Skip to content

Comparative Study of Scalp Cooling System and Chemical Cold Cap (COHAIR Study)

Comparative Study of Scalp Cooling System and Chemical Cold Cap on Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced Alopecia in Women With Breast Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03711877
Acronym
COHAIR
Enrollment
256
Registered
2018-10-19
Start date
2019-03-07
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2021-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Breast Cancer

Keywords

alopecia, scalp cooling system, cold cap

Brief summary

This is a phase III, single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized,controlled study

Detailed description

To conduct a prospective randomized controlled study comparing the effect of scalp cooling system (DigniCap) and chemical cold cap on preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia in a group of breast cancer patients receiving standard anthracycline followed paclitaxel regimens. To obtain the exact data on the role of different methods of preventing alopecia in Chinese women with breast cancer. PASS 11 software was used to calculate the sample size. According to the results of previous studies, the hair retention rate of the cold cap group was 67.7%, the hair retention rate of the scalp cooling system group was 50.5%, α=0.05,Power=0.8. The sample size was calculated to be at least 128 cases in each group, 256 cases in total.

Interventions

DEVICEScalp cooling system

Scalp cooling was initiated 30 minutes prior to each chemotherapy cycle, with scalp temperature maintained at 3°C (37°F) throughout chemotherapy and for 90 minutes to 120 minutes afterward. Temperature of scalp cooling system can be controlled constantly, the effect of reducing scalp temperature maybe better and patient tolerance maybe better. Meanwhile, there is a higher likelihood of hair retention due to a tight fit in scalp cooling system.

DEVICECold cap

The operation of chemical cold cap is convenient and the price was low, and the economic burden of patients was not increased. But it is necessary to replace the cold cap periodically during chemotherapy, and the temperature during chemotherapy is difficult to keep constant.

Sponsors

Tao OUYANG
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients, 18≦age ≦66 years * Invasive breast cancer diagnosed with core needle needle biopsy * Staging I-II * Without chemotherapy contraindications, and planned to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a standard regimen (containing 4-cycle dose-dense anthracycline followed 4-cycle paclitaxel) * Attend the study voluntarily, sign the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of malignant tumors * With chemotherapy contraindications * With severe dermatosis and severe sparsity * History of chronic diseases such as cerebrovascular disease, migraine and hyperthyroidism * Uncontrolled diseases(e.g., heart failure, myocardial infarction within 6 months, arrhythmia, unstable diabetes, hypercalcemia) or active infection * Refuse to join the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The effects on the prevention of alopecia of two methodsOne year after neoadjuvant chemotherapyTo compare the effects of scalp cooling system and chemical cold cap on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing anthracycline followed paclitaxel. To assess hair status, a total of three photographs of patients'hair in the both groups were taken by study personnel before the start of first chemotherapy cycle, within 2 days before the start of paclitaxel chemotherapy and within 1 week after the last chemotherapy cycle. Photographs captured hair from the top of head. Patients assessed and estimated the percentage of hair loss using WHO classification of acute and subacute toxicity of anticancer drugs. Success was defined as WHO criteria alopecia grade I (\<25% hair loss) or grade II (25%-50% hair loss). Failure was defined as WHO criteria alopecia grade III (\>50% hair loss) or grade IV. The primary efficacy end point was assessed by clinicians who were independent.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qualify of lifeOne year after neoadjuvant chemotherapyTo compare the effects of scalp cooling system and chemical cold cap on the quality of life. Quality of life was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast CancerSpecific Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30(EORTC QLQ-C30) administered at baseline and at the time of the last chemotherapy cycle.
Psychological stressOne year after neoadjuvant chemotherapyThe Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) administered at baseline and at the time of the last chemotherapy cycle was used to assess anxiety and depression.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXinying Yu, Master
cindy1104@sohu.com0086-10-88271119
Backup ContactYingping Dong, Bachelor
qqyyapp@sohu.com0086-10-88271119

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026