Skip to content

Randomized Trial Assessing Quinagolide Vaginal Ring for Endometriosis-related Pain

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2 Trial Assessing the Efficacy, Safety and Dose-response of Quinagolide Extended-release Vaginal Rings Administered Sequentially for 4 Menstrual Cycles in Women With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-related Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03692403
Acronym
RAQUEL
Enrollment
22
Registered
2018-10-02
Start date
2018-12-26
Completion date
2022-02-14
Last updated
2023-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis-related Pain

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy of three doses of quinagolide administered as an extended-release vaginal ring compared to placebo on reduction of moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain

Interventions

DRUGQuinagolide 720 µg

Vaginal ring containing quinagolide 720 µg for daily releases

DRUGQuinagolide 360 µg

Vaginal ring containing quinagolide 360 µg for daily releases

Vaginal ring containing quinagolide 1080 µg for daily releases

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo

Sponsors

Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pre-menopausal females aged ≥18 years at time of signing informed consent(s) with regular menstrual cycles. * Body mass index (BMI) of 18-42 kg/m2 (both inclusive) at screening. * Initial confirmation of endometriosis by laparoscopy or laparotomy within the last 10 years before the run-in visit or visualization of persistent endometrioma by repeat ultrasound. * Transvaginal ultrasound documenting a uterus with no clinically significant abnormalities and presence of at least one ovary with no clinically significant abnormalities (with the exception of endometrioma) at the run-in visit. * Eligible participants experienced moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain, which was defined as at the run-in visit, the participant having an NRS score of ≥5 for the worst endometriosis related pain during the past menstrual cycle and at randomization, the participant having a mean daily NRS score of ≥4 for the worst endometriosis related pain during each run-in menstrual cycle.

Exclusion criteria

* History of no relief of endometriosis related pain after any medical therapy or surgery. However, history of partial pain relief, discontinuation due to side effects are not exclusionary. * Known bone diseases (e.g. osteoporosis, Paget's disease and osteomalacia) affecting bone resorption or bone formation markers. * Any significant abnormal findings of heart examinations before randomization. * History of mental illness including occurrence of acute psychosis, bipolar disorders and schizophrenia (except for well-controlled anxiety and/or depression with no changes to interventions for 6 months prior to start of run-in) * History of impulse control disorders including pathological gambling, compulsive buying, hypersexuality, and binge eating or being identified with potential impulse control disorder by the questionnaire for impulsive-compulsive disorders (a score ≥2 for any sub-questions of Question 3 or a score ≥1 for any sub-questions of Question 4) prior to randomization. * History of orthostatic hypotension or recurrent syncope.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Changes from baseline to cycle 4.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Changes over 4 menstrual cycles
Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Changes over 4 menstrual cycles
Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Changes over 4 menstrual cycles
Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Changes over 4 menstrual cycles.
Frequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainFrom baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)The participants recorded daily if they had sexual intercourse, in an e-diary. For the days when participants did not have intercourse, the participant recorded if the reason for not having intercourse was because they expected pain: Yes (I did not have intercourse this day, because I expected pain) or No (I did not have intercourse this day, but this was not because I expected pain). The numbers represent the cumulative number of days with no intercourse, summed across all participants. In some cases, there are missing data as not every participant completed the e-diary for 100% of study days.
Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Changes over 4 menstrual cycles.
Changes in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed weekly by participants in an e-Diary. EHP-30 is a quality-of-life questionnaire. Score ranges from 0-100 and lower score denotes improvement. Changes over 4 menstrual cycles.
Changes in ECG Parameters Including QRS Duration at Cycle 4At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by 12-lead ECG
Changes in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodFrom baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)The participants recorded daily if they had any vaginal bleeding during the past 24 hours, in an e-diary. Of the participants who had a bleeding, the participant recorded if this was menstrual bleeding: Yes (I had a vaginal bleeding that was menstrual bleeding) or No (I had a vaginal bleeding that was not menstrual bleeding). The numbers represent the cumulative number of days with vaginal bleeding, summed across all participants. In some cases, there are missing data as not every participant completed the e-diary for 100% of study days.
Changes in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)The participants recorded daily if they had any vaginal bleeding during the past 24 hours, in an e-diary. Of the participants who had a bleeding, the participant recorded the assessed bleeding volume as either spotting (tiny amount of blood on underwear or panty liners), light bleeding (requiring 1-3 sanitary pads or tampons per day), moderate bleeding (requiring 4-6 sanitary pads or tampons per day), or heavy bleeding (requiring more than 6 sanitary pads or tampons per day). The numbers represent the cumulative number of days with vaginal bleeding, summed across all participants. In some cases, there are missing data as not every participant completed the e-diary for 100% of study days.
Percentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedFrom baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary
Total and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedFrom baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary
Responder RateFrom baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed as ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥70% reduction from the baseline in mean daily NRS score for the worst endometriosis-related pain, dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain and for the worst endometriosis-related pain impact
Changes in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by the Biberoglu and Behrman (B&B) scale which is a 4-point scale with 0=none and 3=severe. The scores are the mean individual scores. The B&B scale consists of two parts. The first part of the B&B scale evaluates symptoms of endometriosis (i.e. pain). There are 3 subscales: pelvic pain(A, 0=none and 3=severe), dysmenorrhea (B, 0=none and 3=severe), and dyspareunia(C, 0=none and 3=severe). The total pelvic pain score is the sum of the three scores, i.e. A+B+C, which can range from 0 to 9. The second part of the B&B scale evaluates signs of endometriosis. There are 2 subscales pelvic tenderness (D, 0=none and 3=severe) and induration (E, 0=none and 3=severe) based on findings from a pelvic examination. The total physical pain score is the sum of the two scores, i.e. D+E, which can range from 0 to 6. The total symptom and sign severity score is the sum of all five scores, i.e. A+B+C+D+E, which can range from 0 to 15. The values are the change from baseline to cycle 4.
Changes in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresFrom baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by the EHP-30 quality-of-life questionnaire completed by participants. Score ranges from 0-100 with lower score denoting improvement.
Changes in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by the PGIS scale completed by participants. PGIS is a 6-point scale depicting a participant's rating of their current conditions from good to bad. It ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (very severe).
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresAt cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by the PGIC scale completed by participants. PGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a patient's rating of their overall improvement from good to bad.
Plasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesWithin 5 days after first ring insertion and at around 1 month, 3 months, 3.5 months and 4 months after baseline (each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by blood samples collection
Serum Levels of Mid-luteal Phase ProgesteroneAt baseline and cycle 4 (around 3.5 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by blood samples collection
Number of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)At baseline and cycle 4 (around 3.5 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by blood samples collection
Serum Levels of EstradiolAt baseline and cycle 4 (around 3.5 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by blood samples collection
Serum Levels of ProlactinAt baseline and cycle 4 (around 3.5 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by blood samples collection
Serum Levels of Thyrotropin (TSH)At baseline and cycle 4 (around 3.5 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by blood samples collection
Serum Levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1)At baseline and cycle 4 (around 3.5 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Bone Turnover Markers, Determined by Bone Resorption Marker Serum C-terminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (s-CTx)From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by blood samples collection. Changes from baseline to cycle 4
Changes in Bone Turnover Markers, Determined by Bone Formation Marker Serum Procollagen Type I N Propeptide (s-PINP)From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by blood samples collection. Changes from baseline to cycle 4
Changes in ECG Parameters Including PR Interval at Cycle 4At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by 12-lead ECG
Changes in ECG Parameters Including QT Interval at Cycle 4At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by 12-lead ECG
Changes in ECG Parameters Including QTcF Interval at Cycle 4At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by 12-lead ECG
Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Clinically Significant Echocardiography Findings Indicating Valvular Heart DiseaseAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by echocardiography. Each echocardiography was to be assessed as normal or abnormal according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for valvular heart disease. If abnormal, the level of valvular regurgitation and valvular stenosis was specified as mild, moderate or severe and valvular structure was evaluated as well. Measured at cycle 4.
Proportion of Subjects Identified With Potential Impulse Control DisordersAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by the questionnaire for impulsive-compulsive disorders completed by participants. Measured at cycle 4.
Frequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsFrom signing informed consent through study completion, around 8 monthsAssessed by an Adverse Events Log completed by the Investigator
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: AlbuminAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alkaline PhosphataseAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine AminotransferaseAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Aspartate AminotransferaseAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: BicarbonateAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Direct BilirubinAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: BilirubinAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CalciumAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CholesterolAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ChlorideAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CreatinineAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: GlucoseAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: PotassiumAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Lactate DehydrogenaseAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: PhosphateAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ProteinAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: SodiumAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: UrateAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Urea NitrogenAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Basophils AbsoluteAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: BasophilsAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Eosinophils AbsoluteAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: EosinophilsAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: HematocritAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: HemoglobinAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Lymphocytes AbsoluteAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: LymphocytesAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular HGB ConcentrationAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular VolumeAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Monocytes AbsoluteAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: MonocytesAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Neutrophils AbsoluteAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: NeutrophilsAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: PlateletsAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With Menstrual Bleeding and for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With no Menstrual BleedingAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Days with menstrual bleeding (dysmenorrhea). No menstrual bleeding (non-menstrual pelvic pain) Changes from baseline to cycle 4
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: LeukocytesAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Urinalysis Parameters (Protein, Glucose, Bilirubin, pH, Nitrite, Ketone, Urobilinogen, Blood, Leukocytes, and Specific Gravity)At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by urine sample collection (dip-stick test). Overall Urinalysis Result.
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry ParametersAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology ParametersAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Urinalysis ParametersAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by urine samples collection
Frequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingFrom baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by a questionnaire completed by participants, addressing ring insertion
Frequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingFrom baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by a questionnaire completed by participants, addressing ring removal.
Frequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingFrom baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)Assessed by a questionnaire completed by participants, addressing any feeling of the ring while the ring is in the body.
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: ErythrocytesAt baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)Assessed by blood samples collection

