Skip to content

An Eye Tracking Study of Affective Disorder Patients With Suicide Risk

An Eye Tracking Study of Affective Disorder Patients With Suicide Risk

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03711045
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-10-18
Start date
2018-09-01
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2018-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Suicide

Keywords

eye-tracking, eye movement, saccade

Brief summary

This research tries to investigate the validity and reliability of eye-tracking technologies by using different paradigms (eg. free-view, pro-saccade and anti-saccade) which served as a novel way of evaluating suicide risk among affective disorder patients including bipolar and unipolar depression. All the participants including health control will be assessed by clinical interviewing, self-report assessment, cognitive evaluation and eye-tracking task.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALeye-tracking

After completing a demographics form, theBeck Depression Inventory,Beck Anxiety Inventory,Barratt Impulsiveness Scale and Ruminative Response Scale-21, each participant has to go to the eye-tracking room and seats in a height adjustable chair and places their chin in a chin rest which was positioned to make sure all participants' eye are in the same location relative to the camera and the monitor. There are 18 trials and 2 filler trials in the free-view task, each of which contains 4 pictures on the same screen for 25 seconds. There is also a gap screen between each trial lasting for 2 seconds when participants were asked to fixate in the center of the screen. During the experiment, participants are instructed to watch the screen as naturally as possible, and the initial location of the fixation of each trial and the total dwell time of each emotional images(negative, happy, neutral and suicide-related)and the changes of the pupil size were recorded.

Sponsors

Central South University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnostic and Statistical Manual,DSM-IV diagnosis of depression or Bipolar disorder * BDI-II\>20(Suicide and disorder control group); BDI-II\<13,no history of depression(Health control) * Informed consent * suicide attempt in the past 6 months(suicide risk group)

Exclusion criteria

* Current or past substance abuse, psychotic disorder,obsessive compulsive disorder , Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, in the past 6 months * History of epilepsy or head trauma * Eye disorders * History of electroconvulsive therapy in the past 4 weeks.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
eye movement performance during free-view task1 hourThe first fixated location and latency(msec)of eah trial, the total dwell time(msec) in each interest areas(IAs) during the whole trial to assess the attentional bias in the experiment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Scores in self-report assessment:Beck Depression Inventory5 minutesThis scale is aimed to assess the clinical depressive symptom in the recent 7 days.
Scores in self-report assessment:Beck Anxiety Inventory5 minutesThis scale is aimed to assess the clinical anxieous symptom in the recent 7 days
Scores in self-report assessment:Barratt Impulsiveness Scale5 minutesThis scale is aimed to assess participant's impulsive trait.
Scores in self-report assessment:Ruminative Response Scale5 minutesThis scale is aimed to assess participant's ruminative thinking process.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactLi Lingjiang, MD Ph.D.
LLJ2920@csu.edu.cn+86 13807314575

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026