Skip to content

Adjuvant De-Escalated Radiation + Adjuvant Nivolumab for Intermediate-High Risk P16+ Oropharynx Cancer

Phase II Trial of Adjuvant De-Escalated Radiation + Concurrent and Adjuvant Nivolumab for Intermediate-High Risk P16+ Oropharynx Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03715946
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-10-23
Start date
2018-11-16
Completion date
2024-03-31
Last updated
2025-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell of Head and Neck, Oropharynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

Oropharynx Cancer, OPSCC, Nivolumab, Adjuvant therapy, De-Escalated Radiation, Squamous cell carcinoma, P16+, Head and Neck cancer, Oropharynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell of Head and Neck, Transoral surgery, Radiotherapy

Brief summary

This clinical trial will evaluate a new combination of treatments for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell cancers (OPSCC), and compare it to the current standard of care (concurrent, platinum-based chemoradiotherapy). Chemoradiotherapy is efficacious, but also associated with significant toxicities and is only suitable for patients with good performance status and without severe comorbidities. The purpose of this trial is to demonstrate equivalent oncologic outcome with fewer adverse effects and improved quality of life when compared to the standard of care.

Detailed description

This study aims to enroll 135 patients (male and female, age 18+) who are newly diagnosed with resectable, squamous cell carcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma of the oropharynx. Survival rate and treatment response of OPSCC varies based on HPV infection status and genotype; therefore, in this study, only patients who are HPV seropositive and have HPV type 16 will be enrolled. All patients will receive the same treatment, i.e. there is no active control group. In this trial, patients will undergo transoral surgery followed by de-intensified adjuvant radiotherapy plus nivolumab. The radiotherapy will consist of 45 or 50 Gy (depending on tumor volume) in 25 daily fractions, 6 fractions per week. Nivolumab will be administered at a fixed dose of 240 mg over 30 minutes IV every 2 weeks during radiotherapy, and at 480 mg over 60 minutes IV every 4 weeks for 6 doses after radiotherapy. The first dose will be given prior to the first fraction of radiation (Day 1) on Day -3 (+/- 2 days), and continued every 2 weeks (+/- 2 days). Nivolumab will thus be given in weeks 2 and 4 of radiotherapy. Adjuvant nivolumab will then be given for a total of 6 additional doses after the completion of radiotherapy every 4 weeks (+/- 7 days), starting in the second or third week after the completion of radiotherapy. Doses of nivolumab may be interrupted, delayed, or discontinued depending on how well the subject tolerates the treatment. Relevant outcome measures include disease free survival (2 year post surgery); percutaneous gastronomy dependence (1-year postsurgery); acute and late toxicity; patient-reported Quality of Life measures, locoregional control and distant metastatic control.

Interventions

A fully human anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody

45-50 Gy accelerated fractionation in 25 daily fractions, 6 fractions per week

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Robert L. Ferris, MD, PhD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>/= 18 years. * ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. * Patients must have newly diagnosed, histologically or cytologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma of the oropharynx. Patients must have been determined to have resectable oropharyngeal disease. Patients with primary tumor or nodal metastasis fixed to the carotid artery, skull base or cervical spine are not eligible. * Patients must have intermediate risk factors, as described below as determined by imaging studies (performed \< 45 days prior to registration) and complete neck exam, from the skull base to the clavicles. The following imaging is required: CT scan of neck only with IV contrast or MRI. PET scan of HN and chest with IV contrasted CT correlation is encouraged prior to enrollment. Intermediate risk features: Tobacco \<10 pk-yr: T0-3 plus any one of the following: \>N2b (\> 5 LN's +), N2c/N3, +ENE \>1 mm, or + margin (if approved by surgical chair) OR Tobacco \>10 pk-yr: T0-3 plus any one of the following: any N2, N3, +ENE \>1 mm, or + margin (if approved by surgical chair) * Patients must have no evidence of distant metastases (M0) * Patients must have biopsy-proven p16+ oropharynx cancer; the histologic evidence of invasive squamous cell carcinoma may have been obtained from the primary tumor or metastatic lymph node. It is required that patients have a positive p16 IHC (as surrogate for HPV) status from either the primary tumor or metastatic lymph node. * Carcinoma of the oropharynx associated with HPV as determined by p16 protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed by a CLIA approved laboratory. * No prior radiation above the clavicles. * Patients with a history of a curatively treated malignancy must be disease-free for at least two years except for carcinoma in situ of cervix, differentiated thyroid cancer, melanoma in-situ (if fully resected), and/or non-melanomatous skin cancer, or clinically negligible in judgement of investigator. * Patients with the following within the last 6 months prior to registration must be evaluated by a cardiologist and / or neurologist prior to entry into the study. * Congestive heart failure \> NYHA Class II * CVA / TIA * Unstable angina * Myocardial infarction (with or without ST elevation) * Patients must have acceptable renal and hepatic function within 4 weeks prior to registration as defined below: * Absolute neutrophil count ≥1,500/mm3 * Platelets ≥ 100,000/mm3 * Total bilirubin ≤ the upper limit of normal (ULN) * Calculated creatinine clearance must be \> 60 ml/min using the Cockcroft-Gault formula: (140-age)\*wt(kg)/(\[Cr\]\*72). For women the calculation should be multiplied by 0.85 * Women must not be pregnant or breast-feeding. All females of childbearing potential must have a blood test or urine study within 2 weeks prior to registration to rule out pregnancy. A female of childbearing potential is any woman, regardless of sexual orientation or whether they have undergone tubal ligation, who meets the following criteria: 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or 2) has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months). * Patient without intercurrent illness likely to interfere with protocol therapy. * Patients must not have uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled infection despite antibiotics or uncontrolled hypertension within 30 days prior to registration.

