Facial Rhytides, Skin Folds, Loss of Volume and Skin Quality
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to quantify the psychological and emotional impact of comprehensive aesthetic treatment with a portfolio of Allergan products by measuring the change in participant's satisfaction with facial appearance from baseline to the final study visit.
Interventions
OTHERSkinMedica
SkinMedica products (Facial Cleanser, TNS Essential Serum®, Rejuvenative Moisturizer, Optional: Total Defense + Repair Broad Spectrum Sunscreen SPF34), applied daily from Month 6 to Month 11 (BELKYRA Treatment) and Month 0 to Month 5 (Non-BELKYRA Treatment).
DEVICEJUVÉDERM®
Facial filler injection (JUVÉDERM VOLBELLA with Lidocaine, and/or JUVÉDERM VOLIFT with Lidocaine, and/or JUVÉDERM VOLUMA with Lidocaine, and/or JUVÉDERM VOLITE with Lidocaine) from Month 6 to Month 8 (BELKYRA Treatment) and Month 0 to Month 2 (Non-BELKYRA Treatment).
DRUGBOTOX Cosmetic®
BOTOX Cosmetic, 20 U to glabellar lines and/or 2-6 U injected bilaterally to crow's feet lines and/or 24 U injected to forehead lines at Month 9 and Month 10 (BELKYRA Treatment) and at Month 3 and Month 4 (Non-BELKYRA Treatment).
DRUGBELKYRA®
BELKYRA, subcutaneous injection for maximum of 6 treatments, 1 month apart from Month 0 to Month 5. Maximum dose = 100 mg (10mL).
Sponsors
Allergan
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Accept the obligation not to receive any other facial procedures or treatments at any time during the study that are not related to the study * Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test before each injectable treatment and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study * Willing to avoid direct and prolonged sun exposure to the facial skin, which includes tanning beds, for the duration of the study
Exclusion criteria
* History of any intervention to treat submental fat (SMF) (e.g. liposuction, surgery, or lipolytic agents) * History of trauma associated with the chin or neck areas that in the judgment of the investigator may affect evaluation of safety or efficacy of treatment * An anatomical feature (e.g. predominant subplatysmal fat, loose skin in the neck or chin area, prominent platysmal bands) for which reduction in SMF may, in the judgment of the investigator, result in an aesthetically unacceptable outcome * Evidence of any cause of enlargement in the submental area (e.g. thyroid enlargement, cervical adenopathy, ptotic submandibular gland) other than localized SMF * Any medical condition (e.g. respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological disease, or thyroid dysfunction) that would interfere with assessment of safety or efficacy or compromise the participant's ability to undergo study procedures or give informed consent * Body mass index (BMI) \> 30 * Known allergy or sensitivity to the study products or their components * Pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant at any time during the study * Received BOTOX Cosmetic® or treatment with any other botulinum toxin product for any condition at any time prior to entry in the study * Received (or is planning to receive) anticoagulation, antiplatelet or thrombolytic medications (e.g. warfarin) or other substances known to increase coagulation time from 10 days prior to injection and up to 3 days post-injection * Undergone plastic surgery of the face and/or neck, tissue grafting, or tissue augmentation with silicone, fat, or other permanent dermal fillers, or be planning to undergo any of these procedures at any time during the study * Received temporary or semi-permanent facial or neck dermal filler injections (e.g. hyaluronic acid (HA), calcium hydroxylapatite, L-polylactic acid) at any time prior to entry in the study * Received mesotherapy, skin resurfacing (laser, photomodulation, intense pulsed light, radio frequency, dermabrasion, chemical peel, or non-ablative procedures) in the face or neck within 6 months prior to study enrollment * Began use of any new over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, oral or topical, antiwrinkle products on the facial area within 90 days prior to enrollment or planning to begin use of such products at any time during the study * Lip tattoos, facial hair or scars that would interfere with visualization of the lips and perioral area for the effectiveness assessments * Received any investigational product within 60 days prior to study enrollment or planning to participate in another investigation during the course of this study * An employee (or a relative of an employee) of the investigators, Allergan, or representative of Allergan * Current use of oral corticosteroids * Current use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (e.g. aspirin, ibuprofen) with the exception of a daily low dose of aspirin, from 10 days prior to injection up to 3 days post-injection * Prescription topical retinoid therapy and/or topical hormone cream applied to the face, for potential participants who have not been on a consistent dose regimen for at least 6 months