Skip to content

Antibiotic Prophylaxis Before Shock Wave Lithotripsy

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy on Reducing Urinary Tract Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03692715
Acronym
APPEAL
Enrollment
1732
Registered
2018-10-02
Start date
2018-09-27
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nephrolithiasis, Ureteral Calculi, Ureteral Stones

Keywords

ureteral stones; ureteral calculi; shockwave lithotripsy

Brief summary

This is a two arm, double blind RCT comparing the use of a single dose ciprofloxacin prior to SWL to saline alone. The multicenter trial will be conducted with a pragmatic emphasis including both high volume and low volume sites internationally.

Detailed description

This is a two arm, double blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the use of a single dose ciprofloxacin prior to shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) to placebo. The multicenter trial will be conducted with a pragmatic emphasis including both high volume and low volume sites internationally. Eligibility criteria include patients older than 18 years presenting for SWL who do not meet one of the pre-defined exclusion criteria (outlined below). Eligible patients will provide written informed consent. Patients will undergo central randomization, which will be accessed by phone or internet. Un-blinding will occur only once statistical analysis is complete. Patients will undergo SWL using standard procedures at the participating center. Participants will asked to provide a pre-procedure study questionnaire, a modified International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire and a urine sample for analysis prior to SWL and follow-up. Follow-up questionnaires and a requisition for urine culture will be provided in a pre-stamped, self-addressed envelope along with instructions to return both culture and questionnaires to their participating center at 7-14 days post-SWL. If the follow-up questionnaire has not been received by post-operative day 10 patients will receive a reminder phone call. A second envelope will be sent containing a requisition for urine culture and follow-up questionnaire when necessary. Alternatively, if a 2 week follow-up is conducted at the participating site then data-forms can be completed and collected at that time. In the event that a urine culture was not submitted 7 days post-operatively, one can be collected up to 14 days post-op. Additional clinical parameters such as presence of double J, stone characteristics and renal insufficiency will be recorded at the time of SWL by the dedicated research staff at the participating center. Data acquisition and occurrence of outcomes will be monitored continuously with scheduled audits. Primary and secondary outcomes are outlined below. The power calculation for this protocol was performed using Stata v.10.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). The investigators used the American Urological Association Best Practice Statement on antibiotic prophylaxis to estimate a 60% relative risk reduction with treatment arm. Therefore to achieve a power of 90% with a significance level of p\<0.05, 661 patients will need to be recruited in each arm for a total of 1,322 patients. Accounting for 10% loss to follow-up, the total required will be 1454, or approximately 1500 patients. Assuming that 25% of patients screened will either refuse to be randomized or will meet one of the pre-defined exclusion criteria, a minimum of 2000 patients will need to be screened in order to randomize 1500 patients.

Interventions

DRUGCiprofloxacin

Oral or intravenous ciprofloxacin prior to shockwave lithotripsy.

DRUGPlacebo

identical oral placebo if oral cipro was used, or intravenous saline alone in a blinded fashion if IV cipro was used prior to shockwave lithotripsy.

Sponsors

University of Helsinki
CollaboratorOTHER
Helsinki University Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Western University, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
CollaboratorOTHER
King Abdulaziz University
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Sao Luiz
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
CollaboratorOTHER
Tallaght University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Clinical Urology and Epidemiology Working Group
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patients will undergo central randomization, which will be accessed by phone or internet. Un-blinding will occur only once statistical analysis is complete.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients older than 18 years presenting for SWL who do not meet one of the pre-defined

Exclusion criteria

.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite outcome including positive urine culture, symptoms of cystitis, pyelonephritis or urosepsis7-14 days post-shockwave lithotripsyThe composite outcome with be assessed as a dichotomous variable. The presence of Positive post-SWL urine culture (≥ 10e5 Colony Forming Unit/ ml), with either one or more of symptoms of cystitis (defined as new onset burning sensation or pain with voiding, frequency, urgency), or pyelonephritis or urosepsis (hospital admission with fever ≥38.5 C) will be considered as an event.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptoms of cystitis defined as new onset burning sensation or pain with voiding, frequency, urgency7-14 days post-shockwave lithotripsySymptoms of cystitis will be considered as a dichotomous variable with new onset burning sensation or pain with voiding, frequency, urgency will be considered an event
Pyelonephritis or urosepsis defined as Hospital admission with fever ≥38.5 Celsius7-14 days post-shockwave lithotripsyPyelonephritis or urosepsis will be assessed as a dichotomous variable with Hospital admission with fever ≥38.5 Celsius will be considered as an event
Bacteriuria defined as ≥ 100000 Colony Forming Unit/ml7-14 days post-shockwave lithotripsyBacteriuria will be assessed as a dichotomous variable with presence of is ≥100000 Colony Forming Unit/ml will be considered as an event
Individual components of International Prostate Symptom Score (0-7 per domain, with higher score indicating worse outcome)14 days post-shockwave lithotripsyIndividual IPSS domains will be assessed as continuous variables and include incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining and nocturia. Higher scores as considered as more severe symptoms
Pain scale determined on a range of 0-5 with higher score indicating worse outcome14 days post-shockwave lithotripsyPain scale will be assessed as a continuous variable. The scale will be elicited by asking In the past week, how often have you had burning or discomfort with urination? Higher score is considered as more severe symptoms
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) total score (0-35, higher score indicates worse outcome)14 days post-shockwave lithotripsyChange in total value of IPSS score will be assessed as a continuous variable with a range from 0-35 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. This score is calculated by summation of individual component scores (0-5) across 7 domains

Countries

Brazil, Canada, Finland, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026