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was performed in 12 investigational sites in the US between Dec 2018 and Feb 2022

Pre-assignment details

In total, 107 participants were screened. Of these, 85 were screening failures and 22 were randomized. All the randomized participants were exposed to the investigational medical product (IMP): 6 participants to Quinagolide 360 µg, 5 participants to Quinagolide 720 µg, 8 participants to Quinagolide 1080 µg and 3 participants to Placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Quinagolide 360 µg
Vaginal ring containing Quinagolide 360 μg, with daily target release rate of 4.5 μg Quinagolide 360 µg: Vaginal ring containing quinagolide 360 µg for daily releases
6
Quinagolide 720 µg
Vaginal ring containing Quinagolide 720 μg, with daily target release rate of 9 μg Quinagolide 720 µg: Vaginal ring containing quinagolide 720 µg for daily releases
5
Quinagolide 1080 µg
Vaginal ring containing Quinagolide 1080 μg, with daily target release rate of 13.5 μg Quinagolide 1080 µg: Vaginal ring containing quinagolide 1080 µg for daily releases
8
Placebo
Vaginal ring containing matching placebo Placebo: Matching placebo
3
Total22

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0001
Overall StudyOther0010
Overall StudyPregnancy0100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicQuinagolide 720 µgQuinagolide 360 µgQuinagolide 1080 µgPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants6 Participants8 Participants3 Participants22 Participants
Age, Continuous33.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.36
29.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.22
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.65
32.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
33.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.82
Body Mass Index (BMI)26.58 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.006
28.33 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.428
29.91 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.038
32.33 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.19
29.05 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.348
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants5 Participants6 Participants3 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline
10
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline
6
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline
7
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline
8
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline
9
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants6 Participants6 Participants2 Participants18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants6 participants8 participants3 participants22 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants6 Participants8 Participants3 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 50 / 80 / 30 / 30 / 30 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 63 / 52 / 82 / 31 / 32 / 35 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 50 / 80 / 30 / 30 / 30 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.

Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Changes from baseline to cycle 4.

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.-0.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.213
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.-2.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.092
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.-2.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.344
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.-3.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.685
Secondary

Changes in Bone Turnover Markers, Determined by Bone Formation Marker Serum Procollagen Type I N Propeptide (s-PINP)

Assessed by blood samples collection. Changes from baseline to cycle 4

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Bone Turnover Markers, Determined by Bone Formation Marker Serum Procollagen Type I N Propeptide (s-PINP)-1.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 9.56
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Bone Turnover Markers, Determined by Bone Formation Marker Serum Procollagen Type I N Propeptide (s-PINP)-3.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.36
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Bone Turnover Markers, Determined by Bone Formation Marker Serum Procollagen Type I N Propeptide (s-PINP)10.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 20.12
PlaceboChanges in Bone Turnover Markers, Determined by Bone Formation Marker Serum Procollagen Type I N Propeptide (s-PINP)-21.0 ng/mL
Secondary

Changes in Bone Turnover Markers, Determined by Bone Resorption Marker Serum C-terminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (s-CTx)

Assessed by blood samples collection. Changes from baseline to cycle 4

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Bone Turnover Markers, Determined by Bone Resorption Marker Serum C-terminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (s-CTx)-0.060 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.121
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Bone Turnover Markers, Determined by Bone Resorption Marker Serum C-terminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (s-CTx)0.277 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.3026
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Bone Turnover Markers, Determined by Bone Resorption Marker Serum C-terminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (s-CTx)0.067 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.0685
PlaceboChanges in Bone Turnover Markers, Determined by Bone Resorption Marker Serum C-terminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (s-CTx)-0.031 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.0354
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase-8.3 IU/LStandard Deviation 23.26
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase46.0 IU/LStandard Deviation 69.3
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase-5.8 IU/LStandard Deviation 6.38
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase-3.0 IU/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Albumin

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Albumin-0.5 g/LStandard Deviation 3
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Albumin0.5 g/LStandard Deviation 2.12
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Albumin-2.8 g/LStandard Deviation 2.28
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Albumin-3.0 g/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alkaline Phosphatase

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alkaline Phosphatase-16.5 IU/LStandard Deviation 20.94
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alkaline Phosphatase26.5 IU/LStandard Deviation 45.96
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alkaline Phosphatase-7.2 IU/LStandard Deviation 14.62
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alkaline Phosphatase-13.0 IU/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Aspartate Aminotransferase

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Aspartate Aminotransferase-5.3 IU/LStandard Deviation 14.57
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Aspartate Aminotransferase26.5 IU/LStandard Deviation 41.72
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Aspartate Aminotransferase-0.6 IU/LStandard Deviation 1.14
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Aspartate Aminotransferase4.0 IU/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bicarbonate

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bicarbonate-0.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.63
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bicarbonate0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.54
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bicarbonate-0.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.92
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bicarbonate-2.0 mmol/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin1.3 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.57
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin4.3 umol/LStandard Deviation 3.63
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin-2.1 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.23
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin1.7 umol/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.06
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.05
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.07
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium-0.1 mmol/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Chloride

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Chloride0.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.71
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Chloride1.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Chloride1.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.51
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Chloride2.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.12
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol0.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.46
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.49
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.27
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol-0.1 mmol/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Creatinine

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Creatinine-3.3 umol/LStandard Deviation 13.39
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Creatinine-10.6 umol/LStandard Deviation 3.75
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Creatinine0.0 umol/LStandard Deviation 7.26
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Creatinine0.9 umol/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Direct Bilirubin

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Direct Bilirubin0.0 umol/LStandard Deviation 0
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Direct Bilirubin0.0 umol/LStandard Deviation 0
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Direct Bilirubin-0.7 umol/LStandard Deviation 0.72
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Direct Bilirubin0.0 umol/LStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Gamma Glutamyl Transferase

