Skip to content

Changes of Pain and Functional Parameters in Back Pain Patients Over Time

Changes of Pain and Functional Parameters in Back Pain Patients With or Without Radiculopathy Over Time

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03689400
Enrollment
19
Registered
2018-09-28
Start date
2018-10-11
Completion date
2020-01-31
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Changes Over Time in Pain and Functional Parameters

Brief summary

Back pain affects patients' daily life. Patients can suffer from various symptoms which appear intermittent or permanent; pain, sensory malfunction, reduction of muscular strength and coordination. Therefore, patients are impaired in participation and activity. Physiotherapy is recommended to improve those symptoms and to positively affect the cause of the problem. However, some patients do not benefit from physiotherapeutic treatment and require a surgery. The investigators intend to attend patients suffering from back pain and to document the changes of pain and functional parameters over a period of 6 months. The investigators include pre-operative, post-operative or non-operated patients which allows to discuss the different treatment options and its effects.

Detailed description

To assess pain and functional parameters physicians, medical staff and physiotherapist often use subjective clinical testings which impede the comparability of testings over time, between testers and between subjects. Therefore, a second aim of this study is to evaluate each subjective clinical test with a standardized objective measurement tool.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* appointment at the neurosurgery department due to back pain * German speaking * willingness to see a physiotherapist * willingness to participate in 3 measurements over 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* no appointment at the neurosurgery department due to back pain * not German speaking * no willingness to see a physiotherapist * no willingness to participate in 3 measurements over 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Visual Analog Scale Pain ScoresBaseline, 6 weeks, 6 monthsChanges in pain were assessed using a unidimensional 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale. The scale ranged from one endpoint depicting a happy face, indicating no pain, to the other endpoint depicting a sad face, indicating worst possible pain. The distance in centimeters from the low end (0) of the VAS to the patient's mark was used as a numerical measure of pain severity. The lowest score was 0, indicating no pain, the maximum score 10, indicating worst possible pain. Higher scores indicate more severe pain.
Changes in Visual Analog Scale Ratings of NumbnessBaseline, 6 weeks, 6 monthsChanges in pain were assessed using a unidimensional 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale. The scale ranged from one endpoint depicting a happy face, indicating no numbness, to the other endpoint depicting a sad face, indicating worst possible numbness. The distance in centimeters from the low end of the VAS to the patient's mark was used as a numerical measure of pain severity. The lowest score was 0, indicating no numbness, the maximum score 10, indicating worst possible numbness. Higher scores indicate more severe numbness.
Changes in Visual Analog Scale Ratings of ParesthesiaBaseline, 6 weeks, 6 monthsChanges in pain were assessed using a unidimensional 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale. The scale ranged from one endpoint depicting a happy face, indicating no paresthesia to the other endpoint depicting a sad face, indicating worst possible paresthesia. The distance in centimeters from the low end of the VAS to the patient's mark was used as a numerical measure of pain severity. The lowest score was 0, indicating no paresthesia, the maximum score 10, indicating worst possible paresthesia. Higher scores indicate more severe numbness.
Changes in Anterior Flexion Measured in CentimetersBaseline, 6 weeks, 6 monthsThe fingertip-to-floor (FTF) test (cm) was used to assess the lumbar maximal anterior flexion. Patients performed maximal flexion up to the pain threshold, keeping the elbows, fingers, and knees straight and the heels together.
Changes in Back Extension Measured in DegreesBaseline, 6 weeks, 6 monthsExtension was measured using a baseline bubble inclinometer. Patients performed maximal extension up to the pain threshold, keeping the elbows, fingers, and knees straight and the heels together.
Changes in Lateral Flexion Measured in CentimetersBaseline, 6 weeks, 6 monthsThe fingertip-to-floor (FTF) test (cm) was used to assess the lumbar maximal lateral flexion. Patients performed maximal flexion up to the pain threshold, keeping the elbows, fingers, and knees straight and the heels together. The contralateral hip remained in contact with the treatment table during lateral flexion.
Changes in the Maximal Isometric Strength in NewtonBaseline, 6 weeks, 6 monthsMaximal isometric strength was tested using the NOD hand-held dynamometer. An active strength test of the primary innervated muscle was performed for 3 s using a standardized procedure adapted from Mentiplay et al. The patient was instructed to press against the examiner's hand-and thus the hand-held dynamometer-as hard and as long as possible. The dynamometer recorded the strength and duration of the isometric contraction both graphically and numerically. The tested muscles included: L3: M. quadriceps femoris; L4: M. quadriceps femoris; M. tibialis anterior (TA); L5: M. TA; M. extensor hallucis longus (EHL); S1: M. gastrocnemius; M. triceps surae. Due to the small subgroups, the maximal isometric strengths of the quadriceps femoris muscle and triceps surae muscle were excluded from the analysis.The mean of the two closest of three values (N) was used for further analysis.
Changes in Nerve Tension Assessed by the Straight Leg Raising Test, Measured in DegreesBaseline, 6 weeks, 6 monthsNerve tension of the affected spinal nerve root was assessed using the straight leg raise pain provocation test. A baseline bubble inclinometer was placed directly above the patella to measure the angle in degrees between the examination table and the elevated limb.
Changes in Quality of Life Assessed by the Physical Component Summary of the 36-Item Short Form Health SurveyBaseline, 6 weeks, 6 monthsGeneral health was evaluated using the German version 2.0 of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The PCS score aggregates four subscales-Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, and General Health-into a standardized score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better physical health.
Changes in Quality of Life Assessed by the Mental Component Summary of the 36-Item Short Form Health SurveyBaseline, 6 weeks, 6 monthsGeneral health was evaluated using the German version 2.0 of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The MCS score aggregates four subscales-Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health-into a standardized score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better mental health.
Changes in Physical Activity Assessed Using the International Physical Activity QuestionnaireeBaseline, 6 weeks, 6 monthsPhysical activity was assessed using the self-administered short German version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) with a last 7 days recall. Data were processed and analyzed according to the official IPAQ scoring protocol and reported in metabolic equivalents of task minutes per week
Changes in Disability According to the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline, 6 weeks, 6 monthsDisability was assessed using the German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. The ODI consists of 10 sections, each scored from 0 to 5. Scores are summed and expressed as a percentage ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability.

