Skip to content

Marijuana Effects on Simulated Driving Performance

Marijuana Effects on Simulated Driving Performance

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03699540
Enrollment
10
Registered
2018-10-09
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2023-01-01
Last updated
2024-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Drinking, Cannabis, Cannabis Use, Marijuana, Marijuana Usage

Keywords

simulated driving, outpatient

Brief summary

This study will examine the effects of various strains of marijuana on simulated driving performance; the effects of alcohol administration will also be examined to further understand how marijuana-induced driving changes compare to the effects of alcohol. Secondary outcomes will include physiological effects, subjective- and observer-rated outcomes, and psychomotor performance under the various dose conditions.

Interventions

DRUGMarijuana

Experimental, non-therapeutic administration of active marijuana dose(s)

DRUGAlcohol

Experimental, non-therapeutic administration of active alcohol dose(s)

Experimental, non-therapeutic administration of inactive alcohol dose(s)

DRUGInactive marijuana

Experimental, non-therapeutic administration of inactive marijuana dose(s)

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
Shanna Babalonis, PhD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled design

Intervention model description

Within-subject, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, double-blind study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy, adult participants * Ages 21-50 * History of marijuana use * History of alcohol use

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant medical conditions * Ongoing/significant drug use outside of marijuana and alcohol use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Peak for Standard Deviation in Lane Position (SDLP)This outcome was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals.Standard deviation of lane position (SDLP) of the car is the amount of weaving/swerving of the car in and out of the lane. It is a frequent metric for assessing driving ability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject-Rated Outcomes: Mean Peak Score for Driving DifficultyThis outcome (VAS score) was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals.Participants rated their subjective response on a standardized VAS scale (0 to 100). Higher scores indicate worse outcome/greater impairment. Raw data transformed to peak scores.
Subject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Drug and Alcohol EffectThis outcome (VAS scores) was recorded prior to and in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs)Participants rated their subjective response on a standardized VAS scale (0 to 100). Higher scores indicate greater drug effects. Raw data transformed to peak scores.
Subject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Difficulty ConcentratingThis outcome was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals.Participants rated their subjective response on a Likert type scale (Not at all=0, A Little Bit=1, Moderately=2, Quite A Bit=3, Extremely=4). Greater values indicate greater drug effect. Raw data transformed to peak scores.
Observer-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for RelaxedThis outcome was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals.Research observer rated on a Likert type scale (Not at all=0, A Little Bit=1, Moderately=2, Quite A Bit=3, Extremely=4). Greater values indicate greater drug effect. Raw data transformed to peak scores.
Observer-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Good MoodThis outcome was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals.Research observer rated on a Likert type scale (Not at all=0, A Little Bit=1, Moderately=2, Quite A Bit=3, Extremely=4). Greater values indicate greater drug effect. Raw data transformed to peak scores.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited via internet postings (e.g., Craigslist) and locally posted flyers.

Pre-assignment details

Participants meeting all I/E criteria were invited to enroll. Unique, randomized dose orders were created for each participant. The study utilized a within-subject, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, double-blind design.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Completing Participants
Subjects who completed the study
9
Total9

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCompleting Participants
Age, Continuous32.56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.58
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 90 / 90 / 90 / 90 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 91 / 92 / 91 / 93 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 90 / 90 / 90 / 90 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Peak for Standard Deviation in Lane Position (SDLP)

Standard deviation of lane position (SDLP) of the car is the amount of weaving/swerving of the car in and out of the lane. It is a frequent metric for assessing driving ability.

Time frame: This outcome was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals.

Population: Per Protocol population, defined as participants completing the experimental drug conditions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inactive Alcohol / THC 0mgMean Peak for Standard Deviation in Lane Position (SDLP)1.33 centimetersStandard Error 0.09
Inactive Alcohol / THC 15mgMean Peak for Standard Deviation in Lane Position (SDLP)1.37 centimetersStandard Error 0.09
Inactive Alcohol / THC 30mgMean Peak for Standard Deviation in Lane Position (SDLP)1.42 centimetersStandard Error 0.1
Inactive Alcohol / Combined THC 15mg / CBD 7.5mgMean Peak for Standard Deviation in Lane Position (SDLP)1.35 centimetersStandard Error 0.08
Active Alcohol / THC 0mgMean Peak for Standard Deviation in Lane Position (SDLP)1.77 centimetersStandard Error 0.24
Secondary

Observer-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Good Mood

Research observer rated on a Likert type scale (Not at all=0, A Little Bit=1, Moderately=2, Quite A Bit=3, Extremely=4). Greater values indicate greater drug effect. Raw data transformed to peak scores.