prior to enrollment and who are unable to maintain regimen for the study * Systemic retinoid therapy within one year prior to study enrollment * Medical condition that may increase the risk of exposure to botulinum toxin including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert Syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other disease that might interfere with neuromuscular function * Current use of aminoglycoside antibiotics, curare-like agents, or agents that might interfere with neuromuscular (skeletal) function * History of facial nerve palsy * Anticipated need for treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype for any reason during the study (other than study treatment) * Tendency to accumulate fluid in the lower eyelids, or large infraorbital fat pads, i.e., significant convexity or projection from the infraorbital fat pads * Mid-face volume deficit due to congenital defect, trauma, abnormalities in adipose tissue related to immune-mediated diseases such as generalized lipodystrophy (e.g. juvenile dermatomyositis), partial lipodystrophy (e.g. Barraquer-Simons syndrome), inherited disease, or human immunodeficiency virus-related disease * Undergone oral surgery or other dental procedures (e.g. tooth extraction, orthodontia, or implantation) within 30 days prior to enrollment or be planning to undergo any of these procedures during the study * Participants with neuromuscular disorders including generalized muscle weakness, diplopia, ptosis, dysphonia, dysarthria, severe dysphagia, and respiratory compromise * Participants with a history of allergies or hypersensitivity to HA or lidocaine
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Overall Scale to End of Study | Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5) | The participant assessed satisfaction using the 10 items on the FACE-Q: Satisfaction with Facial Appearance questionnaire measured on a 4-point scale where 1=very dissatisfied, 2=somewhat dissatisfied, 3=somewhat satisfied, and 4=very satisfied. The responses to the items were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score with 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale to End of Study | Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5) | The participant assessed age-related facial appearance using the FACE-Q questionnaire measured on a 4-point aging appraisal scale where 1=definitely disagree, 2=somewhat disagree, 3=somewhat agree, 4=definitely agree. The responses to the items on the questionnaire were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score. Lower scores indicated better outcome and responders were defined as having achieved a younger category. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Psychological Well-being as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Psychological Function Scale to End of Study | Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5) | The participant assessed psychological well-being using the FACE-Q questionnaire measured on a 4-point psychological function scale where 1=definitely disagree, 2=somewhat disagree, 3=somewhat agree, 4=definitely agree. The responses to the items on the questionnaire were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score with 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher well-being. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Social Function as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Social Function Scale to End of Study | Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5) | The participant assessed social function using the FACE-Q questionnaire measured on a 4-point social function scale where 1=definitely disagree, 2=somewhat disagree, 3=somewhat agree, 4=definitely agree. The responses to the items on the questionnaire were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score with 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher social function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Skin as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction With Skin Scale to End of Study | Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5) | The participant assessed overall satisfaction with skin using the FACE-Q questionnaire measured on a 4-point scale where 1=very dissatisfied, 2=somewhat dissatisfied, 3=somewhat satisfied, and 4=very satisfied. The responses to the items on the questionnaire were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score with 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Expectations of Life Change as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Expectations Scale to End of Study | Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5) | The participant assessed expectations of life change using the FACE-Q questionnaire measured on a 4-point expectations scale where 1=definitely disagree, 2=somewhat disagree, 3=somewhat agree, 4=definitely agree. The responses to the items on the questionnaire were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score with 0 (worst) to 100 (best). