Skip to content

The Effects of rTMS in Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury

The Effects of Systematic, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Rehabilitation After Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Neuromuscular Adaptations and Recovery of Lower Limb Muscle Strength

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03690726
Enrollment
19
Registered
2018-10-01
Start date
2019-01-02
Completion date
2020-08-01
Last updated
2020-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neurorehabilitation, Rehabilitation, Spinal Cord Injury, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Brief summary

The project will investigate whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can be used to potentiate/prime spinal cord injured patients' nervous systems for more intense rehabilitation exercise of longer duration - thus leading to greater recovery of motion function. The technique, in which a magnetic coil is positioned above the scalp and forms a magnetic field that activates the desired center of the brain (eg motor cortex), is used in clinical practice for the treatment of a number of disorders. However, although a combination of rTMS and gait training in SCI patients previously has proven beneficial, it is unknown whether additional functional gains can be achieved by combining rTMS and supervised, high-intensity resistance training. In this project, 30 newly-admitted patients will be recruited and randomized to receive either active rTMS and strength training (n = 15) or sham (imitated) rTMS + strength training, in parallel with standard care. The investigators hypothesize that the active rTMS group will have superior gains in locomotor function and muscle mass, compared to the sham group.

Interventions

DEVICErepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the leg motor cortex, in combination with resistance training

OTHERSham stimulation

Imitated magnetic stimulation: An active coil will be activated under the subject's head, firing down into the mattress, while an inactive coil will be held over the scalp

Sponsors

University of Southern Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Intervention Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* sub-acute (\<6 months) incomplete spinal cord injury * admitted at the SCIWDK for primary rehabilitation

Exclusion criteria

* Medical history of multiple central nervous system lesions, * severe structural, * inflammatory or degenerative cerebral disorders, * epilepsy, * other neurological diseases, * lower limb peripheral injury, * or orthopedic injuries that may limit maximal effort contractions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
6 minutes walking testMeasures the change from baseline and after 8 weeks of interventionTest of ambulatory endurance. It measures the maximal distance covered within 6 minutes.
Lower limb maximal muscle strengthMeasures the change from baseline and after 8 weeks of interventionMeasures the maximal voluntary contraction torque of the knee flexors and knee extensors.
Timed up and go testMeasures the change from baseline and after 8 weeks of interventionMeasures the time (in seconds) it takes a person to get up from an ordinary chair with back and armrest, walk 3 meters, turn back to the chair and sit back.
Rate of force developmentMeasures the change from baseline and after 8 weeks of interventionMeasures the explosive muscle force of the knee flexors and knee extensors.
10 meter walking testMeasures the change from baseline and after 8 weeks of interventionMeasures the time (in seconds) it takes to cover 10 meters during level-ground walking.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantitative Sensory TestingMeasures the change from baseline and after 8 weeks of interventionMeasures the sensitivity to heat and cold stimuli on the skin.
H-reflex testMeasures the change from baseline and after 8 weeks of interventionMeasures spasticity from the ratio of the amplitude between the M-wave and H-wave. These are evoked during a short electrical stimulation impulse delivered to the nerves innervating the soleus muscle.
Modified Ashworth ScaleMeasures the change from baseline and after 8 weeks of interventionA manual test that measures spasticity from 0 to 4, where 0 is no spasticity and 4 is widespread spasticity.
The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord InjuryMeasures the change from baseline and after 8 weeks of interventionAn examination that is used to score the motor and sensory impairment and severity of a spinal cord injury.
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury testMeasures the change from baseline and after 8 weeks of interventionA test that assesses the amount of physical assistance needed, as well as devices required, for walking following paralysis that results from Spinal Cord Injury.
Pressure algometryMeasures the change from baseline and after 8 weeks of interventionA test for the pressure sensitivity of the pain nerve fibers in and superficial to the masseter and soleus muscles.
Self-reported painMeasures the change from baseline and after 8 weeks of interventionExamines self-reported pain through a 100mm Visual-Analogue Scale, scored 0-100, where 0 is no pain and 100 is the greatest pain imaginable.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026