Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of MP1032 in Patients With Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase II, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Efficacy and Safety Trial of Two Oral Doses (150 mg Bid / 300 mg Bid) of MP1032 in Male and Female Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03706209
Enrollment
155
Registered
2018-10-15
Start date
2018-02-27
Completion date
2019-06-12
Last updated
2024-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis

Keywords

moderate to severe, chronic, plaque psoriasis

Brief summary

The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of two oral doses of MP1032 (150 mg bid and 300 mg bid) when taken for 12 weeks by patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

Detailed description

This trial is a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two oral doses of MP1032 (150 mg bid and 300 mg bid) in adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. The trial design consists of a 28-day screening period, a 12-week treatment period, and subsequently a 28-day follow-up period. Each patient will have 6 visits and unscheduled visits as needed. Approximately 150 patients (2 × 50 patients MP1032 and 50 patients placebo) who meet the entry criteria will be randomized on Day 1 to receive either 150 mg MP1032, 300 mg MP1032 or placebo orally twice daily for 12 weeks. The administration of IMP will stop after end of study (in max. 13 weeks). PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index), PGA (Physician Global Assessment) and BSA (Body Surface Area) Scores will be recorded at predefined timepoints as basis for the efficacy evaluation. Safety parameter will be monitored from the signing of the informed consent form (ICF) until the last follow-up visit. To evaluate systemic concentrations of MP1032 PK (pharmacokinetics) samples will be analyzed in a subgroup.

Interventions

DRUGMP1032

hard gelatin capsules containing 50mg MP1032 as active ingredient

DRUGPlacebo

hard gelatin capsules containing no active ingredient

Sponsors

Bioskin GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
MetrioPharm AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

