Skip to content

Early TIPS Versus Glue Obliteration to Prevent Rebleeding From Gastric Varices

A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Treatment Strategies to Prevent Rebleeding From Gastric Varices: Early TIPS Versus Glue Obliteration

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03705078
Acronym
GAVAPROSEC
Enrollment
104
Registered
2018-10-15
Start date
2019-01-03
Completion date
2024-02-29
Last updated
2025-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bleeding Gastric Varices, Cirrhosis

Keywords

Bleeding gastric varices, cirrhosis, type 2 gastro-esophageal varices, isolated gastric varices, transjugular intra-hepatic porto systemic shunt (TIPS), portal hypertension, glue obliteration, tissue adhesive

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the superiority of an early tips strategy over standard treatment by glue obliteration (G0) in preventing bleeding recurrence or death at one year after a non GOV1 gastric variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients initially treated by GO.

Interventions

PROCEDURETransjugular Portosytemic Shunt (TIPS)

The TIPS is placed under radiologic guidance. A branch of the intrahepatic portal vein is punctured; afterwards, the splenic vein is catheterized so that a portal venography and pressure measurements can be performed. Then, the parenchymal track is dilated and a stent is placed. A final portography and pressure measurement in the main portal vein and the inferior caval vein are performed.

PROCEDUREglue obliteration

The standard protocol uses cyanoacrylate and lipiodol in 1:1 ratio injecting with no more than 1 mL at the varix each time. In most cases, cyanoacrylate is usually extruded into the stomach lumen within 1-3 months after injection. The French observational survey observed that a large majority (78%) of practitioners diluted glue with lipiodol and most (68%) proposed a proportion of glue to lipiodol of 1:1 the total volume injected per varix (from 1mL to 20 mL) varied substantially. Regarding the type of glue, although the majority of published data concern Histoacryl®, nearly half of practitioners used Glubran®. This lack of preference for one glue over the other may be explained by the fact that only Glubran® is approved in this indication in Europe.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cirrhotic patients: the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis will be based on previous needle liver biopsy or on the combination of clinical, biochemical, and radiological findings. If biopsy findings are unavailable and in case of non-complicated cirrhosis, non-invasive markers will be used. * Variceal bleeding at endoscopy from gastroesophageal gastric varices type 2 or isolated gastric varices type 1 or 2 (Sarin classification) according to the following criteria: endoscopic signs of an active spurting or oozing from gastric varices (GV); adherent blood clots, white nipple signs, or erosions on the GV and absence of other bleeding sources. * Hemodynamically stable patient (Mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg) without clinical significant rebleeding (Baveno criteria) within 12 hours after the initial endoscopy with glue obliteration. * Written informed consent obtained.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant woman or breastfeeding. * Minor and patients older than 75 years. * Non cirrhotic portal hypertension. * Hepatocellular carcinoma outside the Milan criteria or other cancer at a palliative stage. * Child Pugh score \> 13. * History of severe or refractory hepatic encephalopathy unrelated to gastrointestinal bleeding. * Congestive heart failure. * History or presence of pulmonary hypertension. * Patients with other indication for TIPS. * Uncontrolled gastric variceal bleeding. * Portal vein cavernoma. * Patient who have previously received a TIPS procedure. * Failure to receive clear information in patients without an identified trusted person. * Refusal of the participation agreement by signing the information form and consent as defined. * Exclusion period from another biomedical study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of clinically significant rebleeding (upper gastrointestinal bleeding whatever its origin)12 monthsDefined by Baveno VI consens group as a recurrent melena or hematemesis resulting in any of the following: * Hospital admission * Blood transfusion * 3 g/dL drop in hemoglobin
death12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative number of packed red blood cellsDay 42
Incidence of complications of cirrhosis (infections, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome) during follow-up12 months
Frequency of TIPS complications12 months
All-cause mortality and liver-related mortalityDay 42
MELD score (Model for End Stage Liver Disease) in TIPS group6 monthsMELD score = 9.57\*LN(creatinin in mg/dl) + 3.78\*LN(Bilirubin in mg/dl) + 11.2\*LN(INR) + 6.43
MELD score (Model for End Stage Liver Disease) in glue obliteration group6 monthsMELD score = 9.57\*LN(creatinin in mg/dl) + 3.78\*LN(Bilirubin in mg/dl) + 11.2\*LN(INR) + 6.43
Number of days of hospitalization12 months
Frequency of glue obliteration complications12 months
Incidence of rebleedingDay 42

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026