Exclusion criteria

* Any serious or uncontrolled medical disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration, impair the ability of the subject to receive protocol therapy, or interfere with the interpretation of study results. * Subjects with active, known or suspected autoimmune disease. Subjects with vitiligo, type I diabetes mellitus, residual hypothyroidism due to autoimmune condition only requiring hormone replacement, psoriasis not requiring systemic treatment, or conditions not expected to recur in the absence of an external trigger are permitted to enroll. * Subjects with a condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (\> 10 mg daily prednisone equivalents) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days of study drug administration. Inhaled or topical steroids and adrenal replacement doses \> 10 mg daily prednisone equivalents are permitted in the absence of active autoimmune disease. * Prior treatment with an anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, anti-CTLA-4 antibody, or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting T-cell co-stimulation or immune checkpoint pathways. * Treatment with any chemotherapy, radiation therapy, biologics for cancer, or investigational therapy within 30 days of first administration of study treatment (subjects with prior radiation, cytotoxic or investigational products \< 4 weeks prior to treatment might be eligible after discussion between investigator and sponsor, if toxicities from the prior treatment have been resolved to Grade 1 (NCI CTCAE version 4). * Known positive test for hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBV sAg) or hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV antibody) indicating acute or chronic infection. Subjects who test positive for HCV antibody but negative for HCV ribonucleic acid are permitted to enroll. * Known history of testing positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and CD4 count \< 200 or known acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). * Any Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities. * History of allergy to study drug components. * History of severe hypersensitivity reaction to any human monoclonal antibody. * Prisoners or subjects who are involuntarily incarcerated. * Subjects compulsorily detained for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical (e.g., infectious disease) illness.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
One-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)At 1 year post start of treatmentThe probability of PFS measured from of beginning of study treatment, without local, regional or distant disease recurrence (appearance of new metastatic lesions). Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.
PEG Tube DependenceAt 1-year post-surgeryPresence /absence of enteral feeding tube.
Two-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)At 2 years post start of treatmentThe probability of PFS measured from of beginning of study treatment, without local, regional or distant disease recurrence (appearance of new metastatic lesions). Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)At baselineThe MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20 - item written questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (scoring is 5-strongly disagree, 4-disagree, 3-no opinion, 2-agree, 1-strongly agree). Subscales evaluate the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. A composite score is generated by calculating the mean response for the 19 items (excluding the global question) making up the emotional, functional and physical subscales and multiplying the result by 20, resulting in a score ranging from 20 representing a low QOL function to 100 indicating high QOL. Higher scores indicate better perception of swallowing function.
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score (Total)Calculated at 30 months after start of treatmentTotal scores as mean average of the combined timepoint values for the FACT-H&N (version 4)17 consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true the statements are for them for the past 7 days. Subscale responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)At baselineMDASI-HN measures treatment related symptom burden in head and neck cancer patients. The 20-item MDASI measures both severity and burden of symptoms and their effect on patients' daily activities, using a numeric rating scale of 0-10. This instrument includes 13 core symptoms and 9 head and neck specific items. Higher scores indicate superior perception of function.
MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN) (Total)Calculated at 30 months after start of treatmentTotal scores as mean average of the combined timepoint values. Includes all time-points for MDASI-HN is a 28 symptom items questionnaire of 13 general cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, fatigue and nausea; 9 HNC-related symptoms, such as problems with mucus in mouth and difficulty swallowing or chewing; 6 items to evaluate the effects of symptoms on daily life, including mood and enjoyment of life. Each item/subscale is rated on a 11-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine), while the items that assess the interference of symptoms on daily activities are rated from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely). When calculating any subscale score (arithmetic mean of items in the subscale), a majority of the subscale's items must have been responded to (7 of the 13 core symptom severity items or 4 of the 6 interference items would represent the majority of the items for the subscale).Total scores range 0-280;higher scores mean better life quality.
EuroQoL-5D QuestionnaireAt baselineEQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A value set consists of weights that can convert each EQ-5D health profile into a value on a scale anchored at 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead). The scale allows negative values to be assigned to health states that are considered worse than dead. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state; EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.
EuroQoL-5D Questionnaire (Total)Calculated at 30 months after start of treatmentTotal scores as mean average of the combined timepoint values for the EQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A value set consists of weights that can convert each EQ-5D health profile into a value on a scale anchored at 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead). The scale allows negative values to be assigned to health states that are considered worse than dead. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state; EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.
Worst Grade of Adverse Events Related to TreatmentUp to 24 monthsNumber of patients experiencing Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) related to study treatment per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0
Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) RatingAt 6 and 24 months after completion of treatmentThree swallowing outcomes will be rated by the SLP conducting the MBS study and reported by research staff: 1) laryngeal penetration (yes, no); 2) aspiration (no, sensate, silent), and 3) pharyngeal residue (no, \< 50%, \> 50%). These have been selected as universal items generally reported by swallowing clinicians that have been shown to significantly predict pneumonia in patients with oropharyngeal cancers. Prevalence of these dysphagia endpoints will be estimated at each time point.
Local Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) at One YearAt 1-year post-surgeryProbability of patients with disease growth that is not present within the area in which disease was first located. Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.
Local Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) at Two YearsAt 2-years post-surgeryProbability of patients with disease growth that is not present within the area in which disease was first located. Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.
Regional Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)At one year post surgeryProbability of patients with disease growth that is not present within the anatomical region in which disease was first located. Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.
Distant Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) at One YearAt one year post-surgeryProbability of patients with disease that has spread (metastasized) to areas farther away from where disease was first located. Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.
Distant Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)At 2 years post-surgeryPercentage of patients with disease that has spread (metastasized) to areas farther away from where disease was first located. Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.
Overall Survival (OS) at One YearAt one yearThe probability of survival from the start of treatment.
Overall Survival (OS) at Two YearsAt two yearsThe probability of survival from the start of treatment.
Performance Status Scale (PSS-HN)At 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after completion of treatmentThe Performance Status Scale (PSS-HN) is a clinician-rated instrument consisting of 3 questions: normalcy of diet, public eating/swallowing, and understandability of speech subscales in patients with head and neck cancer. Each subscale is rated from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better performance.
MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) (Total - Overall Score)Up to 30 months after start of treatmentTotal scores including all time-points for the MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20 - item written questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (scoring is 5-strongly disagree, 4-disagree, 3-no opinion, 2-agree, 1-strongly agree). Subscales evaluate the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. A composite score is generated by calculating the mean response for the 19 items (excluding the global question) making up the emotional, functional and physical subscales and multiplying the result by 20, resulting in a score ranging from 20 representing a low QOL function to 100 indicating high QOL. Higher scores indicate better perception of swallowing function. Scores taken at month 3, 6, 12, 24 and 30 months after completion of treatment were averaged for the population and reported below.
Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)At baselineThe VHI-10 is a patient self-assessment instrument that quantifies patients' perception of their voice handicap. It evaluates patient's physical (P), emotional (E), and functional (F) perceptions of voice and has shown to be highly reliable for internal consistency and test-retest stability. The VHI-10 utilizes a 10-item questionnaire in which the patient circles the response that most accurately reflects his or her own experience on a linear scale (from never to always). Always response is scored 4 points, a Never response is scored 0. The remaining options are scored between 1 and 3 points. The tallied number of points for each of the subscales is computed to a total composite score. Scores for the VHI-10 range from zero-to-40, with higher scores indicating a greater voice-related handicap.
Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) (Total)Calculated at 30 months after completion of treatmentTotal scores are a mean average of time-points for the VHI-10 is a patient self-assessment instrument that quantifies patients' perception of their voice handicap. It evaluates patient's physical (P), emotional (E), and functional (F) perceptions of voice and has shown to be highly reliable for internal consistency and test-retest stability. The VHI-10 utilizes a 10-item questionnaire in which the patient circles the response that most accurately reflects his or her own experience on a linear scale (from never to always). Always response is scored 4 points, a Never response is scored 0. The remaining options are scored between 1 and 3 points. The tallied number of points for each of the subscales is computed to a total composite score. Scores for the VHI-10 range from zero-to-40, with higher scores indicating a greater voice-related handicap.
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreAt baseline (prior to treatment)The FACT-H&N (version 4)17 consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true the statements are for them for the past 7 days. Subscale responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Total scores as mean average of the combined participant values.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determination of Oral Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNAAt baseline prior to treatmentDetermination of oral HPV DNA present/measured in oral tissue samples.
Presence of Plasma CytokinesAt baseline prior to treatment; Up to 5 yearsDetermination of cytokines present in plasma samples. The presence of cytokines in tissues can associated positively or negatively in the development of disease.
Tumor TP53 MutationAt baseline prior to treatment; Up to 5 yearsDetermination of tumor TP53 mutation as measured in serum and/or tissue samples. The presence of TP53 mutations results in a protein that is less able to control cell proliferation as it is unable to trigger apoptosis in cells with damaged DNA.
Determination of Tumor GenomicsAt baseline prior to treatment; Up to 5 yearsDetermination of tumor genomics, measured in serum and/or tissue samples. This measure will explore the of DNA sequence and gene expression differences in tumor cells and gene abnormalities may that drive the drives disease growth.
Antigen-specific Immune Response to Human Papillomavirus (HPV)At baseline prior to treatment; Up to 5 yearsDetermination of antigen-specific cellular immune response to Human papillomavirus (HPV) measured in serum and/or tissue samples.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab Injection
RT of 45 or 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions, 6 fractions per week. Nivolumab will be administered at 240 mg every 2 weeks during radiotherapy, and at 480 mg every 4 weeks for 6 doses after radiotherapy. Nivolumab Injection: A fully human anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody Radiotherapy (RT): 45-50 Gy accelerated fractionation in 25 daily fractions, 6 fractions per week
40
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRadiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab Injection
Age, Continuous59.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
39 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

