Skip to content

Rhythmical Massage Compared With Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback in Women With Menstrual Pain (Dysmenorrhea)

Efficacy of Rhythmical Massage in Comparison to Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback in Women With Primary Dysmenorrhea - a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03712800
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-10-19
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2018-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Dysmenorrhea

Keywords

Dysmenorrhea, Women Health, Rhythmical Massage, Anthroposophic Medicine, HRV Biofeedback

Brief summary

A study to explore whether rhythmical massage and heart rate variability biofeedback can help to reduce pain in women suffering from menstrual pain (dysmenorrhea).

Detailed description

This is a three-arm randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of rhythmical massage and HRV biofeedback in women with primary dysmenorrhea compared to a control group. The main focus is on pain intensity during menstruation. Moreover, analgesics intake, SF-12 mental and physical scores and parameters of a 24h-HRV measurement are assessed before and after the three-month intervention.

Interventions

OTHERRhythmical massage

Rhythmical Massage according to Dr Ita Wegman, derived from Swedish Massage in the 1920s. Applied for various indications in the context of Anthroposophic Medicine, aiming at a recovery of self-regulation and self-healing forces.

BEHAVIORALHRV biofeedback

One of various biofeedback types, HRV biofeedback gives a visual feedback of the participant's heart rate variability as an indicator for general health, physical and cognitive performance, self-regulation and a decreased risk of illness.

Sponsors

ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary and Integrative Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants are randomized to one of the three groups (rhythmical massage, HRV biofeedback or control). After the three-month intervention period, the controls receive rhythmical massage for ethical and compliance reasons. Assessments are taken before and after the intervention phase. Pain intensity is once more queried three months after the end of the intervention period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
16 Years to 46 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least one year of primary dysmenorrhea (physician-confirmed). * Written informed consent (also from parents/legal guardians of underage girls). * Menarche at least one year ago.

Exclusion criteria

* Secondary dysmenorrhea. * Participation in another study. * Mental retardation. * Addiction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean pain intensity during menstruationBaseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).Mean pain intensity on the three days of maximal menstrual discomfort, as indicated by the participants on a numeric rating scale in a pain diary.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SF-12 sum-scoreBaseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).Overall quality of life as assessed by the SF-12 questionnaire.
SF-12 mentalBaseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).Quality of life (subscore mental) as assessed by the SF-12 questionnaire.
SF-12 physicalBaseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).Quality of life (subscore physical) as assessed by the SF-12 questionnaire.
Maximum pain intensity during menstruationBaseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).Maximum pain intensity on the three days of maximal menstrual discomfort, as indicated by the participants on a numeric rating scale in a pain diary.
RMSSDBaseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).Root mean square of successive differences, derived from 24h ECGs.
LF/HF-RatioBaseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).LF/HF-Ratio = Ratio of two bands from frequency domain analysis: LF band (0.04-0.15 Hz), HF band (0.15-0.40 Hz), derived from 24h ECGs.
Analgesics intake during menstruationBaseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).Percentage of participants taking analgesics.
SDNNBaseline (pre intervention) and after three months (post intervention).Standard deviation of normal to normal beats, derived from 24h ECGs.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026