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With Radiculopathy
Adult patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation associated with radiculopathy at the Cantonal Hospital of Graubünden. Physical assessment was done to diagnose LR; an MRI was performed to confirm the presence of an LDH. All patients included in this study received physiotherapy at the Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, regardless of whether they had undergone surgery beforehand.
19
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPatients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With Radiculopathy
Age, Continuous47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
Level of lesion
fifth lumbar vertebra (L5)
9 Participants
Level of lesion
first sacral vertebra (S1)
5 Participants
Level of lesion
fourth lumbar vertebra (L4)
2 Participants
Level of lesion
second lumbar vertebra (L2)
0 Participants
Level of lesion
third lumbar vertebra (L3)
3 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants
Side of lesion
Left
10 Participants
Side of lesion
Right
9 Participants
Type of treatment
Conservative only
9 Participants
Type of treatment
Surgery and Conservative
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in Anterior Flexion Measured in Centimeters

The fingertip-to-floor (FTF) test (cm) was used to assess the lumbar maximal anterior flexion. Patients performed maximal flexion up to the pain threshold, keeping the elbows, fingers, and knees straight and the heels together.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months

Population: four patients missed the six-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Anterior Flexion Measured in CentimetersBaseline21.7 CentimeterStandard Deviation 16.3
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Anterior Flexion Measured in Centimeters6 weeks follow-up17.8 CentimeterStandard Deviation 14.9
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Anterior Flexion Measured in Centimeters6 months follow-up11.8 CentimeterStandard Deviation 10.4
Primary

Changes in Back Extension Measured in Degrees

Extension was measured using a baseline bubble inclinometer. Patients performed maximal extension up to the pain threshold, keeping the elbows, fingers, and knees straight and the heels together.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months

Population: four patients missed the six-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Back Extension Measured in DegreesBaseline18.7 DegreeStandard Deviation 8
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Back Extension Measured in Degrees6 weeks follow-up21.8 DegreeStandard Deviation 5.8
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Back Extension Measured in Degrees6 months follow-up27.9 DegreeStandard Deviation 10
Primary

Changes in Disability According to the Oswestry Disability Index

Disability was assessed using the German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. The ODI consists of 10 sections, each scored from 0 to 5. Scores are summed and expressed as a percentage ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months