One-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The probability of PFS measured from of beginning of study treatment, without local, regional or distant disease recurrence (appearance of new metastatic lesions). Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.

Time frame: At 1 year post start of treatment

Population: All patients treated with Radiotherapy (RT) and Nivolumab with radiologic evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionOne-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)97.50 percentage of participants
Primary

PEG Tube Dependence

Presence /absence of enteral feeding tube.

Time frame: At 1-year post-surgery

Population: All trial participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionPEG Tube DependencePEG tube dependence patients1 Participants
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionPEG Tube DependencePatients not PEG tube dependent39 Participants
Primary

Two-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The probability of PFS measured from of beginning of study treatment, without local, regional or distant disease recurrence (appearance of new metastatic lesions). Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.

Time frame: At 2 years post start of treatment

Population: All patients treated with Radiotherapy (RT) and Nivolumab with radiologic evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionTwo-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)90.00 percentage of participants
Secondary

Distant Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)

Percentage of patients with disease that has spread (metastasized) to areas farther away from where disease was first located. Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.

Time frame: At 2 years post-surgery

Population: All patients treated with Radiotherapy (RT) and Nivolumab with radiologic evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionDistant Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)92.50 percentage of patients
Secondary

Distant Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) at One Year

Probability of patients with disease that has spread (metastasized) to areas farther away from where disease was first located. Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.

Time frame: At one year post-surgery

Population: All patients treated with Radiotherapy (RT) and Nivolumab with radiologic evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionDistant Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) at One Year97.50 percentage of patients
Secondary

EuroQoL-5D Questionnaire

EQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A value set consists of weights that can convert each EQ-5D health profile into a value on a scale anchored at 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead). The scale allows negative values to be assigned to health states that are considered worse than dead. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state; EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.

Time frame: At 9 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the EQ-5D questionnaire(s) at the 9-month timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairemobility.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireself_care.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.707
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireusual_activities1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.414
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairepain_discomfort1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.414
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireanxiety_depression.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.707
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D QuestionnaireAnalog Scale Score62.500 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 45.9619
Secondary

EuroQoL-5D Questionnaire

EQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A value set consists of weights that can convert each EQ-5D health profile into a value on a scale anchored at 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead). The scale allows negative values to be assigned to health states that are considered worse than dead. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state; EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.

Time frame: At baseline

Population: All treated patients that completed the EQ-5D questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireself_care.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireusual_activities.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairepain_discomfort.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.511
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireanxiety_depression.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.586
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D QuestionnaireAnalog Scale Score66.450 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.116
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairemobility.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.218
Secondary

EuroQoL-5D Questionnaire

EQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A value set consists of weights that can convert each EQ-5D health profile into a value on a scale anchored at 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead). The scale allows negative values to be assigned to health states that are considered worse than dead. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state; EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.

Time frame: At 30 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the EQ-5D questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairemobility.00 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireself_care.00 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireusual_activities.00 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairepain_discomfort.00 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireanxiety_depression.00 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D QuestionnaireAnalog Scale Score85.000 score on a scale
Secondary

EuroQoL-5D Questionnaire

EQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A value set consists of weights that can convert each EQ-5D health profile into a value on a scale anchored at 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead). The scale allows negative values to be assigned to health states that are considered worse than dead. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state; EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.

Time frame: At 24 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the EQ-5D questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairemobility.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.344
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireself_care.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.501
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireusual_activities.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.559
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairepain_discomfort.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.662
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireanxiety_depression.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.449
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D QuestionnaireAnalog Scale Score73.891 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.4058
Secondary

EuroQoL-5D Questionnaire

EQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A value set consists of weights that can convert each EQ-5D health profile into a value on a scale anchored at 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead). The scale allows negative values to be assigned to health states that are considered worse than dead. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state; EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.

Time frame: At 12 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the EQ-5D questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairemobility.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.292
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireself_care.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireusual_activities.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.571
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairepain_discomfort.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.612
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireanxiety_depression.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.359
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D QuestionnaireAnalog Scale Score75.348 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.3823
Secondary

EuroQoL-5D Questionnaire

EQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A value set consists of weights that can convert each EQ-5D health profile into a value on a scale anchored at 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead). The scale allows negative values to be assigned to health states that are considered worse than dead. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state; EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.

Time frame: At 21 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the EQ-5D questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireusual_activities1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.414
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairepain_discomfort1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.414
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireanxiety_depression.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.707
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D QuestionnaireAnalog Scale Score55.000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.2132
Secondary

EuroQoL-5D Questionnaire

EQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A value set consists of weights that can convert each EQ-5D health profile into a value on a scale anchored at 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead). The scale allows negative values to be assigned to health states that are considered worse than dead. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state; EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.

