Skip to content

BPT to Improve Bodily Disturbances in Post-treatment Cancer Patients

A Clinical Trial of Group-based Body Psychotherapy (BPT) to Improve Bodily Disturbances in Post-treatment Cancer Patients in Combination With Randomized Controlled Smartphone-triggered Bodily Interventions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03707548
Acronym
KPTK
Enrollment
88
Registered
2018-10-16
Start date
2018-09-03
Completion date
2019-11-05
Last updated
2020-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer Patients

Keywords

body psychotherapy, smartphone-triggered interventions, psychosocial impairments related to cancer, cancer-related disturbances in bodily wellbeing, Body Image Scale, group psychotherapy, bodily disturbances in post-treatment cancer patients

Brief summary

With this project investigators focus on the evaluation whether bodily disturbances in post-treatment cancer patients can be influenced positively by group BPT and if intermittent smartphone-triggered bodily interventions are effective.

Detailed description

Background: Disturbances in bodily wellbeing represent one key aspect of psychosocial impairments related to cancer. Therefore, interventions to improve bodily wellbeing in post-treatment cancer patients are important. Objectives: This project aims at two goals: 1. Investigators want to evaluate whether bodily disturbances in post-treatment cancer patients can be influenced positively by group BPT (Non-randomized evaluation of a weekly group BPT using a waiting-period comparator). 2. In addition the efficacy of intermittent smartphone-triggered bodily interventions is assessed with a nested RCT to evaluate short-term efficacy of smartphone-triggered bodily interventions. Study design: The project follows the outline of a non-randomized evaluation of a weekly group BPT using a waiting-period comparator, with a nested randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the short-term efficacy of smartphone-triggered bodily interventions. Study flow: * Participants will first undergo a waiting period (duration at least 6 weeks) followed by the group BPT (6 weekly sessions, 90 minutes each). * During the group BPT, either a smartphone-triggered bodily intervention or a smartphone-triggered control intervention will be provided at random (randomization on a daily basis) over a period of 5 consecutive weeks on 6 days per week. This will result in 15 smartphone-triggered bodily interventions and 15 smartphone-triggered control interventions, which each patient will undergo. Measurement points: Patients will be surveyed at three points in time (initial consultation, pre- and post-intervention). Standardized questionnaires will be used to measure patients' body disturbances, body image, body mindfulness, physical complaints, quality of life, vitality, mental health, anxiety and depression and to explore the effects of BPT on bodily disturbances and body image in post-treatment cancer patients.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBPT

BPT will consist of 6 weekly group sessions, based on a scientific approach, integrating body-oriented techniques to improve patients' awareness, perception, acceptance, and expression regarding their body.

BEHAVIORALSmartphone-triggered bodily interventions

Smartphone-triggered bodily interventions will consist of brief BPT exercises insuring the transfer from the group BPT sessions into patients' daily lives. Smartphone bodily interventions will be triggered by short audio-clips.

BEHAVIORALSmartphone triggered control intervention

The smartphone triggered control intervention will be selected fairy tales presented by audio-clips.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Study design: The project follows the outline of a non-randomized evaluation of a weekly group BPT using a waiting-period comparator, with a nested randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the short-term efficacy of smartphone-triggered bodily interventions. Measurement points: * Patients will be surveyed at three points in time (initial consultation, pre- and post-intervention) to explore the effects of BPT on bodily disturbances and body image in post-treatment cancer patients. * During the BPT Intervention group cohesion and bodily well-being will be assessed weekly. * The smartphone-triggered bodily and control interventions will be provided over a period of 5 consecutive weeks on 6 days per week and will be assessed pre- and post intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Having received curatively intended treatment for any malignant neoplasm; primary treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) being completed \>/= 3 months ago before study inclusion. Any other ongoing anti-tumor therapy is allowed (e.g., hormonal therapy, adjuvant immunotherapy) * existing bodily disturbances * No sign of progress or recurrence of malignancy at study inclusion according to treating physician * Score of 0 or 1 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score * Having an anticipated life expectancy of \>/= 12 months, according to treating physician * age 18 years or older * Capacity to participate in group BPT sessions in Basel or Winterthur, 3 study assessments, and the smartphone-triggered interventions * Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Suffering from a severe current mental disorder * Risk of current suicidality, as indicated by a suicide item score \>/= 2 in the BDI-II (Beck Depression Inventory), as this group BPT intervention is not appropriate to support suicidal patients in acute crises * Participation in any other clinical trial with a psychosocial intervention * Receiving any other current psychotherapeutic treatment with the exception of already established therapies * Inability to understand and speak German

