Skip to content

Post-Operative Outcomes of Low Thermal Dissection vs. Traditional Electrosurgery

Pilot Study: Post-Operative Outcomes of Low Thermal Dissection vs. Traditional Electrosurgery for Mastectomy Breast Flap Creation With Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03711916
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-10-19
Start date
2017-03-17
Completion date
2018-12-03
Last updated
2019-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Hemostasis, Mastectomy, Perfusion; Complications

Keywords

Breast cancer, Mastectomy, Perfusion, Hemostasis

Brief summary

Low thermal dissection devices have been introduced as a tool to improve surgical outcomes. PlasmaBlade, a low thermal dissection device, has shown to be associated with effective cutting, and significantly lower temperature than traditional electrosurgical dissection device. Thus, low thermal devices would improve flap perfusion by decreasing the thermal injury resulted by the dissection. Looking into the use of low thermal devices in cases of mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction has not been documented. The aim of this study is to determine if there are clinical flap perfusion, surgical site drainage, and pain scores differences between mastectomy flaps created using low thermal dissection device and those done with the standard care of Bovie cautery in order to warrant a formal study.

Detailed description

This is a single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing postoperative flap perfusion and surgical site drainage between patients randomized to breast flap creation by PlasmaBlade (low thermal dissection intervention) on one breast and by a Bovie cautery (Control) for the contralateral breast flap. Candidates will have elected to undergo bilateral post-mastectomy immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be enrolled and baseline data collection completed prior to randomization and surgery. Patients and the plastic surgeon will be blinded in regards to intervention randomization. Only the oncology surgeon has knowledge of which device used for each breast flap. However, after the plastic surgeon makes the assessment of the flap, he/she will be unblinded in order to complete the reconstruction procedure using the same dissection device on the same side it was used for in the mastectomy procedure. Patient-specific surgical details will be recorded intraoperatively. Following the surgery, post-operative flap perfusion will be recorded using SPY imaging system. Surgical site drainage will be measured until drainage removal. Post-operative pain (Visual Analog Scale for Pain) and the occurrence of adverse events will be recorded up until discharge and 30-days postoperative follow up visit.

Interventions

DEVICEPlasmaBlade 3.0S

PlasmaBlade (Medtronic) is approved by United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a low thermal dissection device that has shown to be associated with effective cutting, and significantly lower temperature than traditional electrosurgical dissection devices.

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged 18-75 years. * Choose bilateral mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction. * Have no inflammatory breast cancers. * Have not had radiotherapy before mastectomy. * Understand the study purpose, requirements, and risks. * Be able and willing to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Active connective tissue disease. * History of, or plan to undergo irradiation of the breasts.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PerfusionDay of SurgeryPlastic surgeon objectively assesses degree of perfusion with the SPY Perfusion Assessment system (intra-operative fluorescence imaging system). Plastic surgeon describes perfusion as Left better than Right, Right better than Left, or both sides equally perfused.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DrainageUp to 14 days post-operatively.Patient records amount of drainage (in cc's) from each drain until drain is removed by plastic surgeon.
Pain ScoresDays 1,2,3,7,30 Post-operativelyPatient records pains scores using Visual Analog Scale (10cm long line upon which patients indicates level of pain)for each side at Day 1, 2, 3, 7, and 30. Scores range from 0-10. Score of 0 corresponds with 0 cm on the line and 10 corresponds with 10cm on the line. 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates most severe pain.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026