Time frame: At 18 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the EQ-5D questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairemobility.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireself_care.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireusual_activities.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairepain_discomfort.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireanxiety_depression.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D QuestionnaireAnalog Scale Score75.000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3205
Secondary

EuroQoL-5D Questionnaire

EQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A value set consists of weights that can convert each EQ-5D health profile into a value on a scale anchored at 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead). The scale allows negative values to be assigned to health states that are considered worse than dead. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state; EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.

Time frame: At 3 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the EQ-5D questionnaire(s) for 3-month timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairemobility.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.488
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireself_care.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireusual_activities.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.535
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireanxiety_depression.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.787
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairepain_discomfort.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.488
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D QuestionnaireAnalog Scale Score77.857 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.496
Secondary

EuroQoL-5D Questionnaire

EQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A value set consists of weights that can convert each EQ-5D health profile into a value on a scale anchored at 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead). The scale allows negative values to be assigned to health states that are considered worse than dead. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state; EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.

Time frame: At 6 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the EQ-5D questionnaire(s) at the 6-month timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairemobility.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.183
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireself_care.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireusual_activities.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.374
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnairepain_discomfort.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.495
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaireanxiety_depression.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.301
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D QuestionnaireAnalog Scale Score75.017 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.8526
Secondary

EuroQoL-5D Questionnaire (Total)

Total scores as mean average of the combined timepoint values for the EQ-5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. A value set consists of weights that can convert each EQ-5D health profile into a value on a scale anchored at 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead). The scale allows negative values to be assigned to health states that are considered worse than dead. EQ-5D-5L index scores range from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state; EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.

Time frame: Calculated at 30 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the EQ-5D questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaire (Total)mobility.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.269
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaire (Total)self_care.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.357
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaire (Total)usual_activities.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.558
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaire (Total)pain_discomfort.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.611
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaire (Total)anxiety_depression.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.478
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionEuroQoL-5D Questionnaire (Total)Analog Scale Score72.250 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.3426
Secondary

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score

The FACT-H&N (version 4)17 consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true the statements are for them for the past 7 days. Subscale responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: At 18 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the FACT-H\&N questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScorePWB12.5000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.11043
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreSWB20.0825 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.39882
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreEWB13.7500 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75379
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFWB21.1250 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3504
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreHNCS30.5000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.60902
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN106.9575 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.03037
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN TOI73.1250 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.28807
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT_G76.4575 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.13144
Secondary

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score

The FACT-H&N (version 4)17 consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true the statements are for them for the past 7 days. Subscale responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: At 30 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the FACT-H\&N questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScorePWB25.0000 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreSWB27.0000 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreEWB15.0000 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFWB23.0000 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreHNCS32.0000 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN122.0000 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN TOI80.0000 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT_G90.0000 score on a scale
Secondary

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score

The FACT-H&N (version 4)17 consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true the statements are for them for the past 7 days. Subscale responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: At 24 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the FACT-H\&N questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScorePWB23.5725 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.0245
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreSWB22.3332 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.24231
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreEWB14.9565 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34479
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFWB22.3043 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.65674
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreHNCS28.7317 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.34582
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN112.4083 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.63526
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN TOI75.1186 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.41533
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT_G83.1666 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.99082
Secondary

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score

The FACT-H&N (version 4)17 consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true the statements are for them for the past 7 days. Subscale responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: At 21 months after completion of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the FACT-H\&N questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN TOI56.5000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.99138
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScorePWB15.5000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.43503
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreSWB15.5000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.94975
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreEWB12.0000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.65685
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFWB15.0000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.31371
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreHNCS26.0000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.24264
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN84.0000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.59798
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT_G58.0000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.35534
Secondary

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score

The FACT-H&N (version 4)17 consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true the statements are for them for the past 7 days. Subscale responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Total scores as mean average of the combined participant values.

Time frame: At baseline (prior to treatment)

Population: All treated patients that completed the FACT-HN questionnaire(s) at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScorePWB22.5275 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.53886
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreSWB25.0687 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18941
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreEWB14.5282 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92408
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFWB19.8462 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.46539
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreHNCS26.5156 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.73295
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN Total Score108.9554 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.67586
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN TOI69.2161 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.77417
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT_G82.1589 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.98443
Secondary

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score

The FACT-H&N (version 4)17 consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true the statements are for them for the past 7 days. Subscale responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: At 3 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the FACT-H\&N questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScorePWB22.2857 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.64451
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreSWB23.4524 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.08693
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreEWB14.7143 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38013
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFWB19.5714 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.56448
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreHNCS24.8571 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.23465
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN104.8810 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.60323
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN TOI66.7143 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.49969
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT_G80.0239 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1546
Secondary

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score

The FACT-H&N (version 4)17 consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true the statements are for them for the past 7 days. Subscale responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: At 6 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the FACT-H\&N questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScorePWB24.3438 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61027
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreSWB25.3800 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.08092
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreEWB15.1562 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68694
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFWB22.3906 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.03013
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreHNCS27.4478 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.01893
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN114.7184 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.36375
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN TOI74.1822 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.97082
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT_G87.2706 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.80596
Secondary

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score

The FACT-H&N (version 4)17 consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true the statements are for them for the past 7 days. Subscale responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: At 9 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the FACT-H\&N questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score17.0000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.31371
Secondary

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score

The FACT-H&N (version 4)17 consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true the statements are for them for the past 7 days. Subscale responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: At 12 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the FACT-H\&N questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScorePWB24.1857 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5408
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreSWB25.3809 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.77407
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreEWB14.5294 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7492
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFWB22.5687 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.73219
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreHNCS29.8000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.09146
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN116.2990 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6276
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT HN TOI76.4364 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.81122
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) ScoreFACT_G86.6226 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.68824
Secondary

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score (Total)

Total scores as mean average of the combined timepoint values for the FACT-H&N (version 4)17 consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true the statements are for them for the past 7 days. Subscale responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: Calculated at 30 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the FACT-H\&N questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score (Total)PWB23.3432 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.17244
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score (Total)SWB24.5010 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.10237
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score (Total)EWB14.6476 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.10983
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score (Total)FWB21.4080 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.94202
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score (Total)HNCS27.9586 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.94262
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score (Total)FACT HN112.0201 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.20657
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score (Total)FACT HN TOI72.8599 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.10666
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N) Score (Total)FACT_G83.9290 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.77629
Secondary

Local Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) at One Year

Probability of patients with disease growth that is not present within the area in which disease was first located. Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.

Time frame: At 1-year post-surgery

Population: All patients treated with Radiotherapy (RT) and Nivolumab with radiologic evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionLocal Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) at One Year100.00 percentage of participants
Secondary

Local Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) at Two Years

Probability of patients with disease growth that is not present within the area in which disease was first located. Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.