double-blind

Intervention model description

Three-arm randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group phase II multi-center trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participants legally competent to sign and give informed consent. 2. Adult male and female patients between 18 years and 70 years with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis (diagnosed by Investigator): 1. PASI score ≥10 - ≤20 at baseline 2. BSA score: \> 10% 3. Stable disease duration of ≥ 6 months at the initiation of IMP. 4. topical therapy fails to control the disease 3. Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18.5 and 34.9 kg/m2. 4. Women of childbearing potential (WCBP) must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening (Visit 1). In addition, sexually active WCBP must agree to use adequate contraception throughout the trial (see Section 3.2 for more details on adequate contraception): 1. A method with less than 1% failure rate OR 2. Abstinence 5. Post-menopausal women with spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 12 months and women on hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). The use of hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) during the trial is permitted, however for these patients an appropriate contraception method according to Inclusion Criterion 4 must be ensured. Sterilized women may be included (see Section 3.2 for more details on sterile definition) 6. Male patients who are sexually active with a female partner and are not surgically sterile (vasectomy performed at least six months prior to treatment) must agree to inform their female sexual partner to use an acceptable form of birth control as described in the informed consent form. For females, an acceptable method (Pearl Index \< 1%) would be to use implants, injectable, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices, or be postmenopausal, be surgically sterile (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) 7. In good health as judged by the investigator, based on medical history, physical examination, serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis 8. Patients must meet the following clinical laboratory criteria: * White blood cell count ≥3.5 × 109/L * Platelet count ≥100 × 109/L * Serum creatinine ≤1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN); estimated glomerular filtration rate \>60 mL/min * Total bilirubin ≤1.5 × ULN * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤2.5 × ULN * Hemoglobin ≥ lower limit of normal as per central laboratory reference ranges for women and men accordingly * No coagulopathy (International Normalized Ratio \[INR\] \<1.5) 9. Patients agree to minimize normal sun exposure during the course of the trial 10. Patients are considered reliable and capable of adhering to the protocol (e.g. able to understand the patient information and complete diaries), visit schedule, or medication intake according to the judgment of the Investigator.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with non-plaque form of psoriasis (erythrodermic, guttate, pustular form of psoriasis). Associated psoriasis arthritis is allowed provided no other in-/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PASI 75 - Week 12 (EoT)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Percentage of patients reaching PASI 75 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI score at End-of-Treatment (EoT) compared to baseline.
PGA Improvement - Week 12 (EoT)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)PGA improvement rate in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of 1 or more points on the 7-points PGA scale at End-of-Treatment (EoT) compared to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PASI 50 - Week 12 (EoT)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Percentage of patients reaching PASI 50 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 50% in the PASI score at End-of-Treatment (EoT) compared to baseline.
PASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 12 (EoT)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. Displayed are changes in the PASI score (LS mean estimates) at end of treatment (EoT) compared to baseline in the different arms in patients of the FAS subject analysis set wherein negative values indicate a better outcome.
PASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. For the change of baseline negative values indicate improvement and positive values indicate worsening.
Time to PASI 75from treatment start (Study Day 1 - Baseline) to either Study Day 25, 56, 84 (EoT) or 112 (FU)Time to the achievement of PASI 75, if applicable. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. Displayed is the number of responders that reached an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI score in the respective week.
Time to PASI 50from treatment start (Study Day 1 - Baseline) to either Study Day 25, 56, 84 (EoT) or 112 (FU)Time to the achievement of PASI 50, if applicable. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies. It is a physician's assessment of psoriasis that is a therapeutic standard in clinical studies for this disease. Displayed is the number of responders that reached an improvement of at least 50% in the PASI score in the respective week.
PGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean PGA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at end of treatment. The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). For change from baseline negative values indicate improvement.
PGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). The 7-point's assessment of psoriasis is a therapeutic standard in clinical studies for this disease. Frequency of the scores from 0 to 6 at end of treatment in the different treatment groups is displayed.
BSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean BSA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at end of treatment. The BSA (Body Surface Area) provides information on the total surface area of the body affected with psoriasis plaques in percent (%).
PASI 75 - Week 4Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Percentage of patients reaching PASI 75 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI score at the respective visit (week 4) compared to baseline.
PASI 75 - Week 8Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Percentage of patients reaching PASI 75 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI score at the respective visit (week 8) compared to baseline.
PASI 75 - Week 16 (FU)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Percentage of patients reaching PASI 75 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI score at the respective visit (Follow Up) compared to baseline.
PASI 50 - Week 4Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Percentage of patients reaching PASI 50 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 50% in the PASI score at the respective visit (week 4) compared to baseline.
PASI 50 - Week 8Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Percentage of patients reaching PASI 50 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 50% in the PASI score at the respective visit (week 8) compared to baseline.
PASI 50 - Week 16 (FU)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Percentage of patients reaching PASI 50 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 50% in the PASI score at the respective visit (Follow Up) compared to baseline.
PASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 4Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. Displayed are changes in the PASI score (LS mean estimates) at the respective visit (week 4) compared to baseline in the different arms in patients of the FAS subject analysis set wherein negative values indicate a better outcome.
PASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 8Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies with a maximum value of 72 points, any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. It is a physician's assessment of psoriasis that is a therapeutic standard in clinical studies for this disease. Displayed are changes in the PASI score (LS mean estimates) at the respective visit (week 8) compared to baseline in the different arms in patients of the FAS subject analysis set wherein negative values indicate a better outcome.
PASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 16 (FU)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. Displayed are changes in the PASI score (LS mean estimates) at the respective visit (week 16, FU) compared to baseline in the different arms in patients of the FAS subject analysis set wherein negative values indicate a better outcome.
PASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. For the change of baseline negative values indicate improvement and positive values indicate worsening.
PASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. For the change of baseline negative values indicate improvement and positive values indicate worsening.
PASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. For the change of baseline negative values indicate improvement and positive values indicate worsening.
PGA Improvement - Week 4Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)PGA improvement rate in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of 1 or more points on the 7-points PGA scale at the respective visit (week 4) compared to baseline.
PGA Improvement - Week 8Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)PGA improvement rate in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of 1 or more points on the 7-points PGA scale at the respective visit (week 8) compared to baseline.
PGA Improvement - Week 16 (FU)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)PGA improvement rate in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of 1 or more points on the 7-points PGA scale at the respective visit (Follow Up) compared to baseline.
PGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean PGA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at the respective visit (week 4). The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease).
PGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean PGA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at the respective visit (week 8). The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease).
PGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean PGA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at Follow Up visit. The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease).
PGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). Frequency of different scores at the respective visit (baseline) is displayed.
PGA Frequency Counts - Week 4Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). Frequency of different scores at the respective visit (week 4) is displayed.
PGA Frequency Counts - Week 8Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). Frequency of different scores at the respective visit (week 8) is displayed.
PGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). Frequency of different scores at follow up visit is displayed.
BSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean BSA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at the respective visit (week 4). The BSA (Body Surface Area) provides information on the total surface area of the body affected with psoriasis plaques in percent (%).
BSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean BSA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at the respective visit (week 8). The BSA (Body Surface Area) provides information on the total surface area of the body affected with psoriasis plaques in percent (%).
BSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Mean BSA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at follow up visit. The BSA (Body Surface Area) provides information on the total surface area of the body affected with psoriasis plaques in percent (%).
PK Data - CmaxMorning dose on Study Day 1The non-compartment parameter Cmax is the maximum MP1032 concentration observed based on the evaluation of systemic MP1032 concentrations in plasma samples wherein the respective blood samples were taken predose and 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after dosing.
PK Data - TmaxMorning dose on Study Day 1The non-compartment parameter tmax is the time point (effective) at which the maximum concentration (Cmax) was observed based on the evaluation of systemic MP1032 concentrations in plasma samples wherein the respective blood samples were taken predose and 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after dosing.
PK Data - AUC(0,t)Morning dose on Study Day 1The non-compartment parameter AUC(0,t) is the area under the concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable sample drawn based on the evaluation of systemic MP1032 concentrations in plasma samples wherein the respective blood samples were taken predose and 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after dosing.
Number of Patients With TEAEsOverall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in treatment groups compared to placebo
Number of Patients With Serious TEAEsOverall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)Number of patients with serious treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in treatment groups compared to placebo
Number of Patients With TEAEs Leading to Study DiscontinuationOverall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to study discontinuation in treatment groups compared to placebo
Number of Patients With TEAEs by SOCOverall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in treatment groups compared to placebo displayed by MedDRA System Organ Classes (SOCs). Only PTs (MedDRA Preferred Terms) occuring in at least 5% of the patients were considered for this overview.
Number of Patients With TEAEs by IntensityOverall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in treatment groups compared to placebo displayed by severity
Number of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPOverall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in treatment groups compared to placebo displayed according to investigators causality assessment.
Number of Patients With TEAEs by Causality With the IMPOverall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in treatment groups compared to placebo displayed according to investigators causality assessment wherein certainly, probably and possibly related were summarized as related whereas unlikely and not related were summarized as not related.
PASI 75 VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)Percentage of patients reaching PASI 75 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo in the valid cases set (VCS). The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI score at End-of-Treatment (EoT) compared to baseline.
Extent of Exposure - Capsules Per Applicationoverall trial / treatment period - from baseline to week 12 (EoT) or - if applicable - week16 (FU)Average number of capsules per application = # dosed capsules / # applications. Planned were 2 applications (a 6 capsules) twice a day over a treatment period of 12 weeks. The number of missed and/or overdosed capsules is determined based on the restitution of used study drug packages.
Extent of Exposure - Capsules Per Dayoverall trial / treatment period - from baseline to week 12 (EoT) or - if applicable - week16 (FU)Average number of capsules per day = # dosed capsules / days of treatment. Planned were 2 applications (a 6 capsules) twice a day over a treatment period of 12 weeks. The number of missed and/or overdosed capsules is determined based on the restitution of used study drug packages.
Sufficient Extent of Exposureoverall trial / treatment period - cumulative from baseline to week 12 (EoT) or - if applicable - week16 (FU)Exposure was regarded as sufficient if the patient took at least 80% of planned applications (respectively capsules) wherein % exposure was calculated as 100 \* # dosed capsules / # planned capsules. Planned were 2 applications (a 6 capsules) twice a day over a treatment period of 12 weeks (i.e. 1008 capsules). The number of missed and/or overdosed capsules is determined based on the restitution of used study drug packages.
Extent of Exposure - Treatment Durationoverall trial / treatment period - cumulative from baseline to week 4, 8, 12 (EoT), and - if applicable - week16 (FU)Treatment duration = date of last dose - date of first dose + 1. 84 treatment days (12 weeks) were planned.
Extent of Exposure - Dosed Capsulesoverall trial / treatment period - cumulative from baseline to week 12 (EoT) or - if applicable - week16 (FU)Total (cumulative) number of dosed capsules = 6 \* # planned applications - # missed capsules + # overdose capsules. Planned were 2 applications (a 6 capsules) twice a day over a treatment period of 12 weeks. The number of missed and/or overdosed capsules is determined based on the restitution of used study drug packages.
PGA Improvement VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)PGA improvement rate in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo in the valid-cases-set (VCS). The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of 1 or more points on the 7-points PGA scale at End-of-Treatment (EoT) compared to baseline.

