Skip to content

Trial of PCC Versus FFP in Patients Undergoing Heart Surgery

A Pragmatic Pilot Randomised Phase II Controlled Trial of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates (PCC) Versus Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) in Adult Patients Who Are Undergoing Heart Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03715348
Acronym
PROPHESY
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-10-23
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2020-01-29
Last updated
2020-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bleeding, Surgery, Transfusion

Keywords

fresh frozen plasma, prothrombin complex concentrate, cardiac surgery

Brief summary

The PROPHESY trial is a single centre pilot trial investigating Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) or Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (PCC) treatment for patients who are bleeding during cardiac surgery, and who are NOT receiving a vitamin K antagonist agent (e.g. warfarin). This pilot study will investigate the feasibility of delivering the different components of the trial, so that investigators can determine if it's feasible to move to a future large trial that will aim to compare the efficacy and safety of FFP versus PCC in adult patients who are actively bleeding during cardiac surgery.

Detailed description

There are \ 30,000 cardiac procedures performed each year in the United Kingdom (UK), and it is estimated that \ 30% of these cases require plasma transfusion for management of bleeding during cardiovascular surgery. Bleeding after cardiac surgery that requires blood transfusion is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, resulting in substantial costs to the health service. There have been no clinical trials that have compared the safety and efficacy of FFP versus PCC in cardiac surgery in patients who are bleeding, and who are not on vitamin K antagonists. In the UK, FFP transfusion is the standard treatment for management of bleeding: however, the use of PCC in this setting is rising, with several observational studies now demonstrating that it is safe, and that its administration is associated with reduced blood transfusion requirements, albeit no difference in other outcomes. Potential advantages of PCC over FFP are: increased concentration of clotting factors leading to faster improvement of reversing coagulopathy; improved ease and speed of administration; reduced fluid volume; and reduced incidence of immune modulatory side effects. While observational studies have suggested that PCC can be safely administered in bleeding patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the clinical equipoise and, the lack of high quality evidence means that a randomised control trial is required to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of both in bleeding patients undergoing cardiac surgery not relating to warfarin. Prior to such a trial, the investigators will perform a single-centre pilot study to assess if individual components of a large trial are deliverable.

Interventions

DRUGProthrombin Complex Concentrate (PCC)

PCC is a blood product produced through pooling of thousands of human plasmas, which is then treated to inactivate enveloped viruses. From the pooled plasma, vitamin K dependent clotting factors (factors II, VII, IX and X, and protein C and protein S), are selected to produce the concentrated form called PCC.

BIOLOGICALFresh Frozen Plasma

Fresh Frozen Plasma a blood component manufactured from whole blood collection.

Sponsors

British Heart Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Queen Mary University of London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Pragmatic pilot, open label, phase II randomised controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Able to give consent * Any cardiovascular surgeries excluding procedures under

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recruitment rateWithin 24 hours of surgeryProportion of eligible patients who consent to the study Proportion of patients who have consented and who bleed within 24 hours and who require FFP transfusion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Delivery of different components of the trial to see if a larger trial is feasibleCollected at 90 days or death, whichever occurs firstThe data collected from different trial componenets, such as study drugs administration, study procedure adherence and analysis of clinical outcome data will be combined and assessed to see whether it is feasible to successfully run this pilot as a larger, multi-centre trial
To compare the impact of FFP and PCC on the haemostatic capacity of bleeding patients after cardiac surgeryWithin 24 hours of surgeryRoutine clotting tests and additional clotting tests will be performed to measure clotting factor levels, markers for clotting and anticoagulant activity in patients receiving FFP compare to PCC
Qualitative research involving completion of a Delphi survey to apprise the management and conduct of a larger trialCompleted over a 4 month period during the study follow-up stageUsing the Delphi survey, information will be obtained from patient and public involvement (PPI) and healthcare professionals on the design/running of the larger trial, in order to understand how best to optimise identification and recruitment of participants, and to improve adherence to the trial procedures and protocol.
Qualitative research involving interviews of patients and healthcare professionals involved in PROPHESY to apprise the management and conduct of a larger trialBy the 90 days end of study visitInterviews will be conducted with 6 study subjects and 8 healthcare professionals involved in the PROPHESY trial to inform on the key aspects for the successful conduct and mangement of a larger trial

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026