1: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusions to reach participant's maximum infusion volume
Infusion parameter 3.1: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusions to reach participant's maximum infusion volume
Infusion parameter 3.2: Cohort 1- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian number of infusions per month per participant
Infusion parameter 3.2: Cohort 1- Month 3Month 3Median number of infusions per month per participant
Infusion parameter 3.2: Cohort 1- Month 6Month 6Median number of infusions per month per participant
Infusion parameter 3.2: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusions per month per participant
Infusion parameter 3.2: Cohort 2- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian number of infusions per month per participant
Infusion parameter 3.2: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusions per month per participant
Infusion parameter 3.3: Cohort 1- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian number of infusions to reach final dose interval per participant
Infusion parameter 3.3: Cohort 1- Month 3Month 3Median number of infusions to reach final dose interval per participant
Infusion parameter 3.3: Cohort 1- Month 6Month 6Median number of infusions to reach final dose interval per participant
Infusion parameter 3.3: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusions to reach final dose interval per participant
Infusion parameter 3.3: Cohort 2- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian number of infusions to reach final dose interval per participant
Infusion parameter 2: Cohort 3- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusion sites.
Infusion parameter 3: Cohort 3- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian infusion duration.
Infusion parameter 3.1: Cohort 3- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusions to reach participant's maximum infusion volume (infusion rate)
Infusion parameter 3.2: Cohort 3- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusions per month per participant
Infusion parameter 3.3: Cohort 3- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusions to reach final dose interval per participant

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Preference Questionnaire (TPQ): Cohort 212 Month final follow-upThe TPQ is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess participants' preference towards the administration of new subcutaneous immunoglobulin G (SCIG) therapy. There are 4-items on the questionnaire, which investigate a participant's preference on the clinic/hospital/home setting of receiving the immunoglobulin therapy, the participant's rating on the frequency and method of administration, and the participant's preference to continue receiving the SCIG treatment.
Infusion parameter 4.1: Cohort 3- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian maximal infusion rate per site
Treatment Preference Questionnaire (TPQ): Cohort 312 Month final follow-upThe TPQ is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess participants' preference towards the administration of new subcutaneous immunoglobulin G (SCIG) therapy. There are 4-items on the questionnaire, which investigate a participant's preference on the clinic/hospital/home setting of receiving the immunoglobulin therapy, the participant's rating on the frequency and method of administration, and the participant's preference to continue receiving the SCIG treatment.
Infusion parameter 4.2: Cohort 3- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upNumber of infusions that are discontinued, slowed, or interrupted
Infusion parameter 4.1: Cohort 1- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian maximal infusion rate per site
Infusion parameter 4.1: Cohort 1- Month 3Month 3Median maximal infusion rate per site
Infusion parameter 4.1: Cohort 1- Month 6Month 6Median maximal infusion rate per site
Infusion parameter 4.1: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian maximal infusion rate per site
Infusion parameter 4.1: Cohort 2- Start of data collectionBaselineMedian maximal infusion rate per site
Infusion parameter 4.1: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian maximal infusion rate per site
Infusion parameter 4.2: Cohort 1- Start of data collectionBaselineNumber of infusions that are discontinued, slowed, or interrupted
Infusion parameter 4.2: Cohort 1- Month 3Month 3Number of infusions that are discontinued, slowed, or interrupted
Infusion parameter 4.2: Cohort 1- Month 6Month 6Number of infusions that are discontinued, slowed, or interrupted
Infusion parameter 4.2: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upNumber of infusions that are discontinued, slowed, or interrupted
Infusion parameter 4.2: Cohort 2- Start of data collectionBaselineNumber of infusions that are discontinued, slowed, or interrupted
Infusion parameter 4.2: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upNumber of infusions that are discontinued, slowed, or interrupted
Infusion parameter 4.3: Cohort 1- Month 3Month 3Median number of infusions to reach participant's maximum infusion rate
Infusion parameter 4.3: Cohort 1- Month 6Month 6Median number of infusions to reach participant's maximum infusion rate
Infusion parameter 4.3: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusions to reach participant's maximum infusion rate
Infusion parameter 4.3: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusions to reach participant's maximum infusion rate
Infusion parameter 5.1: Cohort 1- Start of data collectionBaselineMean dose
Infusion parameter 5.1: Cohort 1- Month 3Month 3Mean dose
Infusion parameter 5.1: Cohort 1- Month 6Month 6Mean dose
Infusion parameter 5.1: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMean dose
Infusion parameter 5.1: Cohort 2- Start of data collectionBaselineMean dose
