Skip to content

Video Balance-based Exercise in Persons With Stroke

Effect of Interactive Video Balance-based Exercise in Persons With Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03698357
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-10-09
Start date
2017-09-04
Completion date
2019-03-30
Last updated
2019-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

interactive video balance-based exercise, conventional physiotherapy

Brief summary

This study is to compare the effects of Interactive video balance-based exercise (IVBE) intervention and conventional rehabilitation on the balance and functional performance in stroke survivors. Fifteen participants will receive Interactive video balance-based exercise, while the other half will receive conventional rehabilitation.

Detailed description

Thirty individuals with stroke are recruited and allocated to 2 groups in this study. Fifteen participants in group A will undergo 30 minutes a day and 3 days a week interactive video balance-based exercise intervention for four weeks. Another 15 participants allocated to the group B will receive 30 minutes a day and 3 days a week conventional rehabilitation for four weeks. Time up go test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES), Motricity Index (MI), Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) were assessed before and after intervention in both groups

Interventions

BEHAVIORALinteractive video balance-based exercise

Interactive video balance-based exercise :10 minutes of warm up exercise, 30 minutes of Interactive video balance-based exercise and 5 minutes of cool down exercise.

BEHAVIORALConventional physiotherapy

conventional physiotherapy: 10 minutes of warm up exercise, 30 minutes conventional physiotherapy and 5 minutes of cool down exercise. Conventional physiotherapy contains rolling, sitting, balance exercise, standing, overground walking, facilitation of the paretic limbs, and so on.

Sponsors

Taipei Medical University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. patients present with unilateral hemiplegia caused by a first-ever stroke 2. cognitive ability is sufficient to understand the nature of study (Mini-Mental State Examination score\>=23) 3. medical and psychological condition stable

Exclusion criteria

1. patients having severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth scale \> 3) 2. severe hearing or eye problem 3. intake of drugs or other medical condition that can affect function or can't tolerate rehabilitation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Berg Balance Scale (BBS)Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groupsParticipants perform a series of 14 functional balance tasks, such as maintaining a quiet stance, sitting-to-stand, shifting weight and reaching, turning in place, standing on one leg, and maintaining a tandem stance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Time Up Go test (TUG)Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groupsThe TUG test is a quick, reliable, valid, and accurate method commonly used to test dynamic stability and functional mobility. In the test, participants stand up from a 46-cm-high armchair with back support, walk straight for 3 m, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down as quickly and safely as possible.
Change of Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES)Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groupsThe MFES is a 14-item rating scale questionnaire that contains the original 10-activity Falls Efficacy Scale and 4 additional activities. It is used to assess confidence of not falling while performing daily activities.
Change of Motricity Index (MI)Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groupsThe MI reflects general muscle strength in persons with stroke.
Change of Functional Ambulation Category (FAC)Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groupsThe FAC is based on the required level of assistance during walking in individuals with stroke.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026