Skip to content

A Study of Durvalumab as Consolidation Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

A Phase III, Randomised,Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled,Study of Durvalumab as Consolidation Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced,Unresectable NSCLC, Who Have Not Progressed Following Definitive, Platinum-Based Chemoradiation Therapy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03706690
Acronym
PACIFIC-5
Enrollment
407
Registered
2018-10-16
Start date
2018-11-27
Completion date
2027-02-26
Last updated
2026-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Keywords

NSCLC, Double-Blind, PD-L1, MEDI4736, Durvalumab, PFS, OS

Brief summary

This is a Phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study assessing the efficacy and safety of durvalumab compared with placebo, as consolidation therapy in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, non-small cell lung cancer (Stage III), who have not progressed following definitive, platinum-based, chemoradiation therapy.

Detailed description

Approximately 400 patients will be randomized in a 2:1 to receive treatment with durvalumab or placebo therapy. The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of durvalumab treatment compared with placebo in terms of PFS.

Interventions

DRUGDurvalumab

Durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks \[q4w\] intravenously \[iv\] until clinical progression/ deterioration or confirmed radiological progression.

OTHERPlacebo

Matching placebo for infusion every 4 weeks iv until clinical progression/deterioration or confirmed radiological progression

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Sponsor, excluding supply chain management personnel and unblinded monitors of site pharmacies, will remain blinded.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 130 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age≥18 years 2. Documented NSCLC and present with locally advanced, unresectable (Stage III) disease; 3. Receipt of concurrent or sequential chemoradiation therapy, 4. No progression following definitive, platinum-based, concurrent or sequential chemoradiation therapy 5. World Health Organization (WHO) PS of 0 or 1; 6. No prior exposure to any anti CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti PD L2 antibodies, excluding therapeutic anticancer vaccines 7. Adequate organ and marrow function required 8. Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks 9. Tumor PD-L1 status, with the Ventana SP263 PD-L1 IHC assay determined by a reference laboratory, must be known prior to randomization. 10. Tumour sample requirements are as follows: Provision of a tumour tissue sample (newly acquired sample \<=3 months old is preferred, but an archived sample \<=6 months old is acceptable) in a quantity sufficient to allow for analysis.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of allogeneic organ transplantation, or another primary malignancy, or active primary immunodeficiency. 2. Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders 3. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness that would limit compliance with study requirement, substantially increase risk of incurring AEs, or compromise the ability of the patient to give written informed consent 4. Active infection including tuberculosis hepatitis B hepatitis C (HCV), or human immunodeficiency virus (positive human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\] 1/2 antibodies). 5. Mixed small cell and NSCLC histology, sarcomatoid variant 6. Any unresolved toxicity National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade ≥2 from the prior chemoradiation therapy. 7. Receipt of live attenuated vaccine within 30 days prior to the first dose of IP. 8. Major surgical procedure (as defined by the Investigator) within 28 days prior to the first dose of IP.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Modified Intent-to-Treat [mITT] Set)Tumor scans performed at screening, every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)The PFS per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. (RECIST 1.1) using blinded independent central review (BICR) assessments was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression (PD) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs) and an absolute increase of \>=5 millimeters (mm), taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since treatment started including the baseline sum of diameters. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)The OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Intent-to-Treat [ITT] Set)Tumor scans performed at screening, every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)The PFS per RECIST 1.1 using BICR assessments was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective PD or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since treatment started including the baseline sum of diameters. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Percentage of Participants Alive at 24 Months (OS24)Month 24OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy. The OS24 was defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months after randomization.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Tumor scans performed at screening, every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)The ORR per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the percentage of participants with at least 1 visit response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on all participants in the subset of the analysis population including only those participants with measurable disease at baseline per BICR. The CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters as long as criteria for PD are not met.
Duration of Response (DoR)Tumor scans performed at screening, every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)The DoR per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since treatment started including the baseline sum of diameters. The DoR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Percentage of Participants Alive and Progression-Free at 12 and 18 Months (PFS12 and PFS18)Months 12 and 18The PFS per RECIST 1.1 using BICR assessments was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective PD or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since treatment started including the baseline sum of diameters. The PFS12 and PFS18 were defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator at 12 and 18 months, respectively and both were obtained using the algorithm for the RECIST 1.1 site Investigator tumor data.
Time From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)Tumor scans performed at screening, every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression event subsequent to first subsequent therapy, or death. The date of the second progression was recorded by the Investigator and defined according to local standard clinical practice and could have involved any of objective radiological imaging, symptomatic progression, or death. Median time to PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Time to Death or Distant Metastases (TTDM)Tumor scans performed at screening, every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)TTDM as per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of distant metastasis or death in the absence of distant metastasis. Distant metastasis was defined as any new lesion that was outside of the radiation field according to RECIST 1.1. Median TTDM was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
Serum Concentration of DurvalumabEnd of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, pre-infusion on Cycles 2 and 4 Day 1 and Month 3 follow-up (each cycle=28 days)Blood samples were collected to determine the concentration of durvalumab.
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabPre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2 and 4 (each cycle=28 days)Blood samples were collected to determine the presence of ADAs and ADA-neutralizing antibodies (nAb) for durvalumab using validated assays. ADA prevalence was defined as the number of participants with positive ADA result at any time, baseline or post-baseline. ADA incidence was defined as either treatment-induced (post-baseline ADA positive only) or treatment-boosted ADA (baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted to \>=4-fold during the study period). Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA positive only post-baseline and not detected at baseline. Persistently positive was defined as having at least 2 post-baseline ADA positive assessments with at least 16 weeks between the first and last positive assessment, or ADA positive at the last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive was defined as having at least 1 post-baseline ADA positive assessment without fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive.
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132Baseline (Day 1) and Week 132Patient reported outcomes for 5 disease related symptoms was assessed using EORTC QLQ-Core 30 (C30) items questionnaire (fatigue, appetite loss) and EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer module 13 (LC13) (dyspnoea, cough and pain in chest).An outcome variable consisting of a score from 0 to 100 was derived for each of the symptom scales/symptom items, functional scales, and global health status scale with higher scores on global health status/QoL and functioning scales representing better health status/function, but higher scores on symptom scales/items representing greater symptom severity. An improvement in symptoms were indicated by a negative change in score from baseline. A positive change in score from baseline indicated a deterioration of symptoms. A minimum clinically meaningful change was defined as change from baseline of \>=10. Change from baseline in C30: global health status/QoL, physical functioning, fatigue, appetite loss and LC13: dyspnoea, cough and pain in chest are presented.
Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Status Based on Overall Survival, Progression-Free Survival and Objective Response RateUp to 9 yearsBlood samples will be collected for clinical biomarker testing and a tumor specimen will be collected as per tumor specimen collection requirements. The specimen will be evaluated by immunohistochemistry to determine the expression of tumor specific antigens and immune markers. The PD-L1 is a biomarker and data for number of participants with its positive status will be presented.