Time frame: This outcome was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals.

Population: Per Protocol population, defined as participants completing the experimental drug conditions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inactive Alcohol / THC 0mgObserver-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Good Mood1.25 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.31
Inactive Alcohol / THC 15mgObserver-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Good Mood1.44 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.24
Inactive Alcohol / THC 30mgObserver-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Good Mood1.78 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.15
Inactive Alcohol / Combined THC 15mg / CBD 7.5mgObserver-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Good Mood1.89 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.11
Active Alcohol / THC 0mgObserver-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Good Mood2.11 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.31
Secondary

Observer-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Relaxed

Research observer rated on a Likert type scale (Not at all=0, A Little Bit=1, Moderately=2, Quite A Bit=3, Extremely=4). Greater values indicate greater drug effect. Raw data transformed to peak scores.

Time frame: This outcome was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals.

Population: Per Protocol population, defined as participants completing the experimental drug conditions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inactive Alcohol / THC 0mgObserver-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Relaxed1.50 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.19
Inactive Alcohol / THC 15mgObserver-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Relaxed1.67 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.17
Inactive Alcohol / THC 30mgObserver-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Relaxed2.00 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.17
Inactive Alcohol / Combined THC 15mg / CBD 7.5mgObserver-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Relaxed2.11 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.11
Active Alcohol / THC 0mgObserver-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Relaxed2.11 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.11
Secondary

Subject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Difficulty Concentrating

Participants rated their subjective response on a Likert type scale (Not at all=0, A Little Bit=1, Moderately=2, Quite A Bit=3, Extremely=4). Greater values indicate greater drug effect. Raw data transformed to peak scores.

Time frame: This outcome was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals.

Population: Per Protocol population, defined as participants completing the experimental drug conditions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inactive Alcohol / THC 0mgSubject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Difficulty Concentrating0.38 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.26
Inactive Alcohol / THC 15mgSubject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Difficulty Concentrating1.11 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.26
Inactive Alcohol / THC 30mgSubject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Difficulty Concentrating2.22 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.57
Inactive Alcohol / Combined THC 15mg / CBD 7.5mgSubject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Difficulty Concentrating0.78 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.36
Active Alcohol / THC 0mgSubject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Difficulty Concentrating3.89 Score on a scale (0 to 4)Standard Error 0.95
Secondary

Subject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Drug and Alcohol Effect

Participants rated their subjective response on a standardized VAS scale (0 to 100). Higher scores indicate greater drug effects. Raw data transformed to peak scores.

Time frame: This outcome (VAS scores) was recorded prior to and in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs)

Population: Per Protocol population, defined as participants completing the experimental drug conditions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inactive Alcohol / THC 0mgSubject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Drug and Alcohol Effect6.13 Score on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Error 2.88
Inactive Alcohol / THC 15mgSubject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Drug and Alcohol Effect32.11 Score on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Error 8.41
Inactive Alcohol / THC 30mgSubject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Drug and Alcohol Effect68.89 Score on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Error 4.66
Inactive Alcohol / Combined THC 15mg / CBD 7.5mgSubject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Drug and Alcohol Effect38.44 Score on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Error 8.39
Active Alcohol / THC 0mgSubject-Rated Outcome: Mean Peak Score for Drug and Alcohol Effect71.22 Score on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Error 7.42
Secondary

Subject-Rated Outcomes: Mean Peak Score for Driving Difficulty

Participants rated their subjective response on a standardized VAS scale (0 to 100). Higher scores indicate worse outcome/greater impairment. Raw data transformed to peak scores.

Time frame: This outcome (VAS score) was recorded in regular intervals after drug administration for the duration of the session (approx. 9 hrs) and a peak score was calculated across all these time intervals.

Population: Per Protocol population, defined as participants completing the experimental drug conditions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inactive Alcohol / THC 0mgSubject-Rated Outcomes: Mean Peak Score for Driving Difficulty6.75 Score on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Error 4.46
Inactive Alcohol / THC 15mgSubject-Rated Outcomes: Mean Peak Score for Driving Difficulty33.89 Score on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Error 10.77
Inactive Alcohol / THC 30mgSubject-Rated Outcomes: Mean Peak Score for Driving Difficulty40.89 Score on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Error 10.02
Inactive Alcohol / Combined THC 15mg / CBD 7.5mgSubject-Rated Outcomes: Mean Peak Score for Driving Difficulty30.22 Score on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Error 10.1
Active Alcohol / THC 0mgSubject-Rated Outcomes: Mean Peak Score for Driving Difficulty71.89 Score on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Error 9.48

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026