Skip to content

Influence of Early vs Late SPN on Long-term Quality of Life in ICU Patients After Gastrointestinal Oncological Surgery

Influence of Early vs Late Supplemental ParenteraL Nutrition on Long-term Quality of Life in ICU Patients After Gastrointestinal Oncological Surgery. A Prospective, Randomised, Multi-centre Assessor-blinded Study. hELPLiNe Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03699371
Acronym
hELPLiNe
Enrollment
220
Registered
2018-10-09
Start date
2018-11-01
Completion date
2021-05-01
Last updated
2018-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nutrition Aspect of Cancer

Keywords

early parenteral nutrition, supplemental nutrition, quality of life, oncological surgery, critical care

Brief summary

BACKGROUND: Nutrition plays a significant role in ICU treatment, and may influence mortality and length of stay in ICU. Enteral route (EN) is preferential to parenteral route (PN) in provision of daily nutritional requirements. When enteral route is insufficient, supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) is recommended. Optimal timing of SPN in acute phase of illness remains elusive. ICU patients suffer significant lean body mass loss, in majority, in the first 7-10 days of stay. Optimal provision of protein may prevent muscle wasting. Lean body mass is essential for optimal physical functioning after treatment. Although ICU mortality has been reduced lately, the number of patients going to rehabilitation after ICU stay has tripled. Patients after oncological surgery of the gastrointestinal tract may be threatened with impairment of physical functioning after ICU treatment. AIM: To compare the influence of early and late supplemental parenteral nutrition on long-term physical functioning in ICU patients after oncological surgery of the gastrointestinal tract. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, multi-centre assessor-blinded study. METHODS & ANALYSIS: Patients will be randomised into intervention group that would receive SPN on first day, and would be continued until 7th day of stay in ICU. Control group would receive SPN on 7th day of stay in ICU, when it is not then already met via enteral route. Physical Component of SF-36 Scale at 6 month after ICU admission will be assessed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEarly Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition

Intervention group: would receive EN reaching up to 20 % of daily nutritional requirements and early (on first day of stay in ICU) provision (of up to 80%) of protein (2 g/kg/ day or in case of CRRT 2,5 g/kg/ day) and caloric (15-20 kcal/kg/day) needs in SPN that would be continued until 7th day of stay in ICU. Central venous catheter placement would not be assessed as a part of intervention due to the fact that it is a part of routine medical activities performed during admission to ICU.

Sponsors

Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Opolu
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical University of Lublin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

prospective, randomised, multi-centre assessor-blinded study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ICU patients in the acute phase of critical illness after gastrointestinal oncological surgery. 2. Admitted to the ICU during the previous 24 hours with a minimum expected ICU stay of ≥5 days 3. Central venous access available for continuous infusion of the study drugs 4. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥2 5. Written informed consent from the patient or the patient's legal representative

Exclusion criteria

Contraindication against SPN or inability to receive SPN via central venous access 1. Received PN within 7 days before randomisation 2. Expected to receive ≥20% of energy via supplemental enteral nutrition (EN) and/or non-nutritional sources (e.g. glucose solution for drug dilution or lipids from propofol) during the first 3 nutritional treatment days 3. Inability to initiate EN prior to randomization 4. Body mass index (BMI) \<17 kg/m2 or \>35 kg/m2 5. Any severe, persistent blood coagulation disorder with uncontrolled bleeding 6. Any congenital errors of amino acid metabolism 7. Known hypersensitivity to fish, egg, soybean proteins, peanut proteins, or to any of the active substances or excipients contained in SPN. 8. Known hypersensitivity to milk protein or to any other substance contained in SPN 9. Acute liver failure with encephalopathy, including intoxication (e.g. paracetamol, death cap, golden chain) and/or liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\], alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\], gamma glutamyl transferase \[GGT\]) or bilirubin exceeding 10 x ULN 10. Hemophagocytic syndrome 11. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and/or C 12. Pregnancy or lactation 13. Patient unlikely to survive to 6 months due to underlying illness 14. Receiving end-of-life-care Laboratory Exclusions: 15. Hypertriglyceridemia characterised by serum triglyceride levels \>4 mmol/L \[\>350 mg/dL\]) 16. Treatment-refractory, clinically significant major abnormality in the serum concentration of any electrolyte (sodium, potassium, magnesium, total calcium, chloride, inorganic phosphate) Concomitant Therapy Exclusions: 17. Chronic maintenance therapy with systemic glucocorticoid steroids (Hydrocortisone \>0.3 mg/kg/d) 18. Concomitant administration of chemotherapy 19. Administration of growth hormone and teduglutide within the previous 4 weeks Other Exclusions: 20. Chronic liver failure ( Child -Pugh scale B or C) e.g. secondary to drug or alcohol abuse 21. Participation in another interventional clinical trial within the previous 4 weeks 22. Previous inclusion in the present study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Long-term quality of life at 6 monthsPhysical component of 36 -SF questionnaire at 6 months after admission to ICULong-term quality of life measured in physical component of 36 -SF questionnaire
Long-term quality of life at 3 monthsPhysical component of 36 -SF questionnaire at 3 months after admission to ICULong-term quality of life measured in physical component of 36 -SF questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Antibiotic-free daysFor 28 days since admission to ICU or till dischargeNumber of days patient was not given the antibiotics
Energy IntakeFor 7 days since admission to ICUEnergy delivery defined as daily input of calories via SPN
Enteral route intoleranceAt day 3 since admission to ICUInability to administer up to 60% of protein needs on 3rd day via enteral route
Thickness of diaphragm1st, 3rd, 5th day of ICU stayChange from baseline in ultrasound measured thickness of diaphragm
Protein deliveryFor 7 days since admission to ICUProtein delivery defined as daily input of proteins via SPN
Blood glucose profileFor 7 days since admission to ICUBlood glucose profile defined as mean daily glucose level
Organic phosphorus levelFor 7 days since admission to ICUOrganic phosphorus level defined as result in blood test performed daily
Mechanical VentilationFor 28 days since admission to ICU or till dischargeNumbers of days of mechanical ventilation
Length of stay in the ICUFor 28 days since admission to ICU or till dischargeNumbers of days of patient stay in ICU
ICU mortalityFor 28 days since admission to ICU or till discharge
Hospital mortalityFor 28 days since admission to ICU or till discharge
Length of stay in hospitalFor 28 days since admission to ICU or till dischargeNumbers of days of patient stay in hospital
Health-care associated infectionFor 28 days since admission to ICU or till dischargeNew onset of health-care associated infection
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ( SOFA score)For 28 days since admission to ICU or till dischargeWe will collect data regarding changes from baseline SOFA score - to determine the extent of a person's organ function failure. SOFA scoring system is useful in predicting the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. Patient can be scored from 0 to 24. If the patient is scored 0 than the patient is in a good state and predicted mortality is low, while 24 is the worst result with expected very high mortality rate.
Insulin doseFor 7 days since admission to ICUInsulin dose defined as summary daily input of insulin

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
PCS SF-36 changeFrom enrollment till 6 months assessmentChange from baseline in PCS SF-36

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactPaweł Piwowarczyk, MD PhD
piwowarczyk.pawel@gmail.com815372713

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026