Skip to content

The Effect of T-CPR on the Quality of CPR and AED Use

The Effect of Telephone Assistance on the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Use of Automated External Defibrillator.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03690102
Enrollment
153
Registered
2018-10-01
Start date
2018-09-30
Completion date
2020-08-23
Last updated
2021-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Basic Cardiac Life Support, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to examine the effect of telephone assistance and standardized basic life support courses on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the use of automated external defibrillator (AED). The investigators hypothesize that bystanders can provide compressions in correct frequency and use an AED correctly as well as safely from telephone instructions but that correct and successful ventilations including correct open airway require training on a course.

Detailed description

The study aims at answering the following research questions: 1. How is the quality of CPR and use of AED when performed by an inexperienced bystander who receives telephone assistance compared to the quality when performed by a trained bystander, who has passed a standardized European Resuscitation Council (ERC) course in basic life support (BLS) but does not receive telephone assistance? 2. How is the quality of CPR and use of AED when performed by a trained bystander who has passed a standardized ERC course in BLS and who receives telephone assistance compared to the quality when performed by a trained bystander who does not receive telephone assistance? The questions are sought answered through simulated cardiac arrest scenarios in non-classroom settings. Participants are recruited from ERC courses in BLS. Participants are randomised to one of three groups (stratified for course type using computer-generated randomisation lists with blocks of variable sizes): 1. Cardiac arrest scenario test before BLS course with telephone-assistance. 2. Cardiac arrest scenario test after BLS course, no telephone-assistance. 3. Cardiac arrest scenario test after BLS course with telephone-assistance.

Interventions

OTHERT-CPR

Participants receive telephone instructions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) from the Emergency Medical Services in Copenhagen during the cardiac arrest scenario test.

OTHERERC standardized BLS course

Participants will receive and complete the standardized course in basic life support (BLS) from European Resuscitation Council (ERC).

Sponsors

TrygFonden, Denmark
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Southern Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment Participants are randomized to one of three groups (stratified for course type, using computer-generated lists with variable block sizes): Participants are given a cardiac arrest scenario test either before or after a European Resuscitation Council standardized basic life support course. Two of the groups receive instructions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from a dispatcher when they call the Emergency Medical Services.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participant at a European Resuscitation Council standardized basic life support course. Participants are enrolled from courses for university students, courses for elderly and courses for recruits in the Danish Emergency Management Agency.

Exclusion criteria

* Basic life support course within the last two years. * Healthcare professional or background as healthcare professional. * Instructor in basic life support or first aid. * Lifeguard or background as lifeguard. * Does not want to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compression depth8 minutesKeeps a compression depth as recommended by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) (5-6 cm) on at least 50 % of compressions (yes/no). Measured by advanced manikin.
Compression rate8 minutesRescuer keeps a compression rate of approximately 100-120 compressions per min. throughout the CPR (yes/no). Measured by advanced manikin.
Shock delivered8 minutesShock delivered with AED (yes/no). Assessed by ERC instructor.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess breathing8 minutesLooks, listens AND feels for normal breathing (yes/no). Assessed by ERC instructor.
Recoil/lean8 minutesFull rise on at least 50 % of all compressions (yes/no). Measured by advanced manikin.
Rescue breaths8 minutesMore than 400 mL for at least 50 % of all ventilations (yes/no). Measured by advanced manikin.
Ratio8 minutesAcceptable range 28-32:2 (yes/no). Assessed by ERC instructor.
Activate AED8 minutesActivates AED immediately upon arrival (yes/no). Assessed by ERC instructor.
Attachment of AED pads8 minutesCorrect attachment of AED pads according to the picture in protocol (yes/no). Assessed by ERC instructor.
Hands-of time8 minutesRelevant actions of resuscitation within more than 75 % of the test time (yes/no). Measured as no flow time by advanced manikin.
Compression depth 28 minutesPercentage of compressions with a depth within the recommendations from ILCOR (5-6 cm) (%). Measured by advanced manikin.
Compression rate 28 minutesAverage rate of compressions (compressions/minute). Measured by advanced manikin.
Rescue breaths 28 minutesPercentage of ventilations with more than 400 mL (%). Measured by advanced manikin.
Time to first compression8 minutesTime from scenario start to first compression. Assessed by ERC instructor.
Hand placement8 minutesCorrect hand placement in at least 50 % of compressions (yes/no). Measured by advanced manikin.
Stand clear8 minutesEnsures safety by looking around and verbally announcing delivery of shock (yes/no). Assessed by ERC instructor.
Responsiveness8 minutesShakes AND shouts (yes/no). Assessed by ERC instructor.
Open airway8 minutesOpens or correctly tries to open mouth (chin lift OR jaw thrust) (yes/no). Assessed by ERC instructor.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026