Skip to content

Pentafecta Outcomes After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Pentafecta Outcomes After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: First 120 Cases in Brazilian University Hospital

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03706508
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-10-16
Start date
2013-08-09
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2018-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complication of Surgical Procedure, Erectile Dysfunction, Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

Robot-assisted prostatectomy, Pentafecta, Biochemical failure, Surgical margin

Brief summary

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is a surgical technique for the treatment of prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to report our initial experience with RALRP, by applying the concept of pentafecta. Pentafecta consists of the five main outcomes in the postoperative period of RALRP: erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, postoperative complications, surgical margins and biochemical failure.

Detailed description

This study will describe a initial experience in RALRP in Brazilian University Hospital. The follow-up of patients was performed as an examination at the medical consultation every three months. Complications were categorized according to the Clavien classification system. Biochemical failure was established by PSA level. Continence was defined as patients who remain dry and who do not require any kind of protection in their everyday activities. Sexual potency was defined as the ability to get and keep an erection for long enough to have satisfying sexual relations with or without the use of type-5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE-5) and a Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score greater or equal to 21. Positive surgical margin is defined as the presence of neoplastic glands in direct contact with the ink on the surface of the piece, with no interposed connective tissue.

Interventions

PROCEDURERobot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Patients with localized prostate cancer underwent transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Sponsors

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

• patients diagnosed with localized Prostate Adenocarcinoma submitted to surgical treatment with Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Exclusion criteria

* patients undergoing other treatments for adenocarcinoma of the prostate * conversion to open prostatectomy * loss of follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Erectile Dysfunction6 monthsSexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score greater or equal to 21.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biochemical Failure6 monthBiochemical failure was established by PSA level grater or equal to 0,2 ng/ml.
Surgical Margin15 daysIt is defined as the presence of neoplastic glands in direct contact with the ink on the surface of the piece.
Urinary Continence6 monthsContinence was defined as patients who remain dry and who do not require any kind of protection.Patients will be questioned in the postoperative consultations if there is a need to use some protection.
Surgical Complication30 daysComplications were categorized according to the Clavien classification system.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactBrasil S Neto, PhD
bneto@hcpa.edu.br+55 51 33598286
Backup ContactEduardo T Cachoeira, MD
cachoeira.uro@gmail.com+55 51 998123454

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026