Comparison of stAndard and Hybrid Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of proximaL Aortic dissEctions

Comparison of Standard and Hybrid Techniques in Surgical Treatment of Proximal Aortic Dissection

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03711136

Acronym

CASTLE

Enrollment

100

Registered

2018-10-18

Start date

2018-01-01

Completion date

2018-08-31

Last updated

2018-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aorto-related Events, State of Non-operated Aortic Segments

Brief summary

The study is devoted to the evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of patients with proximal aortic dissection. Two groups of patients with standard and hybrid surgery are compared. Early and long-term postoperative results are evaluated.

Interventions

PROCEDUREaortic prosthesis

ascending aortic and/or aortic arch prosthesis with linear vascular prosthesis or hybrid prosthesis

Study design

Observational model

COHORT

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

* aortic dissection type A

Exclusion criteria

* age limits

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Aorto-related events	3 years	Death, reoperations,thoracoabdomminal aneurysms

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026