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Gamma Glutamyl Transferase-3.5 IU/LStandard Deviation 9.75
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Gamma Glutamyl Transferase11.0 IU/LStandard Deviation 14.14
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Gamma Glutamyl Transferase-2.8 IU/LStandard Deviation 11.32
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Gamma Glutamyl Transferase-9.0 IU/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.4
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose-0.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.59
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.49
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose4.8 mmol/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Lactate Dehydrogenase

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Lactate Dehydrogenase-11.8 IU/LStandard Deviation 14.86
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Lactate Dehydrogenase35.0 IU/LStandard Deviation 55.15
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Lactate Dehydrogenase-16.0 IU/LStandard Deviation 14.68
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Lactate Dehydrogenase8.0 IU/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.08
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.43
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.12
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate0.0 mmol/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Potassium

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Potassium-0.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.58
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Potassium-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Potassium-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.32
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Potassium-0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Protein

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Protein-0.8 g/LStandard Deviation 4.35
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Protein0.0 g/LStandard Deviation 2.83
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Protein-3.4 g/LStandard Deviation 3.65
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Protein-5.0 g/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Sodium

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Sodium1.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.73
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Sodium-1.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.54
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Sodium1.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.39
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Sodium0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.95
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Urate

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Urate-5.9 umol/LStandard Deviation 31.85
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Urate-23.8 umol/LStandard Deviation 50.47
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Urate10.7 umol/LStandard Deviation 64.8
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Urate41.6 umol/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Urea Nitrogen

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Urea Nitrogen0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.21
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Urea Nitrogen-2.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.76
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Urea Nitrogen-0.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.84
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Urea Nitrogen-0.7 mmol/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Basophils

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Basophils0.0 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 0.03
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Basophils0.0 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 0.02
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Basophils0.0 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 0.02
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Basophils0.0 *10^3 cells/uL
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Basophils Absolute

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Basophils Absolute-0.3 Basophils Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 0.25
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Basophils Absolute-0.4 Basophils Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 0.21
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Basophils Absolute0.0 Basophils Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 0.05
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Basophils Absolute0.1 Basophils Absolute (%)
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Eosinophils

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Eosinophils-0.1 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 0.02
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Eosinophils-0.1 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 0.14
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Eosinophils0.0 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 0.13
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Eosinophils0.0 *10^3 cells/uL
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Eosinophils Absolute

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Eosinophils Absolute-0.6 Eosinophils Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 0.71
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Eosinophils Absolute-0.3 Eosinophils Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 2.19
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Eosinophils Absolute-1.4 Eosinophils Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 3.73
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Eosinophils Absolute0.0 Eosinophils Absolute (%)
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin0.3 pg/cellStandard Deviation 0.58
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin0.0 pg/cellStandard Deviation 0
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin-0.2 pg/cellStandard Deviation 0.45
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin0.0 pg/cell
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration0.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.72
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.32
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.52
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration1.2 mmol/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume0.0 fLStandard Deviation 2.65
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume0.5 fLStandard Deviation 3.54
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume0.2 fLStandard Deviation 1.64
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume-3.0 fL
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Erythrocytes

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Erythrocytes-0.1 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.35
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Erythrocytes-0.1 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.42
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Erythrocytes-0.2 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.24
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Erythrocytes-0.1 10^12 cells/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Hematocrit

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Hematocrit0.0 RATIOStandard Deviation 0.03
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Hematocrit0.0 RATIOStandard Deviation 0.02
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Hematocrit0.0 RATIOStandard Deviation 0.03
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Hematocrit0.0 RATIO
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Hemoglobin

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Hemoglobin1.3 g/LStandard Deviation 10.07
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Hemoglobin-1.5 g/LStandard Deviation 14.85
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Hemoglobin-6.0 g/LStandard Deviation 7.87
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Hemoglobin0.0 g/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes0.3 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 1.72
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes-0.5 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2.05
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes0.0 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 1.63
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes0.0 10^9 cells/L
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Lymphocytes

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Lymphocytes0.3 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 0.39
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Lymphocytes-0.2 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 0.54
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Lymphocytes-0.1 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 0.43
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Lymphocytes0.3 *10^3 cells/uL
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Lymphocytes Absolute

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Lymphocytes Absolute2.5 Lymphocytes Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 1.96
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Lymphocytes Absolute-0.6 Lymphocytes Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 0.35
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Lymphocytes Absolute-2.1 Lymphocytes Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 8.22
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Lymphocytes Absolute3.9 Lymphocytes Absolute (%)
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Monocytes

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Monocytes-0.2 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 0.03
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Monocytes-0.2 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 0.04
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Monocytes0.0 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 0.13
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Monocytes0.0 *10^3 cells/uL
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Monocytes Absolute

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Monocytes Absolute-2.1 Monocytes Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 0.26
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Monocytes Absolute-2.2 Monocytes Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 1.34
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Monocytes Absolute-0.1 Monocytes Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 1.32
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Monocytes Absolute0.6 Monocytes Absolute (%)
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Neutrophils

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Neutrophils0.3 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.37
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Neutrophils0.0 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.67
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Neutrophils0.1 *10^3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1.52
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Neutrophils-0.3 *10^3 cells/uL
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Neutrophils Absolute

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Neutrophils Absolute0.6 Neutrophils Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 2.74
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Neutrophils Absolute3.4 Neutrophils Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 2.9
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Neutrophils Absolute3.7 Neutrophils Absolute (%)Standard Deviation 7.28
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Neutrophils Absolute-4.6 Neutrophils Absolute (%)
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Platelets

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Platelets-10.3 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 26.54
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Platelets36.5 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 50.2
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Platelets1.8 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 33.33
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters: Platelets12.0 10^9 cells/L
Secondary

Changes in ECG Parameters Including PR Interval at Cycle 4

Assessed by 12-lead ECG

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in ECG Parameters Including PR Interval at Cycle 4-1.8 msecStandard Deviation 11.17
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in ECG Parameters Including PR Interval at Cycle 48.0 msecStandard Deviation 8.72
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in ECG Parameters Including PR Interval at Cycle 41.0 msecStandard Deviation 11.66
PlaceboChanges in ECG Parameters Including PR Interval at Cycle 4-2.5 msecStandard Deviation 2.12
Secondary

Changes in ECG Parameters Including QRS Duration at Cycle 4

Assessed by 12-lead ECG

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in ECG Parameters Including QRS Duration at Cycle 4-0.2 msecStandard Deviation 4.82
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in ECG Parameters Including QRS Duration at Cycle 45.0 msecStandard Deviation 5.83
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in ECG Parameters Including QRS Duration at Cycle 42.8 msecStandard Deviation 7.19
PlaceboChanges in ECG Parameters Including QRS Duration at Cycle 4-7.5 msecStandard Deviation 9.19
Secondary

Changes in ECG Parameters Including QTcF Interval at Cycle 4

Assessed by 12-lead ECG

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in ECG Parameters Including QTcF Interval at Cycle 4-6.2 msecStandard Deviation 6.18
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in ECG Parameters Including QTcF Interval at Cycle 41.5 msecStandard Deviation 11.39
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in ECG Parameters Including QTcF Interval at Cycle 43.2 msecStandard Deviation 13.22
PlaceboChanges in ECG Parameters Including QTcF Interval at Cycle 4-17.5 msecStandard Deviation 33.23
Secondary

Changes in ECG Parameters Including QT Interval at Cycle 4

Assessed by 12-lead ECG

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in ECG Parameters Including QT Interval at Cycle 4-1.2 msecStandard Deviation 22.33
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in ECG Parameters Including QT Interval at Cycle 4-7.5 msecStandard Deviation 23.61
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in ECG Parameters Including QT Interval at Cycle 418.0 msecStandard Deviation 30.32
PlaceboChanges in ECG Parameters Including QT Interval at Cycle 47.0 msecStandard Deviation 5.66
Secondary

Changes in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Scores

Assessed by the PGIS scale completed by participants. PGIS is a 6-point scale depicting a participant's rating of their current conditions from good to bad. It ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (very severe).