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by SPA Questionnaire (Items 2 and 3) to End of Study | Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5) | The participant assessed age-related facial appearance using the 3 items on the SPA Questionnaire. Participants were asked 'how they think of their facial appearance looks compared to their age on the day of assessment' and participants had to respond in any one of the following responses: 1) I look my current age, or 2) I look (enter number of years) years younger, or 3) I look (enter number of years) years older. Results for Items 2 and 3 are reported. The higher number of years in Item 2 implies better self-perception of age; a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. The fewer number of years in Item 3 implies better self-perception of age; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
| Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Investigator | Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to the End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5) | The investigator assessed the participant's improvement from Baseline to the End of Study using the GAIS where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse and -2=Much Worse. |
| Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Participant | Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to the End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5) | The participants self-assessed their improvement from Baseline to the End of Study using the GAIS where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse and -2=Much Worse. |
| Change From Baseline in the Periorbital Aesthetic Appearance Questionnaire (PAAQ) Total Score | Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5) | The PAAQ consists of 9 questions answered by the participant about their satisfaction with their eye appearance over the past 7 days. Each question is answered using a 5-point scale where: 0=Never (best) to 4=all of the time (worst). The responses to the items on the questionnaire were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score with 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Lower scores indicate higher satisfaction. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. |
| Number of Participants With Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by Self-perception of Age (SPA) Questionnaire (Item 1) | Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5) | The participant assessed age-related facial appearance using the 3 items on the SPA Questionnaire. Participants were asked 'how they think of their facial appearance looks compared to their age on the day of assessment' and participants had to respond in any one of the following responses: 1) I look my current age, or 2) I look (enter number of years) years younger, or 3) I look (enter number of years) years older. Item 1: Number of participants who responded 'I look my current age' is reported. |
Countries
Canada
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
A total of 59 participants were enrolled, of which 58 were randomized in the study to receive BELKYRA and non-BELKYRA treatment in the ratio of approximately 1:2. Participants receiving BELKYRA treatment entered the study at Month 0 continuing on to Month 11. Participants not receiving BELKYRA following screening entered the study at Month 0 (similar to Month 6 visit of the BELKYRA arm) to begin treatment with JUVÉDERM hyaluronic acid (HA) facial fillers, SkinMedica, and BOTOX Cosmetic.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| BELKYRA Treatment BELKYRA was injected into the subcutaneous fat for maximum of 6 treatments, 1 month apart from Month 0 to Month 5. Maximum dose did not exceed 100 mg \[10 mL\] in a single treatment.
SkinMedica products: (Facial Cleanser, TNS Essential Serum®, Rejuvenative Moisturizer, Optional: Total Defense + Repair Broad Spectrum Sunscreen SPF34), applied daily from Month 6 to Month 11.
Facial filler injectable treatment (JUVÉDERM VOLBELLA with Lidocaine and/or JUVÉDERM VOLIFT with Lidocaine and/or JUVÉDERM VOLUMA with Lidocaine and/or JUVÉDERM VOLITE with Lidocaine) from Month 6 to Month 8. The volume of filler injected at initial and touch-up treatments was determined by the investigator.
BOTOX Cosmetic 20 units (U) to glabellar lines and/or 2-6 U injected bilaterally to crow's feet lines and/or 24 U total injected to forehead lines at Month 9 and Month 10. | 13 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment Participants who did not receive BELKYRA. SkinMedica products: (Facial Cleanser, TNS Essential Serum®, Rejuvenative Moisturizer, Optional: Total Defense + Repair Broad Spectrum Sunscreen SPF34), applied daily from Month 0 to Month 5.
Facial filler injectable treatment (JUVÉDERM VOLBELLA with Lidocaine and/or JUVÉDERM VOLIFT with Lidocaine and/or JUVÉDERM VOLUMA with Lidocaine and/or JUVÉDERM VOLITE with Lidocaine) from Month 0 to Month 2. The volume of filler injected at initial and touch-up treatments was determined by the investigator.