Countries

Germany, Poland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
150 mg MP1032 Bid
3 × 50 mg (150 mg) MP1032 plus 3 × placebo hard gelatin capsules (per dosage) provided twice daily over a period of 12 weeks. MP1032: hard gelatin capsules containing 50mg MP1032 as active ingredient Placebo: hard gelatin capsules containing no active ingredient
51
300 mg MP1032 Bid
6 × 50 mg (300 mg) MP1032 hard gelatin capsules (per dosage) provided twice daily over a period of 12 weeks. MP1032: hard gelatin capsules containing 50mg MP1032 as active ingredient
48
Placebo Bid
6 × placebo hard gelatin capsules (per dosage) provided twice daily over a period of 12 weeks. Placebo: hard gelatin capsules containing no active ingredient
55
Total154

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic150 mg MP1032 Bid300 mg MP1032 BidPlacebo BidTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
48 Participants46 Participants52 Participants146 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
51 Participants48 Participants55 Participants154 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
12 Participants14 Participants15 Participants41 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
39 Participants34 Participants40 Participants113 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants18 Participants20 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants30 Participants35 Participants106 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 510 / 480 / 550 / 204
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 5115 / 4832 / 557 / 204
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 510 / 483 / 551 / 204

Outcome results

Primary

PASI 75 - Week 12 (EoT)

Percentage of patients reaching PASI 75 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI score at End-of-Treatment (EoT) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 12 (EoT)Responder4 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder46 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 12 (EoT)Responder4 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder43 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 75 - Week 12 (EoT)Responder1 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 75 - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder53 Participants
p-value: 0.16195% CI: [0.47, 35.97]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.11195% CI: [0.55, 55.43]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

PGA Improvement - Week 12 (EoT)

PGA improvement rate in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of 1 or more points on the 7-points PGA scale at End-of-Treatment (EoT) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 12 (EoT)Responder14 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder36 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 12 (EoT)Responder14 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder33 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Improvement - Week 12 (EoT)Responder10 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Improvement - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder44 Participants
p-value: 0.22295% CI: [0.71, 4.25]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.18295% CI: [0.75, 4.91]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

BSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)

Mean BSA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at end of treatment. The BSA (Body Surface Area) provides information on the total surface area of the body affected with psoriasis plaques in percent (%).

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT)20.2 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 13
150 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Day 119 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 8.8
150 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT) - change from baseline1.2 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 9.4
300 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT)19.7 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 17.2
300 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Day 119.2 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 10.5
300 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT) - change from baseline0.5 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 11.3
Placebo BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Day 117.5 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 6.3
Placebo BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT) - change from baseline-0.2 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 5.3
Placebo BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT)17.3 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 8.7
Secondary

BSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)

Mean BSA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at follow up visit. The BSA (Body Surface Area) provides information on the total surface area of the body affected with psoriasis plaques in percent (%).

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU)20.9 BSA (%)Standard Deviation 15.5
150 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU) - change from baseline0.6 BSA (%)Standard Deviation 12.8
300 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU)20.2 BSA (%)Standard Deviation 19.8
300 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU) - change from baseline0.4 BSA (%)Standard Deviation 13.4
Placebo BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU)15.5 BSA (%)Standard Deviation 6.4
Placebo BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU) - change from baseline-1.1 BSA (%)Standard Deviation 4.1
Secondary

BSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4

Mean BSA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at the respective visit (week 4). The BSA (Body Surface Area) provides information on the total surface area of the body affected with psoriasis plaques in percent (%).

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 419.7 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 12.4
150 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Day 119 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 8.8
150 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 4 - change from baseline0.7 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 8.3
300 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 418.3 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 11.9
300 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Day 119.2 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 10.5
300 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 4 - change from baseline-0.9 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 6.3
Placebo BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Day 117.5 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 6.3
Placebo BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 4 - change from baseline-0.4 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 3.1
Placebo BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 417.1 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 7.1
Secondary

BSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8

Mean BSA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at the respective visit (week 8). The BSA (Body Surface Area) provides information on the total surface area of the body affected with psoriasis plaques in percent (%).

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 820.4 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 12.9
150 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Day 119 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 8.8
150 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 8 - change from baseline1.4 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 9.5
300 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 818.6 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 14.7
300 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Day 119.2 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 10.5
300 mg MP1032 BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 8 - change from baseline-0.6 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 9
Placebo BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Day 117.5 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 6.3
Placebo BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 8 - change from baseline-0.9 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 3.9
Placebo BidBSA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 816.6 percentage of body surface areaStandard Deviation 7.9
Secondary

Extent of Exposure - Capsules Per Application

Average number of capsules per application = # dosed capsules / # applications. Planned were 2 applications (a 6 capsules) twice a day over a treatment period of 12 weeks. The number of missed and/or overdosed capsules is determined based on the restitution of used study drug packages.

