Skip to content

Clinical Comparison of Femoral Nerve Versus Adductor Canal Block Following Anterior Ligament Reconstruction

Clinical Outcome Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery (COFAKS)-Addendum

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03704376
Acronym
FNB vs ACB
Enrollment
125
Registered
2018-10-12
Start date
2016-02-01
Completion date
2017-11-16
Last updated
2021-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Keywords

Femoral Nerve Block, Adductor Canal Block

Brief summary

This study will examine the potential differences between femoral nerve blockade (FNB) and adductor canal blockade (ACB) for pain control and quadriceps muscle activation for patients following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Detailed description

Adequate pain control following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) often requires a regional nerve block. The femoral nerve block (FNB) has been traditionally employed. More recently, ultrasound application to regional nerve blocks allows for the use of alternatives such as the adductor canal block following ACL reconstruction. In 2009, Manickam et al. were the first to describe the ultrasound guided adductor canal technique for the purposes of knee joint analgesia. Unlike other traditional techniques that seek to cause a sensory as well as a motor blockade, the adductor canal block attempts to spare the motor block of the neighboring distributions in an attempt to offer selective analgesia and strength preservation. Chisholm et al demonstrated the adductor canal block provides similar and adequate postoperative analgesia when compared to the FNB, following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Their study focused on analgesia and did not evaluate quadriceps function or impact on rehabilitation. Sharma et al drew the first association between femoral nerve blocks and increased fall risk due to muscle weakness in total knee arthroplasty population. A randomized, blinded study to compare quadriceps strength following adductor canal versus FNB was performed by Kwofie et al. They showed that compared with FNB, adductor canal block results in significant quadriceps motor sparing and significantly preserved balance. These studies focused on acute muscle weakness after regional anesthesia and its relation to safety. Quadriceps function is very important in rehabilitation of ACL reconstruction. Luo et al demonstrated long term deficits related to FNB. They demonstrated that patients treated with FNB after ACL reconstruction had significant isokinetic deficits in knee extension and flexion strength at 6 months when compared with patients who did not receive a nerve block. Patients without a block were 4 times more likely to meet criteria for clearance to return to sports at 6 months. In addition, Krych et al found significantly inferior quadriceps strength and function at 6 months in FNB group. Based on the available literature, we aim to compare femoral nerve versus adductor canal block in regards to pain control and muscle strength in ACL reconstruction patients until return to sport.

Interventions

DRUG30 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine
DRUG15 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine
DRUG100 mcg clonidine
DEVICEHigh-frequency linear ultrasound transducer

Sponsors

Memorial Hermann Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males & Females ages 16-30 yrs * Undergoing ACL reconstruction by Co-Investigator (Walter Lowe) * Receiving peri-operative FNB or ACB

Exclusion criteria

* Not enrolled within the COFAKS study * Receiving intrathecal nerve blockade or no blockade

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (sEMG)Post-operative day 1Quadriceps muscle activation was examined using surface electromyography (sEMG) of the vastus medialis oblique muscle. Peak sEMG activity was recorded in microvolts (uV) on the surgical and contralateral limbs while performing five maximal effort isometric contractions in full knee extension--the reported values are equal to the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the contralateral limb minus the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the surgical limb.
Quadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (EMG)Post-operative day 14Quadriceps muscle activation was examined using surface electromyography (sEMG) of the vastus medialis oblique muscle. Peak sEMG activity was recorded in microvolts (uV) on the surgical and contralateral limbs while performing five maximal effort isometric contractions in full knee extension--the reported values are equal to the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the contralateral limb minus the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the surgical limb.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise TestPost-operative day 1The straight leg raise assessment was performed in a standardized long-sitting position with well-knee flexed to 90 degrees. Patients were asked to complete 30 repetitions of straight leg raises with a small bolster supporting the heel using the following criteria; (1) perform with no visible quad lag (2) reach the height of the opposite tibial tubercle and (3) maintain a controlled rate of 30 hertz for the ascending and descending phases. The examination was only performed on the surgical limb and the absolute number of successful repetitions is reported.
Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale1 hr post surgeryThe items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, 0 being the better outcome.
Narcotics Use as Assessed by Morphine Equivalents ConsumedEntire post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) visit post surgery, PACU range 1 hr to 12 hrs post surgerymorphine equivalents consumed during the entire post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) visit post surgery will be obtained from the All-scripts electronic medical record (EMR) system.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

125 were enrolled, but 39 were excluded because they ended up receiving a different type of graft.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Femoral Nerve Blockade
Ultrasound guided FNB (30 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine with 100 mcg clonidine using a 22-gauge 40 mm ProBloc II insulated needle; Kimberly-Clark, Roswell, Georgia) below the inguinal ligament using a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer (4-12 Hz; Mindray M7; Mindray North America, Mahwah, NJ) with stimulator confirmation. 30 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine 100 mcg clonidine High-frequency linear ultrasound transducer
38
Adductor Canal Blockade
Ultrasound guided ACB (15 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine with 100 mcg clonidine using a 22-gauge 40 mm ProBloc II insulated needle; Kimberly-Clark, Roswell, Georgia) at the mid-thigh using a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer (4-12 Hz; Mindray M7; Mindray North America, Mahwah, NJ). 15 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine 100 mcg clonidine High-frequency linear ultrasound transducer
40
Total78

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdductor Canal BlockadeTotalFemoral Nerve Blockade
Age, Continuous21.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
22.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
24.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
40 Participants78 Participants38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants35 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants43 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 380 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 3811 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 380 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Quadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (EMG)

Quadriceps muscle activation was examined using surface electromyography (sEMG) of the vastus medialis oblique muscle. Peak sEMG activity was recorded in microvolts (uV) on the surgical and contralateral limbs while performing five maximal effort isometric contractions in full knee extension--the reported values are equal to the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the contralateral limb minus the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the surgical limb.

