Skip to content

Aflibercept Injection Into the Vitreous Body of the Eye: Study to Learn More About Patient Relevant Outcomes, Real World Treatment Patterns and How Well the Treatment Works for Patients Suffering From Abnormal Growth of New Blood Vessels Under the Retina.

Intravitreal Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD): an Observational Study Assessing Patient Relevant Outcomes, Real-world Treatment Pattern and Effectiveness

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03714308
Acronym
ANDROMEDA
Enrollment
554
Registered
2018-10-22
Start date
2019-01-28
Completion date
2023-05-12
Last updated
2023-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular Degeneration

Keywords

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Brief summary

In this clinical study researchers want to gain a deeper understanding of treatment consistence under real world conditions over the course of 24 months of Aflibercept injections into the eye for patients suffering from abnormal growth of new blood vessels under the retina (neovascular age-related macular degeneration). The study aims to identify potential reasons that may allow classification of non-consistence as patient or physician driven. They want to describe treatment effectiveness (how well the treatment works) and associations between treatment effectiveness, non-consistence and patient relevant outcomes, such as vision specific quality of life and treatment satisfaction.

Interventions

DRUGIvt. Aflibercept (Eylea, BAY86-5321)

Treatment is applied according to routine clinical practice and independent of the study setting.

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of neovascular age-related macular degeneration * Decision to initiate treatment with intravitreal aflibercept was made as per investigator's routine treatment practice or current treatment with IVT-AFL (all prior anti-VEGF treatments must have been applied by the participating study site) * No participation in an investigational program with interventions outside of routine clinical practice * No contra-indications according to the local marketing authorization/ Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) * Ability and willingness to participate in telephone interviews

Exclusion criteria

* Any prior therapy with intravitreal steroids in the study eye. * Concomitant therapy (except nutritional supplements) with any other agent to treat nAMD in the study eye * Any prior transpupillary thermotherapy, photodynamic therapy, macular rotation/ translocation or macular laser in the study eye or * Structural damage to the center of the macula in either eye * Any other condition expected to permanently limit visual acuity outcomes over the course of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to first appearance of non-consistenceUp to 24 monthsNon-consistence is: * Failure of subjects to appear to a scheduled injection visit; * Strong time deviation of injections from approved aflibercept posology.
Reasons why a patient failed to appear to a scheduled injection visitUp to 24 monthsAsked in telephone interviews

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) lettersFrom baseline to 4, 12 and 24 months
Reasons for therapeutic switchingAt 12 and 24 monthsAsked in telephone interviews
Change in central retinal thickness (CRT)From baseline to 4, 12 and 24 months
Treatment satisfaction by MAC-TSQAt 4, 12 and 24 monthsTreatment satisfaction is assessed with the MAC-TSQ (Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire) consisting of 14 items (each item is scored from 0-6) resulting in a score range of 0-72 (a higher score represents better treatment satisfaction).
Change in treatment satisfactionFrom 4 month to 12 and 24 monthsComprises change in treatment satisfaction from 4 months to 12 and 24 months. Treatment satisfaction is assessed with the MAC-TSQ (Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire) consisting of 14 items (each item is scored from 0-6) resulting in a score range of 0-72 (a higher score represents better treatment satisfaction).
Vision-specific quality of life by NEI VFQ-25At baseline, 4, 12 and 24 monthsVision-specific quality of life is assessed with the NEI VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire), i.e. a 25-item questionaire that gives a score on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best = no vision problems).
Change in vision-specific quality of lifeFrom baseline to 4, 12 and 24 monthsComprises change in vision-specific quality of life between baseline and 4, 12 and 24 months. Vision-specific quality of life is assessed with the NEI VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire), i.e. a 25-item questionaire that gives a score on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best = no vision problems).
Burden of therapyAt 4, 12 and 24 monthsDescriptive measure summarising information about patient´s time for scheduling and attending appointments and anxiety reasons. Asked in telephone interviews.
Information about disease and treatmentAt 4, 12 and 24 monthsDescribes to what extent patients were informed about their disease and treatment. Asked in telephone interviews.
Willingness to continue therapyAt 4, 12 and 24 monthsAsked in telephone interviews
Reasons for treatment discontinuationAt 4, 12 and 24 monthsAsked in telephone interviews
Change in general quality of life by EQ-5DFrom baseline to 12 and 24 monthsGeneral quality of life is assessed with EQ-5D ®, a 5-item questionnaire assessing 5 health related dimensions on 5 levels (% is calculated for each level) and complemented by a visual analogue scale (range 0-100, high score represents better quality of life).
Proportion of patients discontinuing disease monitoring at participating centerAt 12 and 24 months
Time from baseline to first instance of non-persistenceUp to 24 monthsNon-persistence: Patients terminating treatment with aflibercept.
Percentage of patients receiving 3 initial monthly injectionsUp to 24 months
Percentage of consistently treated patientsAt 12 and 24 monthsNon-consistence is: * Failure of subjects to appear to a scheduled injection visit; * Strong time deviation of injections from approved aflibercept posology.
Average time between visitsUp to 24 months
Average time between injections in the study eyeUp to 24 months
Number of injections in the study eye per yearUp to 24 months
Number of visits per study eye per yearUp to 24 monthsComprises monitoring, injection and post-injection visits
Number of visits in clinics/ ophthalmology practices other than the study center per yearUp to 24 months
Number of examinations of the study eye per yearUp to 24 monthsComprises optical coherence tomography (OCT), visual acuity tests, funduscopy examinations or angiography examinations.
Number of injections until start of observationAt baselineOnly for pre-treated patients
Duration of treatment until start of observationAt baselineOnly for pre-treated patients
Type of treatment until start of observationAt baselineOnly for pre-treated patients
Percentage of non-persistent patientsAt 12 and 24 monthsNon-persistence is: Patients terminating treatment with aflibercept.
Proportion of patients undergoing therapeutic switchAt 12 and 24 months

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026