Time frame: overall trial / treatment period - from baseline to week 12 (EoT) or - if applicable - week16 (FU)

Population: The safety-evaluation-set (SES) included all patients who received any trial medication at least once.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidExtent of Exposure - Capsules Per Application6.00 capsules per applicationStandard Deviation 0.02
300 mg MP1032 BidExtent of Exposure - Capsules Per Application6.00 capsules per applicationStandard Deviation 0.01
Placebo BidExtent of Exposure - Capsules Per Application6.00 capsules per applicationStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Extent of Exposure - Capsules Per Day

Average number of capsules per day = # dosed capsules / days of treatment. Planned were 2 applications (a 6 capsules) twice a day over a treatment period of 12 weeks. The number of missed and/or overdosed capsules is determined based on the restitution of used study drug packages.

Time frame: overall trial / treatment period - from baseline to week 12 (EoT) or - if applicable - week16 (FU)

Population: The safety-evaluation-set (SES) included all patients who received any trial medication at least once.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidExtent of Exposure - Capsules Per Day11.48 capsules per dayStandard Deviation 1.4
300 mg MP1032 BidExtent of Exposure - Capsules Per Day11.85 capsules per dayStandard Deviation 0.2
Placebo BidExtent of Exposure - Capsules Per Day11.79 capsules per dayStandard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Extent of Exposure - Dosed Capsules

Total (cumulative) number of dosed capsules = 6 \* # planned applications - # missed capsules + # overdose capsules. Planned were 2 applications (a 6 capsules) twice a day over a treatment period of 12 weeks. The number of missed and/or overdosed capsules is determined based on the restitution of used study drug packages.

Time frame: overall trial / treatment period - cumulative from baseline to week 12 (EoT) or - if applicable - week16 (FU)

Population: The safety-evaluation-set (SES) included all patients who received any trial medication at least once.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidExtent of Exposure - Dosed Capsules821.9 capsulesStandard Deviation 304.3
300 mg MP1032 BidExtent of Exposure - Dosed Capsules920.6 capsulesStandard Deviation 214.2
Placebo BidExtent of Exposure - Dosed Capsules872.2 capsulesStandard Deviation 248.3
Secondary

Extent of Exposure - Treatment Duration

Treatment duration = date of last dose - date of first dose + 1. 84 treatment days (12 weeks) were planned.

Time frame: overall trial / treatment period - cumulative from baseline to week 4, 8, 12 (EoT), and - if applicable - week16 (FU)

Population: The safety-evaluation-set (SES) included all patients who received any trial medication at least once.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidExtent of Exposure - Treatment Duration70.7 daysStandard Deviation 24.1
300 mg MP1032 BidExtent of Exposure - Treatment Duration76.1 daysStandard Deviation 21.1
Placebo BidExtent of Exposure - Treatment Duration73.9 daysStandard Deviation 21
Secondary

Number of Patients With Serious TEAEs

Number of patients with serious treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in treatment groups compared to placebo

Time frame: Overall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)

Population: The safety-evaluation-set (SES) included all patients who received any trial medication at least once.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With Serious TEAEs0 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With Serious TEAEs0 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With Serious TEAEs3 participants
p-value: 0.2439Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.2461Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients With TEAEs

Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in treatment groups compared to placebo

Time frame: Overall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)

Population: The safety-evaluation-set (SES) included all patients who received any trial medication at least once.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs22 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs15 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs33 participants
p-value: 0.1193Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.0054Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients With TEAEs by Causality With the IMP

Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in treatment groups compared to placebo displayed according to investigators causality assessment wherein certainly, probably and possibly related were summarized as related whereas unlikely and not related were summarized as not related.

Time frame: Overall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)

Population: The safety-evaluation-set (SES) included all patients who received any trial medication at least once.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Causality With the IMPRelated5 participants
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Causality With the IMPNot related17 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Causality With the IMPRelated2 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Causality With the IMPNot related13 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Causality With the IMPRelated9 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Causality With the IMPNot related24 participants
p-value: 0.098Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.0032Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients With TEAEs by Intensity

Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in treatment groups compared to placebo displayed by severity

Time frame: Overall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)

Population: The safety-evaluation-set (SES) included all patients who received any trial medication at least once.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by IntensityMild13 participants
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by IntensityModerate7 participants
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by IntensitySevere2 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by IntensityMild11 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by IntensitySevere0 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by IntensityModerate4 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by IntensityModerate15 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by IntensitySevere4 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by IntensityMild14 participants
p-value: 0.0507Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.0005Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMP

Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in treatment groups compared to placebo displayed according to investigators causality assessment.

Time frame: Overall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)

Population: The safety-evaluation-set (SES) included all patients who received any trial medication at least once.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPUnlikely related6 participants
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPPossibly related4 participants
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPCertainly related0 participants
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPProbably related1 participants
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPNot related11 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPPossibly related2 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPCertainly related0 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPProbably related0 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPUnlikely related5 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPNot related8 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPNot related10 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPUnlikely related14 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPCertainly related0 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPPossibly related8 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by Relation to the IMPProbably related1 participants
p-value: 0.0504Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.0013Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients With TEAEs by SOC

Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in treatment groups compared to placebo displayed by MedDRA System Organ Classes (SOCs). Only PTs (MedDRA Preferred Terms) occuring in at least 5% of the patients were considered for this overview.

