Skip to content

everlinQ Endovascular Access System Enhancements (EASE) Study

everlinQ Endovascular Access System Enhancements (EASE) Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03708770
Enrollment
32
Registered
2018-10-17
Start date
2015-07-27
Completion date
2017-06-19
Last updated
2025-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Diseases

Brief summary

Prospective, single-center study to evaluate the everlinQ System when used to create an endoAVF in hemodialysis patients.

Detailed description

A total of up to 50 subjects will be enrolled and will undergo an endoAVF creation procedure using the everlinQ System. All subjects will be followed for up to 12 months post index procedure based on Investigator's discretion.

Interventions

Sponsors

C. R. Bard
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Eligible for a native arteriovenous fistula. 2. Adult (age \>18 years old). 3. Established, non-reversible kidney failure requiring hemodialysis (including pre-dialysis patients). 4. Target vein diameter(s) ≥ 2.0 mm or large enough to accommodate device diameter. 5. Target artery diameter ≥ 2.0 mm or large enough to accommodate device diameter. 6. Estimated life expectancy \> 1 year. 7. Patient is free of clinically significant conditions or illness within 30 days prior to the AV fistula that may compromise the procedure

Exclusion criteria

1. Known central venous stenosis or central vein narrowing \> 50% based on imaging on the same side as the planned AVF creation. 2. Upper extremity venous occlusion(s) and/or vessel abnormality(ies) on the same side as the planned AVF creation that precludes endovascular AVF creation by everlinQ System as deemed by the interventionalists' clinical judgment. 3. Prior surgically created access in the planned treatment location. 4. Functioning surgical access in the planned treatment arm. 5. Pregnant women. 6. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure. 7. Hypercoagulable state. 8. Known bleeding diathesis. 9. Immunosuppression, defined as use of immunosuppressive medications used to treat an active condition. 10. Documented history of drug abuse including intravenous drugs within six months of AVF creation. 11. Planned concomitant major surgical procedure within 6 months of enrollment or previous major surgery within 30 days of enrollment. 12. Currently being treated with another investigational device or drug. 13. Known allergy to contrast dye which cannot be adequately pre-medicated. CD-0015 Rev 02 - EASE Study Clinical Protocol CONFIDENTIAL Page 8 of 16 14. Known adverse effects to sedation and/or anesthesia which cannot be adequately pre-medicated. 15. Patients who do not have an ulnar or radial artery. 16. At the time of procedure distance between target artery and vein will not allow magnets to align vessels sufficiently to create the fistula. 17. Evidence of active infections on the day of the index procedure. 18. Written informed consent not obtained.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Protocol-Defined endoAVF MaturationThrough 6 months post-index procedureProtocol-defined endoAVF maturation is defined as endoAVF that is free of stenosis or thrombosis, with brachial artery flow at least 500ml/min and at least 4 mm vein diameter (as measured by duplex ultrasound) OR subject was dialized using 2 needles.
Number of Participants With Device-Related SAEs3 months following AVF creationThe safety Endpoint is protocol-defined as Device-Related SAE at 3 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Patency at 6 Months Post-index Procedure6 months post-index procedurePrimary Patency is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next clinically driven reintervention at the original treatment site to maintain or reestablish patency or loss of endoAVF patency. The primary patency rate is determined via Kaplan-Meier methods and based on the time of endoAVF creation until any intervention designed to maintain or reestablish patnecy or endoAVF abandonment.
Number of Participants Per Catheter Exposure Type1-7 days, 30 days, 3, and 6 months post-index procedureNumber of participants with Central Venous Catheters (CVC), endoAVF only access, CVC + endoAVF access, and not reciving dialysis at 3 and 6 months post-index procedure.
Number of Days to Fistula MaturationDays from Index ProcedureDefined as the number of days between the date of AVF creation and the date of endoAVF maturation (based on primary efficacy endpoint definition of maturation).
Number of Endo-AVF-related Re-interventionsAt 6 months follow-upThe re-intervention rate for endo-AVF (defined as any intervention required to maintain or re-establish patency) was calculated at each available follow-up visit post-index procedure.
Number of Participants With Technical Success1-7 days following index-procedureTechnical success is defined as verification that an endoAVF has been created and remains patent 1-7 days after the index procedure. Patency is determined by experienced examiner as the presence of a bruit that is detected with stethoscope, or presence of thrill, or via Duplex Ultrasound, or via angiogram.
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Patency at 6 Months Post-Index Procedure6 months post-index procedureTime from endoAVF creation until access abandonment. Abandonment due to renal transplant receipt was not included in this endpoint assessment.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First subject enrolled July 27, 2015 and last subject enrolled November 8, 2016. Last subject follow-up was June 19, 2017.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
endoAVF
everlinQ endoAVF System
32
Total32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicendoAVF
Access Arm
Left
25 Participants
Access Arm
Right
7 Participants
Access Artery
Brachial
9 Participants
Access Artery
Radial
19 Participants
Access Artery
Ulnar
4 Participants
Access Vein
Brachial
13 Participants
Access Vein
Radial
17 Participants
Access Vein
Ulnar
2 Participants
Age, Customized
Age of Participants
50.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Fistula Type
Radial-Radial
20 Participants
Fistula Type
Ulnar-Ulnar
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Paraguay
32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 32
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Device-Related SAEs