BOTOX Cosmetic 20 units (U) to glabellar lines and/or 2-6 U injected bilaterally to crow's feet lines and/or 24 U total injected to forehead lines at Month 3 and Month 4. | 45 |
| Total | 58 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Withdraw Consent | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | BELKYRA Treatment | Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 53.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.88 | 51.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.93 | 51.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.25 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 11 Participants | 40 Participants | 51 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 7 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 13 | 0 / 46 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 9 / 13 | 20 / 45 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 13 | 0 / 45 |
Outcome results
Primary
Change From Baseline in Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Overall Scale to End of Study
The participant assessed satisfaction using the 10 items on the FACE-Q: Satisfaction with Facial Appearance questionnaire measured on a 4-point scale where 1=very dissatisfied, 2=somewhat dissatisfied, 3=somewhat satisfied, and 4=very satisfied. The responses to the items were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score with 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5)
Population: Evaluable Population included all participants as defined in the Full Analysis Population who had at least one post treatment efficacy assessment at the final visit. Full Analysis Population included all participants who had met all eligibility criteria at the screening visit and received any product used as treatment in this study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Overall Scale to End of Study | Baseline | 40.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.79 |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Overall Scale to End of Study | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 21.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.76 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Overall Scale to End of Study | Baseline | 37.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.96 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Overall Scale to End of Study | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 32.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
p-value: 0.0009Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale to End of Study
The participant assessed age-related facial appearance using the FACE-Q questionnaire measured on a 4-point aging appraisal scale where 1=definitely disagree, 2=somewhat disagree, 3=somewhat agree, 4=definitely agree. The responses to the items on the questionnaire were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score. Lower scores indicated better outcome and responders were defined as having achieved a younger category. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5)
Population: Evaluable Population included all participants as defined in the Full Analysis Population who had at least one post treatment efficacy assessment at the final visit. Full Analysis Population included all participants who had met all eligibility criteria at the screening visit and received any product used as treatment in this study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale to End of Study | Baseline | 41.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.66 |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale to End of Study | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 23.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.72 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale to End of Study | Baseline | 40.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.73 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale to End of Study | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 35.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.43 |
p-value: 0.0043Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by SPA Questionnaire (Items 2 and 3) to End of Study
The participant assessed age-related facial appearance using the 3 items on the SPA Questionnaire. Participants were asked 'how they think of their facial appearance looks compared to their age on the day of assessment' and participants had to respond in any one of the following responses: 1) I look my current age, or 2) I look (enter number of years) years younger, or 3) I look (enter number of years) years older. Results for Items 2 and 3 are reported. The higher number of years in Item 2 implies better self-perception of age; a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. The fewer number of years in Item 3 implies better self-perception of age; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5)
Population: Evaluable Population included all participants as defined in the Full Analysis Population who had at least one post treatment efficacy assessment at the final visit. Full Analysis Population included all participants who had met all eligibility criteria at the screening visit and received any product used as treatment in this study. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by SPA Questionnaire (Items 2 and 3) to End of Study | Look (Number of Years) Younger; Baseline | 3.0 years |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by SPA Questionnaire (Items 2 and 3) to End of Study | Look (Number of Years) Younger; Change from Baseline to End of Study | 6.0 years |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by SPA Questionnaire (Items 2 and 3) to End of Study | Look (Number of Years) Older; Baseline | 5.0 years |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by SPA Questionnaire (Items 2 and 3) to End of Study | Look (Number of Years) Older; Change from Baseline to End of Study | -2.5 years |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by SPA Questionnaire (Items 2 and 3) to End of Study | Look (Number of Years) Older; Change from Baseline to End of Study | -5.0 years |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by SPA Questionnaire (Items 2 and 3) to End of Study | Look (Number of Years) Younger; Baseline | 5.0 years |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by SPA Questionnaire (Items 2 and 3) to End of Study | Look (Number of Years) Older; Baseline | 5.5 years |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by SPA Questionnaire (Items 2 and 3) to End of Study | Look (Number of Years) Younger; Change from Baseline to End of Study | 2.5 years |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Expectations of Life Change as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Expectations Scale to End of Study
The participant assessed expectations of life change using the FACE-Q questionnaire measured on a 4-point expectations scale where 1=definitely disagree, 2=somewhat disagree, 3=somewhat agree, 4=definitely agree. The responses to the items on the questionnaire were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score with 0 (worst) to 100 (best). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5)