Time frame: Overall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)

Population: The safety-evaluation-set (SES) included all patients who received any trial medication at least once.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by SOCGastrointestinal disorder5 participants
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by SOCNervous system disorder2 participants
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by SOCSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3 participants
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by SOCInfections and infestations11 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by SOCInfections and infestations8 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by SOCSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by SOCNervous system disorder4 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by SOCGastrointestinal disorder2 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by SOCNervous system disorder2 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by SOCInfections and infestations14 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by SOCSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders10 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs by SOCGastrointestinal disorder7 participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation

Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to study discontinuation in treatment groups compared to placebo

Time frame: Overall Trial - Explicit inquiry on Day1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (EoT), Week 16 (Follow Up)

Population: The safety-evaluation-set (SES) included all patients who received any trial medication at least once.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
150 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation2 participants
300 mg MP1032 BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation0 participants
Placebo BidNumber of Patients With TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation5 participants
p-value: 0.4395Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.0593Fisher Exact
Secondary

PASI 50 - Week 12 (EoT)

Percentage of patients reaching PASI 50 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 50% in the PASI score at End-of-Treatment (EoT) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 12 (EoT)Responder8 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder42 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 12 (EoT)Responder10 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder37 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 50 - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder48 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 50 - Week 12 (EoT)Responder6 Participants
p-value: 0.4795% CI: [0.5, 4.52]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.13695% CI: [0.76, 7.82]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PASI 50 - Week 16 (FU)

Percentage of patients reaching PASI 50 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 50% in the PASI score at the respective visit (Follow Up) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 16 (FU)Responder8 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 16 (FU)Non-Responder30 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 16 (FU)Responder10 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 16 (FU)Non-Responder30 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 50 - Week 16 (FU)Responder6 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 50 - Week 16 (FU)Non-Responder38 Participants
p-value: 0.35595% CI: [0.53, 5.72]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.19895% CI: [0.67, 7.37]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PASI 50 - Week 4

Percentage of patients reaching PASI 50 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 50% in the PASI score at the respective visit (week 4) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 4Responder2 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 4Non-Responder48 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 4Responder7 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 4Non-Responder40 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 50 - Week 4Responder5 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 50 - Week 4Non-Responder49 Participants
p-value: 0.28795% CI: [0.08, 2.27]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.33295% CI: [0.53, 6.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PASI 50 - Week 8

Percentage of patients reaching PASI 50 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 50% in the PASI score at the respective visit (week 8) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 8Responder5 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 8Non-Responder45 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 8Responder9 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 50 - Week 8Non-Responder38 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 50 - Week 8Responder7 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 50 - Week 8Non-Responder47 Participants
p-value: 0.71995% CI: [0.25, 2.63]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.35795% CI: [0.55, 5.32]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PASI 75 VCS - Week 12 (EoT)

Percentage of patients reaching PASI 75 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo in the valid cases set (VCS). The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI score at End-of-Treatment (EoT) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The valid-cases-set (VCS) included all patients from the full-analysis-set (FAS), who completed the assessment of the co-primary endpoints without any protocol violation interfering with the precise evaluation of treatment efficacy and with sufficient exposure to IMP.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder29 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Responder3 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Responder3 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder33 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 75 VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder33 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 75 VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Responder1 Participants
p-value: 0.29495% CI: [0.33, 25.39]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.29195% CI: [0.31, 53.14]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PASI 75 - Week 16 (FU)

Percentage of patients reaching PASI 75 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI score at the respective visit (Follow Up) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 16 (FU)Responder4 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 16 (FU)Non-Responder34 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 16 (FU)Responder5 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 16 (FU)Non-Responder35 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 75 - Week 16 (FU)Responder2 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 75 - Week 16 (FU)Non-Responder42 Participants
p-value: 0.37595% CI: [0.38, 12.84]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.11695% CI: [0.66, 27.08]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PASI 75 - Week 4

Percentage of patients reaching PASI 75 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI score at the respective visit (week 4) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 4Responder0 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 4Non-Responder50 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 4Responder1 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 4Non-Responder46 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 75 - Week 4Responder2 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 75 - Week 4Non-Responder52 Participants
p-value: 0.178Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.71895% CI: [0.05, 7.48]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PASI 75 - Week 8

Percentage of patients reaching PASI 75 in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI score at the respective visit (week 8) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 8Responder2 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 8Non-Responder48 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 8Responder1 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI 75 - Week 8Non-Responder46 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 75 - Week 8Responder1 Participants
Placebo BidPASI 75 - Week 8Non-Responder53 Participants
p-value: 0.47495% CI: [0.21, 28.05]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.86795% CI: [0.08, 19.05]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 12 (EoT)

Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. Displayed are changes in the PASI score (LS mean estimates) at end of treatment (EoT) compared to baseline in the different arms in patients of the FAS subject analysis set wherein negative values indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 12 (EoT)0.1 score on a scale (PASI baseline change)Standard Error 1
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 12 (EoT)-1.1 score on a scale (PASI baseline change)Standard Error 1
Placebo BidPASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 12 (EoT)-0.1 score on a scale (PASI baseline change)Standard Error 1
p-value: 0.89495% CI: [-2.6, 3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Estimates and treatment comparison of least square means using an ANCOVA model, with treatment arm and (pooled) analysis center as factors and baseline outcome as covariate.p-value: 0.45695% CI: [-3.8, 1.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

PASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 16 (FU)

Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. Displayed are changes in the PASI score (LS mean estimates) at the respective visit (week 16, FU) compared to baseline in the different arms in patients of the FAS subject analysis set wherein negative values indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 16 (FU)-0.3 score on a scale (PASI baseline change)Standard Error 1.3
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 16 (FU)-0.8 score on a scale (PASI baseline change)Standard Error 1.2
Placebo BidPASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 16 (FU)-0.8 score on a scale (PASI baseline change)Standard Error 1.2
Comparison: Estimates and treatment comparison of least square means using an ANCOVA model, with treatment arm and (pooled) analysis center as factors and baseline outcome as covariate.p-value: 0.80195% CI: [-3, 3.9]ANCOVA
Comparison: Estimates and treatment comparison of least square means using an ANCOVA model, with treatment arm and (pooled) analysis center as factors and baseline outcome as covariate.p-value: 0.95795% CI: [-3.4, 3.3]ANCOVA
Secondary

PASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 4

Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. Displayed are changes in the PASI score (LS mean estimates) at the respective visit (week 4) compared to baseline in the different arms in patients of the FAS subject analysis set wherein negative values indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 4-0.3 score on a scale (PASI baseline change)Standard Error 0.7
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 4-1.7 score on a scale (PASI baseline change)Standard Error 0.7
Placebo BidPASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 4-0.6 score on a scale (PASI baseline change)Standard Error 0.7
Comparison: Estimates and treatment comparison of least square means using an ANCOVA model, with treatment arm and (pooled) analysis center as factors and baseline outcome as covariate.p-value: 0.75795% CI: [-1.7, 2.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Estimates and treatment comparison of least square means using an ANCOVA model, with treatment arm and (pooled) analysis center as factors and baseline outcome as covariate.p-value: 0.26795% CI: [-3.1, 0.9]ANCOVA
Secondary

PASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 8

Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies with a maximum value of 72 points, any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. It is a physician's assessment of psoriasis that is a therapeutic standard in clinical studies for this disease. Displayed are changes in the PASI score (LS mean estimates) at the respective visit (week 8) compared to baseline in the different arms in patients of the FAS subject analysis set wherein negative values indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 80.2 score on a scale (PASI baseline change)Standard Error 0.9
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 8-1.8 score on a scale (PASI baseline change)Standard Error 0.9
Placebo BidPASI ANCOVA Change From Baseline - Week 8-0.8 score on a scale (PASI baseline change)Standard Error 0.8
Comparison: Estimates and treatment comparison of least square means using an ANCOVA model, with treatment arm and (pooled) analysis center as factors and baseline outcome as covariate.p-value: 0.41295% CI: [-1.4, 3.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Estimates and treatment comparison of least square means using an ANCOVA model, with treatment arm and (pooled) analysis center as factors and baseline outcome as covariate.p-value: 0.40195% CI: [-3.5, 1.4]ANCOVA
Secondary

PASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)

Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. For the change of baseline negative values indicate improvement and positive values indicate worsening.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT)15 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 9.1
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Day 114.7 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 2.8
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT) - change from baseline0.3 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 8.4
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT)13 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 9
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Day 114.2 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 2.7
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT) - change from baseline-1.2 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 7.6
Placebo BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Day 113.8 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 2.5
Placebo BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT) - change from baseline-0.3 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 5.5
Placebo BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT)13.5 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 6
Secondary

PASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)

Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. For the change of baseline negative values indicate improvement and positive values indicate worsening.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU)15.1 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 9.3
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU) - change from baseline0.3 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 9
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU) - change from baseline-0.7 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 9.6
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU)13.6 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 11
Placebo BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU)12.3 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 5.1
Placebo BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU) - change from baseline-1.2 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 4.7
Secondary

PASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 4

Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. For the change of baseline negative values indicate improvement and positive values indicate worsening.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 414.5 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 7.1
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Day 114.7 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 2.8
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 4 - change from baseline-0.2 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 6.3
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 412.4 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 5.5
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Day 114.2 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 2.7
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 4 - change from baseline-1.8 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 4.2
Placebo BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Day 113.8 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 2.5
Placebo BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 4 - change from baseline-0.7 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 4.1
Placebo BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 413.1 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 4.6
Secondary

PASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 8

Mean PASI score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. For the change of baseline negative values indicate improvement and positive values indicate worsening.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 815.1 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 8.1
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Day 114.7 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 2.8
150 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 8 - change from baseline0.4 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 7.4
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 812.3 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 7.8
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Day 114.2 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 2.7
300 mg MP1032 BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 8 - change from baseline-1.9 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 6.4
Placebo BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Day 113.8 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 2.5
Placebo BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 8 - change from baseline-1 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 4.9
Placebo BidPASI Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 812.8 score on a scale (PASI)Standard Deviation 5.4
Secondary

PGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)

Mean PGA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at end of treatment. The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). For change from baseline negative values indicate improvement.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT)4.0 score on a scale (PGA)Standard Deviation 1.3
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Day 14.1 score on a scale (PGA)Standard Deviation 0.7
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT) - change from baseline-0.1 score on a scale (PGA)Standard Deviation 1.1
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT)3.8 score on a scale (PGA)Standard Deviation 1.2
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Day 14.2 score on a scale (PGA)Standard Deviation 0.7
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT) - change from baseline-0.4 score on a scale (PGA)Standard Deviation 1
Placebo BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Day 14.1 score on a scale (PGA)Standard Deviation 0.7
Placebo BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT) - change from baseline-0.0 score on a scale (PGA)Standard Deviation 0.8
Placebo BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 12 (EoT)Week 12 (EoT)4.1 score on a scale (PGA)Standard Deviation 1
p-value: 0.99295% CI: [0, 0]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.14395% CI: [0, 0]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

PGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)

Mean PGA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at Follow Up visit. The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease).

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU)3.8 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 1.3
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Day 14.1 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU) - change from baseline-0.2 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 1.1
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU)3.8 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 1.3
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Day 14.2 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU) - change from baseline-0.4 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 1.1
Placebo BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Day 14.1 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
Placebo BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU) - change from baseline-0.1 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
Placebo BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 16 (FU)Week 16 (FU)3.9 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 1.1
p-value: 0.92195% CI: [0, 0]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.48895% CI: [0, 0]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

PGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4

Mean PGA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at the respective visit (week 4). The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease).

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 43.9 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.9
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Day 14.1 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 4 - change from baseline-0.1 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 43.9 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.9
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Day 14.2 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 4 - change from baseline-0.3 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.6
Placebo BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Day 14.1 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
Placebo BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 4 - change from baseline-0.1 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.6
Placebo BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 4Week 44.0 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 1
p-value: 0.67195% CI: [0, 0]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.18395% CI: [0, 0]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

PGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8

Mean PGA score and change to baseline in treatment groups (150 and 300mg) compared to placebo at the respective visit (week 8). The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease).

