Skip to content

Evaluation of Antagonist Wear Behavior and Patient Satisfaction of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate Glass When Compared to Monolithic Zirconia

Evaluation of Antagonist Wear Behavior and Patient Satisfaction of Monolithic Zirconia Versus Lithium Silicate Zirconia Crowns

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03697018
Enrollment
26
Registered
2018-10-05
Start date
2018-10-31
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2018-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wear of the Natural Enamel

Brief summary

evaluation of wear behavior and patient satisfaction of monolithic zirconia and zirconia reinforced glass crowns after follow-up periods 0,3,6,12 months.

Detailed description

two groups of patients will be selected according to special inclusion criteria n=13 in each group total of 26. each group will receive one of the crowns used in this study either ( monolithic zirconia or zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass) after crown delivery wear and patient satisfaction will be recorded at 0,3,6,12 moths follow-up periods.

Interventions

OTHERzirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic

It represent a new generation of glass ceramic material. Using an innovative manufacturing process the glass ceramic is enriched with zirconia (10% by weight) for dental CAD/CAM applications for the fabrication of inlays, onlays, crowns and anterior and posterior single tooth restorations on implant abutments.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

double blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient age range from 20-60 to be able to read and write in order to sign the informed consent document. 2. Patients physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative procedures. 3. Patients with no active periodontal and or pulpal diseases, having teeth with good restorations. 4. Patients with root canal treated teeth requiring full coverage restorations. 5. Patients indicated for full coverage (e.g. moderate to severe discoloration, coronal fracture, malposed or malformed teeth). 6. Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and assessments

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth. 2. Patient with poor oral hygiene. 3. Patients with psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations 4. Patient with no opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration. 5. Patient suffering from Para functional habits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
wear of the antagonist natural enamelfrom baseline till one yearloss of opposing tooth structure which will be measured by 3D Profilometer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
patient satisfactionfrom baseline till one yearvisual analogue scale (VAS): scale range from 0-10 for describing the intensity of pain the patient suffering. 0: no pain, 5: moderate pain, 10: unbearable pain.

Contacts

Primary Contactesraa mohamed hany
esraamhany@gmail.com00201005669044
Backup Contacthesham katamesh, professor
00201222102001

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026