Population: Evaluable Population included all participants as defined in the Full Analysis Population who had at least one post treatment efficacy assessment at the final visit. Full Analysis Population included all participants who had met all eligibility criteria at the screening visit and received any product used as treatment in this study. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Expectations of Life Change as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Expectations Scale to End of Study | Baseline | 51.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.96 |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Expectations of Life Change as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Expectations Scale to End of Study | Change from Baseline to End of Study | -1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Expectations of Life Change as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Expectations Scale to End of Study | Baseline | 50.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.24 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Expectations of Life Change as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Expectations Scale to End of Study | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 4.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.48 |
p-value: 0.7878Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.0349Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Skin as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction With Skin Scale to End of Study
The participant assessed overall satisfaction with skin using the FACE-Q questionnaire measured on a 4-point scale where 1=very dissatisfied, 2=somewhat dissatisfied, 3=somewhat satisfied, and 4=very satisfied. The responses to the items on the questionnaire were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score with 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5)
Population: Evaluable Population included all participants as defined in the Full Analysis Population who had at least one post treatment efficacy assessment at the final visit. Full Analysis Population included all participants who had met all eligibility criteria at the screening visit and received any product used as treatment in this study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Skin as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction With Skin Scale to End of Study | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 21.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.62 |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Skin as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction With Skin Scale to End of Study | Baseline | 38.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.61 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Skin as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction With Skin Scale to End of Study | Baseline | 36.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.14 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Skin as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction With Skin Scale to End of Study | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 34.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.53 |
p-value: 0.0004Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Psychological Well-being as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Psychological Function Scale to End of Study
The participant assessed psychological well-being using the FACE-Q questionnaire measured on a 4-point psychological function scale where 1=definitely disagree, 2=somewhat disagree, 3=somewhat agree, 4=definitely agree. The responses to the items on the questionnaire were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score with 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher well-being. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5)
Population: Evaluable Population included all participants as defined in the Full Analysis Population who had at least one post treatment efficacy assessment at the final visit. Full Analysis Population included all participants who had met all eligibility criteria at the screening visit and received any product used as treatment in this study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Psychological Well-being as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Psychological Function Scale to End of Study | Baseline | 57.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.09 |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Psychological Well-being as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Psychological Function Scale to End of Study | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 21.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.16 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Psychological Well-being as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Psychological Function Scale to End of Study | Baseline | 67.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.79 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Psychological Well-being as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Psychological Function Scale to End of Study | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 18.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.02 |
p-value: 0.0017Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Social Function as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Social Function Scale to End of Study
The participant assessed social function using the FACE-Q questionnaire measured on a 4-point social function scale where 1=definitely disagree, 2=somewhat disagree, 3=somewhat agree, 4=definitely agree. The responses to the items on the questionnaire were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score with 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher social function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5)
Population: Evaluable Population included all participants as defined in the Full Analysis Population who had at least one post treatment efficacy assessment at the final visit. Full Analysis Population included all participants who had met all eligibility criteria at the screening visit received any product used as treatment in this study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Social Function as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Social Function Scale to End of Study | Baseline | 54.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.84 |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Social Function as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Social Function Scale to End of Study | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 18.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.17 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Social Function as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Social Function Scale to End of Study | Baseline | 63.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.46 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Social Function as Measured by Rasch-transformed Score of FACE-Q Social Function Scale to End of Study | Change from Baseline to End of Study | 15.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.74 |