Countries

China, Hong Kong, India, Mexico, Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Korea, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORYilong Wu, MD

Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This Phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at 82 investigational sites across 10 countries in participants with locally advanced, unresectable, non-small cell lung cancer (Stage III), who had not progressed following definitive, platinum-based, chemoradiation therapy (CRT).

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of a screening period (Day -84 to Day -1), randomization (Day 1), treatment period commencing on Day 1 and a survival follow-up period until protocol-specified discontinuation criteria were met. A total of 407 participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either durvalumab or placebo in this study. Results are presented up to data cut-off (DCO) date of 23-Jun-2024.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Durvalumab
Participants received durvalumab 1500 mg via IV infusion on Day 1 and Q4W thereafter until confirmed radiological progression, initiation of alternative cancer therapy, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another discontinuation criterion was met.
272
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to durvalumab via IV infusion on Day 1 and Q4W thereafter until confirmed radiological progression, initiation of alternative cancer therapy, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another discontinuation criterion was met.
135
Total407

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalDurvalumab
Age, Continuous61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.96
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.33
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
135 Participants402 Participants267 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
97 Participants294 Participants197 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
38 Participants113 Participants75 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants43 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
117 Participants364 Participants247 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
143 / 27275 / 135
other
Total, other adverse events
223 / 27194 / 134
serious
Total, serious adverse events
104 / 27145 / 134

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Modified Intent-to-Treat [mITT] Set)

The PFS per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. (RECIST 1.1) using blinded independent central review (BICR) assessments was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression (PD) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs) and an absolute increase of \>=5 millimeters (mm), taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since treatment started including the baseline sum of diameters. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: Tumor scans performed at screening, every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)

Population: The mITT set included all randomized participants who were without sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DurvalumabProgression-Free Survival (PFS) (Modified Intent-to-Treat [mITT] Set)14.0 months
PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) (Modified Intent-to-Treat [mITT] Set)6.5 months
Comparison: The hazard ratio and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for the level of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (PD-L1 \<1% versus \[vs\] PD-L1 \>=1%) and prior therapy (concurrent \[c\]CRT vs sequential \[s\]CRT), with treatment as the only covariate and ties handled by Efron approach.p-value: 0.03895% CI: [0.578, 0.986]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132