Time frame: Post-operative day 14

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadeQuadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (EMG)183.2 microvolts (uV)Standard Deviation 41.8
Adductor Canal BlockadeQuadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (EMG)126.5 microvolts (uV)Standard Deviation 48.9
Primary

Quadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (EMG)

Quadriceps muscle activation was examined using surface electromyography (sEMG) of the vastus medialis oblique muscle. Peak sEMG activity was recorded in microvolts (uV) on the surgical and contralateral limbs while performing five maximal effort isometric contractions in full knee extension--the reported values are equal to the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the contralateral limb minus the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the surgical limb.

Time frame: 4 weeks post operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadeQuadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (EMG)109.1 microvolts (uV)Standard Deviation 32.2
Adductor Canal BlockadeQuadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (EMG)94.1 microvolts (uV)Standard Deviation 33.2
Primary

Quadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (sEMG)

Quadriceps muscle activation was examined using surface electromyography (sEMG) of the vastus medialis oblique muscle. Peak sEMG activity was recorded in microvolts (uV) on the surgical and contralateral limbs while performing five maximal effort isometric contractions in full knee extension--the reported values are equal to the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the contralateral limb minus the quadriceps sEMG in uV of the surgical limb.

Time frame: Post-operative day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadeQuadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (sEMG)266.5 microvolts (uV)Standard Deviation 52.4
Adductor Canal BlockadeQuadriceps Muscle Activation as Assessed by Surface Electromyography (sEMG)212.5 microvolts (uV)Standard Deviation 65.1
Secondary

Narcotics Use as Assessed by Morphine Equivalents Consumed

morphine equivalents consumed during the entire post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) visit post surgery will be obtained from the All-scripts electronic medical record (EMR) system.

Time frame: Entire post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) visit post surgery, PACU range 1 hr to 12 hrs post surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadeNarcotics Use as Assessed by Morphine Equivalents Consumed14.8 milligrams (mg)Standard Deviation 8.3
Adductor Canal BlockadeNarcotics Use as Assessed by Morphine Equivalents Consumed16.0 milligrams (mg)Standard Deviation 7.4
Secondary

Number of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise Test

The straight leg raise assessment was performed in a standardized long-sitting position with well-knee flexed to 90 degrees. Patients were asked to complete 30 repetitions of straight leg raises with a small bolster supporting the heel using the following criteria; (1) perform with no visible quad lag (2) reach the height of the opposite tibial tubercle and (3) maintain a controlled rate of 30 hertz for the ascending and descending phases. The examination was only performed on the surgical limb and the absolute number of successful repetitions is reported.

Time frame: Post-operative day 14

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadeNumber of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise Test23.3 number of repetitionsStandard Deviation 10.6
Adductor Canal BlockadeNumber of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise Test24.2 number of repetitionsStandard Deviation 10.9
Secondary

Number of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise Test

The straight leg raise assessment was performed in a standardized long-sitting position with well-knee flexed to 90 degrees. Patients were asked to complete 30 repetitions of straight leg raises with a small bolster supporting the heel using the following criteria; (1) perform with no visible quad lag (2) reach the height of the opposite tibial tubercle and (3) maintain a controlled rate of 30 hertz for the ascending and descending phases. The examination was only performed on the surgical limb and the absolute number of successful repetitions is reported.

Time frame: 4 weeks post operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadeNumber of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise Test29.7 number of repetitionsStandard Deviation 1.4
Adductor Canal BlockadeNumber of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise Test30 number of repetitionsStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Number of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise Test

The straight leg raise assessment was performed in a standardized long-sitting position with well-knee flexed to 90 degrees. Patients were asked to complete 30 repetitions of straight leg raises with a small bolster supporting the heel using the following criteria; (1) perform with no visible quad lag (2) reach the height of the opposite tibial tubercle and (3) maintain a controlled rate of 30 hertz for the ascending and descending phases. The examination was only performed on the surgical limb and the absolute number of successful repetitions is reported.

Time frame: Post-operative day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadeNumber of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise Test3.2 number of repetitionsStandard Deviation 6.1
Adductor Canal BlockadeNumber of Successful Repetitions With Straight Leg Raise Test6.2 number of repetitionsStandard Deviation 8
Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.

Time frame: 2 hr post surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale1.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Adductor Canal BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better

Time frame: 3 hr post surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Adductor Canal BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale3.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.

Time frame: 4 hr post surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Adductor Canal BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.08
Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.

Time frame: 5 hr post surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Adductor Canal BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale3.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.

Time frame: 6 hr post surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.51
Adductor Canal BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale3.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.99
Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.

Time frame: 7 hr post surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.22
Adductor Canal BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.

Time frame: 8 hr post surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Adductor Canal BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.

Time frame: 9 hr post surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Adductor Canal BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.

Time frame: 10 hr post surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Adductor Canal BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale2.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.

Time frame: 11 hr post surgery

Population: No participants were analyzed for this time point because participants were discharged from hospital at around 10 hours, before this time point would have occurred.

Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better outcome.

Time frame: 12 hr post surgery

Population: No participants were analyzed for this time point because participants were discharged from hospital at around 10 hours, before this time point would have occurred.

Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, with 0 being the better

Time frame: Postoperative physicians visit

Population: Patients were not analyzed at postoperative physicians visit.

Secondary

Postoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The items are scored on a visual analogical scale from 0-10, 0 being the better outcome.

Time frame: 1 hr post surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femoral Nerve BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale0.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.09
Adductor Canal BlockadePostoperative Pain Control as Assessed by a Numeric Pain Rating Scale0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026