Skip to content

The Effects of Different Ways of Dressing Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections

The Effects of Different Ways of Dressing Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03692559
Enrollment
331
Registered
2018-10-02
Start date
2015-08-20
Completion date
2017-02-03
Last updated
2018-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI)

Keywords

CRBSI, CLABSI

Brief summary

The goal of our study was to investigate whether different methods of dressing could lower catheter-associated bloodstream infections.

Detailed description

The study method was experimental in design and recruited 331 medical intensive care unit patients with placement of central catheters in one regional hospital in northern Taiwan. The investigators used block randomization to assign patients to the study group or control group. In study group which included 163 participants, the investigators used aseptic coverings during dressing and in the control group which included 168 participants the process of dressing was as routine. Study period started from the first day of catheter insertion and ends with either the removal of catheter or discharge from intensive care unit. The investigators defined the infection outcome according to culture results, and the guidelines by Infectious Diseases Society of America and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA. Analysis was done by SPSS version 23. The investigators used percentage and average to study characteristics of participants. The investigators used Chi-Square or Fisher's exact test and Poisson distribution to analyze the incidence rate of bloodstream infections and the infection density. The investigators used Kaplan-Meier curve to demonstrate the catheter infection-free days and the catheter redness symptoms days of the two groups. The investigators used logistic regression model to analyze factors associated with development of bloodstream infections.

Interventions

OTHERfull aseptic dressing

Replacement of the central venous catheters in the dressing process

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults older than 20 years old * Patients with central venous catheters * Agree to participate in this study, and fill out the study consent

Exclusion criteria

* PICC patients placed * Patients with bloodstream infection * Patients with immunocompromised patients (such as HIV, AIDS, pregnant, or cancer patients who are receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Catheter-related blood stream infections density after dressing changeup to 18 monthsConfirm blood culture results and judge whether it is catheter related Bloodstream infection(CRBSI)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection density after dressing changeup to 18 monthsConfirm blood culture results and judge whether it is catheter related Bloodstream infection, CLABSI

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026