Time frame: At 2-years post-surgery

Population: All patients treated with Radiotherapy (RT) and Nivolumab with radiologic evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionLocal Recurrence-free Survival (RFS) at Two Years97.50 percentage of participants
Secondary

MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

The MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20 - item written questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (scoring is 5-strongly disagree, 4-disagree, 3-no opinion, 2-agree, 1-strongly agree). Subscales evaluate the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. A composite score is generated by calculating the mean response for the 19 items (excluding the global question) making up the emotional, functional and physical subscales and multiplying the result by 20, resulting in a score ranging from 20 representing a low QOL function to 100 indicating high QOL. Higher scores indicate better perception of swallowing function.

Time frame: At 18 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDADI questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Daily (one-item Global Score summary)4.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.577
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Composite (average across 19 items)79.8688 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.88788
Secondary

MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

The MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20 - item written questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (scoring is 5-strongly disagree, 4-disagree, 3-no opinion, 2-agree, 1-strongly agree). Subscales evaluate the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. A composite score is generated by calculating the mean response for the 19 items (excluding the global question) making up the emotional, functional and physical subscales and multiplying the result by 20, resulting in a score ranging from 20 representing a low QOL function to 100 indicating high QOL. Higher scores indicate better perception of swallowing function.

Time frame: At 21 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDADI questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Daily (one-item Global Score summary)3.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.414
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Composite (average across 19 items)61.2871 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.53215
Secondary

MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

The MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20 - item written questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (scoring is 5-strongly disagree, 4-disagree, 3-no opinion, 2-agree, 1-strongly agree). Subscales evaluate the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. A composite score is generated by calculating the mean response for the 19 items (excluding the global question) making up the emotional, functional and physical subscales and multiplying the result by 20, resulting in a score ranging from 20 representing a low QOL function to 100 indicating high QOL. Higher scores indicate better perception of swallowing function.

Time frame: At 24 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDADI questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Daily (one-item Global Score summary)3.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.233
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Composite (average across 19 items)74.1703 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.44307
Secondary

MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

The MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20 - item written questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (scoring is 5-strongly disagree, 4-disagree, 3-no opinion, 2-agree, 1-strongly agree). Subscales evaluate the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. A composite score is generated by calculating the mean response for the 19 items (excluding the global question) making up the emotional, functional and physical subscales and multiplying the result by 20, resulting in a score ranging from 20 representing a low QOL function to 100 indicating high QOL. Higher scores indicate better perception of swallowing function.

Time frame: At 30 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDADI questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Daily (one-item Global Score summary)4.00 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Composite (average across 19 items)76.8421 score on a scale
Secondary

MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

The MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20 - item written questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (scoring is 5-strongly disagree, 4-disagree, 3-no opinion, 2-agree, 1-strongly agree). Subscales evaluate the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. A composite score is generated by calculating the mean response for the 19 items (excluding the global question) making up the emotional, functional and physical subscales and multiplying the result by 20, resulting in a score ranging from 20 representing a low QOL function to 100 indicating high QOL. Higher scores indicate better perception of swallowing function.

Time frame: At 6 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDADI questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Daily (one-item Global Score summary)3.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.186
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Composite (average across 19 items)72.8767 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.07152
Secondary

MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

The MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20 - item written questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (scoring is 5-strongly disagree, 4-disagree, 3-no opinion, 2-agree, 1-strongly agree). Subscales evaluate the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. A composite score is generated by calculating the mean response for the 19 items (excluding the global question) making up the emotional, functional and physical subscales and multiplying the result by 20, resulting in a score ranging from 20 representing a low QOL function to 100 indicating high QOL. Higher scores indicate better perception of swallowing function.

Time frame: At baseline

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDADI questionnaire(s) at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Daily Activity (one-item Global Score summary)3.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.405
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Composite (average across 19 items)74.0217 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1612
Secondary

MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

The MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20 - item written questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (scoring is 5-strongly disagree, 4-disagree, 3-no opinion, 2-agree, 1-strongly agree). Subscales evaluate the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. A composite score is generated by calculating the mean response for the 19 items (excluding the global question) making up the emotional, functional and physical subscales and multiplying the result by 20, resulting in a score ranging from 20 representing a low QOL function to 100 indicating high QOL. Higher scores indicate better perception of swallowing function.

Time frame: At 12 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDADI questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Daily (one-item Global Score summary)3.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Composite (average across 19 items)76.0519 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.039
Secondary

MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

The MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20 - item written questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (scoring is 5-strongly disagree, 4-disagree, 3-no opinion, 2-agree, 1-strongly agree). Subscales evaluate the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. A composite score is generated by calculating the mean response for the 19 items (excluding the global question) making up the emotional, functional and physical subscales and multiplying the result by 20, resulting in a score ranging from 20 representing a low QOL function to 100 indicating high QOL. Higher scores indicate better perception of swallowing function.

Time frame: At 3 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDADI questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Daily (one-item Global Score summary)3.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.366
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Composite (average across 19 items)67.2227 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.60136
Secondary

MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

The MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20 - item written questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (scoring is 5-strongly disagree, 4-disagree, 3-no opinion, 2-agree, 1-strongly agree). Subscales evaluate the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. A composite score is generated by calculating the mean response for the 19 items (excluding the global question) making up the emotional, functional and physical subscales and multiplying the result by 20, resulting in a score ranging from 20 representing a low QOL function to 100 indicating high QOL. Higher scores indicate better perception of swallowing function.

Time frame: At 9 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDADI questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Daily (one-item Global Score summary)4.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)Composite (average across 19 items)74.2105 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.69891
Secondary

MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) (Total - Overall Score)

Total scores including all time-points for the MDADI measures swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with swallowing dysfunction in a 20 - item written questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (scoring is 5-strongly disagree, 4-disagree, 3-no opinion, 2-agree, 1-strongly agree). Subscales evaluate the patient's physical (P), emotional (E) and functional (F) perceptions of swallowing dysfunction. A composite score is generated by calculating the mean response for the 19 items (excluding the global question) making up the emotional, functional and physical subscales and multiplying the result by 20, resulting in a score ranging from 20 representing a low QOL function to 100 indicating high QOL. Higher scores indicate better perception of swallowing function. Scores taken at month 3, 6, 12, 24 and 30 months after completion of treatment were averaged for the population and reported below.

Time frame: Up to 30 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDADI questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) (Total - Overall Score)Daily (one-item Global Score summary)3.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.216
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) (Total - Overall Score)Composite (average across 19 items)74.0179 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.27447
Secondary

MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)

MDASI-HN measures treatment related symptom burden in head and neck cancer patients. The 20-item MDASI measures both severity and burden of symptoms and their effect on patients' daily activities, using a numeric rating scale of 0-10. This instrument includes 13 core symptoms and 9 head and neck specific items. Higher scores indicate superior perception of function.

