Breast Cancer Stage III
Conditions
Keywords
breast cancer, supraclavicular lymph node, dissection, radiotherpy, prognosis
Brief summary
Breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis are defined as Ⅲc stage (N3) according to the newly published 8th AJCC TNM staging system. No concret guide line was supported to such patients. It is still pending whether to exert supraclavicular lymph node dissection to breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis. To evaluate the clinical significance and complication of supraclavicular lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis, the investigators randomize patients into two groups, one group is supraclavicular lymph node dissection with radiotherapy group, the other group is radiotherapy group.
Detailed description
Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of deaths from cancer in women worldwide. Breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis are defined as Ⅲc stage (N3) according to the newly published 8th AJCC TNM staging system. Clinical outcomes are similar for patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastases at first presentation and for patients with recurrent ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastases. The survival rate was lower in patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastases than in patients with lower axillary or subclavian nodal involvement. No concrete guide line was supported to such patients. It is still pending whether to exert supraclavicular lymph node dissection to breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis. Patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastases who were treated with surgery or radiotherapy and achieved good neck control were reported to achieve better survival than those for whom surgical treatment or irradiation did not result in good local control. Patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastases should be offered a combined modality approach, including systemic therapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Furthermore, local treatment, usually including axillary and supraclavicular lymph node, either by surgical clearance or by radical radiotherapy, can prevent the tumor cells from drainage, might be play a more important role. However, the role of surgical removal of the supraclavicular nodes is uncertain compared with radical radiotherapy. To our knowledge, the available literature comparing these two local treatments of ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastases is scarce. Furthermore, the studies comparing the outcome of dissection of supraclavicular lymph node combined with local radiotherapy and radiotherapy of supraclavicular lymph node is also rare. All the related reports up to date have mixed them up. To evaluate the clinical significance and complication of supraclavicular lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis, we randomize patients into two groups, one group is supraclavicular lymph node dissection with radiotherapy group, the other group is radiotherapy group. Therefore, in addition to investigating the role of surgical removal of the supraclavicular nodes in Chinese patients, we also try to reveal the potential difference between these two treatments, hoping to bring more insight into clinical practice.
Interventions
PROCEDUREsupraclavicular lymph node dissection
people with supraclavicular lymph node metastasis before surgery should receive dissection of supraclavicular lymph node and the supraclavicular lymph node metastasis should be confirmed either by core needle biopsy or fine needle aspiration biopsy
RADIATIONsupraclavicular area radiotherapy
people with supraclavicular lymph node metastasis before surgery should receive radiotherapy of supraclavicular area and the supraclavicular lymph node metastasis should be confirmed either by core needle biopsy or fine needle aspiration biopsy
Sponsors
Xinhong Wu, PhD
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
No minimum to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Ability to understand the study procedures and contents, and willingness to voluntarily sign the written informed consent form; 2. Age≤75 years old, female; 3. Histologically confirmed breast cancer; 4. Histologically or cytologically confirmed ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis； 5. cT0-T3； 6. low and moderate risk for anesthesia
Exclusion criteria
1. Absolute and relative contraindication for surgery or radiation； 2. existing distant metastasis before surgery； 3. non-invasive breast cancer； 4. with contralateral breast cancer； 5. Previous history of breast cancer or other malignancies； 6. ECOG≥2； 7. inflammatory breast cancer； 8. pregnancy； 9. any serious complications which caused patients not suitable to participate this study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Disease free survival | 3-5 years | Disease free survival for 3 years and 5 years, which means the rate of patients without local recurrence and distant metastasis in the whole patients at the same group will be calculated with Kaplan Meier survival curves. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Occurring rate of complications | 3-5 years | Occurring rate of complications including the occurring rate of infection, hemorrhage, limb lymphedema, time in hospital, brachial plexopahy, radiation induced lung injury in each group were recorded in patients' medical record. |
| Overall survival | 3-5 years | Overall survival for 3 years and 5 years, which means the rate of patients alive in the whole patients at the same group will be calculated with kaplan meier survival curves. |
| Life quality score | 3-5 years | Life quality score was evaluated by European Organization of Research and treatment of Cancer-Questionnaire of Life Quality-C30 Version 3 (EORTC-QLQ-C30 V3), which conduct a series of questions about the patients' physical condition, activity of daily life, adverse reaction and mood condition. The range in the questionnaire for the score is from 1 to 4, in which 1 stands for having no discomfort and 4 stands for having great discomfort. |
| Recurrence free survival | 3-5 years | Recurrence free survival for 3 years and 5 years, which means the rate of patients without local recurrence in the whole patients at the same group will be calculated with Kaplan Meier survival curves. |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed