Skip to content

Brain Connectivity in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Brain Connectivity in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): a Biomarker to Predict Treatment Response

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03709940
Acronym
BCADHD
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-10-17
Start date
2013-05-03
Completion date
2016-03-10
Last updated
2018-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Keywords

longitudinal study, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), brain connectivity, biomarker, treatment response, methylphenidate, stimulant medication

Brief summary

This study investigates whether a relationship exists between pre-treatment brain characteristics and treatment response in adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

Detailed description

There is a pressing need in psychiatry to offer more individualised treatments, and to improve outcomes from clinical trials. This 'individualised medicine' approach requires the development of biomarkers of treatment response. 60 adults with ADHD are recruited from the Adult ADHD Clinic at the Maudsley Hospital, London, United Kingdom. The study is developed over three sessions, two at baseline (DAY 1 and DAY 2) and one after two months of treatment (follow-up). The first two sessions are conceived as a single-blind non-randomised placebo-controlled cross-over experiment. The first 30 participants enrolled in the study receive a placebo tablet (ascorbic acid 50 mgs) on DAY 1 before the behavioural assessment and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. The behavioural assessment and the functional MRI measurements are repeated two days after (DAY 2), under a clinically effective dose (20 mgs) of short-acting methylphenidate (MPH). The order of the tablets is reverted for the remaining 30 participants to balance any potential expectation and practice effect between the two conditions. Placebo and medication are over-encapsulated with the same red opaque capsules by the pharmacy team. Also, the protocol followed during the two sessions is absolutely identical in respect of timing and tests administered in order to keep the participants blind to the drug condition (medication or placebo). After the scanning sessions, all the participants receive the same prescription of a long-acting formulation of MPH, according to the clinical guidelines adopted by the Maudsley Hospital. Treatment response is evaluated clinically and behaviourally after 2 months of treatment (follow-up). Pre-treatment brain characteristics are tested as potential predictors (biomarkers) of treatment response.

Interventions

DRUGMPH

Participants undergo behavioural tests and brain scanning twice, once under placebo and once under an acute dose of MPH, before starting long-term treatment with a long-acting formulation of MPH used routinely at the Adult ADHD Clinic.

Sponsors

Shire
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
King's College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The first part of the study (DAY 1 and DAY 2) is conceived as a single-blind placebo-controlled cross-over experiment. Participants are blind to the order of the tablets (placebo and MPH). After the two scanning sessions, all 60 participants are started on a long-acting formulation of MPH used routinely at the Adult ADHD Clinic (open trial phase).

Intervention model description

30 participants with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) undergo behavioural tests and brain scanning twice, once under placebo and once under an acute dose of methylphenidate (MPH). The order of the tablets is inverted for the second half of the sample, thus the last 30 participants undergo behavioural tests and brain scanning twice, once under an acute dose of MPH and once under placebo. All 60 participants are then treated with a long-acting formulation of MPH used routinely at the Adult ADHD Clinic.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* males * aged 18-45 years old * intelligent quotient (IQ) \> 70 (as measured by WASI) * diagnosis of ADHD confirmed through clinical assessment (Adult ADHD Clinic) * non-medicated (stimulant medication-naive or not taking stimulant medication for at least 4 weeks)

Exclusion criteria

* no other brain disorders other than ADHD * no condition precluding MRI scanning (e.g., metallic implants, claustrophobia)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diffusion imaging-based measurements as statistically significant predictors of treatment response (i.e. of participants' performance on adult ADHD rating scale at follow-up as compared to baseline).In the month 2-3 following the last scan.Diffusion based measurements include specific measures of anatomical connectivity of pathways originating in the frontal lobes, such as the fronto-striatal pathways and the superior longitudinal fasciculus. According to previously published criteria, treatment response is defined as a symptomatic improvement of at least 30%, as measured by participants' performance on adult ADHD rating scale at follow-up as compared to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional connectivity measurements as statistically significant predictors of treatment response (i.e. of participants' performance on adult ADHD rating scale at follow-up as compared to baseline).In the month 4-5 following the last scan.Functional connectivity measurements include the strength of functional connectivity along pathways originating in the frontal lobes, such as the fronto-striatal pathways and the attentive networks. Treatment response is defined as in outcome 1.
Diffusion imaging-based measurements as statistically significant predictors of treatment response defined by a data-driven approach.In the month 6-7 following the last scan.A categorical approach (data-driven analysis using multivariate k-mean clustering) is used to define treatment response on the basis of clinical and behavioural characteristics at follow-up. Clinical characteristics include participants' performance on adult ADHD rating scale at follow-up as compared to baseline, whereas behavioural characteristics include participants' performance on the Qb test at follow-up as compared to baseline.
Functional connectivity measurements as statistically significant predictors of treatment response as defined by a data-driven approach.In the month 8-9 following the last scan.Treatment response is defined as in outcome 3.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026