Skip to content

Accuracy of Arch Analysis in Mixed Dentition Using Digital Models Versus Plaster Ones.

Accuracy of Arch Analysis in Mixed Dentition Using Digital Study Models Versus the Plaster Models Using Tanaka and Johnston Prediction Equation:

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03714932
Enrollment
10
Registered
2018-10-22
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
2020-09-20
Last updated
2020-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Malocclusion

Keywords

Arch analysis, Mixed dentition,Tanaka & Johnston

Brief summary

Accuracy of arch analysis in mixed dentition using digital study models versus the plaster models using Tanaka and Johnston prediction equation:

Detailed description

Space analysis is traditionally performed by diagnostic measurements that have been obtained from plaster dental casts through measurements which might be influenced by subjective interpretation and bias when constructed. \*So another method of diagnostically measuring study models was introduced (Digital software). This system creates digital images of dental casts with software. From the digitized models, various analyses and routine measurements could be done that might accelerate and solve many problems and difficulties associated with storage, retrieval, reproduction, communication, and breakage of conventional plaster casts. * Taking an impressions for a mixed dentition aged children. * Perform a measurements using Tanaka and Johnston equation for an arch analysis using a caliper and 3Shape ortho-analyzer software. * Casts will be scanned using the 3D scanner then by using the 3shape software measurements will be held according to Tanaka and Johnstopn prediction equation.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST3shape ortho analyzer software

Arch analysis , manual analysis , digital analysis , Mixed dentition , Tanaka and Johnston

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 10 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Aged range from 6-10. * patients medically free from any syndromes that could affect the normal eruption. * Normal radiographical findings in teeth eruption. * Erupted lower incisors.

Exclusion criteria

* Extracted lower 1st permanent molar. * congenital missing of incisors. * Badly decayed permanent incisors or 1st molar that could compromise the measurements. * Any sensitivity to any of the impression materials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
accuracy of digital models in arch analysis.6 monthsusing digital models through software(3shape ortho analyzer) to evaluate it's accuracy in arch analysis through prediction equation(Tanaka and Johnston equations)versus plaster models by using manual caliper.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactsara Mohamed Tag El Deen, master
sara-mohamed@dentistry.cu.edu.eg01066960533

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026