The safety Endpoint is protocol-defined as Device-Related SAE at 3 months.

Time frame: 3 months following AVF creation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
endoAVFNumber of Participants With Device-Related SAEs0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Protocol-Defined endoAVF Maturation

Protocol-defined endoAVF maturation is defined as endoAVF that is free of stenosis or thrombosis, with brachial artery flow at least 500ml/min and at least 4 mm vein diameter (as measured by duplex ultrasound) OR subject was dialized using 2 needles.

Time frame: Through 6 months post-index procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
endoAVFNumber of Participants With Protocol-Defined endoAVF Maturation29 Participants
Secondary

Number of Days to Fistula Maturation

Defined as the number of days between the date of AVF creation and the date of endoAVF maturation (based on primary efficacy endpoint definition of maturation).

Time frame: Days from Index Procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
endoAVFNumber of Days to Fistula Maturation9.2 Days from Index ProcedureStandard Deviation 19.1
Secondary

Number of Endo-AVF-related Re-interventions

The re-intervention rate for endo-AVF (defined as any intervention required to maintain or re-establish patency) was calculated at each available follow-up visit post-index procedure.

Time frame: At 6 months follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
endoAVFNumber of Endo-AVF-related Re-interventions2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Per Catheter Exposure Type

Number of participants with Central Venous Catheters (CVC), endoAVF only access, CVC + endoAVF access, and not reciving dialysis at 3 and 6 months post-index procedure.

Time frame: 1-7 days, 30 days, 3, and 6 months post-index procedure

Population: Number of participants (n) for each follow-up period varies from total participants in the study (N=32) according to the number of participants that attend follow-up and/or had data relevant to the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeCVC only at 1-7 days post index procedure31 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeEndoAVF only at 1-7 days post index procedure0 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeCVC & endoAVF at 1-7 days post index procedure0 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeNo dialysis at 1-7 days post-index procedure1 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeCVC only at 30 days post-index procedure26 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeEndoAVF only at 30 days post-index procedure1 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeCVC & endoAVF at 30 days post-index procedure0 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeNo dialysis at 30 days post-index procedure1 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeCVC only at 3 months post-index5 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeEndoAVF only 3 months post-index10 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeCVC + endoAVF at 3 months post-index0 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeNo dialysis at 3 months post-index1 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeCVC only at 6 months post-index7 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeEndoAVF only 6 months post-index19 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeCVC + endoAVF at 6 months post-index0 Participants
endoAVFNumber of Participants Per Catheter Exposure TypeNo dialysis at 6 months post-index0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Technical Success

Technical success is defined as verification that an endoAVF has been created and remains patent 1-7 days after the index procedure. Patency is determined by experienced examiner as the presence of a bruit that is detected with stethoscope, or presence of thrill, or via Duplex Ultrasound, or via angiogram.

Time frame: 1-7 days following index-procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
endoAVFNumber of Participants With Technical Success30 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Patency at 6 Months Post-Index Procedure

Time from endoAVF creation until access abandonment. Abandonment due to renal transplant receipt was not included in this endpoint assessment.

Time frame: 6 months post-index procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
endoAVFPercentage of Participants With Secondary Patency at 6 Months Post-Index Procedure86.8 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This was not a hypothesis-driven study. Therefore, there were no primary effectiveness or safety endpoints.~The Secondary Patency endpoint was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Secondary

Primary Patency at 6 Months Post-index Procedure

Primary Patency is defined as the interval following the index intervention until the next clinically driven reintervention at the original treatment site to maintain or reestablish patency or loss of endoAVF patency. The primary patency rate is determined via Kaplan-Meier methods and based on the time of endoAVF creation until any intervention designed to maintain or reestablish patnecy or endoAVF abandonment.

Time frame: 6 months post-index procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
endoAVFPrimary Patency at 6 Months Post-index Procedure83.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This was not a hypothesis-driven study. Therefore, there were no primary effectiveness or safety endpoints.~The Primary Patency endpoint was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026