Skip to content

Comparison of Three Methods for NG Tube Placement

Comparison of Three Methods for NG Tube Placement in Intubated Patients in the Emergency Department During 2016-2018

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03699306
Acronym
NG
Enrollment
75
Registered
2018-10-09
Start date
2017-01-21
Completion date
2018-08-10
Last updated
2018-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unconsciousness

Brief summary

Background and Aim: Tubular feeding is used, in patients who cannot take food through their mouths, but the digestive system has the ability to digest food. This method is safe and affordable for the patient and results in maintaining the function of the digestive system and reducing the risk of infection and sepsis. The purpose of this study was to compare the three methods of the NG tube placement in intubated patients in the emergency department of university-affiliated hospitals of Isfahan from2016 to 2018. Materials and Methods: This study was a randomized and prospective clinical trial. The statistical population of this study was all patients who had been referred to the emergency department of Al-Zahra and Ayatollah Kashani hospitals in Isfahan between2016and2018. The sample size was 25 in each group, and in total 75 subjects. The first group was NG tube insertion by the conventional method, the second group was using brake cable and the third group was embeddedby highwayman's hitch or draw hitch, using a silk thread. For all patients, demographic characteristics and possible complications were recorded. Finally, the data were analyzed using SPSS20 software at two statistical levels of descriptive and inferential.

Interventions

PROCEDURENG tube insertion method

a feeding tube called naso-gastric or NG tube were inserted through nostril inside the stomach randomly by one of three methods mentioned earlier

Sponsors

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all intubated patients, referred to the emergency department

Exclusion criteria

* the presence of symptoms of skull base fracture, * bleeding disorders and coagulopathies, * maxillofacial trauma, which led to deformity and impairment of NG tube, * upper respiratory tract diseases and anomalies, * nasal congestion and nostril stenosis, * esophageal disorder (esophageal stenosis and esophageal varicose vein), * and a history of head and neck radiotherapy. * Patients who had been intubated in other centers and being referred to these two centers were also excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
success rateIntraoperative (time from entry of the NG tube through nostril til entering inside the stomach or whenever the operator declared.)success rate was defined as successfully inserted NG tube inside the stomach

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
procedure durationIntraoperative (from nostril entry til sromach entry or operatoe declaration as the end of procedure)it was measured as the total time from start of the procedure til the entry of the tube inside the stomach.

Countries

Iran

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026