Time frame: At baseline

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDASI-HN questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Interference mean2.4158 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.20166
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Core mean1.6094 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28258
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)HN symptoms mean1.2133 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55947
Secondary

MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)

MDASI-HN is a 28 symptom items questionnaire of 13 general cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, fatigue and nausea; 9 HNC-related symptoms, such as problems with mucus in the mouth and difficulty in swallowing or chewing; 6 items to evaluate the effects of symptoms on daily life, including mood and enjoyment of life. Each item/subscale is rated on a 11-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine), while the items that assess the interference of symptoms on daily activities are rated from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely). When calculating any subscale score (arithmetic mean of items in the subscale), a majority of the subscale's items must have been responded to (ie, 7 of the 13 core symptom severity items or 4 of the 6 interference items would represent the majority of the items for the subscale). Total scores range from 0 to 280, with higher scores indicating better quality of life/lesser impairment.

Time frame: At 3 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDASI-HN questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Core mean2.6272 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8146
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Interference mean3.6945 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91017
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)HN symptoms mean1.1852 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.61882
Secondary

MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)

MDASI-HN is a 28 symptom items questionnaire of 13 general cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, fatigue and nausea; 9 HNC-related symptoms, such as problems with mucus in the mouth and difficulty in swallowing or chewing; 6 items to evaluate the effects of symptoms on daily life, including mood and enjoyment of life. Each item/subscale is rated on a 11-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine), while the items that assess the interference of symptoms on daily activities are rated from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely). When calculating any subscale score (arithmetic mean of items in the subscale), a majority of the subscale's items must have been responded to (ie, 7 of the 13 core symptom severity items or 4 of the 6 interference items would represent the majority of the items for the subscale). Total scores range from 0 to 280, with higher scores indicating better quality of life/lesser impairment.

Time frame: At 6 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDASI-HN questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Core mean1.4928 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9653
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Interference mean2.9615 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87749
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)HN symptoms mean.6076 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73105
Secondary

MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)

MDASI-HN is a 28 symptom items questionnaire of 13 general cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, fatigue and nausea; 9 HNC-related symptoms, such as problems with mucus in the mouth and difficulty in swallowing or chewing; 6 items to evaluate the effects of symptoms on daily life, including mood and enjoyment of life. Each item/subscale is rated on a 11-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine), while the items that assess the interference of symptoms on daily activities are rated from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely). When calculating any subscale score (arithmetic mean of items in the subscale), a majority of the subscale's items must have been responded to (ie, 7 of the 13 core symptom severity items or 4 of the 6 interference items would represent the majority of the items for the subscale). Total scores range from 0 to 280, with higher scores indicating better quality of life/lesser impairment.

Time frame: At 9 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDASI-HN questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Core mean5.1538 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Interference mean5.8333 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)HN symptoms mean3.8889 score on a scale
Secondary

MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)

MDASI-HN is a 28 symptom items questionnaire of 13 general cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, fatigue and nausea; 9 HNC-related symptoms, such as problems with mucus in the mouth and difficulty in swallowing or chewing; 6 items to evaluate the effects of symptoms on daily life, including mood and enjoyment of life. Each item/subscale is rated on a 11-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine), while the items that assess the interference of symptoms on daily activities are rated from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely). When calculating any subscale score (arithmetic mean of items in the subscale), a majority of the subscale's items must have been responded to (ie, 7 of the 13 core symptom severity items or 4 of the 6 interference items would represent the majority of the items for the subscale). Total scores range from 0 to 280, with higher scores indicating better quality of life/lesser impairment.

Time frame: At 12 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDASI-HN questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Core mean1.7163 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.40834
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Interference mean2.5912 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87383
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)HN symptoms mean.8239 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.30055
Secondary

MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)

MDASI-HN is a 28 symptom items questionnaire of 13 general cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, fatigue and nausea; 9 HNC-related symptoms, such as problems with mucus in the mouth and difficulty in swallowing or chewing; 6 items to evaluate the effects of symptoms on daily life, including mood and enjoyment of life. Each item/subscale is rated on a 11-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine), while the items that assess the interference of symptoms on daily activities are rated from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely). When calculating any subscale score (arithmetic mean of items in the subscale), a majority of the subscale's items must have been responded to (ie, 7 of the 13 core symptom severity items or 4 of the 6 interference items would represent the majority of the items for the subscale). Total scores range from 0 to 280, with higher scores indicating better quality of life/lesser impairment.

Time frame: At 18 months

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDASI-HN questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Core mean2.4615 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8648
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Interference mean3.2222 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.00924
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)HN symptoms mean1.2222 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92771
Secondary

MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)

MDASI-HN is a 28 symptom items questionnaire of 13 general cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, fatigue and nausea; 9 HNC-related symptoms, such as problems with mucus in the mouth and difficulty in swallowing or chewing; 6 items to evaluate the effects of symptoms on daily life, including mood and enjoyment of life. Each item/subscale is rated on a 11-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine), while the items that assess the interference of symptoms on daily activities are rated from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely). When calculating any subscale score (arithmetic mean of items in the subscale), a majority of the subscale's items must have been responded to (ie, 7 of the 13 core symptom severity items or 4 of the 6 interference items would represent the majority of the items for the subscale). Total scores range from 0 to 280, with higher scores indicating better quality of life/lesser impairment.

Time frame: At 21 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDASI-HN questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Core mean3.2692 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66525
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Interference mean3.3333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41421
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)HN symptoms mean1.8333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59272
Secondary

MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)

MDASI-HN is a 28 symptom items questionnaire of 13 general cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, fatigue and nausea; 9 HNC-related symptoms, such as problems with mucus in the mouth and difficulty in swallowing or chewing; 6 items to evaluate the effects of symptoms on daily life, including mood and enjoyment of life. Each item/subscale is rated on a 11-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine), while the items that assess the interference of symptoms on daily activities are rated from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely). When calculating any subscale score (arithmetic mean of items in the subscale), a majority of the subscale's items must have been responded to (ie, 7 of the 13 core symptom severity items or 4 of the 6 interference items would represent the majority of the items for the subscale). Total scores range from 0 to 280, with higher scores indicating better quality of life/lesser impairment.

Time frame: At 24 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDASI-HN questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Core mean1.8379 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95695
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Interference mean2.9444 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52938
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)HN symptoms mean.9027 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.61271
Secondary

MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)

MDASI-HN is a 28 symptom items questionnaire of 13 general cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, fatigue and nausea; 9 HNC-related symptoms, such as problems with mucus in the mouth and difficulty in swallowing or chewing; 6 items to evaluate the effects of symptoms on daily life, including mood and enjoyment of life. Each item/subscale is rated on a 11-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine), while the items that assess the interference of symptoms on daily activities are rated from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely). When calculating any subscale score (arithmetic mean of items in the subscale), a majority of the subscale's items must have been responded to (ie, 7 of the 13 core symptom severity items or 4 of the 6 interference items would represent the majority of the items for the subscale). Total scores range from 0 to 280, with higher scores indicating better quality of life/lesser impairment.