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 84.0 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 1.1
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Day 14.1 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 8 - change from baseline-0.1 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.9
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 83.8 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 1.1
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Day 14.2 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 8 - change from baseline-0.4 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.8
Placebo BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Day 14.1 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.7
Placebo BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 8 - change from baseline-0.2 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 0.8
Placebo BidPGA Descriptive Statistics - Week 8Week 83.9 PGA scoreStandard Deviation 1.1
p-value: 0.54295% CI: [0, 0]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.32895% CI: [0, 0]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

PGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)

The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). Frequency of different scores at the respective visit (baseline) is displayed.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)1 - Almost Clear0 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)5 - Moderate to Severe13 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)3 - Mild to Moderate8 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)0 - Clear0 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)4 - Moderate28 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)6 - Severe0 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)2 - Mild1 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)5 - Moderate to Severe14 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)0 - Clear0 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)1 - Almost Clear0 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)2 - Mild0 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)3 - Mild to Moderate8 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)4 - Moderate24 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)6 - Severe1 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)4 - Moderate27 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)2 - Mild0 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)5 - Moderate to Severe15 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)1 - Almost Clear0 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)0 - Clear0 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)3 - Mild to Moderate11 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Day 1 (Baseline)6 - Severe1 Participants
Secondary

PGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)

The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). The 7-point's assessment of psoriasis is a therapeutic standard in clinical studies for this disease. Frequency of the scores from 0 to 6 at end of treatment in the different treatment groups is displayed.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)0 - Clear0 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)3 - Mild to Moderate10 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)4 - Moderate15 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)5 - Moderate to Severe12 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)6 - Severe6 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)1 - Almost Clear1 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)2 - Mild6 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)6 - Severe2 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)2 - Mild7 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)3 - Mild to Moderate9 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)5 - Moderate to Severe13 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)1 - Almost Clear1 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)4 - Moderate15 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)0 - Clear0 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)4 - Moderate18 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)5 - Moderate to Severe18 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)2 - Mild4 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)6 - Severe3 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)0 - Clear0 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)3 - Mild to Moderate11 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 12 (EoT)1 - Almost Clear0 Participants
Secondary

PGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)

The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). Frequency of different scores at follow up visit is displayed.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)2 - Mild4 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)6 - Severe3 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)4 - Moderate9 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)3 - Mild to Moderate10 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)1 - Almost Clear2 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)0 - Clear0 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)5 - Moderate to Severe10 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)5 - Moderate to Severe12 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)0 - Clear0 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)1 - Almost Clear3 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)2 - Mild4 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)3 - Mild to Moderate8 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)4 - Moderate11 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)6 - Severe2 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)6 - Severe2 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)4 - Moderate14 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)1 - Almost Clear1 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)5 - Moderate to Severe13 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)0 - Clear0 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)3 - Mild to Moderate10 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 16 (FU)2 - Mild4 Participants
Secondary

PGA Frequency Counts - Week 4

The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). Frequency of different scores at the respective visit (week 4) is displayed.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 41 - Almost Clear0 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 44 - Moderate19 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 43 - Mild to Moderate15 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 40 - Clear0 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 46 - Severe2 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 45 - Moderate to Severe12 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 42 - Mild2 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 43 - Mild to Moderate13 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 40 - Clear0 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 41 - Almost Clear0 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 42 - Mild2 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 44 - Moderate21 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 45 - Moderate to Severe10 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 46 - Severe1 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 44 - Moderate20 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 41 - Almost Clear0 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 46 - Severe0 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 45 - Moderate to Severe19 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 43 - Mild to Moderate10 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 42 - Mild5 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 40 - Clear0 Participants
Secondary

PGA Frequency Counts - Week 8

The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). Frequency of different scores at the respective visit (week 8) is displayed.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 81 - Almost Clear0 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 84 - Moderate17 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 83 - Mild to Moderate11 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 80 - Clear0 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 86 - Severe3 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 85 - Moderate to Severe14 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 82 - Mild5 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 83 - Mild to Moderate11 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 80 - Clear0 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 81 - Almost Clear1 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 82 - Mild5 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 84 - Moderate18 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 85 - Moderate to Severe9 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 86 - Severe3 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 84 - Moderate17 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 81 - Almost Clear1 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 86 - Severe1 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 85 - Moderate to Severe19 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 83 - Mild to Moderate10 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 82 - Mild6 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Frequency Counts - Week 80 - Clear0 Participants
Secondary

PGA Improvement VCS - Week 12 (EoT)

PGA improvement rate in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo in the valid-cases-set (VCS). The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of 1 or more points on the 7-points PGA scale at End-of-Treatment (EoT) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The valid-cases-set (VCS) included all patients from the full-analysis-set (FAS), who completed the assessment of the co-primary endpoints without any protocol violation interfering with the precise evaluation of treatment efficacy and with sufficient exposure to IMP.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Responder9 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder23 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Responder13 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder23 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Improvement VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Responder8 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Improvement VCS - Week 12 (EoT)Non-Responder26 Participants
p-value: 0.61795% CI: [0.45, 3.77]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.31995% CI: [0.6, 5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PGA Improvement - Week 16 (FU)

PGA improvement rate in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of 1 or more points on the 7-points PGA scale at the respective visit (Follow Up) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 16 (FU)Responder14 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 16 (FU)Non-Responder24 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 16 (FU)Responder13 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 16 (FU)Non-Responder27 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Improvement - Week 16 (FU)Responder12 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Improvement - Week 16 (FU)Non-Responder32 Participants
p-value: 0.31195% CI: [0.63, 4.26]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.69995% CI: [0.47, 3.17]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PGA Improvement - Week 4

PGA improvement rate in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of 1 or more points on the 7-points PGA scale at the respective visit (week 4) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 4Responder11 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 4Non-Responder39 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 4Responder13 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 4Non-Responder34 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Improvement - Week 4Responder9 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Improvement - Week 4Non-Responder45 Participants
p-value: 0.4595% CI: [0.55, 3.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.18695% CI: [0.74, 5.26]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PGA Improvement - Week 8

PGA improvement rate in treatment groups (150 and 300 mg bid) compared to placebo. The PGA (Physician's global assessment) provides an overall evaluation of the severity of the disease ranging from 0 (clear skin - no diseases) to 6 (severe disease). The number of responders corresponds to the number of patients with an improvement of 1 or more points on the 7-points PGA scale at the respective visit (week 8) compared to baseline.

