Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for High Risk Laparotomy Wounds. A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.

Dehiscence of Internal Surgical Wound, Surgical Site Infection, Surgical Wound, Wound Dehiscence, Surgical

negative pressure wound closure, surgical site infection, cost effectiveness

Negative pressure wound closure technique (NPWT) has been widely introduced in different clinical settings. Most of the studies report it as an effective and cost-effective method to treat complicated surgical wounds or even open abdomen. NPWT as a prophylactic effort to prevent complications of high risk surgical wounds has recently been introduced, but the concept is still lacking clinical evidence in terms of clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness. In this randomized, multi centric study investigators aim to compare prophylactic negative pressure wound closure (ciNPWT) with traditional, dry wound dressing at high infection risk laparotomy wounds.

The aim is to compare ciNPWT (closed incisional negative pressure wound dress) technique to the traditional, dry wound dressing technique at high infection risk laparotomy wounds. Control arm will be treated as usual: sterile gauze or high-absorbing surgical wound dress. Experimental arm will be dressed with: one layer of silver-containing, impregnated mesh laxer (Atrauman® Ag - Hartmann) directly placed on the primary closed wound, one layer of alcohol-soaked foam (VivanoMed® White Foam - Hartmann) and sufficient-size sealant film (Hydrofilm® - Hartmann). A negative pressure of -90 Hgmm will be administered in a continuous mode over 5 days postoperatively. Surgical site infection and abdominal wall dehiscence rate will be assessed, as well as cost effectiveness will be calculated at both arms.

Hungary