Time frame: At 30 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDASI-HN questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Core mean1.2308 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)Interference mean1.0000 score on a scale
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN)HN symptoms mean.3333 score on a scale
Secondary

MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN) (Total)

Total scores as mean average of the combined timepoint values. Includes all time-points for MDASI-HN is a 28 symptom items questionnaire of 13 general cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, fatigue and nausea; 9 HNC-related symptoms, such as problems with mucus in mouth and difficulty swallowing or chewing; 6 items to evaluate the effects of symptoms on daily life, including mood and enjoyment of life. Each item/subscale is rated on a 11-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine), while the items that assess the interference of symptoms on daily activities are rated from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely). When calculating any subscale score (arithmetic mean of items in the subscale), a majority of the subscale's items must have been responded to (7 of the 13 core symptom severity items or 4 of the 6 interference items would represent the majority of the items for the subscale).Total scores range 0-280;higher scores mean better life quality.

Time frame: Calculated at 30 months after start of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the MDASI-HN questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN) (Total)Core mean1.7527 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48249
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN) (Total)Interference mean2.7670 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08132
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionMD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN) (Total)HN symptoms mean.9527 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38315
Secondary

Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) Rating

Three swallowing outcomes will be rated by the SLP conducting the MBS study and reported by research staff: 1) laryngeal penetration (yes, no); 2) aspiration (no, sensate, silent), and 3) pharyngeal residue (no, \< 50%, \> 50%). These have been selected as universal items generally reported by swallowing clinicians that have been shown to significantly predict pneumonia in patients with oropharyngeal cancers. Prevalence of these dysphagia endpoints will be estimated at each time point.

Time frame: At 6 and 24 months after completion of treatment

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) at One Year

The probability of survival from the start of treatment.

Time frame: At one year

Population: All trial participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionOverall Survival (OS) at One Year100.00 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) at Two Years

The probability of survival from the start of treatment.

Time frame: At two years

Population: All trial participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionOverall Survival (OS) at Two Years97.50 percentage of participants
Secondary

Performance Status Scale (PSS-HN)

The Performance Status Scale (PSS-HN) is a clinician-rated instrument consisting of 3 questions: normalcy of diet, public eating/swallowing, and understandability of speech subscales in patients with head and neck cancer. Each subscale is rated from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better performance.

Time frame: At 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after completion of treatment

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Regional Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)

Probability of patients with disease growth that is not present within the anatomical region in which disease was first located. Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.

Time frame: At two years post-surgery

Population: All patients treated with Radiotherapy (RT) and Nivolumab with radiologic evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionRegional Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)100.00 participants
Secondary

Regional Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)

Probability of patients with disease growth that is not present within the anatomical region in which disease was first located. Measurement/determination of disease progression (recurrence) by CT and MRI, Chest X-Ray (Lesions acceptable as measurable when clearly defined and surrounded by an aerated lung), Tumor Markers, Clinical Examination (Clinically detected lesions will only be considered measurable when they are superficial (e.g., skin nodules and palpable lymph nodes). For skin lesions, documentation by color photography, including a ruler to estimate size of the lesion, Cytology and Histology (Cytologic confirmation of the neoplastic nature of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment is required when the measurable tumor has met response or stable disease criteria, Ultrasound (Ultrasound may be used only as an alternative to clinical measurements for superficial palpable lymph nodes, subcutaneous lesions and thyroid nodules.

Time frame: At one year post surgery

Population: All patients treated with Radiotherapy (RT) and Nivolumab with radiologic evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionRegional Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)100.00 percentage of participants
Secondary

Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)

The VHI-10 is a patient self-assessment instrument that quantifies patients' perception of their voice handicap. It evaluates patient's physical (P), emotional (E), and functional (F) perceptions of voice and has shown to be highly reliable for internal consistency and test-retest stability. The VHI-10 utilizes a 10-item questionnaire in which the patient circles the response that most accurately reflects his or her own experience on a linear scale (from never to always). Always response is scored 4 points, a Never response is scored 0. The remaining options are scored between 1 and 3 points. The tallied number of points for each of the subscales is computed to a total composite score. Scores for the VHI-10 range from zero-to-40, with higher scores indicating a greater voice-related handicap.

Time frame: At baseline

Population: All treated patients that completed the VHI-10 questionnaire(s) at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionVoice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)7.2432 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.01875
Secondary

Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)

The VHI-10 is a patient self-assessment instrument that quantifies patients' perception of their voice handicap. It evaluates patient's physical (P), emotional (E), and functional (F) perceptions of voice and has shown to be highly reliable for internal consistency and test-retest stability. The VHI-10 utilizes a 10-item questionnaire in which the patient circles the response that most accurately reflects his or her own experience on a linear scale (from never to always). Always response is scored 4 points, a Never response is scored 0. The remaining options are scored between 1 and 3 points. The tallied number of points for each of the subscales is computed to a total composite score. Scores for the VHI-10 range from zero-to-40, with higher scores indicating a greater voice-related handicap.

Time frame: At 30 months after completion of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the VHI-10 questionnaire(s) for 30-month timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionVoice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)0.0000 score on a scale
Secondary

Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)

The VHI-10 is a patient self-assessment instrument that quantifies patients' perception of their voice handicap. It evaluates patient's physical (P), emotional (E), and functional (F) perceptions of voice and has shown to be highly reliable for internal consistency and test-retest stability. The VHI-10 utilizes a 10-item questionnaire in which the patient circles the response that most accurately reflects his or her own experience on a linear scale (from never to always). Always response is scored 4 points, a Never response is scored 0. The remaining options are scored between 1 and 3 points. The tallied number of points for each of the subscales is computed to a total composite score. Scores for the VHI-10 range from zero-to-40, with higher scores indicating a greater voice-related handicap.

Time frame: At 18 months after completion of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the VHI-10 questionnaire(s) for 18-month timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionVoice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)6.0000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.08276
Secondary

Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)

The VHI-10 is a patient self-assessment instrument that quantifies patients' perception of their voice handicap. It evaluates patient's physical (P), emotional (E), and functional (F) perceptions of voice and has shown to be highly reliable for internal consistency and test-retest stability. The VHI-10 utilizes a 10-item questionnaire in which the patient circles the response that most accurately reflects his or her own experience on a linear scale (from never to always). Always response is scored 4 points, a Never response is scored 0. The remaining options are scored between 1 and 3 points. The tallied number of points for each of the subscales is computed to a total composite score. Scores for the VHI-10 range from zero-to-40, with higher scores indicating a greater voice-related handicap.