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score2 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activities during the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score3 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activities during the last menstrual cycleDecreased score2 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the last menstrual cycleDecreased score2 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score3 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change2 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activities during the last menstrual cycleNo Change2 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score2 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the last menstrual cycleNo Change2 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score3 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score4 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activities during the last menstrual cycleNo Change0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activities during the last menstrual cycleDecreased score4 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activities during the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the last menstrual cycleNo Change1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score4 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the last menstrual cycleDecreased score3 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score4 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the last menstrual cycleNo Change3 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the last menstrual cycleDecreased score3 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score4 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change2 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score4 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activities during the last menstrual cycleNo Change0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activities during the last menstrual cycleDecreased score5 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activities during the last menstrual cycleIncreased score1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score5 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score4 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score1 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the last menstrual cycleNo Change0 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score2 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score2 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change0 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change0 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score2 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change0 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleNo Change0 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during the last menstrual cycleDecreased score2 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of pain on daily activities during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleDecreased score2 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activities during the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activities during the last menstrual cycleDecreased score2 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresImpact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activities during the last menstrual cycleNo Change0 Participants
PlaceboChanges in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ScoresEndometriosis-related pain during non-menstrual bleeding days of the last menstrual cycleIncreased score0 Participants
Secondary

Changes in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Scores

Assessed by the EHP-30 quality-of-life questionnaire completed by participants. Score ranges from 0-100 with lower score denoting improvement.

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 1-7.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.22
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 2-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.55
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 3-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.98
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 4-4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.79
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 2-12.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.88
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 3-12.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.02
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 4-23.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.63
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 1-12.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.09
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 3-18.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.25
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 2-19.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.52
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 4-23.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.86
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 1-8.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.86
PlaceboChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 4-50.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.82
PlaceboChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 2-49.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 68.59
PlaceboChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 1-39.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 74.25
PlaceboChanges in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) ScoresCycle 3-14.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.31
Secondary

Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.

Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Changes over 4 menstrual cycles

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 1-1.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.051
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 2-0.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.678
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 30.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.076
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 4-0.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.989
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 3-1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.442
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 1-1.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 4-3.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.252
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 2-1.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.427
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 1-0.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.699
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 2-1.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.545
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 3-1.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.429
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 4-2.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.787
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 3-3.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.495
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 2-1.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.556
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 4-4.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.495
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dysmenorrhea.Cycle 1-4.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.455
Secondary

Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.

Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Changes over 4 menstrual cycles.

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 1-1.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 2-1.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.008
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 3-0.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.514
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 4-1.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.468
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 3-0.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.551
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 40.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.109
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 1-0.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.088
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 2-0.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.756
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 3-2.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.791
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 2-1.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.542
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 4-2.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.864
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 1-1.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.972
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 3-7.00 score on a scale
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 1-1.00 score on a scale
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Dyspareunia on Days With Sexual Intercourse.Cycle 4-5.00 score on a scale
Secondary

Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.

Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Changes over 4 menstrual cycles

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 3-0.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.057
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 2-0.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.343
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 1-0.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 4-0.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.213
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 1-1.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 3-1.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.788
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 2-2.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.127
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 4-2.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.092
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 1-0.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.733
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 2-1.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.254
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 3-1.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.912
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 4-2.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.344
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 2-1.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 1-1.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.397
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 4-3.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.685
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain.Cycle 3-2.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.152
Secondary

Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With Menstrual Bleeding and for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With no Menstrual Bleeding

Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Days with menstrual bleeding (dysmenorrhea). No menstrual bleeding (non-menstrual pelvic pain) Changes from baseline to cycle 4

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With Menstrual Bleeding and for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With no Menstrual BleedingDysmenorrhea-0.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.989
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With Menstrual Bleeding and for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With no Menstrual BleedingNon-menstrual pelvic pain-0.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.236
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With Menstrual Bleeding and for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With no Menstrual BleedingDysmenorrhea-3.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.252
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With Menstrual Bleeding and for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With no Menstrual BleedingNon-menstrual pelvic pain-2.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With Menstrual Bleeding and for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With no Menstrual BleedingNon-menstrual pelvic pain-2.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.274
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With Menstrual Bleeding and for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With no Menstrual BleedingDysmenorrhea-2.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.787
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With Menstrual Bleeding and for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With no Menstrual BleedingDysmenorrhea-4.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.495
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With Menstrual Bleeding and for the Worst Endometriosis-related Pain on Days With no Menstrual BleedingNon-menstrual pelvic pain-3.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Secondary

Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.

Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Changes over 4 menstrual cycles.

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 1-0.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.095
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 2-0.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.867
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 3-0.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.438
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 4-0.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.647
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 2-2.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.194
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 3-1.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.871
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 4-1.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.203
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 1-1.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.079
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 3-0.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.847
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 2-0.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.281
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 4-1.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.649
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 1-0.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.741
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 4-3.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.678
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 2-0.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.518
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 1-1.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.324
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Impact of Endometriosis-related Pain on the Subject's Ability to Function.Cycle 3-2.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.631
Secondary

Changes in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.

Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary. NRS is an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. Changes over 4 menstrual cycles

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 4-0.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.236
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 1-0.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.457
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 3-0.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.194
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 2-0.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.484
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 1-1.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.926
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 2-2.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.995
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 4-2.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 3-3.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.39
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 2-1.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.354
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 1-0.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.847
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 4-2.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.274
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 3-1.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.306
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 4-3.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 3-1.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.632
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 1-1.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.693
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores for the Worst Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain.Cycle 2-1.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.036
Secondary

Changes in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity Scores

Assessed by the Biberoglu and Behrman (B&B) scale which is a 4-point scale with 0=none and 3=severe. The scores are the mean individual scores. The B&B scale consists of two parts. The first part of the B&B scale evaluates symptoms of endometriosis (i.e. pain). There are 3 subscales: pelvic pain(A, 0=none and 3=severe), dysmenorrhea (B, 0=none and 3=severe), and dyspareunia(C, 0=none and 3=severe). The total pelvic pain score is the sum of the three scores, i.e. A+B+C, which can range from 0 to 9. The second part of the B&B scale evaluates signs of endometriosis. There are 2 subscales pelvic tenderness (D, 0=none and 3=severe) and induration (E, 0=none and 3=severe) based on findings from a pelvic examination. The total physical pain score is the sum of the two scores, i.e. D+E, which can range from 0 to 6. The total symptom and sign severity score is the sum of all five scores, i.e. A+B+C+D+E, which can range from 0 to 15. The values are the change from baseline to cycle 4.

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresTotal symptom and sign severity score-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresTotal physical sign pain score-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresTotal pelvic pain score-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresTotal symptom and sign severity score-4.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.95
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresTotal pelvic pain score-3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.66
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresTotal physical sign pain score-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresTotal physical sign pain score-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresTotal pelvic pain score-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.51
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresTotal symptom and sign severity score-4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.91
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresTotal symptom and sign severity score-6.0 score on a scale
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresTotal physical sign pain score-1.0 score on a scale
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Individual and Total Symptom and Sign Severity ScoresTotal pelvic pain score-5.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Changes in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.

Assessed weekly by participants in an e-Diary. EHP-30 is a quality-of-life questionnaire. Score ranges from 0-100 and lower score denotes improvement. Changes over 4 menstrual cycles.

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 3-3.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.065
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 4-6.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.743
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 1-5.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.939
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 2-5.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.059
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 1-5.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.787
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 3-21.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.336
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 4-24.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.171
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 2-13.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.807
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 4-16.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.624
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 2-14.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.47
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 1-7.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.05
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 3-13.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.564
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 3-27.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.253
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 4-31.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.896
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 2-4.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.477
PlaceboChanges in the Mean Weekly Scores of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Impact Domain.Cycle 1-26.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.146
Secondary

Changes in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.