Population: Four patients missed the six-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Disability According to the Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline37.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Disability According to the Oswestry Disability Index6 weeks follow-up16.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Disability According to the Oswestry Disability Index6 months follow-up8.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Primary

Changes in Lateral Flexion Measured in Centimeters

The fingertip-to-floor (FTF) test (cm) was used to assess the lumbar maximal lateral flexion. Patients performed maximal flexion up to the pain threshold, keeping the elbows, fingers, and knees straight and the heels together. The contralateral hip remained in contact with the treatment table during lateral flexion.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months

Population: four patients missed the six-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Lateral Flexion Measured in Centimetersright side: Basline51.3 CentimeterStandard Deviation 4.4
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Lateral Flexion Measured in Centimetersright side: 6 weeks follow-up49.9 CentimeterStandard Deviation 4
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Lateral Flexion Measured in Centimetersright side: 6 months follow-up49.2 CentimeterStandard Deviation 4.4
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Lateral Flexion Measured in CentimetersLeft side: Baseline50.2 CentimeterStandard Deviation 5.4
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Lateral Flexion Measured in CentimetersLeft Side: 6 weeks follow-up49.4 CentimeterStandard Deviation 3.5
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Lateral Flexion Measured in CentimetersLeft side: 6 months follow-up48.6 CentimeterStandard Deviation 3.7
Primary

Changes in Nerve Tension Assessed by the Straight Leg Raising Test, Measured in Degrees

Nerve tension of the affected spinal nerve root was assessed using the straight leg raise pain provocation test. A baseline bubble inclinometer was placed directly above the patella to measure the angle in degrees between the examination table and the elevated limb.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months

Population: Four patients missed the six-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Nerve Tension Assessed by the Straight Leg Raising Test, Measured in DegreesBaseline46.3 DegreeStandard Deviation 23.4
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Nerve Tension Assessed by the Straight Leg Raising Test, Measured in Degrees6 weeks follow-up56.8 DegreeStandard Deviation 17
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Nerve Tension Assessed by the Straight Leg Raising Test, Measured in Degrees6 months follow-up66.3 DegreeStandard Deviation 9
Primary

Changes in Physical Activity Assessed Using the International Physical Activity Questionnairee

Physical activity was assessed using the self-administered short German version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) with a last 7 days recall. Data were processed and analyzed according to the official IPAQ scoring protocol and reported in metabolic equivalents of task minutes per week

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months

Population: Four patients missed the six-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Physical Activity Assessed Using the International Physical Activity QuestionnaireeBaseline2140.9 Metabolic equivalents of task-min./ weekStandard Deviation 2067.6
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Physical Activity Assessed Using the International Physical Activity Questionnairee6 weeks follow-up2961.2 Metabolic equivalents of task-min./ weekStandard Deviation 2460.1
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Physical Activity Assessed Using the International Physical Activity Questionnairee6 months follow-up3718.0 Metabolic equivalents of task-min./ weekStandard Deviation 2846.5
Primary

Changes in Quality of Life Assessed by the Mental Component Summary of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey

General health was evaluated using the German version 2.0 of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The MCS score aggregates four subscales-Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health-into a standardized score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better mental health.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months

Population: Four patients missed the six-month follow-up. One participant failed to answer questions 4b-d of the SF-36 questionnaire at the six-week follow-up and questions 5b-c at both follow-ups, leading to missing values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Quality of Life Assessed by the Mental Component Summary of the 36-Item Short Form Health SurveyBaseline44.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 15.6
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Quality of Life Assessed by the Mental Component Summary of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey6 weeks follow-up53.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 7.5
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Quality of Life Assessed by the Mental Component Summary of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey6 month follow-up55.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.3
Primary

Changes in Quality of Life Assessed by the Physical Component Summary of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey

General health was evaluated using the German version 2.0 of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The PCS score aggregates four subscales-Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, and General Health-into a standardized score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better physical health.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months

Population: Four patients missed the six-month follow-up. One participant failed to answer questions 4b-d of the SF-36 questionnaire at the six-week follow-up and questions 5b-c at both follow-ups, leading to missing values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Quality of Life Assessed by the Physical Component Summary of the 36-Item Short Form Health SurveyBaseline35.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Quality of Life Assessed by the Physical Component Summary of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey6 weeks follow-up44.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Quality of Life Assessed by the Physical Component Summary of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey6 months follow-up51.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Primary