Patient reported outcomes for 5 disease related symptoms was assessed using EORTC QLQ-Core 30 (C30) items questionnaire (fatigue, appetite loss) and EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer module 13 (LC13) (dyspnoea, cough and pain in chest).An outcome variable consisting of a score from 0 to 100 was derived for each of the symptom scales/symptom items, functional scales, and global health status scale with higher scores on global health status/QoL and functioning scales representing better health status/function, but higher scores on symptom scales/items representing greater symptom severity. An improvement in symptoms were indicated by a negative change in score from baseline. A positive change in score from baseline indicated a deterioration of symptoms. A minimum clinically meaningful change was defined as change from baseline of \>=10. Change from baseline in C30: global health status/QoL, physical functioning, fatigue, appetite loss and LC13: dyspnoea, cough and pain in chest are presented.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 132

Population: Analysis was performed on the mITT and ITT set. The mITT set included all randomized participants who were without sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. The ITT set included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-LC13: Pain in chest symptom10.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.592
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-LC13: Cough symptom15.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.467
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Appetite loss symptom5.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.791
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-LC13: Dyspnoea symptom15.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.998
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-LC13: Cough symptom16.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.009
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-LC13: Pain in chest symptom9.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.625
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Global health status/QoL78.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.943
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Global health status/QoL78.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.918
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Fatigue symptom10.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.814
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Physical functioning90.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.12
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Fatigue symptom10.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.866
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Appetite loss symptom5.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.279
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-LC13: Dyspnoea symptom15.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.974
DurvalumabChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Physical functioning90.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.216
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Fatigue symptom13.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.026
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Physical functioning92.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.012
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Fatigue symptom13.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.225
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Global health status/QoL74.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.261
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-LC13: Pain in chest symptom7.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.298
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-LC13: Dyspnoea symptom10.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.112
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Appetite loss symptom3.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.026
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Global health status/QoL74.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.846
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-LC13: Dyspnoea symptom11.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.172
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Appetite loss symptom3.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.808
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-LC13: Cough symptom22.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.943
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-C30: Physical functioning92.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.869
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132mITT set: EORTC QLQ-LC13: Pain in chest symptom6.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.412
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ) at Week 132ITT set: EORTC QLQ-LC13: Cough symptom21.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.932
Secondary

Duration of Response (DoR)

The DoR per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since treatment started including the baseline sum of diameters. The DoR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: Tumor scans performed at screening, every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)

Population: Analysis was performed on the mITT and ITT set. The mITT set included all randomized participants who were without sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. The ITT set included all randomized participants. Only responders (participants with objective response) are analyzed and reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DurvalumabDuration of Response (DoR)mITT setNA months
DurvalumabDuration of Response (DoR)ITT setNA months
PlaceboDuration of Response (DoR)mITT set37.6 months
PlaceboDuration of Response (DoR)ITT set37.6 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab

Blood samples were collected to determine the presence of ADAs and ADA-neutralizing antibodies (nAb) for durvalumab using validated assays. ADA prevalence was defined as the number of participants with positive ADA result at any time, baseline or post-baseline. ADA incidence was defined as either treatment-induced (post-baseline ADA positive only) or treatment-boosted ADA (baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted to \>=4-fold during the study period). Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA positive only post-baseline and not detected at baseline. Persistently positive was defined as having at least 2 post-baseline ADA positive assessments with at least 16 weeks between the first and last positive assessment, or ADA positive at the last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive was defined as having at least 1 post-baseline ADA positive assessment without fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2 and 4 (each cycle=28 days)

Population: ADA analysis set included all participants who had non-missing baseline ADA and at least 1 non-missing post-baseline ADA result.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DurvalumabNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabTreatment-induced ADA3 Participants
DurvalumabNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabPersistently positive0 Participants
DurvalumabNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabnAb positive2 Participants
DurvalumabNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabADA positive at any visit (ADA prevalence)9 Participants
DurvalumabNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabTreatment-emergent ADA positive (ADA incidence)3 Participants
DurvalumabNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabADA positive at both baseline and post-baseline1 Participants
DurvalumabNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabADA positive at baseline only5 Participants
DurvalumabNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabTreatment-boosted ADA0 Participants
DurvalumabNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to DurvalumabTransiently positive4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Status Based on Overall Survival, Progression-Free Survival and Objective Response Rate

Blood samples will be collected for clinical biomarker testing and a tumor specimen will be collected as per tumor specimen collection requirements. The specimen will be evaluated by immunohistochemistry to determine the expression of tumor specific antigens and immune markers. The PD-L1 is a biomarker and data for number of participants with its positive status will be presented.