Time frame: Scoring took place on Site visits: Day1 (Baseline), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (End-of-Treatment), Week 16 (Follow-Up)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 8Responder12 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 8Non-Responder38 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 8Responder16 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidPGA Improvement - Week 8Non-Responder31 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Improvement - Week 8Responder14 Participants
Placebo BidPGA Improvement - Week 8Non-Responder40 Participants
p-value: 0.88495% CI: [0.41, 2.18]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.38495% CI: [0.61, 3.64]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

PK Data - AUC(0,t)

The non-compartment parameter AUC(0,t) is the area under the concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable sample drawn based on the evaluation of systemic MP1032 concentrations in plasma samples wherein the respective blood samples were taken predose and 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after dosing.

Time frame: Morning dose on Study Day 1

Population: The pharmacokinetics evaluation set (PKS) includes all patients without any protocol deviations that could have interfered with the administration of the treatment or the evaluation of systemic concentrations of MP1032, who received at least one dose of IMP and who had any completed determination of MP1032 levels.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPK Data - AUC(0,t)15585.3 AUC(0,t) (ng/mL*min)Standard Deviation 5757.4
300 mg MP1032 BidPK Data - AUC(0,t)26543.8 AUC(0,t) (ng/mL*min)Standard Deviation 16592.3
Secondary

PK Data - Cmax

The non-compartment parameter Cmax is the maximum MP1032 concentration observed based on the evaluation of systemic MP1032 concentrations in plasma samples wherein the respective blood samples were taken predose and 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after dosing.

Time frame: Morning dose on Study Day 1

Population: The pharmacokinetics evaluation set (PKS) includes all patients without any protocol deviations that could have interfered with the administration of the treatment or the evaluation of systemic concentrations of MP1032, who received at least one dose of IMP and who had any completed determination of MP1032 levels.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
150 mg MP1032 BidPK Data - Cmax388 Cmax (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 146.3
300 mg MP1032 BidPK Data - Cmax612.4 Cmax (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 467.3
Secondary

PK Data - Tmax

The non-compartment parameter tmax is the time point (effective) at which the maximum concentration (Cmax) was observed based on the evaluation of systemic MP1032 concentrations in plasma samples wherein the respective blood samples were taken predose and 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after dosing.

Time frame: Morning dose on Study Day 1

Population: The pharmacokinetics evaluation set (PKS) includes all patients without any protocol deviations that could have interfered with the administration of the treatment or the evaluation of systemic concentrations of MP1032, who received at least one dose of IMP and who had any completed determination of MP1032 levels.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
150 mg MP1032 BidPK Data - Tmax15 min
300 mg MP1032 BidPK Data - Tmax22.5 min
Secondary

Sufficient Extent of Exposure

Exposure was regarded as sufficient if the patient took at least 80% of planned applications (respectively capsules) wherein % exposure was calculated as 100 \* # dosed capsules / # planned capsules. Planned were 2 applications (a 6 capsules) twice a day over a treatment period of 12 weeks (i.e. 1008 capsules). The number of missed and/or overdosed capsules is determined based on the restitution of used study drug packages.

Time frame: overall trial / treatment period - cumulative from baseline to week 12 (EoT) or - if applicable - week16 (FU)

Population: The safety-evaluation-set (SES) included all patients who received any trial medication at least once.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidSufficient Extent of ExposureInsufficient16 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidSufficient Extent of ExposureSufficient35 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidSufficient Extent of ExposureInsufficient8 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidSufficient Extent of ExposureSufficient39 Participants
Placebo BidSufficient Extent of ExposureInsufficient15 Participants
Placebo BidSufficient Extent of ExposureSufficient40 Participants
Secondary

Time to PASI 50

Time to the achievement of PASI 50, if applicable. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies. It is a physician's assessment of psoriasis that is a therapeutic standard in clinical studies for this disease. Displayed is the number of responders that reached an improvement of at least 50% in the PASI score in the respective week.

Time frame: from treatment start (Study Day 1 - Baseline) to either Study Day 25, 56, 84 (EoT) or 112 (FU)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 50Week 42 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 50Week 84 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 50Week 12 (EoT)4 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 50Week 16 (FU)1 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 50Week 16 (FU)3 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 50Week 47 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 50Week 12 (EoT)3 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 50Week 83 Participants
Placebo BidTime to PASI 50Week 16 (FU)2 Participants
Placebo BidTime to PASI 50Week 82 Participants
Placebo BidTime to PASI 50Week 12 (EoT)2 Participants
Placebo BidTime to PASI 50Week 45 Participants
p-value: 0.7922Log Rank
p-value: 0.1425Log Rank
Secondary

Time to PASI 75

Time to the achievement of PASI 75, if applicable. The PASI (psoriasis area severity index) is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies and combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) wherein any value higher than 10 is considered as moderate to severe psoriasis. Displayed is the number of responders that reached an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI score in the respective week.

Time frame: from treatment start (Study Day 1 - Baseline) to either Study Day 25, 56, 84 (EoT) or 112 (FU)

Population: The full-analysis-set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of IMP and had at least one post-baseline assessment. The FAS was considered primary analysis set for the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
150 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 75Week 12 (EoT)3 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 75Week 40 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 75Week 82 Participants
150 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 75Week 16 (FU)0 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 75Week 41 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 75Week 80 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 75Week 12 (EoT)3 Participants
300 mg MP1032 BidTime to PASI 75Week 16 (FU)2 Participants
Placebo BidTime to PASI 75Week 12 (EoT)1 Participants
Placebo BidTime to PASI 75Week 42 Participants
Placebo BidTime to PASI 75Week 80 Participants
Placebo BidTime to PASI 75Week 16 (FU)1 Participants
p-value: 0.572Log Rank
p-value: 0.4494Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026