Skip to content

Effectiveness of Electric Stimulation Therapy in Raynaud's Phenomenon

Effectiveness of an Intervention Program With Electric Stimulation Therapy in Patients With Raynaud's Phenomenon: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03699436
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-10-09
Start date
2018-10-01
Completion date
2019-02-20
Last updated
2020-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Raynaud Disease, Raynaud Phenomenon

Keywords

Vascular alterations, Galvanic current, Pain, Peripheral blow flow, Temperature, Upper limb functionality, Central Sensitization, Pain catastrophizing., Number of attacks

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of an intervention with galvanic electrical current on the number of attacks , temperature, pain, peripheral blow flow and upper limb functionality in patients with Raynaud's Phenomenon in comparison to a control group that will maintain their habitual treatment.

Detailed description

Raynaud's Phenomenon is a disorder that causes pain and functional limitation in people who suffer it. Investigators considerer that the application of an electrotherapy intervention with galvanic current, thanks to its vasodilator action, will produce clinically significant improvements in the number of attacks, temperature and blood flow of patients with Raynaud's Phenomenon, which can lead to a decrease in pain associated, frequency and severity of ischemic attacks and therefore an improvement in the functionality of the upper limbs. The experimental group will receive an electrotherapy treatment using galvanic current. To apply the treatment, we will place the patient seated, with their hands inside two containers filled with water up to the limit of their nails without touching them. Next we will connect the electrodes and apply a galvanic current for 10 minutes, there will be a minute of rest for the patient while we change the polarity of this current and we will apply it another 10 minutes. The intensity of the current depends on the threshold of the patient. The control group will maintain their usual conservative and pharmacological treatment without receiving electrotherapy

Interventions

OTHERElectrotherapy with Galvanic Current

The experimental group will receive an electrotherapy treatment with galvanic current in their hands.This protocol will be administered at weekly sessions of 30 minutes with a period of 3 times / week with a total of 20 sessions, distributed over a 7-week period. They will be evaluated at baseline, after the end of the last treatment session and after two months of follow-up.

OTHERControl without Electric Stimulation Therapy

The control group continue with their usual conservative and pharmacological treatment and will not receive electrotherapy treatment. They will be evaluated too at baseline, after the end of the last treatment session and after two months of follow-up.

Sponsors

Universidad de Granada
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being over 18 years of age. * Being diagnosed with Primary or Secondary Raynaud Phenomenon according to the criteria established by LeRoy-Medsger. * A history of at least one year of regular attacks of pallor or acral cyanosis caused by exposure to cold and/or stress. * Having signed the informed consent document and willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of skin alterations such as stings, scars, ulcers or gangrene in the examined area. * Suffering upper limb entrapment syndrome, central nervous system polyneuropathy, Hypothyroidism, renal failure, cerebral or cardiac ischemic disease. * History of drug or alcohol abuse. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women. * Use of vibratory tools. * Participants with tumour process.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Raynaud´s Phenomenon attacksSeven WeeksChange from baseline at the Number of Raynaud´s Phenomenon attacks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Temperature in the Cold Stress TestSeven weeksChange from temperature in the Cold Stress Test
Pain Intensity: Visual Analog ScaleSeven weeksChange from baseline in pain in the Visual Analog Scale. Score range between 0-10 cm where 0 is in considerer no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Central SensitizationSeven weeksChange from baseline in the Central Sensitization Inventory. The cumulative score ranges from 0 to 100.Higher scores indicate increased frequency and severity of the symptoms.
Temperature in the affected areas in patients with Raynaud´s DiseaseSeven weeksChange from baseline temperature in the infrared thermography in patients with Raynaud´s Disease
Oxygen SaturationSeven weeksChange from baseline in Oxygen Saturation
Arterial blood flowSeven weeksChange from baseline in Arterial blood flow in the radial and ulnar artery
Upper limb disabilitySeven WeeksChange from baseline in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. The score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability). Higher scores indicate a greater level of disability and severity.
Pain CatastrophizingSeven weeksChange from baseline in the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Score range is from 0 to 52; higher scores indicate a greater frequency of catastrophic thoughts.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026