Skip to content

Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy(REVATE) Trial

Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy(REVATE) : a Multicenter Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03713749
Enrollment
212
Registered
2018-10-22
Start date
2018-10-22
Completion date
2022-12-22
Last updated
2021-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

Robotic esophagectomy, Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy, Recurrent laryngeal nerve lymh node, Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Brief summary

The investigators will assess the adequacy of nodal dissection along the recurrent laryngeal nerve performed with robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through a prospective multicentre randomized study design.

Detailed description

Radical lymph node dissection (LND) along the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is surgically demanding and can be associated with substantial postoperative morbidity. The question as to whether robot-assisted esophagectomy (RE) might be superior to video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VATE) for performing LND along the RLN in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains open. The investigators will conduct a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (termed REVATE) enrolling patients with ESCC scheduled to undergo LND along the RLN. Patients will be randomly assigned to either RE or VATE. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of unsuccessful LND along the left RLN, which will be defined as 1) failure to remove lymph nodes along the left RLN or 2) occurrence of left RLN palsy following LND. Secondary outcomes will include the number of successfully removed RLN nodes, postoperative recovery, length of hospital stay, 30- and 90-day mortality, quality of life, and oncological outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICERobot esophagectomy (RE)

Patients in RE group will receive Robotic-assisted surgery in thoracic phase.

Sponsors

Shanghai Chest Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age between 18\ 80 2. Histologically proven primary intrathoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and will undergo McKeown MIE and bilateral RLN LND. 3. Patients should have a performance status 0, 1 or 2 according to the European Clinical Oncology Group. 4. Surgical resectable(cT1\ 4a, N0\ 3, M0) 5. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

are 1. Previous major thoracic surgery rendering minimal invasive approach unfeasible 2. prognosis determining malignancy other than esophageal cancer, inability to undergo curative resection and/or follow-up 3. inability to provide oral or written informed consent. 4. pre-existed vocal cord dysfunction will also be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of unsuccessful LND along the left RLNTill 6 months postoperativelyRegardless of the presence of hoarseness, vocal cord function will be assessed by an experienced otolaryngologist using a nexile laryngoscope within one week of surgery. RLN palsy will be classified according to the following variables: site (unilateral versus bilateral); duration (temporary \[i.e., recovering within 6 months\] versus permanent \[i.e. not recovering within 6 months\]); and type of treatment required (type I: no therapy required; type II: injury requiring an elective surgical procedure; type III: injury requiring an urgent surgical procedure)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The number of nodes removed along the right and left RLNThe pathological analysis will be finished within 2 weeks.number of lymph node removed
R0 resection rateThe pathological analysis will be finished within 2 weeks.Microscopically negative proximal/distal and circumferential margin
Operation time(thoracic phase)Day of surgerythoracic phase operation time(minutes)
Operation time(abdominal)Day of surgeryabdominal phase operation time(minutes)
Total operation timeDay of surgerytotal surgical time (expressed in minutes)
Unexpected events and complications occurring during surgeryDay of surgery, up to 24 hours after surgery.massive hemorrhage, perforation of other organs
Post esophagectomy pneumonia rateDuration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2~3 weeksPost esophagectomy pneumonia is defined according to the Revised Uniform Pneumonia Score which includes temperature\[°C\](Range ≥ 36.1 and ≤ 38.4 =0, ≤ 36.0 and ≥ 38.5=1); leukocyte count \[×1000/uL\](≥ 4.0 and ≤ 11.0=0, \<4.0 or \>11.0=1); and pulmonary radiography(Range No infiltrate=0, Diffused or patchy infiltrate=1, Well-circumscribed infiltrate=2). A sum score of 2 points or higher, of which at least 1 point is assigned because of infiltrative findings on pulmonary radiography, indicates the presence of pneumonia.
Rate of major postoperative complicationDuration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2~3 weeksComplication grade: modified Clavien-Dindo classification (MCDC) grade 2-4 Major complications (MCDC grade 2-4) Including: myocardial infarction, anastomotic leakage (clinical or radiologic diagnosis), anastomotic stenosis, chylothorax (chylous leakage, presence of chylous in chest tubes or indication start medium chain triglycerides containing tube feeding, gastric tube necrosis (proven by gastroscopy), pulmonary embolus, deep vein thrombosis. Minor complications (MCDC grade 1) Including: wound infections, pleural effusions, delayed gastric emptying
Blood loss during surgeryDay of surgery, up to 24 hours after surgery.blood loss during surgery (expressed in mL per phase)
In hospital, 30 day and 90 day mortalityParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks and within 30 days or 90 daysDeath occurred during the same hospitalization , within 30 and 90 days after surgery
Length of mechanical ventilator use after surgeryParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2~3 weeksexpressed in minutes
Length of intensive care unit stay after surgeryParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2~3 weeksexpressed in hours
Length of postoperative hospital stayParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2~3 weeksexpressed in days , calculated from the date of surgery to date of discharge
Re-intubation rateParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2~3 weeksNeed for re-intubation after extubation
Re-entry ICU rateParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2~3 weeksNeed to transfer back from ward to ICU after surgery
Overall survival rateAssessed 24/36/60 months after surgeryFrom date of surgery until the date of death from any cause
Disease free survival rateAssessed up to 24/36/60 months after surgeryFrom date of surgery until the date of first documented recurrence
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)pre-operative < 5 days and 4 weeks, 3/6 months and yearly up to 5 years post-operatively.The HADS aims to measure symptoms of anxiety and depression and consists of 14 items,seven items for the anxiety subscale and seven for the depression subscale. The questionnaire responses were analysed in the light of the results of this estimation of the severity of both anxiety and of depression. This enabled a reduction of the number of items in the questionnaire to just seven reflecting anxiety and seven reflecting depression.(Of the seven depression items five reflected aspects of reduction in pleasure response). Each item had been answered by the patient on a four point (0-3) response category so the possible scores ranged from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression. a score of 0 to 7 for either subscale could be regarded as being in the normal range, a score of 11 or higher indicating probable presence ('caseness') of the mood disorder and a score of 8 to 10 being just suggestive of the presence of the respective state.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC) QLQ-C30 , QLQ-OES18pre-operative < 5 days and 4 weeks, 3/6 months and yearly up to 5 years post-operatively.The EORTC QLQ-C30 incorporates a range of QOL issues in five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), a global health/QOL scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The EORTC QLQ-OES18 contains four symptom scales (dysphagia, eating disorders, reflux, and pain) and six single items (difficulty swallowing saliva, choking, dry mouth, taste disorder, cough, and speech-related issues). Each question has four response choices ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much), except for the global QOL scale, which has seven response options ranging from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). All questionnaire responses are linearly transformed to scores from 0 to 100.
Rate of thoracotomy conversionDay of surgery, up to 24 hours after surgery.Number of patients requiring conversion to thoracotomy and related reasons

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026