Changes in the Maximal Isometric Strength in Newton

Maximal isometric strength was tested using the NOD hand-held dynamometer. An active strength test of the primary innervated muscle was performed for 3 s using a standardized procedure adapted from Mentiplay et al. The patient was instructed to press against the examiner's hand-and thus the hand-held dynamometer-as hard and as long as possible. The dynamometer recorded the strength and duration of the isometric contraction both graphically and numerically. The tested muscles included: L3: M. quadriceps femoris; L4: M. quadriceps femoris; M. tibialis anterior (TA); L5: M. TA; M. extensor hallucis longus (EHL); S1: M. gastrocnemius; M. triceps surae. Due to the small subgroups, the maximal isometric strengths of the quadriceps femoris muscle and triceps surae muscle were excluded from the analysis.The mean of the two closest of three values (N) was used for further analysis.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months

Population: Maximal isometric strength was tested from the primary innervated muscle \[L3: M. quadriceps femoris; L4: M. quadriceps femoris; M. tibialis anterior (TA); L5: M. TA; M. extensor hallucis longus (EHL); S1: M. gastrocnemius; M. triceps surae. Four patients missed the 6-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in the Maximal Isometric Strength in NewtonM. tibialis anterior: Baseline91.5 NewtonStandard Deviation 47.6
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in the Maximal Isometric Strength in NewtonM. tibialis anterior: 6 weeks follow-up114.7 NewtonStandard Deviation 71.8
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in the Maximal Isometric Strength in NewtonM. tibialis anterior: 6 months follow-up142.0 NewtonStandard Deviation 65.9
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in the Maximal Isometric Strength in NewtonM. extensor hallucis longus: Baseline22.8 NewtonStandard Deviation 9
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in the Maximal Isometric Strength in NewtonM. extensor hallucis longus: 6 weeks follow-up34.3 NewtonStandard Deviation 19.3
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in the Maximal Isometric Strength in NewtonM. extensor hallucis longus: 6 months follow-up39.5 NewtonStandard Deviation 12.6
Primary

Changes in Visual Analog Scale Pain Scores

Changes in pain were assessed using a unidimensional 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale. The scale ranged from one endpoint depicting a happy face, indicating no pain, to the other endpoint depicting a sad face, indicating worst possible pain. The distance in centimeters from the low end (0) of the VAS to the patient's mark was used as a numerical measure of pain severity. The lowest score was 0, indicating no pain, the maximum score 10, indicating worst possible pain. Higher scores indicate more severe pain.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months

Population: four patients missed the six-month follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Visual Analog Scale Pain ScoresBaseline3.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Visual Analog Scale Pain Scores6 weeks follow-up1.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Visual Analog Scale Pain Scores6 months follow-up0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Primary

Changes in Visual Analog Scale Ratings of Numbness

Changes in pain were assessed using a unidimensional 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale. The scale ranged from one endpoint depicting a happy face, indicating no numbness, to the other endpoint depicting a sad face, indicating worst possible numbness. The distance in centimeters from the low end of the VAS to the patient's mark was used as a numerical measure of pain severity. The lowest score was 0, indicating no numbness, the maximum score 10, indicating worst possible numbness. Higher scores indicate more severe numbness.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months

Population: four patients missed the six-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Visual Analog Scale Ratings of NumbnessBaseline2.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Visual Analog Scale Ratings of Numbness6 weeks follow-up0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Visual Analog Scale Ratings of Numbness6 months follow-up0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Primary

Changes in Visual Analog Scale Ratings of Paresthesia

Changes in pain were assessed using a unidimensional 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale. The scale ranged from one endpoint depicting a happy face, indicating no paresthesia to the other endpoint depicting a sad face, indicating worst possible paresthesia. The distance in centimeters from the low end of the VAS to the patient's mark was used as a numerical measure of pain severity. The lowest score was 0, indicating no paresthesia, the maximum score 10, indicating worst possible paresthesia. Higher scores indicate more severe numbness.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months

Population: four patients missed the six-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Visual Analog Scale Ratings of ParesthesiaBaseline3.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Visual Analog Scale Ratings of Paresthesia6 weeks follow-up0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated With RadiculopathyChanges in Visual Analog Scale Ratings of Paresthesia6 months follow-up0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026