Time frame: Up to 9 years

Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

The ORR per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the percentage of participants with at least 1 visit response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on all participants in the subset of the analysis population including only those participants with measurable disease at baseline per BICR. The CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters as long as criteria for PD are not met.

Time frame: Tumor scans performed at screening, every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)

Population: Analysis was performed on the mITT and ITT set. The mITT set included all randomized participants who were without sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. The ITT set included all randomized participants. Only those participants with measurable disease at baseline per BICR are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DurvalumabObjective Response Rate (ORR)mITT set27.6 percentage of participants
DurvalumabObjective Response Rate (ORR)ITT set27.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboObjective Response Rate (ORR)mITT set20.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboObjective Response Rate (ORR)ITT set19.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: For mITT set. The comparison was performed using a logistic regression model, with treatment as a covariate and adjusting for the level of PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 \<1% vs. PD-L1 \>=1%) and prior therapy (cCRT vs. sCRT), with 95% CI calculated by profile likelihood.p-value: 0.12895% CI: [0.891, 2.607]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: For ITT set. The comparison was performed using a logistic regression model, with treatment as a covariate and adjusting for the level of PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 \<1% vs. PD-L1 \>=1%) and prior therapy (cCRT vs. sCRT), with 95% CI calculated by profile likelihood.p-value: 0.10595% CI: [0.915, 2.638]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

The OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)

Population: Analysis was performed on the mITT and ITT set. The mITT set included all randomized participants who were without sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. The ITT set included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DurvalumabOverall Survival (OS)mITT set38.3 months
DurvalumabOverall Survival (OS)ITT set38.4 months
PlaceboOverall Survival (OS)mITT set32.5 months
PlaceboOverall Survival (OS)ITT set32.5 months
Comparison: For mITT set. The hazard ratio and CIs were calculated using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for the level of PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 \<1% vs PD-L1 \>=1%) and prior therapy (cCRT vs sCRT), with treatment as the only covariate and ties handled by Efron approach.p-value: 0.34695% CI: [0.656, 1.166]Log Rank
Comparison: For ITT set. The hazard ratio and CIs were calculated using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for the level of PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 \<1% vs PD-L1 \>=1%) and prior therapy (cCRT vs sCRT), with treatment as the only covariate and ties handled by Efron approach.p-value: 0.34695% CI: [0.663, 1.162]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Alive and Progression-Free at 12 and 18 Months (PFS12 and PFS18)

The PFS per RECIST 1.1 using BICR assessments was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective PD or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since treatment started including the baseline sum of diameters. The PFS12 and PFS18 were defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator at 12 and 18 months, respectively and both were obtained using the algorithm for the RECIST 1.1 site Investigator tumor data.

Time frame: Months 12 and 18

Population: Analysis was performed on the mITT and ITT set. The mITT set included all randomized participants who were without sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. The ITT set included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DurvalumabPercentage of Participants Alive and Progression-Free at 12 and 18 Months (PFS12 and PFS18)PFS12, mITT set53.6 percentage of participants
DurvalumabPercentage of Participants Alive and Progression-Free at 12 and 18 Months (PFS12 and PFS18)PFS18, mITT set43.4 percentage of participants
DurvalumabPercentage of Participants Alive and Progression-Free at 12 and 18 Months (PFS12 and PFS18)PFS12, ITT set54.2 percentage of participants
DurvalumabPercentage of Participants Alive and Progression-Free at 12 and 18 Months (PFS12 and PFS18)PFS18, ITT set44.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Alive and Progression-Free at 12 and 18 Months (PFS12 and PFS18)PFS18, ITT set33.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Alive and Progression-Free at 12 and 18 Months (PFS12 and PFS18)PFS12, mITT set42.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Alive and Progression-Free at 12 and 18 Months (PFS12 and PFS18)PFS12, ITT set42.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Alive and Progression-Free at 12 and 18 Months (PFS12 and PFS18)PFS18, mITT set34.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Alive at 24 Months (OS24)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy. The OS24 was defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months after randomization.