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in bodily disturbances assessed by questionnairesQuestionnaire at baseline and 6 weeks after baseline (=after the waiting period;pre-therapy) and 14 weeks after baseline (=post-therapy)self-perception of change in appearance and displeasure with change or perceived change in appearance; assessed via Body Image Scale (BIS). BIS total score is calculated by adding the score obtained on each item, yielding a possible range from 0-30. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of body image dissatisfaction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in bodily wellbeingapplied twice on each training day of the smartphone-triggered interventions: first directly preceding, second directly following the smartphone-triggered interventionsbodily wellbeing is assessed by Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire (MDMQ). 3 scales are calculated: good-bad, and awake-tired, calm-nervous. Scores are calculated by adding the score obtained on each item, yielding a possible range from 4-20 in each scale. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Changes in moodapplied twice on each training day of the smartphone-triggered interventions: first directly preceding, second directly following the smartphone-triggered interventionsmood is assessed by Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire (MDMQ). 3 scales are calculated: good-bad, and awake-tired, calm-nervous. Scores are calculated by adding the score obtained on each item, yielding a possible range from 4-20 in each scale. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Changes in body mindfulnessQuestionnaire at baseline and 6 weeks after baseline (=after the waiting period;pre-therapy) and 14 weeks after baseline (=post-therapy)assessed by Body Mindfulness Questionnaire (BMQ). 2 scales are calculated: Experiencing Body Awareness, and Appreciating Body Awareness. Scores are calculated by adding the score obtained on each item, yielding a possible range from 7-42 in each scale. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Changes in somatic symptomsQuestionnaire at baseline and 6 weeks after baseline (=after the waiting period;pre-therapy) and 14 weeks after baseline (=post-therapy)somatic symptoms are assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 items). All scales and single-item measures range in scores from 0 to 100. A high score represents a high level of symptomatology. The following somatic symptom scales are calculated: fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea. The principle for scoring these scales is the same in all cases: 1.The average of the items that contribute to the scale is estimated; this is the raw score. 2. A linear transformation is used to standardise the raw score, so that scores range from 0 to 100.
Changes in somatic symptom disorder-B criteriaQuestionnaire at baseline and 6 weeks after baseline (=after the waiting period;pre-therapy) and 14 weeks after baseline (=post-therapy)somatic symptom disorder-B criteria are assessed by Somatic Symptom Disorder-B Criteria Scale (SSD-12). 1 total score and 3 subscores are calculated: cognitive aspects, affective aspects, and behavioral aspects. Scores are calculated by adding the score obtained on each item. Range for subscales: 0-16; range for total score: 0-48; higher scores are representing greater severity.
Changes in distressQuestionnaire at baseline and 6 weeks after baseline (=after the waiting period;pre-therapy) and 14 weeks after baseline (=post-therapy)distress is assessed by National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer (DT). A visual analogue scale ranging from 0=no distress to 10=extreme distress.
Changes in quality of lifeQuestionnaire at baseline and 6 weeks after baseline (=after the waiting period;pre-therapy) and 14 weeks after baseline (=post-therapy)quality of life is assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 items (EORTC QLQ-C30). The following scales are computed: global health status/quality of life, physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning. All scales range in scores from 0 to 100. A high score for a functional scale represents a high level of functioning, a high score for the global health status represents a high quality of life. The principle for scoring these scales is the same in all cases: 1.The average of the items that contribute to the scale is estimated; this is the raw score. 2. A linear transformation is used to standardise the raw score, so that scores range from 0 to 100.
Changes in suicidal tendencyQuestionnaire at baseline and 6 weeks after baseline (=after the waiting period;pre-therapy) and 14 weeks after baseline (=post-therapy)suicidal tendency is assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Item I: Suicidal tendency. Range from 0 to 3, a higher value representing a higher suicidal tendency.
Changes in anxietyQuestionnaire at baseline and 6 weeks after baseline (=after the waiting period;pre-therapy) and 14 weeks after baseline (=post-therapy)anxiety is assessed by the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A). The anxiety-score is calculated by adding the score obtained on each item, range 0-21, with higher scores representing greater severity.
Changes in depressionQuestionnaire at baseline and 6 weeks after baseline (=after the waiting period;pre-therapy) and 14 weeks after baseline (=post-therapy)Depression is assessed by the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). The depression-score is calculated by adding the score obtained on each item, range 0-21, with higher scores representing greater severity.
Changes in vitalityQuestionnaire at baseline and 6 weeks after baseline (=after the waiting period;pre-therapy) and 14 weeks after baseline (=post-therapy)vitality is assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) - scale vitality. Items in the scale are averaged together to create the vitality score. Range from 0 to 100, a higher score defining a more favorable health state.
Changes in mental healthQuestionnaire at baseline and 6 weeks after baseline (=after the waiting period;pre-therapy) and 14 weeks after baseline (=post-therapy)mental health is assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) - scale mental health. Items in the scale are averaged together to create the mental health score. Range from 0 to 100, a higher score defining a more favorable health state.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in bodily disturbances assessed by semistructured interviewqualitative assessment at baseline and 14 weeks after baseline (=post-therapy)self-perception of change in appearance and displeasure with change or perceived change in appearance; assessed via semistructured interview
Change in group cohesionassessed 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 weeks after baseline directly after each group sessionGroup cohesion is assessed by the Group Climate Questionnaire - Short Form (GCQ-S). The questionnaire consists of a total score and 3 subscales (all ranges from 0 to 6): Scale 1: Engaged: This describes the positive working group atmosphere. Scale 2: Conflict: This reflects anger and tension in the group. Scale 3: Avoiding: This describes behaviors indicating avoidance of personal responsibility of group work by the members. Higher values represent a higher degree in engagement, conflict, or avoiding. Scales scores are determined by calculating the mean of the relevant items.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026