The participants recorded daily if they had any vaginal bleeding during the past 24 hours, in an e-diary. Of the participants who had a bleeding, the participant recorded the assessed bleeding volume as either spotting (tiny amount of blood on underwear or panty liners), light bleeding (requiring 1-3 sanitary pads or tampons per day), moderate bleeding (requiring 4-6 sanitary pads or tampons per day), or heavy bleeding (requiring more than 6 sanitary pads or tampons per day). The numbers represent the cumulative number of days with vaginal bleeding, summed across all participants. In some cases, there are missing data as not every participant completed the e-diary for 100% of study days.

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Moderate - Cycle 49 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Light - Cycle 48 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Moderate - Baseline10 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.No Bleeding - Cycle 491 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Heavy - Cycle 43 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Heavy - Baseline5 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.No bleeding - Baseline91 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Spotting - Cycle 412 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Light - Baseline17 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Spotting - Baseline18 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Spotting - Baseline9 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Light - Cycle 47 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Moderate - Cycle 44 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Moderate - Baseline11 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Heavy - Baseline9 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Light - Baseline11 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.No bleeding - Baseline101 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.No Bleeding - Cycle 457 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Spotting - Cycle 48 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Heavy - Cycle 42 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Spotting - Baseline16 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Light - Baseline12 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Moderate - Baseline15 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Heavy - Baseline10 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.No Bleeding - Cycle 4110 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Spotting - Cycle 411 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Light - Cycle 49 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Moderate - Cycle 410 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Heavy - Cycle 45 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.No bleeding - Baseline144 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Spotting - Cycle 42 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Light - Baseline8 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Heavy - Cycle 43 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.No Bleeding - Cycle 450 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Heavy - Baseline3 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Spotting - Baseline3 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.No bleeding - Baseline56 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Moderate - Baseline3 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Moderate - Cycle 43 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern.Light - Cycle 49 Number of days
Secondary

Changes in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to Period

The participants recorded daily if they had any vaginal bleeding during the past 24 hours, in an e-diary. Of the participants who had a bleeding, the participant recorded if this was menstrual bleeding: Yes (I had a vaginal bleeding that was menstrual bleeding) or No (I had a vaginal bleeding that was not menstrual bleeding). The numbers represent the cumulative number of days with vaginal bleeding, summed across all participants. In some cases, there are missing data as not every participant completed the e-diary for 100% of study days.

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Baseline Yes38 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Baseline No11 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Cycle 4 Yes29 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Cycle 4 No3 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Cycle 4 No5 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Cycle 4 Yes16 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Baseline Yes37 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Baseline No0 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Baseline No10 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Baseline Yes42 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Cycle 4 Yes33 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Cycle 4 No2 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Baseline Yes15 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Baseline No2 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Cycle 4 Yes17 Number of days
PlaceboChanges in Vaginal Bleeding Pattern - Number of Days With Bleeding Related to PeriodBleeding related to period - Cycle 4 No0 Number of days
Secondary

Frequency and Intensity of Adverse Events

Assessed by an Adverse Events Log completed by the Investigator

Time frame: From signing informed consent through study completion, around 8 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsTreatment emergent adverse events4 participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsMild adverse events4 participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsModerate adverse events2 participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsSevere adverse events0 participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsMild adverse events2 participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsModerate adverse events2 participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsSevere adverse events1 participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsTreatment emergent adverse events3 participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsModerate adverse events2 participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsMild adverse events4 participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsSevere adverse events0 participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsTreatment emergent adverse events5 participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsSevere adverse events0 participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsMild adverse events2 participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsTreatment emergent adverse events2 participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Adverse EventsModerate adverse events2 participants
Secondary

Frequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the Ring

Assessed by a questionnaire completed by participants, addressing any feeling of the ring while the ring is in the body.

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Always0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Frequently1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Occasionally5 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Never0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Always0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Frequently0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Occasionally2 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Occasionally6 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Never1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Always0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Frequently1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Frequently0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Never0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Occasionally2 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Never1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Always0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Always0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Never1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Occasionally2 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Frequently2 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Never2 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Occasionally3 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Frequently0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Always0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Never1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Occasionally3 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Frequently0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Always0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Never0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Occasionally3 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Frequently0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Always0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Frequently0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Always1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Never1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Occasionally3 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Never3 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Never2 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Never2 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Frequently0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Frequently0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Occasionally4 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Always1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Always0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Occasionally3 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Frequently0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Occasionally4 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Always1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Frequently0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Always0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Frequently0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Never1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Occasionally1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Occasionally0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Frequently0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Occasionally0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 3Always0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Never1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Never1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Never1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 1Always1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 4Always0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Occasionally1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Felt the RingCycle 2Frequently0 Participants
Secondary

Frequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal Ring

Assessed by a questionnaire completed by participants, addressing ring insertion

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Easy2 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Easy5 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Easy1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Easy3 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Easier than the previous ring3 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Easier than the previous ring1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Easier than the previous ring0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Easier than the previous ring1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)2 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Difficult1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Easy2 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Easier than the previous ring0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Easy4 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Easier than the previous ring1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Easier than the previous ring2 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Easy3 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Easy4 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Easier than the previous ring0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Easy7 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Easy4 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Easy5 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Easy6 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Easier than the previous ring1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Easier than the previous ring1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Easier than the previous ring0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Easier than the previous ring0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Difficult0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Easy2 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Easier than the previous ring0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Difficult0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Easy2 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Easier than the previous ring0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Difficult0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Easy2 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Easier than the previous ring0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Difficult0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Not Applicable (I was not given a new ring)0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Easy1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Easier than the previous ring0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Insertion of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Difficult0 Participants
Secondary

Frequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal Ring

Assessed by a questionnaire completed by participants, addressing ring removal.

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Easy6 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Easy6 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Easy4 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Easy3 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Easy4 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Easy3 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Easy5 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Easy5 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Easy5 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Easy7 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Easy6 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Difficult0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Easy6 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Difficult1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Easy1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 2Difficult1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Difficult0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 1Easy2 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Easy2 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Difficult0 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 4Easy1 Participants
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Ring Acceptability Parameters: Removal of the Vaginal RingCycle 3Difficult0 Participants
Secondary

Frequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected Pain

The participants recorded daily if they had sexual intercourse, in an e-diary. For the days when participants did not have intercourse, the participant recorded if the reason for not having intercourse was because they expected pain: Yes (I did not have intercourse this day, because I expected pain) or No (I did not have intercourse this day, but this was not because I expected pain). The numbers represent the cumulative number of days with no intercourse, summed across all participants. In some cases, there are missing data as not every participant completed the e-diary for 100% of study days.

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainBaseline - Yes36 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 1 - Yes38 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainBaseline - No103 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 1 - No116 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 2 - Yes34 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 2 - No107 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 3 - Yes30 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 3 - No112 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 4 - No94 Number of days
Quinagolide 360 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 4 - Yes29 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 4 - Yes11 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 1 - Yes20 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 3 - No106 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 1 - No107 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 2 - Yes13 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 2 - No109 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 3 - Yes23 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 4 - No67 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainBaseline - Yes46 Number of days
Quinagolide 720 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainBaseline - No94 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 3 - No122 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 2 - Yes29 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 4 - Yes28 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 4 - No117 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 2 - No153 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 3 - Yes31 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainBaseline - No154 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainBaseline - Yes41 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 1 - Yes35 Number of days
Quinagolide 1080 µgFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 1 - No158 Number of days
PlaceboFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 1 - Yes22 Number of days
PlaceboFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainBaseline - Yes24 Number of days
PlaceboFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 3 - Yes1 Number of days
PlaceboFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 2 - Yes11 Number of days
PlaceboFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainBaseline - No48 Number of days
PlaceboFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 3 - No51 Number of days
PlaceboFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 1 - No28 Number of days
PlaceboFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 2 - No40 Number of days
PlaceboFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 4 - Yes3 Number of days
PlaceboFrequency of Avoiding Sexual Intercourse Due to Expected PainCycle 4 - No64 Number of days
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and cycle 4 (around 3.5 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Quinagolide 360 µgNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Baseline< 7.92 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Baseline>= 7.94 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Cycle 4< 7.93 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Cycle 4>= 7.92 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Baseline>= 7.93 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Cycle 4< 7.91 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Cycle 4>= 7.91 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Baseline< 7.92 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Cycle 4< 7.92 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Baseline>= 7.94 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Cycle 4>= 7.93 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Baseline< 7.94 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Cycle 4>= 7.90 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Baseline>= 7.92 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Baseline< 7.91 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Serum Mid-luteal Progesterone Levels ≥25 Nmol/L (7.9 ng/ml)Cycle 4< 7.92 Participants
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores

Assessed by the PGIC scale completed by participants. PGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a patient's rating of their overall improvement from good to bad.

Time frame: At cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaMinimally improved5 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsMinimally improved4 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesMinimally improved4 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painVery much improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaNo change0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painMuch improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesMuch improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsMinimally improved2 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsVery much improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsVery much improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painVery much improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaVery much improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painNo change1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesVery much improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painMuch improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsMuch improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsNo change1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painMinimally improved3 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesNo change1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painMinimally improved3 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaMuch improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painNo change1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsNo change1 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsMuch improved2 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsMinimally improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesVery much improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsMinimally improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesMuch improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsMuch improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesMinimally improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesNo change1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painVery much improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsVery much improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaVery much improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsMuch improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaMuch improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaMinimally improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsNo change1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaNo change1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsVery much improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painMuch improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painVery much improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painMuch improved1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painMinimally improved2 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsNo change2 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painNo change0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painMinimally improved2 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painNo change0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsVery much improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painVery much improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painNo change0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsVery much worse1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painMuch improved2 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painMinimally improved4 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaVery much improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaMuch improved2 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaMinimally improved2 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaNo change1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaVery much worse1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painVery much improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painMuch improved2 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painMinimally improved3 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painNo change1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesVery much improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesMuch improved2 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesMinimally improved3 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesNo change1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesVery much worse0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsVery much improved0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsMuch improved2 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsMinimally improved3 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsNo change0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsVery much worse1 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsMuch improved2 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsMinimally improved3 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsNo change0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesVery much improved2 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painVery much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painMuch improved0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsMinimally improved0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painNo change1 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painMinimally improved0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painVery much improved2 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsNo change0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painMuch improved0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange of non-menstrual pelvic painVery much improved1 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painMinimally improved0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsVery much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaVery much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaNo change0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaMinimally improved0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsVery much improved2 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaMuch improved0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in dysmenorrheaVery much improved2 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsNo change0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsMuch improved0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painVery much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related painNo change0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesVery much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesNo change0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsVery much worse0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsVery much improved2 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesMinimally improved0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the overall impact of endometriosis-related pain on daily activitiesMuch improved0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in the endometriosis related pain impact during non-menstrual periodsMinimally improved0 Participants
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ScoresChange in endometriosis-related pain impact during their menstrual periodsMuch improved0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics Used

Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 3 - Any analgesics39.67 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 40.008
Quinagolide 360 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 3 - Mild analgesics38.00 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 36.92
Quinagolide 360 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 2 - Mild analgesics40.96 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 37.699
Quinagolide 360 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 3 - Strong analgesics10.83 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 24.224
Quinagolide 360 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 4 - Strong analgesics9.17 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 20.497
Quinagolide 360 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 1 - Mild analgesics41.68 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 31.961
Quinagolide 360 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 1 - Strong analgesics10.75 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 22.649
Quinagolide 360 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 4 - Mild analgesics39.88 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 35.135
Quinagolide 360 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 2 - Any analgesics40.96 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 37.699
Quinagolide 360 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 1 - Any analgesics41.68 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 31.961
Quinagolide 360 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 2 - Strong analgesics12.35 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 30.241
Quinagolide 360 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 4 - Any analgesics39.88 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 35.135
Quinagolide 720 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 4 - Mild analgesics1.39 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 2.406
Quinagolide 720 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 3 - Any analgesics32.25 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 44.036
Quinagolide 720 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 2 - Mild analgesics21.00 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 44.215
Quinagolide 720 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 3 - Strong analgesics10.13 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 13.88
Quinagolide 720 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 2 - Strong analgesics10.99 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 14.572
Quinagolide 720 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 3 - Mild analgesics29.47 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 46.115
Quinagolide 720 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 1 - Strong analgesics5.12 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 7.976
Quinagolide 720 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 4 - Any analgesics5.93 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 6.988
Quinagolide 720 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 1 - Any analgesics26.04 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 41.912
Quinagolide 720 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 2 - Any analgesics25.33 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 42.31
Quinagolide 720 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 1 - Mild analgesics22.41 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 43.522
Quinagolide 720 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 4 - Strong analgesics4.55 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 7.873
Quinagolide 1080 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 3 - Mild analgesics38.62 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 44.213
Quinagolide 1080 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 2 - Mild analgesics36.29 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 39.131
Quinagolide 1080 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 1 - Any analgesics44.82 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 35.052
Quinagolide 1080 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 1 - Mild analgesics44.82 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 35.052
Quinagolide 1080 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 1 - Strong analgesics3.43 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 9.071
Quinagolide 1080 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 2 - Any analgesics36.29 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 39.131
Quinagolide 1080 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 2 - Strong analgesics2.86 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 7.559
Quinagolide 1080 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 3 - Any analgesics38.62 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 44.213
Quinagolide 1080 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 3 - Strong analgesics5.17 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 12.67
Quinagolide 1080 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 4 - Any analgesics37.75 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 44.143
Quinagolide 1080 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 4 - Mild analgesics37.75 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 44.143
Quinagolide 1080 µgPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 4 - Strong analgesics3.47 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 8.505
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 2 - Strong analgesics0 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 2 - Any analgesics20.37 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 28.808
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 2 - Mild analgesics20.37 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 28.808
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 4 - Any analgesics2.56 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 3.626
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 1 - Strong analgesics0 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 1 - Mild analgesics3.57 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 5.051
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 4 - Strong analgesics0 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 4 - Mild analgesics2.56 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 3.626
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 3 - Mild analgesics13.46 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 13.598
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 3 - Any analgesics13.46 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 13.598
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 1 - Any analgesics3.57 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 5.051
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedCycle 3 - Strong analgesics0 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of Quinagolide and Metabolites

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: Within 5 days after first ring insertion and at around 1 month, 3 months, 3.5 months and 4 months after baseline (each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesWithin 1-5 days of first ring inserting3.04 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.09
Quinagolide 360 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesLuteinizing hormone surge + 7 days visit during cycle 11.84 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.31
Quinagolide 360 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesReturn of Menses + 7 days visit during cycle 11.22 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.632
Quinagolide 360 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesReturn of Menses+7 days visit during cycle 31.44 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.578
Quinagolide 360 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesLuteinizing hormone surge + 7 days visit during cycle 42.08 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.65
Quinagolide 360 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesReturn of Menses+7 days visit during cycle 41.47 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.799
Quinagolide 720 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesReturn of Menses+7 days visit during cycle 42.07 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.85
Quinagolide 720 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesWithin 1-5 days of first ring inserting7.77 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3.94
Quinagolide 720 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesReturn of Menses+7 days visit during cycle 32.00 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.98
Quinagolide 720 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesLuteinizing hormone surge + 7 days visit during cycle 42.92 pg/mL
Quinagolide 720 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesLuteinizing hormone surge + 7 days visit during cycle 12.36 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.75
Quinagolide 720 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesReturn of Menses + 7 days visit during cycle 11.52 pg/mLStandard Deviation 0.54
Quinagolide 1080 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesLuteinizing hormone surge + 7 days visit during cycle 17.10 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.36
Quinagolide 1080 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesReturn of Menses + 7 days visit during cycle 13.22 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.7
Quinagolide 1080 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesReturn of Menses+7 days visit during cycle 43.41 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.43
Quinagolide 1080 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesReturn of Menses+7 days visit during cycle 35.70 pg/mLStandard Deviation 5.55
Quinagolide 1080 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesWithin 1-5 days of first ring inserting10.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 8.79
Quinagolide 1080 µgPlasma Concentration of Quinagolide and MetabolitesLuteinizing hormone surge + 7 days visit during cycle 45.13 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.91
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Identified With Potential Impulse Control Disorders

Assessed by the questionnaire for impulsive-compulsive disorders completed by participants. Measured at cycle 4.