Time frame: Month 24

Population: Analysis was performed on the mITT and ITT set. The mITT set included all randomized participants who were without sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. The ITT set included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DurvalumabPercentage of Participants Alive at 24 Months (OS24)mITT set60.7 percentage of participants
DurvalumabPercentage of Participants Alive at 24 Months (OS24)ITT set60.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Alive at 24 Months (OS24)mITT set54.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Alive at 24 Months (OS24)ITT set54.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Intent-to-Treat [ITT] Set)

The PFS per RECIST 1.1 using BICR assessments was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective PD or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since treatment started including the baseline sum of diameters. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: Tumor scans performed at screening, every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)

Population: The ITT set included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DurvalumabProgression-Free Survival (PFS) (Intent-to-Treat [ITT] Set)14.1 months
PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) (Intent-to-Treat [ITT] Set)7.4 months
Comparison: The hazard ratio and CIs were calculated using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for the level of PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 \<1% vs PD-L1\>=1%) and prior therapy (cCRT vs sCRT), with treatment as the only covariate and ties handled by Efron approach.p-value: 0.02695% CI: [0.575, 0.966]Log Rank
Secondary

Serum Concentration of Durvalumab

Blood samples were collected to determine the concentration of durvalumab.

Time frame: End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, pre-infusion on Cycles 2 and 4 Day 1 and Month 3 follow-up (each cycle=28 days)

Population: The Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of durvalumab as per protocol for whom any post-dose data were available and who did not violate/deviate from protocol in ways that would significantly have affected the PK analyses. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DurvalumabSerum Concentration of DurvalumabCycle 1 Day 1511415.541 nanogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 222137.0134
DurvalumabSerum Concentration of DurvalumabCycle 2 Day 193929.182 nanogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 86188.4708
DurvalumabSerum Concentration of DurvalumabCycle 4 Day 1138752.016 nanogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 73792.7522
DurvalumabSerum Concentration of DurvalumabMonth 3 follow-up40303.562 nanogram/milliliterStandard Deviation 47725.6327
Secondary

Time From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)

PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression event subsequent to first subsequent therapy, or death. The date of the second progression was recorded by the Investigator and defined according to local standard clinical practice and could have involved any of objective radiological imaging, symptomatic progression, or death. Median time to PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: Tumor scans performed at screening, every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)

Population: Analysis was performed on the mITT and ITT set. The mITT set included all randomized participants who were without sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. The ITT set included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DurvalumabTime From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)mITT set26.4 months
DurvalumabTime From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)ITT set26.2 months
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)mITT set19.5 months
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)ITT set19.5 months
Comparison: For mITT set. The hazard ratio and CIs were calculated using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for the level of PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 \<1% vs. PD-L1 \>=1%) and prior therapy (cCRT vs. sCRT), with treatment as the only covariate and ties handled by Efron approach.p-value: 0.27595% CI: [0.648, 1.138]Log Rank
Comparison: For ITT set. The hazard ratio and CIs were calculated using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for the level of PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 \<1% vs. PD-L1 \>=1%) and prior therapy (cCRT vs. sCRT), with treatment as the only covariate and ties handled by Efron approach.p-value: 0.24195% CI: [0.648, 1.122]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Death or Distant Metastases (TTDM)

TTDM as per RECIST 1.1 using BICR was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of distant metastasis or death in the absence of distant metastasis. Distant metastasis was defined as any new lesion that was outside of the radiation field according to RECIST 1.1. Median TTDM was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: Tumor scans performed at screening, every 8 weeks ±1 week up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks ±1 week thereafter until confirmed PD. Assessed up to the DCO date 23-Jun-2024 (a maximum of approximately 2035 days)

Population: Analysis was performed on the mITT and ITT set. The mITT set included all randomized participants who were without sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. The ITT set included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DurvalumabTime to Death or Distant Metastases (TTDM)ITT set42.6 months
DurvalumabTime to Death or Distant Metastases (TTDM)mITT set42.6 months
PlaceboTime to Death or Distant Metastases (TTDM)mITT setNA months
PlaceboTime to Death or Distant Metastases (TTDM)ITT setNA months
Comparison: For mITT set. The hazard ratio and CIs were calculated using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for the level of PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 \<1% vs. PD-L1 \>=1%) and prior therapy (cCRT vs. sCRT), with treatment as the only covariate and ties handled by Efron approach.p-value: 0.76995% CI: [0.726, 1.578]Log Rank
Comparison: For ITT set. The hazard ratio and CIs were calculated using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for the level of PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 \<1% vs. PD-L1 \>=1%) and prior therapy (cCRT vs. sCRT), with treatment as the only covariate and ties handled by Efron approach.p-value: 0.81295% CI: [0.726, 1.539]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 7, 2026