Skip to content

Validation of the Second Generation of the Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) Using the MRI-PDFF as Reference

Validation of the Second Generation of the Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) Using the MRI-PDFF as Reference

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03704792
Enrollment
207
Registered
2018-10-15
Start date
2019-09-24
Completion date
2021-11-30
Last updated
2022-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Liver Disease

Brief summary

Chronic liver diseases (CLDs) represent a major worldwide public health burden. Worldwide estimations show that 844 million people have CLDs, a lot more than other chronic diseases such as diabetes or cardiovascular diseases. CLD is most of the time an asymptomatic, progressive, and potentially fatal disease. With its complications it becomes one of the major causes of mortality worldwide. Globally, hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus, alcoholic liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, are the most important causes of liver disease. The diagnosis of liver lesions remains an important issue for these patients. The prognosis and management of liver disease greatly depends on the amount of liver fibrosis. In early stages, it is the main factor predicting long-term outcome of these patients. The liver biopsy still represents the gold standard diagnostic tool for liver fibrosis assessment, although a wide spectrum of noninvasive tools are now commonly used as a surrogate to the liver biopsy. It includes direct and indirect serum markers of liver fibrosis, but also several imaging-based methods, including transient elastography (FibroScan®, Echosens, Paris, France). Even if the liver fibrosis is the key pathological feature of progressive liver disease, the accumulation of excessive hepatic triglyceride, hepatic steatosis, is today recognized as an important factor in the pathogenesis of a number of CLD. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are sensitive to steatosis and show interesting diagnostic performances, especially the MRI using the proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) which has shown at least equivalence in accuracy for quantifying hepatic steatosis with both 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and with histological grade, across several studies. Therefore, this technique is now part of the gold standard diagnostic tool to establish the grade of hepatic steatosis. Echosens has developed an ultrasonic controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) designed to quantify hepatic steatosis using a process based on vibration controlled transient elastography (VCTE™). Echosens is working on improving the diagnostic accuracy of the CAP measurement performed with the FibroScan. This protocol is set-up to compare the diagnostic performances of the first generation of the CAP and the second generation of the CAP to the reference, the MRI-PDFF, in patients with CLD, all etiologies combined.

Interventions

DEVICEFibroScan 530 Compact

The FibroScan® is a device equipped with probes (M+ or XL+), each of which consists of an ultrasonic transducer mounted on the axis of a mechanical vibrator. Liver stiffness and CAP measurements are performed on the right lobe of the liver with the patient in a dorsal decubitus and maximal abduction position. The procedure is non-invasive and painless.

Sponsors

Echosens
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient must be at least 18 years of age * Patient must be able to give written informed consent * Patient affiliated to a social security system * Patient with a chronic liver disease, all etiologies

Exclusion criteria

* Vulnerable patient * Pregnant women * Patient with presence of ascites * Contra-indication to MRI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Liver fat content assessed by MRI-PDFF.12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ratio IQR CAPv1/CAPv2 and/or ratio standard deviation CAPv1/CAPv212 months
Difference between CAPv1 and CAPv2 measures12 months
Correlation between CAPv1, CAPv2 and MRI-PDFF12 months

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026