p-value: 0.0105Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary
Change From Baseline in the Periorbital Aesthetic Appearance Questionnaire (PAAQ) Total Score
The PAAQ consists of 9 questions answered by the participant about their satisfaction with their eye appearance over the past 7 days. Each question is answered using a 5-point scale where: 0=Never (best) to 4=all of the time (worst). The responses to the items on the questionnaire were converted to a 100-point Rasch transformed scale score with 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Lower scores indicate higher satisfaction. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5)
Population: Evaluable Population included all participants as defined in the Full Analysis Population who had at least one post treatment efficacy assessment at the final visit. Full Analysis Population included all participants who had met all eligibility criteria at the screening visit and received any product used as treatment in this study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in the Periorbital Aesthetic Appearance Questionnaire (PAAQ) Total Score | Baseline | 55.56 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.215 |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in the Periorbital Aesthetic Appearance Questionnaire (PAAQ) Total Score | Change from Baseline to End of Study | -27.56 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.394 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in the Periorbital Aesthetic Appearance Questionnaire (PAAQ) Total Score | Baseline | 59.69 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.753 |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Change From Baseline in the Periorbital Aesthetic Appearance Questionnaire (PAAQ) Total Score | Change from Baseline to End of Study | -34.07 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.578 |
p-value: 0.0005Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test/Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary
Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Investigator
The investigator assessed the participant's improvement from Baseline to the End of Study using the GAIS where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse and -2=Much Worse.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to the End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5)
Population: Evaluable Population included all participants as defined in the Full Analysis Population who had at least one post treatment efficacy assessment at the final visit. Full Analysis Population included all participants who had met all eligibility criteria at the screening visit and received any product used as treatment in this study.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Investigator | 1=Improved | 2 Participants |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Investigator | -1=Worse | 0 Participants |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Investigator | 2=Much Improved | 11 Participants |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Investigator | -2=Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Investigator | 0=No Change | 0 Participants |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Investigator | -2=Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Investigator | 2=Much Improved | 42 Participants |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Investigator | 1=Improved | 3 Participants |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Investigator | 0=No Change | 0 Participants |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Investigator | -1=Worse | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Participant
The participants self-assessed their improvement from Baseline to the End of Study using the GAIS where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse and -2=Much Worse.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to the End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5)
Population: Evaluable Population included all participants as defined in the Full Analysis Population who had at least one post treatment efficacy assessment at the final visit. Full Analysis Population included all participants who had met all eligibility criteria at the screening visit and received any product used as treatment in this study.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Participant | 1=Improved | 2 Participants |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Participant | -1=Worse | 0 Participants |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Participant | 0=No Change | 0 Participants |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Participant | -2=Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Participant | 2=Much Improved | 11 Participants |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Participant | -2=Much Worse | 0 Participants |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Participant | 2=Much Improved | 33 Participants |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Participant | 1=Improved | 11 Participants |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Participant | 0=No Change | 1 Participants |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Categories as Assessed by the Participant | -1=Worse | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by Self-perception of Age (SPA) Questionnaire (Item 1)
The participant assessed age-related facial appearance using the 3 items on the SPA Questionnaire. Participants were asked 'how they think of their facial appearance looks compared to their age on the day of assessment' and participants had to respond in any one of the following responses: 1) I look my current age, or 2) I look (enter number of years) years younger, or 3) I look (enter number of years) years older. Item 1: Number of participants who responded 'I look my current age' is reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to End of Study (BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 11; Non-BELKYRA Treatment: Up to Month 5)
Population: Evaluable Population included all participants as defined in the Full Analysis Population who had at least one post treatment efficacy assessment at the final visit. Full Analysis Population included all participants who had met all eligibility criteria at the screening visit and received any product used as treatment in this study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants With Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by Self-perception of Age (SPA) Questionnaire (Item 1) | Look Current Age; Baseline | 3 Participants |
| BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants With Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by Self-perception of Age (SPA) Questionnaire (Item 1) | Look Current Age; End of Study | 2 Participants |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants With Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by Self-perception of Age (SPA) Questionnaire (Item 1) | Look Current Age; Baseline | 25 Participants |
| Non-BELKYRA Treatment | Number of Participants With Participant's Assessment of Age-related Facial Appearance as Measured by Self-perception of Age (SPA) Questionnaire (Item 1) | Look Current Age; End of Study | 10 Participants |