Skip to content

Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation in Stroke

Locomotor Function Following Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation in Individuals With Hemiplegic Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03714282
Enrollment
8
Registered
2018-10-22
Start date
2018-10-18
Completion date
2020-05-14
Last updated
2026-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Spinal cord stimulation, electrical stimulation, locomotion

Brief summary

This is a randomized control trial that will evaluate the effectiveness of transcutaneous (non-invasive) spinal cord stimulation on gait and balance function for individuals with hemiplegia due to stroke.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * To determine whether transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with ambulation training modulates corticospinal locomotor networks in individuals with chronic hemiplegic stroke * To determine whether transcutaneous spinal stimulation combined with ambulation training improves locomotor function in individuals with chronic hemiplegic stroke * To determine whether transcutaneous spinal stimulation combined with ambulation training improves symmetry of gait in individuals with chronic hemiplegic stroke * To determine whether transcutaneous spinal stimulation combined with ambulation training improves standing posture and balance in individuals with chronic hemiplegic stroke * To determine whether ambulation efficiency (improved cardiovascular conditioning) improves with transcutaneous non-invasive spinal stimulation and locomotor training in individuals with chronic hemiplegic stroke

Interventions

Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Neurostimulator will deliver transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation while subjects perform locomotor activities.

May receive up to 50 min of locomotion training without transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. However, the amount of time spent in side-lying locomotion training, treadmill training and overground training will depend on individual tolerance and progression.

Sponsors

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of California, Los Angeles
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Healthy Control Group Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 or older * Able and willing to give written consent and comply with study procedures Healthy Control Group

Exclusion criteria

* No history of cerebrovascular accidents or neurological degenerative pathologies (such as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, etc.) * Pregnant or nursing * Skin allergies or irritation; open wounds * Utilizing a powered, implanted cardiac device for monitoring or supporting heart function (i.e. pacemaker, defibrillator, or LVAD) Stroke Group Inclusion Criteria: * Participants are 18 years of age or older * Participants are at least 4 weeks post stroke * Participants with hemiplegia secondary to a single stroke * Functional Ambulation Category of 2 or greater - Patient needs continuous or intermittent support of one person to help with balance and coordination. * Participants are able to provide informed consent * Participants are not currently receiving regular physical therapy services Stroke Group

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Step-length Symmetry Using Symmetry IndexPre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)Participants will ambulate along Gait Rite electronic walkway to evaluate baseline gait pattern at both their self-selected and safe fast gait speed. The GAITRite electronic walkway for the study shall be a minimum of 14 feet long. The GAITRite data capture was chosen as measurement of the patient's overall gait quality. The gait symmetry index of spatio-temporal parameters will be calculated as (100%×(1-\|1-Nonparetic/(Paretic side)\|), which always results in a maximum value of 100%, irrespective of which limb demonstrates greater values, with improvements observed as positive values. Higher scores = better outcome.
Change in Swing-time SymmetryPre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)Participants will ambulate along Gait Rite electronic walkway to evaluate baseline gait pattern at both their self-selected and safe fast gait speed. The GAITRite electronic walkway for the study shall be a minimum of 14 feet long. The GAITRite data capture was chosen as measurement of the patient's overall gait quality. The gait symmetry index of spatio-temporal parameters will be calculated as (100%×(1-\|1-Nonparetic/(Paretic side)\|), which always results in a maximum value of 100%, irrespective of which limb demonstrates greater values, with improvements observed as positive values. Higher scores = better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in 10 Meter Walk Test - Self-selected VelocityPre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)This test will examine the patient's gait speed. Patients will be directed to walk at their preferred and maximum but safe speed. Patients will be positioned 1 meter before the start line and instructed to walk the entire distance and past the end line approximately 1 meter. The distance before and after the course are meant to minimize the effect of acceleration and deceleration. Time will be recorded using a stopwatch and recorded to the one hundredth of a second (ex: 2.15 sec).
Change in 10 Meter Walk Test - Fast VelocityPre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)This test will examine the patient's gait speed. Patients will be directed to walk at their preferred and maximum but safe speed. Patients will be positioned 1 meter before the start line and instructed to walk the entire distance and past the end line approximately 1 meter. The distance before and after the course are meant to minimize the effect of acceleration and deceleration. Time will be recorded using a stopwatch and recorded to the one hundredth of a second (ex: 2.15 sec).
Change in 6 Minute Walk TestPre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)The 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) measures the distance a subject can walk indoors on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes, using assistive devices, as necessary. The test is a reliable and valid evaluation of functional exercise capacity and is used as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity and endurance. The test will be used to determine participant's gait efficiency at baseline and at study completion. The walk test is patient self-paced and assesses the level of functional capacity. Patients are allowed to stop and rest during the test, however, the timer does not stop. If the patient is unable to complete the time, the time stopped is noted and reason for stopping prematurely is recorded.
Change in PCI During 6 Minute Walk TestPre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)Participants completed the 6MWT as heart rate was recorded throughout the testing using a Polar H7 chest belt monitor. Prior to beginning the 6MWT, average resting heart rate was recorded for two minutes while the subject was seated and quiet. Cardiac efficiency during 6MWT was measured by physiological cost index (PCI), which reflects heart rate per meter walked. Reduced PCI indicates improved cardiac efficiency.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORArun Jayaraman, PT, PhD

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants
Age, Continuous58.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.93
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Functional Ambulation Category (FAC)4.625 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.52
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 40 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 4

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026