Skip to content

Oscillatory Versus Non-oscillatory Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure Neonatal Respiratory Support

Oscillatory Versus Non-Oscillatory Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure Neonatal Respiratory Support

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03711565
Enrollment
0
Registered
2018-10-18
Start date
2016-09-19
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2021-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neonatal Respiratory Distress Related Conditions

Keywords

Nasal CPAP, High Frequency NCPAP

Brief summary

Controlled randomized trial looking at Standard nasal continuous airway pressure (CPAP) respiratory support versus High Frequency CPAP in neonates who require respiratory support or who are being extubated and require support post extubation. Patients will be evaluated for need to be reintubated and oxygen requirement and PaCO2 levels

Detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing High Frequency nasal CPAP versus standard nasal CPAP. The patient population includes preterm newborns who require respiratory support but do not need to be initially intubated and preterm or term infants who are being extubated and will require support for the continued lung disease. After obtaining parental consent the patient will be randomized to one of the two treatments. Patients will be followed for requirement of level of oxygen and blood gases looking at acidity (pH) and PaCO2 and Bicarbonate(HCO3). A respiratory index score will be measured. Attending physician will determine the need for the patient to be intubated or reintubated depending on the patient selected. Additionally, frequency, duration and severity of Apnea, Bradycardia and Desaturation events will be recorded. Also safety issues to include pulmonary airleak, nasal injury, facial edema and scalp edema due to straps holding the device in place will be recorded. Also gaseous distension of the stomach and intestines will be assessed and compared between treatment arms. This study is not powered to look at long term outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICERegular Nasal CPAP using a conventional ventilator

The Nasal CPAP is connected to the patient via prongs in the nose. Pressure adjustments are made to improve lung inflation. The frequency and pressure can be adjusted as needed to improve the patient's oxygen and carbon dioxide levels

DEVICEHigh Frequency Nasal CPAP

High Frequency Nasal CPAP for management of respiratory distress Patient will be connected to the high frequency device through nasal prongs. The Bronchotron produces a pressure that is variable with an adjustable frequency that is equal or greater than 500 times per minute connecting to prongs in the patient's nose. The pressure, frequency and amplitude of the pulsations will be adjusted as needed to provide acceptable oxygenation and ventilation.

Sponsors

University of California, Davis
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 4 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Newborn (0-28 days of age) admitted to Neonatal Intensive care unit (NICU) * Ordered Respiratory treatment of Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure (NCPAP) respiratory support

Exclusion criteria

* Major congenital defect * Known or suspected chromosomal disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory Index Score (RSI)72 hours after initiation of supportThe scale is scored based on Fio2 (0 = \<30%, 1 = 30-39%, 2 = 40-49%, 3 = \> or equal to 50%), CPAP/Paw (0 = \<6, 1 = 6-7, 2 = 7-8, 3 = \>8), Spontaneous Respiratory Rate(RR) (0 = \<40, 1 = 40-59, 2 = 60-79, 3 = \> or equal to 80), Retractions (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), and Apnea (0 = none, 1 = 1/2/2015, 2 = 3/4/2015, 3 = \>4). Average index scores will be compared between conditions.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026