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Quinagolide 360 µgProportion of Subjects Identified With Potential Impulse Control Disorders1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgProportion of Subjects Identified With Potential Impulse Control Disorders0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgProportion of Subjects Identified With Potential Impulse Control Disorders0 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects Identified With Potential Impulse Control Disorders0 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Abnormal Clinically Significant Echocardiography Findings Indicating Valvular Heart Disease

Assessed by echocardiography. Each echocardiography was to be assessed as normal or abnormal according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for valvular heart disease. If abnormal, the level of valvular regurgitation and valvular stenosis was specified as mild, moderate or severe and valvular structure was evaluated as well. Measured at cycle 4.

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Quinagolide 360 µgProportion of Subjects With Abnormal Clinically Significant Echocardiography Findings Indicating Valvular Heart Disease0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgProportion of Subjects With Abnormal Clinically Significant Echocardiography Findings Indicating Valvular Heart Disease0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgProportion of Subjects With Abnormal Clinically Significant Echocardiography Findings Indicating Valvular Heart Disease0 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Abnormal Clinically Significant Echocardiography Findings Indicating Valvular Heart Disease0 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Quinagolide 360 µgProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters0 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Parameters0 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Quinagolide 360 µgProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters0 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Haematology Parameters0 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Urinalysis Parameters

Assessed by urine samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Quinagolide 360 µgProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Urinalysis Parameters0 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Urinalysis Parameters0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Urinalysis Parameters0 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes in Urinalysis Parameters0 Participants
Secondary

Responder Rate

Assessed as ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥70% reduction from the baseline in mean daily NRS score for the worst endometriosis-related pain, dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain and for the worst endometriosis-related pain impact

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Quinagolide 360 µgResponder Rate≥50% reduction - non-menstrual pelvic pain20.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 360 µgResponder Rate≥50% reduction - dysmenorrhea0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 360 µgResponder Rate≥30% reduction - impact on the subject's ability to function20.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 360 µgResponder Rate≥70% reduction - non-menstrual pelvic pain0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 360 µgResponder Rate≥50% reduction - endometriosis-related pain0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 360 µgResponder Rate≥70% reduction - dysmenorrhea0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 360 µgResponder Rate≥30% reduction - dysmenorrhea0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 360 µgResponder Rate≥30% reduction - endometriosis-related pain20.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 360 µgResponder Rate≥70% reduction - endometriosis-related pain0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 360 µgResponder Rate≥50% reduction - impact on the subject's ability to function0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 360 µgResponder Rate≥30% reduction - non-menstrual pelvic pain20.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 360 µgResponder Rate≥70% reduction - impact on the subject's ability to function0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 720 µgResponder Rate≥70% reduction - endometriosis-related pain0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 720 µgResponder Rate≥30% reduction - endometriosis-related pain50.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 720 µgResponder Rate≥30% reduction - dysmenorrhea75.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 720 µgResponder Rate≥30% reduction - non-menstrual pelvic pain50.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 720 µgResponder Rate≥30% reduction - impact on the subject's ability to function50.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 720 µgResponder Rate≥50% reduction - endometriosis-related pain25.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 720 µgResponder Rate≥50% reduction - dysmenorrhea50.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 720 µgResponder Rate≥50% reduction - non-menstrual pelvic pain25.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 720 µgResponder Rate≥50% reduction - impact on the subject's ability to function50.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 720 µgResponder Rate≥70% reduction - dysmenorrhea25.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 720 µgResponder Rate≥70% reduction - non-menstrual pelvic pain25.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 720 µgResponder Rate≥70% reduction - impact on the subject's ability to function25.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgResponder Rate≥50% reduction - dysmenorrhea33.3 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgResponder Rate≥30% reduction - non-menstrual pelvic pain33.3 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgResponder Rate≥50% reduction - non-menstrual pelvic pain33.3 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgResponder Rate≥50% reduction - impact on the subject's ability to function33.3 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgResponder Rate≥30% reduction - dysmenorrhea50.0 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgResponder Rate≥70% reduction - endometriosis-related pain16.7 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgResponder Rate≥70% reduction - dysmenorrhea16.7 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgResponder Rate≥30% reduction - endometriosis-related pain33.3 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgResponder Rate≥30% reduction - impact on the subject's ability to function33.3 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgResponder Rate≥70% reduction - impact on the subject's ability to function16.7 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgResponder Rate≥50% reduction - endometriosis-related pain33.3 percentage of participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgResponder Rate≥70% reduction - non-menstrual pelvic pain16.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Rate≥30% reduction - endometriosis-related pain100 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Rate≥50% reduction - dysmenorrhea100 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Rate≥70% reduction - impact on the subject's ability to function0 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Rate≥70% reduction - non-menstrual pelvic pain0 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Rate≥30% reduction - non-menstrual pelvic pain100 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Rate≥50% reduction - non-menstrual pelvic pain50.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Rate≥30% reduction - dysmenorrhea100 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Rate≥70% reduction - endometriosis-related pain0 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Rate≥70% reduction - dysmenorrhea0 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Rate≥50% reduction - impact on the subject's ability to function50.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Rate≥50% reduction - endometriosis-related pain50.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Rate≥30% reduction - impact on the subject's ability to function100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Serum Levels of Estradiol

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and cycle 4 (around 3.5 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgSerum Levels of EstradiolBaseline328.2 pmol/LStandard Deviation 105.46
Quinagolide 360 µgSerum Levels of EstradiolCycle 4415.6 pmol/LStandard Deviation 84.52
Quinagolide 720 µgSerum Levels of EstradiolCycle 4278.8 pmol/LStandard Deviation 229.21
Quinagolide 720 µgSerum Levels of EstradiolBaseline534.4 pmol/LStandard Deviation 215.68
Quinagolide 1080 µgSerum Levels of EstradiolBaseline350.0 pmol/LStandard Deviation 141.05
Quinagolide 1080 µgSerum Levels of EstradiolCycle 4552.3 pmol/LStandard Deviation 267.16
PlaceboSerum Levels of EstradiolBaseline431.6 pmol/LStandard Deviation 67.41
PlaceboSerum Levels of EstradiolCycle 4142.8 pmol/LStandard Deviation 10.9
Secondary

Serum Levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1)

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and cycle 4 (around 3.5 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgSerum Levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1)Baseline216.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 50.11
Quinagolide 360 µgSerum Levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1)Cycle 4211.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 38.37
Quinagolide 720 µgSerum Levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1)Cycle 4208.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 142.27
Quinagolide 720 µgSerum Levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1)Baseline221.1 ng/mLStandard Deviation 89.37
Quinagolide 1080 µgSerum Levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1)Baseline166.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 59.58
Quinagolide 1080 µgSerum Levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1)Cycle 4158.1 ng/mLStandard Deviation 53.32
PlaceboSerum Levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1)Baseline188.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 12.57
PlaceboSerum Levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1)Cycle 4169.9 ng/mLStandard Deviation 12.73
Secondary

Serum Levels of Mid-luteal Phase Progesterone

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and cycle 4 (around 3.5 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgSerum Levels of Mid-luteal Phase ProgesteroneBaseline8.29 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4.984
Quinagolide 360 µgSerum Levels of Mid-luteal Phase ProgesteroneCycle 49.55 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7.389
Quinagolide 720 µgSerum Levels of Mid-luteal Phase ProgesteroneCycle 46.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.505
Quinagolide 720 µgSerum Levels of Mid-luteal Phase ProgesteroneBaseline8.49 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.343
Quinagolide 1080 µgSerum Levels of Mid-luteal Phase ProgesteroneBaseline7.04 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.014
Quinagolide 1080 µgSerum Levels of Mid-luteal Phase ProgesteroneCycle 46.56 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.382
PlaceboSerum Levels of Mid-luteal Phase ProgesteroneBaseline8.57 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1.537
PlaceboSerum Levels of Mid-luteal Phase ProgesteroneCycle 40.05 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Serum Levels of Prolactin