Infusion parameter 5.1: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMean dose
Infusion parameter 5.2: Cohort 1- Start of data collectionBaselineMean dosing interval
Infusion parameter 5.2: Cohort 1- Month 3Month 3Mean dosing interval
Infusion parameter 5.2: Cohort 1- Month 6Month 6Mean dosing interval
Infusion parameter 5.2: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMean dosing interval
Infusion parameter 5.2: Cohort 2- Start of data collectionBaselineMean dosing interval
Infusion parameter 5.2: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMean dosing interval
Infusion parameter 5.3: Cohort 1- Start of data collectionBaselineMean number of dose adjustments
Infusion parameter 5.3: Cohort 1- Month 3Month 3Mean number of dose adjustments
Infusion parameter 5.3: Cohort 1- Month 6Month 6Mean number of dose adjustments
Infusion parameter 5.3: Cohort 1- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMean number of dose adjustments
Infusion parameter 5.3: Cohort 2- Start of data collectionBaselineMean number of dose adjustments
Infusion parameter 5.3: Cohort 2- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMean number of dose adjustments
Infusion parameter 4.3: Cohort 3- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMedian number of infusions to reach participant's maximum infusion rate
Infusion parameter 5.1: Cohort 3- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMean dose
Infusion parameter 5.2: Cohort 3- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMean dosing interval
Infusion parameter 5.3: Cohort 3- 12 Month final follow-up12 Month final follow-upMean number of dose adjustments
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9): Cohort 112 Month final follow-upTSQM-9 is a 9-item, validated, self-administered instrument used to assess participant's satisfaction with medication. The three domains assessed are effectiveness (3 items), convenience (3 items), and global satisfaction (3 items). Scores for each domain are calculated by adding up the items in each domain and then transforming the composite score into a value ranging from 0 to 100. Higher score indicated greater satisfaction in that domain.
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9): Cohort 212 Month final follow-upTSQM-9 is a 9-item, validated, self-administered instrument used to assess participant's satisfaction with medication. The three domains assessed are effectiveness (3 items), convenience (3 items), and global satisfaction (3 items). Scores for each domain are calculated by adding up the items in each domain and then transforming the composite score into a value ranging from 0 to 100. Higher score indicated greater satisfaction in that domain.
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9): Cohort 312 Month final follow-upTSQM-9 is a 9-item, validated, self-administered instrument used to assess participant's satisfaction with medication. The three domains assessed are effectiveness (3 items), convenience (3 items), and global satisfaction (3 items). Scores for each domain are calculated by adding up the items in each domain and then transforming the composite score into a value ranging from 0 to 100. Higher score indicated greater satisfaction in that domain.
Life Quality Index (LQI): Cohort 112 Month final follow-upThe LQI is a self-administered questionnaire developed specifically for participants/legal guardians involved in IVIG treatments. It consists of 15-items, divided into four domains: treatment interferences (6 items), therapy-related problems (4 items), therapy setting (3 items), and treatment costs (2 items). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1: Extremely bad to 7: Extremely good. Total scores range from 15 to 105, with higher scores indicating the highest possible satisfaction with factors such as independence, therapy convenience, social/school/work activities, and health and travel costs.
Life Quality Index (LQI): Cohort 212 Month final follow-upThe LQI is a self-administered questionnaire developed specifically for participants/legal guardians involved in IVIG treatments. It consists of 15-items, divided into four domains: treatment interferences (6 items), therapy-related problems (4 items), therapy setting (3 items), and treatment costs (2 items). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1: Extremely bad to 7: Extremely good. Total scores range from 15 to 105, with higher scores indicating the highest possible satisfaction with factors such as independence, therapy convenience, social/school/work activities, and health and travel costs
Life Quality Index (LQI): Cohort 312 Month final follow-upThe LQI is a self-administered questionnaire developed specifically for participants/legal guardians involved in IVIG treatments. It consists of 15-items, divided into four domains: treatment interferences (6 items), therapy-related problems (4 items), therapy setting (3 items), and treatment costs (2 items). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1: Extremely bad to 7: Extremely good. Total scores range from 15 to 105, with higher scores indicating the highest possible satisfaction with factors such as independence, therapy convenience, social/school/work activities, and health and travel costs
Treatment Preference Questionnaire (TPQ): Cohort 112 Month final follow-upThe TPQ is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess participants' preference towards the administration of new subcutaneous immunoglobulin G (SCIG) therapy. There are 4-items on the questionnaire, which investigate a participant's reference on the clinic/hospital/home setting of receiving the immunoglobulin therapy, the participant's rating on the frequency and method of administration, and the participant's preference to continue receiving the SCIG treatment.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026