Time frame: At 21 months after completion of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the VHI-10 questionnaire(s) for 21-month timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionVoice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)6.0000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41421
Secondary

Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)

The VHI-10 is a patient self-assessment instrument that quantifies patients' perception of their voice handicap. It evaluates patient's physical (P), emotional (E), and functional (F) perceptions of voice and has shown to be highly reliable for internal consistency and test-retest stability. The VHI-10 utilizes a 10-item questionnaire in which the patient circles the response that most accurately reflects his or her own experience on a linear scale (from never to always). Always response is scored 4 points, a Never response is scored 0. The remaining options are scored between 1 and 3 points. The tallied number of points for each of the subscales is computed to a total composite score. Scores for the VHI-10 range from zero-to-40, with higher scores indicating a greater voice-related handicap.

Time frame: At 12 months after completion of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the VHI-10 questionnaire(s) for 12-month timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionVoice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)4.5714 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.82609
Secondary

Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)

The VHI-10 is a patient self-assessment instrument that quantifies patients' perception of their voice handicap. It evaluates patient's physical (P), emotional (E), and functional (F) perceptions of voice and has shown to be highly reliable for internal consistency and test-retest stability. The VHI-10 utilizes a 10-item questionnaire in which the patient circles the response that most accurately reflects his or her own experience on a linear scale (from never to always). Always response is scored 4 points, a Never response is scored 0. The remaining options are scored between 1 and 3 points. The tallied number of points for each of the subscales is computed to a total composite score. Scores for the VHI-10 range from zero-to-40, with higher scores indicating a greater voice-related handicap.

Time frame: At 9 months after completion of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the VHI-10 questionnaire(s) for 9-month timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionVoice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)6.0000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.65685
Secondary

Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)

The VHI-10 is a patient self-assessment instrument that quantifies patients' perception of their voice handicap. It evaluates patient's physical (P), emotional (E), and functional (F) perceptions of voice and has shown to be highly reliable for internal consistency and test-retest stability. The VHI-10 utilizes a 10-item questionnaire in which the patient circles the response that most accurately reflects his or her own experience on a linear scale (from never to always). Always response is scored 4 points, a Never response is scored 0. The remaining options are scored between 1 and 3 points. The tallied number of points for each of the subscales is computed to a total composite score. Scores for the VHI-10 range from zero-to-40, with higher scores indicating a greater voice-related handicap.

Time frame: At 6 months after completion of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the VHI-10 questionnaire(s) for 6-month timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionVoice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)3.7000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.74269
Secondary

Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)

The VHI-10 is a patient self-assessment instrument that quantifies patients' perception of their voice handicap. It evaluates patient's physical (P), emotional (E), and functional (F) perceptions of voice and has shown to be highly reliable for internal consistency and test-retest stability. The VHI-10 utilizes a 10-item questionnaire in which the patient circles the response that most accurately reflects his or her own experience on a linear scale (from never to always). Always response is scored 4 points, a Never response is scored 0. The remaining options are scored between 1 and 3 points. The tallied number of points for each of the subscales is computed to a total composite score. Scores for the VHI-10 range from zero-to-40, with higher scores indicating a greater voice-related handicap.

Time frame: At 3 months after completion of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the VHI-10 questionnaire(s) for 3-month timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionVoice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)3.8333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.75044
Secondary

Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)

The VHI-10 is a patient self-assessment instrument that quantifies patients' perception of their voice handicap. It evaluates patient's physical (P), emotional (E), and functional (F) perceptions of voice and has shown to be highly reliable for internal consistency and test-retest stability. The VHI-10 utilizes a 10-item questionnaire in which the patient circles the response that most accurately reflects his or her own experience on a linear scale (from never to always). Always response is scored 4 points, a Never response is scored 0. The remaining options are scored between 1 and 3 points. The tallied number of points for each of the subscales is computed to a total composite score. Scores for the VHI-10 range from zero-to-40, with higher scores indicating a greater voice-related handicap.

Time frame: At 24 months after completion of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the VHI-10 questionnaire(s) for 24-month timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionVoice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)4.1667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8508
Secondary

Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) (Total)

Total scores are a mean average of time-points for the VHI-10 is a patient self-assessment instrument that quantifies patients' perception of their voice handicap. It evaluates patient's physical (P), emotional (E), and functional (F) perceptions of voice and has shown to be highly reliable for internal consistency and test-retest stability. The VHI-10 utilizes a 10-item questionnaire in which the patient circles the response that most accurately reflects his or her own experience on a linear scale (from never to always). Always response is scored 4 points, a Never response is scored 0. The remaining options are scored between 1 and 3 points. The tallied number of points for each of the subscales is computed to a total composite score. Scores for the VHI-10 range from zero-to-40, with higher scores indicating a greater voice-related handicap.

Time frame: Calculated at 30 months after completion of treatment

Population: All treated patients that completed the VHI-10 questionnaire(s).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionVoice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) (Total)5.0286 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.24983
Secondary

Worst Grade of Adverse Events Related to Treatment

Number of patients experiencing Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) related to study treatment per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: All patients treated with Radiotherapy (RT) and Nivolumab.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionWorst Grade of Adverse Events Related to TreatmentGrade 29 participants
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionWorst Grade of Adverse Events Related to TreatmentGrade 329 participants
Radiotherapy (RT) + Nivolumab InjectionWorst Grade of Adverse Events Related to TreatmentGrade 42 participants
Other Pre-specified

Antigen-specific Immune Response to Human Papillomavirus (HPV)

Determination of antigen-specific cellular immune response to Human papillomavirus (HPV) measured in serum and/or tissue samples.

Time frame: At baseline prior to treatment; Up to 5 years

Other Pre-specified

Determination of Oral Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA

Determination of oral HPV DNA present/measured in oral tissue samples.

Time frame: At baseline prior to treatment

Other Pre-specified

Determination of Tumor Genomics

Determination of tumor genomics, measured in serum and/or tissue samples. This measure will explore the of DNA sequence and gene expression differences in tumor cells and gene abnormalities may that drive the drives disease growth.

Time frame: At baseline prior to treatment; Up to 5 years

Other Pre-specified

Presence of Plasma Cytokines

Determination of cytokines present in plasma samples. The presence of cytokines in tissues can associated positively or negatively in the development of disease.

Time frame: At baseline prior to treatment; Up to 5 years

Other Pre-specified

Tumor TP53 Mutation

Determination of tumor TP53 mutation as measured in serum and/or tissue samples. The presence of TP53 mutations results in a protein that is less able to control cell proliferation as it is unable to trigger apoptosis in cells with damaged DNA.

Time frame: At baseline prior to treatment; Up to 5 years

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026