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and cycle 4 (around 3.5 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgSerum Levels of ProlactinBaseline8.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.4
Quinagolide 360 µgSerum Levels of ProlactinCycle 410.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 5.04
Quinagolide 720 µgSerum Levels of ProlactinCycle 411.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.97
Quinagolide 720 µgSerum Levels of ProlactinBaseline13.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 8.25
Quinagolide 1080 µgSerum Levels of ProlactinBaseline10.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.95
Quinagolide 1080 µgSerum Levels of ProlactinCycle 49.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.5
PlaceboSerum Levels of ProlactinBaseline13.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.69
PlaceboSerum Levels of ProlactinCycle 435.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 20.22
Secondary

Serum Levels of Thyrotropin (TSH)

Assessed by blood samples collection

Time frame: At baseline and cycle 4 (around 3.5 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgSerum Levels of Thyrotropin (TSH)Cycle 41.7 uIU/mLStandard Deviation 0.55
Quinagolide 360 µgSerum Levels of Thyrotropin (TSH)Baseline1.9 uIU/mLStandard Deviation 0.97
Quinagolide 720 µgSerum Levels of Thyrotropin (TSH)Baseline2.1 uIU/mLStandard Deviation 1.25
Quinagolide 720 µgSerum Levels of Thyrotropin (TSH)Cycle 42.1 uIU/mLStandard Deviation 1.17
Quinagolide 1080 µgSerum Levels of Thyrotropin (TSH)Cycle 41.2 uIU/mLStandard Deviation 0.78
Quinagolide 1080 µgSerum Levels of Thyrotropin (TSH)Baseline1.3 uIU/mLStandard Deviation 0.56
PlaceboSerum Levels of Thyrotropin (TSH)Baseline2.7 uIU/mLStandard Deviation 2.14
PlaceboSerum Levels of Thyrotropin (TSH)Cycle 42.3 uIU/mL
Secondary

Total and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics Used

Assessed daily by participants in an e-Diary

Time frame: From baseline to menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 310360.0 mgStandard Deviation 11802.03
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 1325.10 mgStandard Deviation 339.854
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 211266.7 mgStandard Deviation 15184.03
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 2443.41 mgStandard Deviation 557.172
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 18400.0 mgStandard Deviation 7740.8
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 3412.97 mgStandard Deviation 490.864
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 49760.0 mgStandard Deviation 11939.35
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 4403.73 mgStandard Deviation 507.562
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 11575.8 mgStandard Deviation 3431.31
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 166.93 mgStandard Deviation 146.737
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 22541.7 mgStandard Deviation 6225.79
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 294.42 mgStandard Deviation 231.273
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 32013.0 mgStandard Deviation 4501.2
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 379.38 mgStandard Deviation 177.493
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 41159.0 mgStandard Deviation 2591.6
Quinagolide 360 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 446.14 mgStandard Deviation 103.164
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 3333.19 mgStandard Deviation 497.634
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 1427.0 mgStandard Deviation 668.22
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 413.26 mgStandard Deviation 22.968
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 236.03 mgStandard Deviation 45.793
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 4305.0 mgStandard Deviation 528.28
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 118.38 mgStandard Deviation 30.108
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 25480.0 mgStandard Deviation 11594.48
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 2854.0 mgStandard Deviation 1086.93
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 310650.0 mgStandard Deviation 17070.34
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 4400.0 mgStandard Deviation 692.82
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 2230.28 mgStandard Deviation 482.277
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 1213.27 mgStandard Deviation 420.629
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 31143.8 mgStandard Deviation 1460.08
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 416.00 mgStandard Deviation 27.713
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 336.55 mgStandard Deviation 44.327
Quinagolide 720 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 15680.0 mgStandard Deviation 11389.12
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 3590.77 mgStandard Deviation 648.496
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 316166.7 mgStandard Deviation 17716.17
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 354.34 mgStandard Deviation 133.103
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 415333.3 mgStandard Deviation 21142.44
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 4606.03 mgStandard Deviation 824.589
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 412.71 mgStandard Deviation 31.129
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 1697.1 mgStandard Deviation 1844.47
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 127.89 mgStandard Deviation 73.779
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 4305.0 mgStandard Deviation 747.09
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 2915.0 mgStandard Deviation 2420.86
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 230.50 mgStandard Deviation 80.695
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 114514.3 mgStandard Deviation 14920.17
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 1613.51 mgStandard Deviation 665.765
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 31575.8 mgStandard Deviation 3859.99
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 213485.7 mgStandard Deviation 17324.3
Quinagolide 1080 µgTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 2487.05 mgStandard Deviation 613.429
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 40 mgStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 430.77 mgStandard Deviation 43.514
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 28600.0 mgStandard Deviation 12162.24
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 11200.0 mgStandard Deviation 1697.06
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 30 mgStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 41200.0 mgStandard Deviation 1697.06
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 30 mgStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 142.86 mgStandard Deviation 60.609
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 35500.0 mgStandard Deviation 6646.8
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 10 mgStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 3211.54 mgStandard Deviation 255.646
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 20 mgStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 40 mgStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedTotal dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 10 mgStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of mild analgesics - Cycle 2318.52 mgStandard Deviation 450.453
PlaceboTotal and Average Doses of Mild and/or Strong Rescue Analgesics UsedAverage dose of strong analgesics - Cycle 20 mgStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Urinalysis Parameters (Protein, Glucose, Bilirubin, pH, Nitrite, Ketone, Urobilinogen, Blood, Leukocytes, and Specific Gravity)

Assessed by urine sample collection (dip-stick test). Overall Urinalysis Result.

Time frame: At baseline and at menstrual cycle 4 (around 4 months, each cycle is approximately 28 days)

Population: Participants analyzed for this endpoint represent participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Quinagolide 360 µgUrinalysis Parameters (Protein, Glucose, Bilirubin, pH, Nitrite, Ketone, Urobilinogen, Blood, Leukocytes, and Specific Gravity)Abnormal overall urinalysis result0 Participants
Quinagolide 360 µgUrinalysis Parameters (Protein, Glucose, Bilirubin, pH, Nitrite, Ketone, Urobilinogen, Blood, Leukocytes, and Specific Gravity)Normal overall urinalysis result1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgUrinalysis Parameters (Protein, Glucose, Bilirubin, pH, Nitrite, Ketone, Urobilinogen, Blood, Leukocytes, and Specific Gravity)Normal overall urinalysis result1 Participants
Quinagolide 720 µgUrinalysis Parameters (Protein, Glucose, Bilirubin, pH, Nitrite, Ketone, Urobilinogen, Blood, Leukocytes, and Specific Gravity)Abnormal overall urinalysis result0 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgUrinalysis Parameters (Protein, Glucose, Bilirubin, pH, Nitrite, Ketone, Urobilinogen, Blood, Leukocytes, and Specific Gravity)Normal overall urinalysis result2 Participants
Quinagolide 1080 µgUrinalysis Parameters (Protein, Glucose, Bilirubin, pH, Nitrite, Ketone, Urobilinogen, Blood, Leukocytes, and Specific Gravity)Abnormal overall urinalysis result0 Participants
PlaceboUrinalysis Parameters (Protein, Glucose, Bilirubin, pH, Nitrite, Ketone, Urobilinogen, Blood, Leukocytes, and Specific Gravity)Abnormal overall urinalysis result0 Participants
PlaceboUrinalysis Parameters (Protein, Glucose, Bilirubin, pH, Nitrite, Ketone, Urobilinogen, Blood, Leukocytes, and Specific Gravity)Normal overall urinalysis result2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026